|
Wheres the one that points out that the Pickle parents were like in their early 30's. it makes me feel old af
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
# ? Jun 5, 2023 14:10 |
|
I cant believe they got away with lipschitz
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
![]() |
|
hell same
|
![]() |
|
powerful
|
![]() |
|
nvrgrls posted:Can someone post that really really gross pic of the close up of the guy with the terrible beard... you know the one I'm talking about, it makes my eyes water. turn your monitor off ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
![]() |
|
remember when photoshop didnt have layers
|
![]() |
|
graph posted:remember when photoshop didnt have layers we'd never know barack hussein obama's birth certificate was fake
|
![]() |
|
graph posted:remember when photoshop didnt have layers https://archive.org/details/kid-pix-studio_202110
|
![]() |
|
Kenny Logins posted:don't think i've seen this posted in this incarnation of the thread yet https://twitter.com/willw/status/1520689151942619136
|
![]() |
|
graph posted:remember when photoshop didnt have layers i was just talking to a colleague about how great it was when layers came along and changed everything that and being able to ditch loving quarkxpress and not have to bake shadows or whatever thanks to indesign
|
![]() |
|
Agile Vector posted:i was just talking to a colleague about how great it was when layers came along and changed everything just lol if youve never dealt with ps channels. lol. lmao Agile Vector posted:that and being able to ditch loving quarkxpress and not have to bake shadows or whatever thanks to indesign did you mean pagemaker? after they absorbed aldus
|
![]() |
|
layers are a bit bogus imo. they work obv but are a bit cumbersome. they’re a relic of the past and we should move past them. everyone else has adobe why can’t you adope more like it
|
![]() |
|
thats an incredibly dumb take unless you have a suggestion for a replacement for the layer paradigm. im all ears.
|
![]() |
|
node-based image editing
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
![]() |
|
graph posted:just lol if youve never dealt with ps channels. lol. lmao oh, maybe? it's been so long. I trained up on quark just in time for indesign to start to gain ground, so I tried to quickly dump as much of it out of my brain as possible and what's left is a mix of memories. he had more experience back in the aldus days, so i'm probably mixing them up more Jonny 290 posted:thats an incredibly dumb take unless you have a suggestion for a replacement for the layer paradigm. im all ears. pixelmator and affinity photo have non-destructive/image layers that differ from raster layers, but I feel like I'm either stuck in the ps raster layer past or the workflows just aren't as intuitive I just want a pay-once, performant photoshop, adobe. do it, you cowards
|
![]() |
|
Jonny 290 posted:thats an incredibly dumb take unless you have a suggestion for a replacement for the layer paradigm. im all ears. mediaphage posted:node-based image editing why not both?
|
![]() |
|
Made this like twenty years ago, thanks to PS layers!![]()
|
![]() |
|
rescuing these from a previous incarnation of the thread because they are too good to remain in obscurity. they have sound.Video Nasty posted:Did the needful 🔊
|
![]() |
|
Agile Vector posted:i was just talking to a colleague about how great it was when layers came along and changed everything I remember indesign from highschool yearbook. It was baked into the budget that some "subject matter expert" would come in and press the buttons for us teenage A/V kids in relation to that quarkxpress shadow bake thingy. I asked the non-yearbook graphic design art teacher and she explained what it was and why she wouldn't talk me through it because "gently caress that use case and gently caress them kids" and I was all "but I'm one of the kids" and she was all "yeah gently caress you I aint doing that" then left class to smoke a cig. image ![]()
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
![]() |
|
fake news! (he won a contest!)
|
![]() |
|
![]() mask up guys ![]() oh. oh no
|
![]() |
|
Jonny 290 posted:thats an incredibly dumb take unless you have a suggestion for a replacement for the layer paradigm. im all ears. nodes converging all layers and edits into a single stack obfuscates the order of execution once you get past a basic level of complexity as soon as I started using nodes for images it became clear that it’s a superior method they take a moment to understand but then they present the work in such an intuitive way except it does take up more screen space Sagebrush posted:why not both? absolutely. in some ways they’re functionally identical so you could in theory have both operational at the same time
|
![]() |
|
https://va.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_rb7k4zENrh1ygq4u4.mp4
|
![]() |
|
i still dont know what a node is are you talking about an object? like the things illustrator has?
|
![]() |
|
Jonny 290 posted:i still dont know what a node is an operator in a graphical programming environment. like blender's shader nodes. you pipe the output of one function into the input of another and the data is evaluated and transformed along the chain. here is keyshot generating a parquet wood floor material with nodes. ![]() Sagebrush fucked around with this message at 21:46 on May 11, 2022 |
![]() |
|
ah gotcha. not sure how that'd help me content-aware-scale my dick pics but i get it now pic tax: found another speed miata in town. turns out i texted the guy in december but never followed up. might re-ping as he's probably ready to dump it ![]()
|
![]() |
|
Jonny 290 posted:i still dont know what a node is I first came across it in blender but stuff like davinci resolve also does it when you start having a situation where you have (for example) two layers that both have masks and then you’re trying to blend those layers together, the layers module in photoshop starts to be become unclear. the order of operations is not obvious nodes fixes all of this in an easy obvious way. they’re only really necessary once you get a certain level of complexity but once you do they make it so easy and obvious one day they’ll latch on. everyone else is
|
![]() |
|
huh guess ive just never had a problem with this order of operations or w/e thats cool tho ty for explaining![]()
|
![]() |
|
secumen is such a gross word
|
![]() |
|
![]() Still one of the best logos
|
![]() |
|
top 5 for sure sun, like beos was too good for this world
|
![]() |
|
Jonny 290 posted:ah gotcha. not sure how that'd help me content-aware-scale my dick pics but i get it now miatas are neat. i mentioned this in muskchat but small cars that are fun as hell to drive are the best i took a GR 86 on a test spin and it's too good for the price. too bad i don't need a car
|
![]() |
|
Jonny 290 posted:ah gotcha. not sure how that'd help me content-aware-scale my dick pics but i get it now content aware scaling can't do miracles anyway
|
![]() |
|
Jonny 290 posted:huh guess ive just never had a problem with this order of operations or w/e thats cool tho ty for explaining nodes are definitely the way of the future. functionally they're basically like having an API and scripting language for your graphics program, but they're easier to pick up and fart around with than writing actual code. once you get the hang of it, you can build very complicated stuff with relatively few operations. for instance here is a grasshopper thing i made the other day that generates bizarre carbon fiber bike frame shapes from a few freeform curves and sliders. ![]() check out the blender thread for a bunch of insane poo poo that fart simpson and jenny agutter do with it
|
![]() |
|
Beeftweeter posted:small cars that are fun as hell to drive are the best
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
# ? Jun 5, 2023 14:10 |
|
Beeftweeter posted:small cars that are fun as hell to drive are the best My second (I think) car I owned was a black-and-rust Honda CRX, it didn't go too fast at the top end but getting it there was very quick and winding roads etc were absolutley no problem. If I could have one fresh-from-the-showroom classic think I'd take another CRX.
|
![]() |