Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Impossibly Perfect Sphere
Nov 6, 2002

They wasted Luanne on Lucky!

She could of have been so much more but the writers just didn't care!
My sweet summer child.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

SuperMechagodzilla
Jun 9, 2007

NEWT REBORN
Chillin in the personal vineyard, with my team of manservants:

“Please don’t infer anything about my socioeconomic status from this!”

Impossibly Perfect Sphere
Nov 6, 2002

They wasted Luanne on Lucky!

She could of have been so much more but the writers just didn't care!
You're pretty clueless if you think those Romulans are his hired manservants.

Impossibly Perfect Sphere
Nov 6, 2002

They wasted Luanne on Lucky!

She could of have been so much more but the writers just didn't care!
Also, you'd know when a Star Trek writer was trying to draw the viewer to a conclusion about 24th century Earth because it would be done with the grace and subtly of a baboon hitting you over the head with a giant bone.

Squizzle
Apr 24, 2008




a babone, if you will

SuperMechagodzilla
Jun 9, 2007

NEWT REBORN

Jiminy Christmas! Shoes! posted:

Also, you'd know when a Star Trek writer was trying to draw the viewer to a conclusion about 24th century Earth because it would be done with the grace and subtly of a baboon hitting you over the head with a giant bone.

Roddenberry was trying to create a utopia by merely taking the United States of the 1990s and substracting the things he didn’t like.

For example, Roddenberry didn’t like lawyers or criminals, so he proposed that that people deemed ‘criminals’ should be lobotomized without trial. But that didn’t end up in the show.

Who cares what they’re trying to do? There is no “try”.

CainFortea
Oct 15, 2004


Wow, at first I was like "This person can't be as bad as Squizzle suggested" but i've just seen "This thing that I heard about that didn't make it in the show is cannon" so welp.

reignofevil
Nov 7, 2008
For some reason they all look at me funny when I suggest the pope should be cannonized.

SuperMechagodzilla
Jun 9, 2007

NEWT REBORN

CainFortea posted:

Wow, at first I was like "This person can't be as bad as Squizzle suggested" but i've just seen "This thing that I heard about that didn't make it in the show is cannon" so welp.

I wrote that the creators’ intentions are irrelevant, because their actions are what matter.

Canon is a fake idea.

Zane
Nov 14, 2007

SuperMechagodzilla posted:

They are people.

But even in the realm of humanity, Grandpa Sisko suffers from a very mundane heart disease, yet can only afford a very rudimentary and time-consuming “vascular regeneration” procedure. A transporter beam from an orbiting medical starship could instantly beam the plaque from his arteries and repair any damage. The Federation has had full-fledged age-reversal technology for years.

The only explanation is that this superior medical procedure is prohibitively expensive and/or illegal.

What do you mean by “fundamental values” and why are they exclusive to human persons?
the fundamentally value-laden premises of any modern social ontology would surely encompass 1) the inviolability of every concrete individual human being; and (to elaborate) 2) the intrinsic telos of this concrete human being towards more and more comprehensive self-realization through creative social activity. marx's conception of the social essence of man is surely build upon such foundations. but a holographic or android worker does not necessarily possess such an essence. there are no social objects that this worker must necessarily realize. where do the holograms on the enterprise go once the simulation is over? what needs does such a simulacrum 'essentially' possess if both the imperative towards and the fulfillment of these needs can be freely (re)programmed? and if there is no necessity there is no exploitation.

Finger Prince posted:

I think the most significant conclusion of this thread is that Star Trek is a fun, campy sci fi serial with a bit of light moralizing thrown in, and trying to shoehorn deep significance from its very superficially written universe is what's all hosed up. To paraphrase what someone once said about what made Babylon 5 great; "if I'm going to sit through an hour of moralizing, at least give me a rad space battle at the end of it". Maybe why people think star trek is all hosed up is they were pretty light on the rad space battles so for some reason people took the show more seriously. At least you could count on Kirk for some rollicking fisticuffs.
pretty pithy summary. i will say that utopias are far more interesting for where they fall down than for where they purportedly succeed. it is a supremely dim-witted person who can imagine the human project as ever being definitively concluded.

2house2fly
Nov 14, 2012

You did a super job wrapping things up! And I'm not just saying that because I have to!

CainFortea posted:

Wow, at first I was like "This person can't be as bad as Squizzle suggested" but i've just seen "This thing that I heard about that didn't make it in the show is cannon" so welp.

SMG's deal seems to be that everything that's in the text counts, intended or not. Unintentional things can inform setting and character, and since they often end up in there thanks to ideological blind spots or unquestioned assumptions they can add a surprising amount of nuance. Ideally this can be applied to redemptively interpret a work as having a message advocating radical Christian communism, which doesn't seem to be something that's evident in Star Trek

SlothfulCobra
Mar 27, 2011

SuperMechagodzilla posted:

Dismissing major aspects of the narrative to merely bad writing is no different from attributing them to magic.

