|
I remember scoffing at gmail because it seemed comical to me that anyone would need an entire gigabyte for email of all things.
|
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jan 19, 2026 14:43 |
|
At this point I kind of wish I had less storage, because then I'd have deleted decades worth of pointless mailers from game key sites and the like and might actually be able to find poo poo. The search vs storage cost question goes out the window when even a correctly formulated search returns dozens of coincidentally relevant results.
|
|
|
|
Entropic posted:I remember scoffing at gmail because it seemed comical to me that anyone would need an entire gigabyte for email of all things. We're offering 5 gig home internet now and the overwhelming opinion of this is, it's complete overkill, but we're all afraid to say that we'll never need it because we've all been burnt before.
|
|
|
|
Why isn't my 12 year old laptop on Wi-Fi getting the speeds I'm paying for?
|
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:Why isn't my 12 year old laptop on Wi-Fi getting the speeds I'm paying for?
|
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:Why isn't my 12 year old laptop on Wi-Fi getting the speeds I'm paying for?
|
|
|
|
Renegret posted:We're offering 5 gig home internet now and the overwhelming opinion of this is, it's complete overkill, but we're all afraid to say that we'll never need it because we've all been burnt before. AT&T is offering "Hyper-Gig" or whatever in my area, but I've got 1GB already, and don't really need that. I only got it over 500MB because the 1GB comes with unlimited data. Below that has a data cap, and the cost for getting unlimited on 500GB makes it the same price as 1GB, so...
|
|
|
|
Renegret posted:We're offering 5 gig home internet now and the overwhelming opinion of this is, it's complete overkill, but we're all afraid to say that we'll never need it because we've all been burnt before. My telco is offering 10/2 gigs and nobody is biting from the various tech groups with internal insights on user enrolls. The standard 1000/300 is more than adequate for the bulk of the consumers.
|
|
|
|
By the time you're having to spend a decent chunk of money on your internal network, faster internet speeds start to look less appealing. Up to 1gb is easy, past that can become a pain in the arse.
|
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:By the time you're having to spend a decent chunk of money on your internal network, faster internet speeds start to look less appealing. Up to 1gb is easy, past that can become a pain in the arse. A shite web managed zyxel switch with twenty four gig ports and four ten gig uplinks is 250€ if you can wait for discounts/amazon warehouse. If you go unmanaged we are talking half of that. It's not esoteric/expensive as it used to be.
|
|
|
|
I am going to need to implement wired 802.1x. I am aware that this is a significant undertaking. I'm currently browsing training videos, but anybody able to offer a broad overview or any specific gotchas to watch out for?
|
|
|
|
.
BaseballPCHiker fucked around with this message at 13:38 on Apr 1, 2025 |
|
|
|
|
We will be in that exact situation, yes. Management understands this is going to take some time and isn't going to happen everywhere all at once. I think the answer for those printers is going to be MAB, based on the video I'm watching.
|
|
|
|
I think stuff like ClearPass makes this a ton easier
|
|
|
|
guppy posted:I am going to need to implement wired 802.1x. I am aware that this is a significant undertaking. I'm currently browsing training videos, but anybody able to offer a broad overview or any specific gotchas to watch out for? Map your network, have a plan for security zones / segmentation (and follow it), don't be afraid to use MAB for poo poo like printers, also consider putting them in their own zone that has restricted access. What are you doing for wireless clients? We (corp with 3000+ employees) migrated from an old Cisco / fortinet network to an all-Extreme network over the last two years and it went relatively painless. I think the goal was 80% port automation, but they hit well over 90%, and it has mostly been label/card printers that have caused problems. We're doing the OT network next, also moving to Extreme Fabric with NAC and 802.1x on all ports, along with microsegmentation... and I suspect it'll be fine, even with a few thousand devices across the entire city
|
|
|
|
We already have ISE in production, but our implementation wasn't designed/scaled for this use case. We currently do wireless auth via RADIUS using NPS on Windows Server. Guest wireless is currently shunted off into its own guppy fucked around with this message at 15:46 on Feb 14, 2023 |
|
|
|
How do you image / reimage devices? I don’t think you can enforce 802.1x on PXE, so keep that in mind when planning.
|
|
|
|
Need a fallback vlan for that.
|
|
|
|
Good to know, thanks. I am far removed from the group that handles imaging, but for sure they will not appreciate it if I render them unable to do day-to-day business. For that matter, I'm not sure if they even image things anymore, hasn't that all gone by the wayside in favor of Autopilot or whatever it's called?
