|
Should I just end this or does anyone feel like something constructive will happen?
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
# ? May 12, 2025 13:17 |
I’m just not sure wins is coming back which is damming imo
|
|
![]() |
|
i have nothing to say though i really have no idea why we're rushing wins 3?
|
![]() |
|
I'm guessing scum don't have good options here other than gin up a new case, which is hard when no one is talking. Or this is useful for them and they're just v0v
|
![]() |
|
Okay, I'm gonna hammer rather than deal with hours of dead air ##vote wins
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
![]() |
|
You were warned of the risks of moving to Stepford. Unfortunately for your fans, you’ll never get to write that book of poetry Wait Until He’s Asleep, Then Cut It Off. wins32767 - Bobbie Markowitz, TOWN-Aligned Risky Bodyguard has been Eliminated. NOTE: Discord-hosted image links (like this one) expire approximately 24hrs after they were copied from Discord. quote:You are "Bobbie Markowitz." Many know you for your book I Love You, But Please Die. You are a Risky Bodyguard. It is now Night 2. About 24 hours for night action(s), though a little sooner would be preferred if possible. In order to make this less unfavorable for time zone folks, there will be zero nudges/reminders about this (beyond the initial pings). If 24 hours goes by without any submission, it will be assumed that no night action(s) are taken.
|
![]() |
|
You were warned of the risks of moving to Stepford. Now, which aisle is quilted paper towels? Hal Insandenza - Dave Markowitz, SCUM-Aligned Risky Recruiter has been Eliminated. [As described in the OP, flip-flavor (which includes pictures) is not necessarily indicative of cause of elimination] NOTE: Discord-hosted image links (like this one) expire approximately 24hrs after they were copied from Discord. quote:You are "Dave Markowitz." And...how long have you been married? *cue laugh track* You are a Risky Recruiter. It is now Day 3. Deadline is in ~43 hours to get us back on track. Here's yet another 'banner!' NOTE: Discord-hosted image links (like this one) expire approximately 24hrs after they were copied from Discord.
|
![]() |
|
Votecount for Day 3![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() With 8 alive, it's 5 votes to execute. The current deadline is May 17th, 2023 at 8 p.m. EDT -- that's in about 1 day, 19 hours. Note that Auto-Hammer is DISABLED. Please don't post after Hammer (unless otherwise indicated).
|
![]() |
|
I have no idea what's going on at this point, but I am certainly interested.
|
![]() |
|
I guess they misconverted? No NK tho?
|
![]() |
|
Tired Moritz posted:I guess they misconverted? No NK tho? That would make no sense either because they would know wins is their target.
|
![]() |
|
Wait, what? That flip makes no sense. wins already flipped the role Hal was looking for, so why in the world would he be trying to convert anyone? That just seems unlikely to the point that it can be dismissed out of hand. So that means he wasn't killed by his own ability, he must've been killed by someone else. Okay - 11 players seems too small for a 3P but I guess it's not impossible, or we have a town vig. But then what happened to the scum NK? Hal's flip has a really weird line in it:CubicalSucrose posted:You are NOT able to use the scum team night elimination action. So there has to be at least one other player out there who can or this is the saddest scum team in the universe. Somber, meanwhile, you have some explaining to do. Preferably right now. I'm going to ##vote Somber on principle until an explanation manifests.
|
![]() |
|
Actually the more I think about it, the more this seems like evidence for some kind of redirection-type power in play. One way to explain what happened is that scum wanted to NK someone else, but it got redirected to Hal somehow. In that case we can't trust wins's bodyguard either.
|
![]() |
|
Hyper Crab Tank posted:Wait, what? That flip makes no sense. wins already flipped the role Hal was looking for, so why in the world would he be trying to convert anyone? That just seems unlikely to the point that it can be dismissed out of hand. So that means he wasn't killed by his own ability, he must've been killed by someone else. Okay - 11 players seems too small for a 3P but I guess it's not impossible, or we have a town vig. But then what happened to the scum NK? Hal's flip has a really weird line in it: I dunno about that, I'm confirmedish town by wins. Feels like scum are probably just lurking along if I had to guess. I would offer up more info, but it still doesn't make any sense so I'm not sure it would be very helpful.
|
![]() |
|
Hyper Crab Tank posted:Actually the more I think about it, the more this seems like evidence for some kind of redirection-type power in play. One way to explain what happened is that scum wanted to NK someone else, but it got redirected to Hal somehow. In that case we can't trust wins's bodyguard either. Okay, actually that seems more plausible than my working theory and would explain why I thought wins was lying.
|
![]() |
|
Somberbrero posted:Okay, actually that seems more plausible than my working theory and would explain why I thought wins was lying. What is your working theory? With a flip this weird I don't want to leave theories on the table. Did you think wins was lying before?
|
![]() |
|
Redirectors are satanic
|
![]() |
|
Hyper Crab Tank posted:
I more or less had confirmation that wins did not visit me that night he said he did.
|
![]() |
|
Somberbrero posted:I more or less had confirmation that wins did not visit me that night he said he did. More or less? But you also very strongly hinted that you had reason to think wins had attempted the NK, but was prevented from doing so. I still think you need to explain some poo poo here, because from where I'm sitting it feels like you tried to run a risky gambit to get a townie executed.
|
![]() |
|
Mmm, gonna have to side with HCT here. I don't see any reason how people to be so vague when their testimony got a townie killed 2?
|
![]() |
|
I also don't like this:Somberbrero posted:I dunno about that, I'm confirmedish town by wins. If you're now saying you know wins didn't visit you.
|
![]() |
|
I ahve reason to believe Hal was a death miller. Let's not get distracted by this. I'm not going to believe any scum flips if they say "You can't access the nightkill".
|
![]() |
|
Johnny Keats posted:I ahve reason to believe Hal was a death miller. Let's not get distracted by this. I'm not going to believe any scum flips if they say "You can't access the nightkill". Okay, you can't just drop some poo poo like that and then go "yeah but don't worry about it". What the hell do you mean you have "reason to believe" something like that?
|
![]() |
|
Oh, that reminds me. What was that thing about night action votes? Have you figured anything out re that?
|
![]() |
|
Hyper Crab Tank posted:Oh, that reminds me. What was that thing about night action votes? Have you figured anything out re that? Maf edit: Night votes, not night action votes.
|
![]() |
|
Somberbrero posted:I more or less had confirmation that wins did not visit me that night he said he did. I'm giving you very meaningful eye contact right now.
|
![]() |
|
Hyper Crab Tank posted:Oh, that reminds me. What was that thing about night action votes? Have you figured anything out re that? No, I think it was a misdirection. That said, without even any evidence of a scum nightkill existing in this game, things are up in the air.
|
![]() |
|
Okay, I don't like any of what's being put on the table right now. Keats, you'd better tell me your name right now. You seem to know all kinds of weird poo poo about the game and I don't like it, nor do I like that you're going straight to death millers and "no evidence of a scum night kill" when there are like ten more plausible occam's razor-compatible avenues to explore here. If you know something that makes sense of any of this, you really should just put the cards on the table.Johnny Keats posted:I'm giving you very meaningful eye contact right now. And what is this? What the hell did I sign up for
|
![]() |
|
If I claim, I will get modkilled.
|
![]() |
|
Johnny Keats posted:If I claim, I will get modkilled. Even saying this is actually extremely toeing the line, based on the language in my PM.
|
![]() |
|
Johnny Keats posted:If I claim, I will get modkilled. There is no universe in which I am willing to believe this is the case. What the gently caress. I don't even know which of you I want to vote more right now.
|
![]() |
|
Hyper Crab Tank posted:I also don't like this: I shared this thought though. It was weird.
|
![]() |
|
Honestly I believe Keats and that includes the weird as hell claiming = modkill thing. This has nothing to do with me gamewise, but solely on the fact I think sugar and cloaca are just into those kind of things.
|
![]() |
|
lol this game is bonkers
|
![]() |
|
So let me get this straight. Keats, what you're claiming (ha!) is that you are not allowed to claim your role, or Sucrose is going to modkill you? Okay, first of all, why? Are there only specific details you can't claim? Could you tell me your name if I asked you, but just not describe what your role does? Are you claiming your PM literally says "don't tell anyone anything about this or that" or what's the deal here? I find this all incredibly unbelievable but I just want to hear how deep you claim this rabbit hole goes.
|
![]() |
|
Hyper Crab Tank posted:So let me get this straight. Keats, what you're claiming (ha!) is that you are not allowed to claim your role, or Sucrose is going to modkill you? Okay, first of all, why? Are there only specific details you can't claim? Could you tell me your name if I asked you, but just not describe what your role does? Are you claiming your PM literally says "don't tell anyone anything about this or that" or what's the deal here? I'm afraid I may have already violated the rule, so I won't respond to this
|
![]() |
|
Johnny Keats posted:It's possible I am just reading into weird language in my role PM and/or Cubical intentionally loving with me? To be as specific as possible while not role claiming, my role tell me that something happens based on who I am voting at the end of a phase. There is then a parenthetical to specify the two phases that this applies to. What about this? Is this not a (partial) claim of what your role does? If you were in any danger of being modsmitten by talking about your role, surely that would've happened days ago. I think you're lying, but gently caress if I understand why you're choosing this weird way of doing it.
|
![]() |
|
Hyper Crab Tank posted:What about this? Is this not a (partial) claim of what your role does? If you were in any danger of being modsmitten by talking about your role, surely that would've happened days ago. I think you're lying, but gently caress if I understand why you're choosing this weird way of doing it. Sorry, I can't explain that.
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
# ? May 12, 2025 13:17 |
|
##vote Keats Somber has a lot of irregularity to answer for too, and I would vote either one of you, but I don't buy any of this.
|
![]() |