Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Clark Nova
Jul 18, 2004

Beeftweeter posted:

yeah admittedly there's not much info on that tweet but it seems like that's right (from the tweet the one already posted was in reply to):

https://twitter.com/matrosov/status/1653923749723512832

e: for people that block twitter now

idk. if it were something that impacted intel poo poo more generally i think those numbers would be higher but honestly 166 products seems like kind of a lot if we're just talking about motherboards, even if it spans several generations of cpus

the motherborad market is an insanely segmented mess - intel puts out at least three different levels of mobo chipset for every generation and MSI will have each in itx, matx and atx, and then premium upsell versions with more ports and poo poo on top. iirc MSI also sells laptops

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

SlowBloke
Aug 14, 2017

zero knowledge posted:

fortunately the EU is bringing back the glory days of EV with eIDAS and QWACs so you'll get to have those asinine arguments forever.

The only change is rather than reselling geotrust certs, your cert provider will resell one from a EIDAS enabled CA.

Midjack
Dec 24, 2007



Clark Nova posted:

iirc MSI also sells laptops

they do and i'm going to have a fun monday determining how bad this is for my team

Lady Radia
Jul 14, 2021

You're gonna have to try a little harder than that.


Subjunctive posted:

Netscape 6 was the first release based on Mozilla, and it was not ready. It was incredibly slow and bloated still, but AOL management didn’t want to wait for the performance and efficiency work to be finished so they piled all their branded bullshit into it and sent it to market. Mozilla 1.0 wasn’t released for a long time afterwards because it took us a long time to get the lovely layout engine into shape. I remember near-screaming-match meetings with senior AOL managers trying to convince them to not ship the thing because it was going to just destroy the brand that we all still had an emotional attachment to. And it did, but AOL really wanted to turn Netscape into a “destination website” and cared not a ton about the browser other than as a vector for AIM and some shopping toolbars, so whatever I guess!

There were engineers who quit when they got moved from working on the shared Mozilla core over to the Netscape additions. It was a pretty tumultuous time. But the mechanics that we built to keep Netscape’s crap out of the open source tree later gave us extensions, and that was nice.

:cheers: this poo poo owns ty!

Zamujasa
Oct 27, 2010



Bread Liar

Hed posted:

I remember using phoenix in 2000/2001/2002? tabbed browser :smug:

I probably still have the binaries somewhere

i used phoenix for a short while, but it was an early version and it ended up blowing itself up in a way where it was the registered GIF/image viewer and any attempt to open it would create an empty white window with nothing but the decorations

personally i ended up using opera 7, which i think that laptop even still has installed (though it might be opera 9). that served me for a long time, and the ability to turn off styles and make images load on demand was basically a godsend when you're runnin on 32 of god's own megabytes

pairofdimes
May 20, 2001

blehhh

BlankSystemDaemon posted:

FreeBSD Ports started out using MD5 checksums in 1994, and switched to sha256 in 2010, so I'm not really sure I buy this argument.

That's only hashing files offline though right? Taking more time there could be annoying, but you can go do something else while it's working. Web browsing is interactive though, so encrypting/decrypting and hashing every packet to a website means every page load will take longer which could have been a noticeable delay on the hardware of the time. I don't have any hardware of that era to test the theory though. That's not counting the additional time spent in the SSL/TLS handshake before any application data even starts getting sent.

Last Chance
Dec 31, 2004

Lady Radia posted:

:cheers: this poo poo owns ty!

yea more netscape stories plz

spankmeister
Jun 15, 2008






here's a documentary that might scratch some of y'alls itch

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Q7FTjhvZ7Y

mystes
May 31, 2006

Hed posted:

I remember using phoenix in 2000/2001/2002? tabbed browser :smug:

I probably still have the binaries somewhere
I forgot how tabs were like this exciting new feature. It seems really hard to imagine now.

Would my life be better or worse if I couldn't open 500 tabs?

Subjunctive
Sep 12, 2006

✨sparkle and shine✨

spankmeister posted:

here's a documentary that might scratch some of y'alls itch

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Q7FTjhvZ7Y

I'm in this, though not a speaking part (I was remote when they were filming it)

spankmeister
Jun 15, 2008






Subjunctive posted:

I'm in this, though not a speaking part (I was remote when they were filming it)

Can't blame you, wouldn't want to have Tara come beat me with a hockey stick either.