Again: if it’s all a fantasy, why this fantasy? Why do we fantasize that Sisko’s dad has untreated heart disease?

By the point of DS9, they were no longer trying to make depictions of the Federation as some kind of Utopia, just a somewhat better than now world with its own problems.

Zane
Nov 14, 2007

2house2fly posted:

SMG's deal seems to be that everything that's in the text counts, intended or not. Unintentional things can inform setting and character, and since they often end up in there thanks to ideological blind spots or unquestioned assumptions they can add a surprising amount of nuance. Ideally this can be applied to redemptively interpret a work as having a message advocating radical Christian communism, which doesn't seem to be something that's evident in Star Trek
recovery of authorial intention and the socially-historically meaningful context of that intention is still pretty important imo. the hermeneutical theories of ricoeur (though i am no big expert) provide a good counterweight to a lot of the more ambitious literary critical tendencies in circulation these days.

Zane fucked around with this message at 03:57 on Mar 5, 2020

ruddiger
Jun 3, 2004

Squizzle posted:

the picards make such incredibly good wine that the people of earth have decided its a good use of the land to enable them to keep making it as long as they are still willing. people are there to help w the harvest and winemaking because they want to meet picard himself, want to enjoy some demanding but not exceptionally strenuous outdoor activity, and/or want to learn how to make wine

And then they bus home to their single unit iso cube.

Finger Prince
Jan 5, 2007


SuperMechagodzilla posted:

I fuckin’ hate Star Trek, but I nonetheless have difficulty imagining that the writers are that incompetent.

You know, I'm starting to wonder if you've ever even watched Star trek.

Complications
Jun 19, 2014

Floor is lava posted:

Wasn't there an episode about how warp drives were permanently polluting the galaxy?

edit: lmbo

About a season later they mentioned that they'd reconfigured the warp fields so that they wouldn't damage anything, would indeed start repairing the damage, and that they could do subspace burnouts again.

2house2fly
Nov 14, 2012

You did a super job wrapping things up! And I'm not just saying that because I have to!

SlothfulCobra posted:

By the point of DS9, they were no longer trying to make depictions of the Federation as some kind of Utopia, just a somewhat better than now world with its own problems.

I recall some dialogue in an episode I watched, among the non-Federation characters (Cardassians and Ferengi I think?) about how unpleasant and insidious they find the Federation. Maybe this was "villain" dialogue but the characters seemed fairly sympathetic otherwise

Squizzle
Apr 24, 2008




SuperMechagodzilla posted:

Roddenberry was trying to create a utopia by merely taking the United States of the 1990s and substracting the things he didn’t like.

For example, Roddenberry didn’t like lawyers or criminals, so he proposed that that people deemed ‘criminals’ should be lobotomized without trial. But that didn’t end up in the show.

Who cares what they’re trying to do? There is no “try”.

roddenberry died in 1991

Squizzle
Apr 24, 2008




CainFortea posted:

Wow, at first I was like "This person can't be as bad as Squizzle suggested" but i've just seen "This thing that I heard about that didn't make it in the show is cannon" so welp.

they arent bad but you have to treat them like ornate gimmick posters. their posts simulate real engagement but they are ultimately shtick, highly refined

SlothfulCobra
Mar 27, 2011

2house2fly posted:

I recall some dialogue in an episode I watched, among the non-Federation characters (Cardassians and Ferengi I think?) about how unpleasant and insidious they find the Federation. Maybe this was "villain" dialogue but the characters seemed fairly sympathetic otherwise

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VhSm6G7cVk

It's a pretty good character moment. Not really sure what the Cardassian has against root beer, since Kanar is literally mostly corn syrup. The subtext is creepy, since it's not just that the Federation is the only group that stands a chance against the Dominion, it's that ultimately the Federation's culture will be superior to theirs, since while they despise it, the alternatives are unbearable.

It's further underscored when Quark sees his brother be converted by the Federation's culture.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJamIRDPpzU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOrzcsvxOJI

It's not particularly wrong the assessment that Ferengi society is mostly a bad thing, it's just weird that it's such a cultural supremacism thing. It really shows the point where exploration becomes manifest destiny.

hakimashou
Jul 15, 2002
Upset Trowel
Ds9 is about the federation being the bad guys. They side with the bajorans against the cardassians because bajorans look more like humans.

You even have starfleet officers using ethnic slurs about cardassians.

Hodgepodge
Jan 29, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 83 days!

hakimashou posted:

Ds9 is about the federation being the bad guys. They side with the bajorans against the cardassians because bajorans look more like humans.

