|
https://twitter.com/VividVoid_/status/1611029617326067713
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
# ? May 29, 2023 23:21 |
|
https://twitter.com/will_luton/status/1610326326610726912
|
![]() |
|
I've always wondered if defragmenting a traditional mechanical hard drive actually had any real world performance benefit or not. My father religiously defragged his computers for years once a week and insisted he could tell the difference. I never could, even on our old 240mb-equipped 486DX2. Still defragged the fucker once a week though.
|
![]() |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KR3TbL3Tl6M
|
![]() |
|
Cidrick posted:I've always wondered if defragmenting a traditional mechanical hard drive actually had any real world performance benefit or not. My father religiously defragged his computers for years once a week and insisted he could tell the difference. seek times on a decent hard disk were 10-20 ms in the worst case, so it would have to be a severely fragmented large file or a large number of slightly fragmented small files to make a perceptible difference. there are probably some tasks where a familiar user would notice a small change but you would have to let it get real bad before it could be described as "runs slow because of fragmenting" it did make a difference on optical drives, which have much larger seek times, so you can realize significant gains by bundling all your small files into a large file you read as a single operation and interpret in ram
|
![]() |
|
Cidrick posted:I've always wondered if defragmenting a traditional mechanical hard drive actually had any real world performance benefit or not. My father religiously defragged his computers for years once a week and insisted he could tell the difference. if you use btrfs, you can still defrag today. amusingly if you want to enable/disable btrfs compression on existing files, you do it with defrag
|
![]() |
|
haveblue posted:seek times on a decent hard disk were 10-20 ms in the worst case, so it would have to be a severely fragmented large file or a large number of slightly fragmented small files to make a perceptible difference. there are probably some tasks where a familiar user would notice a small change but you would have to let it get real bad before it could be described as "runs slow because of fragmenting" it doesn't take much fragmentation for that 10-20ms to add up. sequential reads on all forms of spinning media are say faster than random reads
|
![]() |
|
https://twitter.com/NoContextBrits/status/1611322567721107456
|
![]() |
|
the sticker in the lower right really makes that image
|
![]() |
|
I’m sure some of those more advanced defrag things did things like order the files windows boots with which are apparently loaded alphabetically so they were stored in that sequence on the disk. it’s feasible to see how that could make a difference I assume modern disk controllers shield the actual inner workings of the disk from the operating system now, so flash drives wear out uniformly etc
|
![]() |
|
https://twitter.com/FoldableHuman/status/1611491203140444160
|
![]() |
|
dan olson is so good, he alone almost entirely compensates for the rest of calgary
|
![]() |
|
https://twitter.com/PonchoRebound/status/1611047387425800215
|
![]() |
|
https://twitter.com/neilcic/status/1611765707636891649?t=Yr4ufyB0xtwpGdpIzzmJjA&s=19
|
![]() |
|
Powerful Two-Hander posted:https://twitter.com/neilcic/status/1611765707636891649?t=Yr4ufyB0xtwpGdpIzzmJjA&s=19 I'm going to tell my kids this was the vote for speaker of the house
|
![]() |
|
https://twitter.com/TheFattRatt/status/1611360280226967553?s=20
|
![]() |
|
my god. it's true. it's all true
|
![]() |
|
https://twitter.com/mathiaszamecki/status/1611807625104003076?s=46&t=GcS3k9NlAwRdskxFAM3isA
|
![]() |
|
https://twitter.com/uyarakq/status/1609173521003057153?s=46&t=G1bmjCW3koz0v0kA6AQ6BA
|
![]() |
|
https://twitter.com/uyarakq/status/1610673061652566025
|
![]() |
|
From that dude's timeline https://mobile.twitter.com/Tetiderrr/status/1611365749163167744
|
![]() |
|
https://twitter.com/extranapkins/status/1611852862849683456
|
![]() |
|
https://twitter.com/gschnakenberg/status/1611746618906234881?s=46&t=FGG9WgC1-kSe9KDWWvJk7A
|
![]() |
|
im not a film expert but shouldnt this gregory have peeped at a frame of this before sending it off? its not like he had to hand decode the dolby compression or something its just a bunch of negatives in a row
|
![]() |
|
Corla Plankun posted:im not a film expert but shouldnt this gregory have peeped at a frame of this before sending it off? its not like he had to hand decode the dolby compression or something its just a bunch of negatives in a row looks like combat footage to me
|
![]() |
|
I don’t know anything about film restoration but maybe it was in a sealed can and had to be opened in a controlled environment
|
![]() |
|
Roosevelt posted:looks like combat footage to me indeed. absolute bloodbath.
|
![]() |
|
https://twitter.com/psychotronica_/status/1612466751177986048?s=20&t=mDQFHUXdkwzgaLHcTEI9zg
|
![]() |
|
you can't pirate windows 10. it's free software
|
![]() |
|
akadajet posted:you can't pirate windows 10. it's free software
|
![]() |
|
akadajet posted:you can't pirate windows 10. it's free software ok, how do I get a copy for free?
|
![]() |
|
buy a dell
|
![]() |
|
that's not free
|
![]() |
|
the computer isnt but the windows is
|
![]() |
|
if you can’t pirate free software then buddy, you ain’t tryin’ hard enough
|
![]() |
|
https://twitter.com/NaughtyZippo/status/1611635604843896835
|
![]() |
|
https://twitter.com/bkmacd/status/1612905887458557958 hell yeah
|
![]() |
|
The Fool posted:buy a dell did you just tell me to go gently caress myself!?!?
|
![]() |
|
in that case buy a small dell, they come with a flared base![]()
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
# ? May 29, 2023 23:21 |
|
hmm dell proctiplex
|
![]() |