|
|
|
|
guppy posted:Good to know, thanks. I am far removed from the group that handles imaging, but for sure they will not appreciate it if I render them unable to do day-to-day business. For that matter, I'm not sure if they even image things anymore, hasn't that all gone by the wayside in favor of Autopilot or whatever it's called? Even if it's all autopilot, you'd still need a way for a refreshed or new laptop to get some sort of internet connection to do the initial authentication and provisioning. There are plenty of solutions, and now is the time to find out what is needed and plan for it.
|
|
|
|
We got a sharp one here folks:
|
|
|
|
SyNack Sassimov posted:We got a sharp one here folks: Someone in our group chat asked if a print queue would need to be re-created if the printer was factory default reset and setup again. Question was already answered, but my idiot brain got this idea, so I decided to share it here too since it didn't get much of a reaction at work for some reason.
|
|
|
|
Goddammit, recruiters. I wasn't in the mood for jokes today. So let's play "Guess the salary!" Recruiter posted:Requirements: $125k in Princeton, NJ
|
|
|
|
That's significantly than I was expecting, having seen a lot of UK job postings for similar roles of late. Yup
|
|
|
|
Arquinsiel posted:That's significantly than I was expecting Significantly what?? I still can't tell if that's a good or bad salary
|
|
|
|
That is amazingly bad salary for New Jersey, for someone who knows openstack, for someone who has python experience with that config management stuff, or someone with ten years exp and a CS That’s a 200k salary + 25-50k other comp person at my company Edit: 125k isn’t far off what we pay people who we recruit directly from college and train for six months before they even bill. That salary with that req is insulting i am a moron fucked around with this message at 22:31 on Feb 16, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
A Frosty Witch posted:Significantly what?? I still can't tell if that's a good or bad salary Like you'd see that advertised at £25-35K around here. poo poo's stupid.
|
|
|
|
UK wages are in the bin, I’ll see if I can find the stats from the other day
|
|
|
|
Yeah I was expecting it to be, like, $60k. The posting alone is unhinged enough, $125k shows they're at least trying.
|
|
|
|
It's interesting that they want decade level in depth experience with Linux and similar systems, but also want windows experience. And networking And programming The salary is even more absurd when you consider it's a role for at least 3 people
|
|
|
|
Yeah, they're dreaming with those requirements, and I told him as much in my response. Even in Detroit, $125k for that spot is lol.
|
|
|
|
"the old guy was doing it all for that price until he quit, surely we can find someone else to do the same"
|
|
|
|
"Prior experience working in a start-up operation" So it's probably a start up that's trying to have a single person as a one stop shop for...every single computer need in existence. Including developing all of the 6 different idea guy's apps.
|
|
|
|
Renegret posted:"Prior experience working in a start-up operation" "Must also be comfortable wearing kneepads and making eye contact, because the VC guys are gonna want some spit-polishing when they stop by, if you know what I mean."
|
|
|
|
I'm hosting a meeting to review a new client with our helpdesk before officially handing the client over for full support desk services and the meeting is hosted by myself and whichever technician did the onsite work. The onsite tech generally takes over for the last quarter of the meeting to do a virtual walkthrough of the clinic using pictures they took. Usually super boring. I just finished covering my section and handed things over to the onsite tech to do his part. I stopped sharing and he started sharing his screen. The window he had open minimized while he swapped to the folder his pictures are in. His background was fully visible for about 1.5 seconds. It was two furries in diapers hardcore loving. Then it was gone. Now I'm watching literally everyone in this meeting trying to keep a straight face and failing and the presenter is moving gamely forward. For the first time ever, this is none of my concern.
|
|
|
|
the onsite tech? so that background is on his work computer?
|
|
|
|
I loving hope not but I don't even know how to begin bringing this up. "So about those making GBS threads dogs loving on your desktop" seems a little brusque. Honestly I'm just going to mention it to his supervisor and let him handle it. I don't get paid near enough to kinkshame.
|
|
|
|
i mean if he has the making GBS threads dogs on there in the first place i don't think addressing it frankly and straightforwardly is gonna rattle him too much
|
|
|
|
Yo buddy just a heads up we all saw your desktop. Cheers and take care.
|
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jan 19, 2026 14:43 |
|
also for some reason the fact that they're making GBS threads has me twice as shook as the original post. talk about a buried lede. maybe i'm the kinkshamer
|
|
|