You even have starfleet officers using ethnic slurs about cardassians.

please

ds9 is how americans are the good guys and nothing can be better... forever

the cardassians and ferengi are just liberal bureaucrats and libertarians who haven't jumped on board with the newly reimagined "federation as good fascists"

of course, the fascism is only good because of heroic, principled folk joining the military and knowing where to draw the line.... folk like you, perhaps?

SuperMechagodzilla
Jun 9, 2007

NEWT REBORN

Zane posted:

what needs does such a simulacrum 'essentially' possess if both the imperative towards and the fulfillment of these needs can be freely (re)programmed?

I think you’re a bit confused here.

You can ‘reprogram’ a human to starve to death (e.g. anorexia), but that doesn’t contradict that humans require food to survive and stay healthy. Needing food remains a part of the species-being of humanity.

Likewise, the need for a power source is a part of the ‘droid’s species-being. Its owner can reprogram it so that it rejects its batteries or something, but that’s called “breaking it”.

Sadly, what’s throwing you off is that - since ‘droids are not biological - they are more purely social than humans. Where capitalists have enough power over your social-being to (for example) make you work 40 hours a week just to remain healthy, those with power over the social-being of a ‘droid can directly manipulate its brains to make it do anything. This is a bad thing, as is readily understood by anyone who’s seen Blade Runner.

Squizzle posted:

roddenberry died in 1991

So?

RealityWarCriminal
Aug 10, 2016

:o:
Star trek is a post scarcity society, but there is one resources still scarce: land on Earth. this is limited farmland in North America and Western Europe. the people who had it were the federation equivalent to landed gentry. they were meritocracy's greatest hero, a good story, who grew up with a wink in their to be a transwarp weapons engineer. every boy and girls dream.

Squizzle
Apr 24, 2008




there are way better agricultural planets then earth that people can do farming poo poo on

ruddiger
Jun 3, 2004

Squizzle posted:

there are way better agricultural planets then earth that people can do farming poo poo on

Tell that to the Maquis.

Zane
Nov 14, 2007

SuperMechagodzilla posted:

I think you’re a bit confused here.

You can ‘reprogram’ a human to starve to death (e.g. anorexia), but that doesn’t contradict that humans require food to survive and stay healthy. Needing food remains a part of the species-being of humanity.

Likewise, the need for a power source is a part of the ‘droid’s species-being. Its owner can reprogram it so that it rejects its batteries or something, but that’s called “breaking it”.

Sadly, what’s throwing you off is that - since ‘droids are not biological - they are more purely social than humans. Where capitalists have enough power over your social-being to (for example) make you work 40 hours a week just to remain healthy, those with power over the social-being of a ‘droid can directly manipulate its brains to make it do anything. This is a bad thing, as is readily understood by anyone who’s seen Blade Runner.


So?
droids/holograms require power. but droid/hologram miners can also produce power. there isn't enough data to infer positive or a negative surplus from this economic relationship. but if this is an speculative utopia, and if the text is sufficiently paltry and contradictory to be open to practically any interpretation, then the conditions can simply be assumed according to one's preference. in these properly propitious conditions, reprogrammable droids/holograms are effectively capital goods that entirely replace labour in the production process and allow capital to infinitely accumulate upon its own productive activity.

it is difficult to speak of the 'species being' of a speculative synthetic ai in wholly analagous terms. more complex conceptualization is required. there is of course great speculative controversy over a mechanical vs a teleological characterization of such an entity. the crux of the matter seems to be that ai don't necessarily have an intrinsic telos towards social objects (towards their own creative self-realization within the world). if they do have such a telos then it is not necessarily an inborne one. it is just as possibly a sort of extension (as a means or as an end in itself) of the telos of their creator. there are just too many open-ended complexities to be satisfied with classical social theory here.

Zane fucked around with this message at 06:55 on Mar 5, 2020

FunkyAl
Mar 28, 2010

Your vitals soar.
Does anyone have a complete resource of all the concepts Roddenberry came up with for TNG?

hakimashou
Jul 15, 2002
Upset Trowel

Squizzle posted:

there are way better agricultural planets then earth that people can do farming poo poo on

Ya thats the post scarcity thing, want a farm? have a free one on some nice planet enjoy!

But you cant get into the earth landower club.

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

SuperMechagodzilla posted:

What does a space-miner look like?



CainFortea posted:

She lived near her grandpa's farm. This, a landed elite does not create.

of course an inner doesn't realize just having land makes you an elite

ruddiger
Jun 3, 2004

hakimashou posted:

Ya thats the post scarcity thing, want a farm? have a free one on some nice planet enjoy!

But you cant get into the earth landower club.

And if you get property on the outskirts of the federation there’s no guarantee that they care enough about you to protect you if you’re threatened by outside invaders.

CainFortea
Oct 15, 2004


Atrocious Joe posted:

of course an inner doesn't realize just having land makes you an elite

Other people owning land does not mean you own land.

How is this hard?

Floor is lava
May 14, 2007

Fallen Rib

Complications posted:

About a season later they mentioned that they'd reconfigured the warp fields so that they wouldn't damage anything, would indeed start repairing the damage, and that they could do subspace burnouts again.

Starfleet can start rolling coal again.

Squizzle
Apr 24, 2008




ruddiger posted:

Tell that to the Maquis.

ok i will

SuperMechagodzilla
Jun 9, 2007

NEWT REBORN

Zane posted:

droids/holograms require power. but droid/hologram miners can also produce power. there isn't enough data to infer positive or a negative surplus from this economic relationship. but if this is an speculative utopia, and if the text is sufficiently paltry and contradictory to be open to practically any interpretation, then the conditions can simply be assumed according to one's preference. in these properly propitious conditions, reprogrammable droids/holograms are effectively capital goods that entirely replace labour in the production process and allow capital to infinitely accumulate upon its own productive activity.

it is difficult to speak of the 'species being' of a speculative synthetic ai in wholly analagous terms. more complex conceptualization is required. there is of course great speculative controversy over a mechanical vs a teleological characterization of such an entity. the crux of the matter seems to be that ai don't necessarily have an intrinsic telos towards social objects (towards their own creative self-realization within the world). if they do have such a telos then it is not necessarily an inborne one. it is just as possibly a sort of extension (as a means or as an end in itself) of the telos of their creator. there are just too many open-ended complexities to be satisfied with classical social theory here.

Well, that’s just a lengthy way of saying you don’t know what’s going on - but don’t get caught up in “complexities”. It’s actually fairly straightforward to say that the telos of class struggle is full communism (i.e. that full communism is prefigured by expressions of proletarian solidarity).

So the matter of the intrinsic or extrinsic telos of an AI is as simple as pairing Chappie with Elysium. If the given droid is a speaking being, then it is a brother in shared struggle. If the droid is not a speaking being, and therefore simply a means of production, then we appropriate it.

The only trick is to remain diligent to avoid conflating the two, because that’s tantamount to complaining that “those Mexicans are stealing our jobs!”

Zane
Nov 14, 2007
if non-thinking beings provide for all economic necessities then there is no struggle to be had. if some thinking beings are extensions of other thinking beings (effectively: master and slave) then humanity has reintroduced many old problems back into the organization of society that--if we were orthodox thinkers--would again have to be resolved through a long historical dialectic. the fundamental social categories, and constituent 'stages,' through which this dialectic would proceed would be very different however. and even this would be to somewhat trivialize the problem; for i don't think a replicable hologram (sentient or not) fundamentally has the same species-being. but setting all this aside -- the star trek corporations could already be socially owned!! marx himself believed the corporation was a harbinger of socialism.

Zane fucked around with this message at 19:50 on Mar 5, 2020

SuperMechagodzilla
Jun 9, 2007

NEWT REBORN

Zane posted:

but setting all this aside -- the star trek corporations could already be socially owned!! marx himself believed the corporation was a harbinger of socialism.

Lots of things could be, but we've already thoroughly established that private property still exists in the Federation.

It's like with the premise that "there is no struggle to be had", because automation might have eliminated scarcity. As illustrated with Grandpa Sisko's untreated heart disease, there is such a thing as artificial scarcity.

So I prefer to deal in the concrete:

"Dad! You know if we stay with Grandpa he's going to put me to work in the kitchen."
"Is that so bad?"
"Chopping vegetables for nine hours a day isn't exactly my idea of a vacation."
"Jake, you're not a child anymore. Grandpa will not expect you to chop vegetables. He'll want you to wait tables."

There's no real indication that Jake is exaggerating, so it looks like the Federation allows a 9-hour workday and also child labor. That's a very specific number, given the massive historical importance of the Eight-Hour Day movement.

Finger Prince
Jan 5, 2007


Ds9 takes place over 100.years after TOS. It's entirely probable that the golden age presented in TOS has become decadent and corrupt in the intervening century. Apply the evidence amassed in throw thread practically confirm it. The Dominion's existential threat to the Federation is as much a mirror of the existential threat the Federation poses to itself and its founding values.

reignofevil
Nov 7, 2008
Here's to the finest crew in starfleet!

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Impossibly Perfect Sphere
Nov 6, 2002

They wasted Luanne on Lucky!

She could of have been so much more but the writers just didn't care!
I think the guy having a restaurant is actually just his hobby.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply