|
im just glad that the spa fad died out almost everywhere, idgaf what web devs do as long as it isn't ever that again
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 03:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? Dec 14, 2024 00:46 |
|
|
Corla Plankun posted:im just glad that the spa fad died out almost everywhere, idgaf what web devs do as long as it isn't ever that again what now?
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 03:11
|
|
|
Janitor Prime posted:what now? single-page (web) applications, presumably this is the first i've heard of them dying out, though
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 03:13
|
|
|
react, vue, et al. are spa frameworks
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 03:15
|
|
|
Corla Plankun posted:im just glad that the spa fad died out almost everywhere, idgaf what web devs do as long as it isn't ever that again what the gently caress are you talking about?
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 03:25
|
|
|
single page applications
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 03:28
|
|
|
oh, you've seen my resume
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 03:31
|
|
|
Achmed Jones posted:single page applications yep. we're still making em
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 03:34
|
|
|
Corla Plankun posted:im just glad that the spa fad died out almost everywhere, idgaf what web devs do as long as it isn't ever that again this is some advanced level irony
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 03:56
|
|
|
akadajet posted:yep. we're still making em can you stop please
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 03:57
|
|
|
akadajet posted:front butt developer you called?
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 05:28
|
|
|
I wrote an spa as babbys first development that was quite literally one html page with all actual sections just hidden/shown and it was horrible and I'll never do it again thinking about it it was more like a mobile app. Gross.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 08:12
|
|
|
Looking at the changelog for chrome 70 it's so weird... Desktop progressive apps and public key support are very similar to existing features that chrome has had for more than a decade. I guess it's good these things are being done right now but it makes me wonder why this took so long.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 15:15
|
|
|
Kilometres Davis posted:Vanilla JS is fine if you don't have to deal with anyone else's code. aint that the truth
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 15:27
|
|
|
yeah. i am a real bad developer but after fumbling around with the big frameworks for a while i have come to the conclusion it is still faster, easier, and more maintainable to just do everything myself
HoboMan fucked around with this message at 15:49 on Oct 18, 2018 |
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2018 15:46
|
|
|
ctps: mildly concerned that the production URL of this web service starts with "staging"
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 12:48
|
|
|
when people capitalize Vanilla JS are they referring to a framework or a dialect of js?
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 13:24
|
|
|
Shinku ABOOKEN posted:when people capitalize Vanilla JS are they referring to a framework or a dialect of js? they just mean they aren't using a spa framework or jquery
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 13:29
|
|
|
Shinku ABOOKEN posted:when people capitalize Vanilla JS are they referring to a framework or a dialect of js? BRB making a framework called "vanilla js with no framework"
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 13:49
|
|
|
gonadic io posted:BRB making a framework called "vanilla js with no framework" ajs ajs baby
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 13:51
|
|
|
Shinku ABOOKEN posted:when people capitalize Vanilla JS are they referring to a framework or a dialect of js?
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 14:58
|
|
|
mystes posted:The trend of capitalizing it may have come from http://vanilla-js.com/ which is a sort of joke that describes framework-less js as if it's a new framework. It's kind of funny to me that just using the language without framework garbage is a joke in and of itself.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 15:21
|
|
|
Finster Dexter posted:It's kind of funny to me that just using the language without framework garbage is a joke in and of itself.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 15:28
|
|
|
mystes posted:I think the idea is that developers pay a lot of attention to whatever the hot new framework is but don't think to periodically go back and see how much better plain javascript has gotten. "better"
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 15:33
|
|
|
Finster Dexter posted:"better" It actually has gotten drastically better than it used to be* *as bad as it is now, it used to be a lot worse
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 15:38
|
|
|
Finster Dexter posted:"better"
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 15:38
|
|
|
Main Paineframe posted:It actually has gotten drastically better than it used to be* the apis you get on the dom are a lot better. things that used to be a pain like service calls are easier to do. the browsers mostly implement it in a predictable way now. and on top of that the language has gotten a lot nicer to use on a modern browser.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 15:43
|
|
|
help my boss thinks unit testing is a separate agile feature
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 16:16
|
|
|
"unit testing, what's that" - my boss
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 16:23
|
|
|
a manager at my last job categorized unit tests as non-functional requirements. "non-functional" simply meant "unimportant" to him so he discouraged working on them as much as possible when their flagship software imploded it practically killed the whole company
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 16:35
|
|
|
AggressivelyStupid posted:"unit testing, what's that" - my boss Sounds like a waste of time imo DaTroof posted:a manager at my last job categorized unit tests as non-functional requirements. "non-functional" simply meant "unimportant" to him so he discouraged working on them as much as possible At my old job I made the mistake of rushing things without unit tests and presenting it as an option. Not making that mistake again
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 16:36
|
|
|
We should start pretending that they're called "unit" tests because you work on them, together with the rest of the functionality, as a "unit".
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 16:39
|
|
|
gonadic io posted:
hello welcome to the last 10 years of our application I'm part of the problem tbh
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 16:45
|
|
|
gonadic io posted:At my old job I made the mistake of rushing things without unit tests and presenting it as an option. Not making that mistake again imo that's the #1 argument for using ci and writing unit tests first. more for the benefit of bureaucracy than the development process itself if you tell management the feature works but you haven't written unit tests yet, they might tell you to skip it if you tell them the build is broken, they'll panic and give it top priority
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 16:47
|
|
|
Skyl3lazer posted:help my boss thinks unit testing is a separate agile feature at least it’s not “suck my unit”
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 17:31
|
|
|
i think we still have only select teams doing any testing before a prod deployment
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 17:32
|
|
|
i am a terrible programmer. holy cow -i think i might be debugging on a release build, but i'm not sure yet. i have other things to do -my live video effects app does several confusing things, and i've been stressing really hard to get the assets work on all supported iphones, including the ones with the dreaded notch. i have not tested on them one of the confusing things it does is place the logo watermark on the preview as a UIImageView over the metal view that renders the effected video frames. i also need to sometimes render the watermark on the metal view, but it is slightly pixelated and not nice looking because the video preview is upscaling a smaller render for gpu optimization. however, the capture renders it at a higher quality thus not pixelated. so i need to switch between the uiimageview and the ciimage that gets drawn onto the metal view. the scaling between these two are totally different not only because of the upscaling in the metal view, but because metal draws strictly with pixels and not points. after figuring out the math, it looks like there is a little margin of error. the logo is slightly wider on the metal view. i'm not sure this is because the metal view is wider than it should be or because my math is wrong on how to convert this
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 18:53
|
|
|
wow i just had a quesadilla and now my mind is as clear as a bell
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 19:41
|
|
|
is there some sort of tool or cheat sheet for doing like a reverse syntax lookup for c++? as in “yes this sequence of names, colons, braces, and brackets is defining a something that inherits from something and something and the overrides something and then...”
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 21:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? Dec 14, 2024 00:46 |
|
|
You're in luck! Parsing C++ source code is famously straightforward.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2018 21:32
|
|