Subjunctive
Sep 12, 2006

✨sparkle and shine✨

spankmeister posted:

Can't blame you, wouldn't want to have Tara come beat me with a hockey stick either.

Tara is a sweetheart and I miss her terribly. she treated me like her kid brother for the years I was there and I’m very grateful for it

Captain Foo
May 11, 2004

we vibin'
we slidin'
we breathin'
we dyin'

eidas boot

spankmeister
Jun 15, 2008






Subjunctive posted:

Tara is a sweetheart and I miss her terribly. she treated me like her kid brother for the years I was there and I’m very grateful for it

Reading my post again it might be construed as putting her in a bad light, which I didn't mean to do at all! She seems like a really cool person!

But i'd definitely be hiding somewhere if I had a list of bugs as long as my arm haha.

The Lone Badger
Sep 24, 2007

mystes posted:

I forgot how tabs were like this exciting new feature. It seems really hard to imagine now.

Would my life be better or worse if I couldn't open 500 tabs?

I used to have a dozen windows open instead.

akadajet
Sep 14, 2003

Shaggar posted:

military security is apparently complete garbage and that poo poo is probably like 50% chinese spies by volume. just blindingly incompetent. the recent leaker passed his background checks cause he was a chud which isnt a threat like smoking weed is. and then on top of that their material controls are all on the honor system. just give yourself access to whatever you need, no biggie. no fine grained controls, just one big pot of sensitive data that everyone gets to access once they pass the laughable clearance

don’t worry. they enforce fips mode via group policy so everything is secure

Captain Foo
May 11, 2004

we vibin'
we slidin'
we breathin'
we dyin'

fips mode is the greatest

post hole digger
Mar 21, 2011

Captain Foo posted:

fips mode is the greatest

Qtotonibudinibudet
Nov 7, 2011



Omich poluyobok, skazhi ty narkoman? ya prosto tozhe gde to tam zhivu, mogli by vmeste uyobyvat' narkotiki

Captain Foo posted:

fips mode is the greatest

only if you enable it on systems that do not require FIPS compliance because they are operated by and for the US government

[ask] me about my MILITARY GRADE ENCRYPTION using the finest cryptographic primitives available in the early 2000s

akadajet
Sep 14, 2003

Qtotonibudinibudet posted:

only if you enable it on systems that do not require FIPS compliance because they are operated by and for the US government

[ask] me about my MILITARY GRADE ENCRYPTION using the finest cryptographic primitives available in the early 2000s

yep that was the joke

theflyingexecutive
Apr 22, 2007

Captain Foo posted:

fips mode is the greatest

Kuvo
Oct 27, 2008

Blame it on the misfortune of your bark!
Fun Shoe

Captain Foo posted:

fips mode is the greatest

sb hermit
Dec 13, 2016





Captain Foo posted:

fips mode is the greatest

abigserve
Sep 13, 2009

this is a better avatar than what I had before
they call it fips mode because when I see it I raise both my hands and fip it the double bird

Shame Boy
Mar 2, 2010

i'm applying for a job at an IT security place a friend of a friend told me about. can i PM one of y'all smart security people and ask if they're like, notoriously bad or something, because i've never heard of them, but also i don't want to broadcast who my future employer might be to the entire forum.

e: to be clear i'm mostly curious if you've heard of them or if they have an awful reputation or something, i can figure out the basics about them just fine through googling

Shame Boy fucked around with this message at 12:33 on May 8, 2023

geonetix
Mar 6, 2011


You can always try. I'm heavily biased but maybe that helps

gnatalie
Jul 1, 2003

blasting women into space
something something fipsmode squad

4lokos basilisk
Jul 17, 2008


Shame Boy posted:

i'm applying for a job at an IT security place a friend of a friend told me about. can i PM one of y'all smart security people and ask if they're like, notoriously bad or something, because i've never heard of them, but also i don't want to broadcast who my future employer might be to the entire forum.

e: to be clear i'm mostly curious if you've heard of them or if they have an awful reputation or something, i can figure out the basics about them just fine through googling

tried checking glassdoor or whatever that other site was, blind or something?

Blinkz0rz
May 27, 2001

MY CONTEMPT FOR MY OWN EMPLOYEES IS ONLY MATCHED BY MY LOVE FOR TOM BRADY'S SWEATY MAGA BALLS
fun fact: golang isnt fips 140-2 compliant out of the box because the crypto module doesn’t do the sane thing and ffi to libssl or similar and instead is fully self-contained without fips compliance being a goal of the library

the only way to make it fips compliant is to use an alternate toolchain like boringssl or microsoft’s. they’re mostly drop in but lol nice job go team

in 1.19+ it’s apparently behind a goexperiment flag and the boringssl toolchain isn’t being maintained as a separate branch anymore at least

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
look i'm sure someone on the go team had a lot of fun rolling their own encryption

Rufus Ping
Dec 27, 2006





I'm a Friend of Rodney Nano
that someone is filippo valsorda and i wouldn't glibly dismiss his work. his newsletter is worth a read

mystes
May 31, 2006

Rufus Ping posted:

that someone is filippo valsorda and i wouldn't glibly dismiss his work. his newsletter is worth a read
I don't care if he's the single best cryptographer in the world; I'm still suspicious of the decision to implement it from scratch

Beeftweeter
Jun 28, 2005

a medium-format picture of beeftweeter staring silently at the camera, a quizzical expression on his face
sounds like the goal was to eliminate external dependencies?

sb hermit
Dec 13, 2016





Jabor posted:

look i'm sure someone on the go team had a lot of fun rolling their own encryption

they probably just statically linked the system libraries like openssl or boringssl or libressl or what have you

I believe fips requirements demand that you link to a specific shared library that has passed certification, so static linking doesn't work

if you want to use a modern fips certified library, you have to pay for rhel (or use a free license) or ubuntu advantage, although I hear oracle linux has it. Rocky Linux and Alma Linux are supposed to get their certifications Real Soon. None of this matters unless you have a specific requirement for it, like if you work with us federal government data.

sb hermit
Dec 13, 2016





Beeftweeter posted:

sounds like the goal was to eliminate external dependencies?

Probably. Certainly makes it easy to put in a docker container, for sure.

Beeftweeter
Jun 28, 2005

a medium-format picture of beeftweeter staring silently at the camera, a quizzical expression on his face

sb hermit posted:

Probably. Certainly makes it easy to put in a docker container, for sure.

makes sense to me for a cross-platform toolchain too, especially considering there was(? still is?) some uncertainty around the different major ssl libraries

Subjunctive
Sep 12, 2006

✨sparkle and shine✨

sb hermit posted:

they probably just statically linked the system libraries like openssl or boringssl or libressl or what have you

I believe fips requirements demand that you link to a specific shared library that has passed certification, so static linking doesn't work

when we did fips for the Mozilla software we just did cert for our crypto library, it sucked but Google could definitely manage fips validation for gossl or whatever if they wanted to

ninja: go could let you link against NSS for fips stuff, haha

sb hermit
Dec 13, 2016





Subjunctive posted:

when we did fips for the Mozilla software we just did cert for our crypto library, it sucked but Google could definitely manage fips validation for gossl or whatever if they wanted to

ninja: go could let you link against NSS for fips stuff, haha

anyone who willingly implements x509 for pki is either being paid to do so or is a complete madman

and I wouldn't be surprised if it's both

also see: ike v1 parsing and validation

Blinkz0rz
May 27, 2001

MY CONTEMPT FOR MY OWN EMPLOYEES IS ONLY MATCHED BY MY LOVE FOR TOM BRADY'S SWEATY MAGA BALLS

Subjunctive posted:

when we did fips for the Mozilla software we just did cert for our crypto library, it sucked but Google could definitely manage fips validation for gossl or whatever if they wanted to

ninja: go could let you link against NSS for fips stuff, haha

and they have for a while https://github.com/golang/go/tree/dev.boringcrypto.go1.18 (1.18 is the last version they had a separate branch for)

i read somewhere that perf is orders of magnitude worse with the fips version so they opted to provide an alternative for those who need it rather than the most folks who probably couldn't care less

e: i think i misunderstood you. according to the same article fips compliance was never a goal of the crypto package and the focus was on performant cryptography operations that didn't require linking against a library across a ton of different architectures and os targets

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

sb hermit
Dec 13, 2016





Also, older fips validation is specific to a compiled binary. As of last year or so, they changed it so that validation can be done on source but the resulting binaries are only good on specific hardware platforms. Or something. I'm not clear on the details but openssl used to let you download fips binaries for some flavor of 0.9.8 because some corporate entity paid for the cert for their own product but then let openssl provide it to everyone for free.

It's wild poo poo.

certifications are serious business and are expensive

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply