|
Tsi Moritz who is scum 
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2025 20:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 25, 2025 09:32 |
|
|
shwinnebego posted:yuming's gambit is bad if town, and so bad that i don't see it as a scum gambit. if yuming IS scum, i reckon she's scum with a more galaxy-brained player who suggested it ... I feel like the first half of that post said it can't be a scum gambit and the second half says it could be, with a sufficiently galaxy-brained scum mate. Why is that not on the table then? Personally I'm starting to feel keeping yuming around is a risk. I think fos is right that the "cop that kills" claim just is at best an SK with extra steps, and I said as much D1 too. Like, what are we thinking the optimal use of this alleged ability is? Yuming kills someone every day, and then we have to trust her the one day she says that a random person is scum because they didn't die? I don't like any part of this, especially with Iggy as the far townier vig role around. ##vote yuming
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2025 21:09
|
|
|
ok lets kill yuming ##vote yuming
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2025 21:12
|
|
|
Zoya posted:##vote cube
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2025 21:15
|
|
for more.
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2025 21:16
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 2 ⚪⚪⚪⚪🟢🟢🟢🟢 yuming (4): Zoya, Ignatius M. Meen, ⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪🟢🟢 DreamingofRoses (2): Disco Anne, yuming ⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪🟢🟢 CubicalSucrose (2): Zoya, ⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪🟢 shwinnebego (1): CubicalSucrose, Maugrim, ⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪🟢 fool of sound (1): CubicalSucrose ⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ Zoya (0): yuming, ⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪⚪ Ignatius M. Meen (0): DreamingofRoses, Not voting: Hal Incandenza, Rhymes With Clue, Tired Moritz, Tsietisin With 14 alive, it's 8 votes to execute. The current deadline is February 11th, 2025 at 8 p.m. UTC -- that's in about 23 hours, 43 minutes.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2025 21:16
|
|
|
shwinnebego posted:ok lets kill yuming ##vote yuming I am just threatening to kill a lurker today. Will I do it?
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2025 21:35
|
|
|
yuming posted:Rude! Once again, we are down 3 town on day 2. Can we cool it on the vigs.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2025 21:41
|
|
|
yuming, who would you shoot of the lurkers remaining? Who would you shoot of the not-lurkers remaining?
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2025 22:28
|
|
|
Ignatius M. Meen posted:Can be harmful and helpful is one thing, but not talking about the ideas behind actions is another, especially given HCT's whole informed thing. Bare minimum, I'd like to know if that player would hit HCT with that again and why. It's sketchy that they're not gonna talk about it IMO and I would probably ask them directly if they were ever going to say anything outside extenuating circumstances. Are there any extenuating circumstances you're aware of here? Yeah, so I got (what I assume to be) RWC's results, and they said their befuddle was a success. It also said "spork visited you" in those results, so presumably from sporks flip RWC would be loud going forward if they continue to do anything, so my guess is that RWC will not be able to befuddle any more, at least without being obvious. So, thinking about it more, RWC not saying anything about befuddling last night and not claiming to be loudified means she is almost certainly scum. There is always a chance I was redirected, but there are some other parts of my role that I will not reveal yet that make me think that is a bit less likely.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2025 22:43
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:Yeah, so I got (what I assume to be) RWC's results, and they said their befuddle was a success. It also said "spork visited you" in those results, so presumably from sporks flip RWC would be loud going forward if they continue to do anything, so my guess is that RWC will not be able to befuddle any more, at least without being obvious. Absolutely willing to vote RWC for this if no explanation can be given, even over yuming. Hal, do the letters R. C. mean anything to you?
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2025 22:57
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:Yeah, so I got (what I assume to be) RWC's results, and they said their befuddle was a success. It also said "spork visited you" in those results, so presumably from sporks flip RWC would be loud going forward if they continue to do anything, so my guess is that RWC will not be able to befuddle any more, at least without being obvious. oh ok yeah if RWC befuddled you and didn't say anything about it until later, that sounds like a straightforwardly scum power if this is correct then we should kill rwc ##vote rwc
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2025 23:02
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:Yeah, so I got (what I assume to be) RWC's results, and they said their befuddle was a success. It also said "spork visited you" in those results, so presumably from sporks flip RWC would be loud going forward if they continue to do anything, so my guess is that RWC will not be able to befuddle any more, at least without being obvious. Sounds hella damning to me if she doesn't respond. ##vote Rhymes
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2025 23:03
|
|
|
Ignatius M. Meen posted:Sounds hella damning to me if she doesn't respond. ##vote Rhymes ##vote RWC Honestly I will probably not take a shot today. I am suspicious of Moritz but has tsi returned to the game? I honestly think the scum profile is NOT to vote me here so I am most suspicious of the sideline crew. I can elaborate more later tonight (which was my plan anyways thinking I may eat the vote.)
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2025 23:07
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:presumably from sporks flip RWC would be loud going forward if they continue to do anything, so my guess is that RWC will not be able to befuddle any more, at least without being obvious. Oh, adding to this though, I didn't see anything about who visited me in my results. So if Spork spotted RWC the befuddle trumps the loudness, which I suppose makes sense, since befuddle typically replaces the _entire_ night result.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2025 23:07
|
|
|
Maugrim posted:Well, if nobody else expresses an interest I can take it. Let me know if you want to lock in the trade. Remember though, you won't receive the boon until the day ends.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2025 23:08
|
|
|
Hyper Crab Tank posted:Absolutely willing to vote RWC for this if no explanation can be given, even over yuming. Hal, do the letters R. C. mean anything to you? No, R. C. doesn't mean anything to me
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2025 23:17
|
|
|
Ok. I'm keeping the details of the precise way I was befuddled (if that was indeed it) close to my chest for now in case it trips someone up, but I thought you might.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2025 23:22
|
|
|
Good enough for me, ##unvote
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2025 23:33
|
|
|
Yeah it would be nice to hear from RWC but I'm not sure what she could say that would make her not the vote today.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2025 00:00
|
|
|
Hyper Crab Tank posted:Let me know if you want to lock in the trade. Remember though, you won't receive the boon until the day ends. Sure, let's lock it in, do I have to give you two fish for this? Or just one?
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2025 00:01
|
|
|
Maugrim posted:Sure, let's lock it in, do I have to give you two fish for this? Or just one? Two fish. I'll pre-emptively ##shake flippers and you can do the same if you want the boon.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2025 00:05
|
|
|
##shake flippers take it, take it all. But per the OP, if this boon is a bust, you will feel all the terrible wrath I can visit upon you. which isn't much as I am very smol.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2025 00:08
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2025 00:11
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2025 00:11
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2025 00:11
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2025 00:11
|
|
|
beautiful seals I dont like the yuming votes. they did nothing that we didnt expect them to do anyway, they clearly cant be scum since we got two kills. i think people voting there are shooked scum that cant just not lurk to win.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2025 00:16
|
|
|
i actually kinda agree with zoya that the cube post from her seal pic is super stinky. im looking at hal for trying to say a befuddler could be possibly town because when and how
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2025 00:17
|
|
|
Hyper Crab Tank posted:Two fish. I'll pre-emptively ##shake flippers and you can do the same if you want the boon. Maugrim posted:##shake flippers take it, take it all. But per the OP, if this boon is a bust, you will feel all the terrible wrath I can visit upon you. which isn't much as I am very smol. Hyper Crab Tank and Maugrim slap their bellies in unison and shake triumphant flippers. The poise! The gallantry! A contract is sealed.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2025 00:34
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:beautiful seals hmmm
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2025 00:37
|
|
|
I could dunk Cube, but not more than I'd dunk Tsi for being absent from the game. Hal's initial weak defense of Rhymes would feel worse if I didn't have the context of him being a result thief in a different game where that wasn't a scum role. As it is, though, I feel better about him now than I did before the day opened.
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2025 00:37
|
|
|
yeah i don't think yuming is the right elim today she might be an SK, it's true, but i'd rather find and eliminate scum today. Rhymes seems like a mechanically solid bet, but let's see how she shakes out postingwise too
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2025 00:38
|
|
|
Zoya, what do you think about Rhymes and Hal in light of Hal's claims?
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2025 00:38
|
|
|
Rhymes With Clue posted:Would vote This is literally the only post RWC has made all game that actually comments at all on who might be scum Everything else is jokes, fluffy approvals of Iggy's gaming things out, and some very nice drawings of seals. Even without Hal's mechanical call-out, Rhymes would be a great vote today
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2025 00:39
|
|
|
shwinnebego posted:This is literally the only post RWC has made all game that actually comments at all on who might be scum I agree with this. RWC was feeling light already and if Hal's intel is true then that is by far my preferred vote today. We have almost a full day to go though so let's see what RWC has to say.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2025 00:45
|
|
|
if hal is right then we should absolutely kill rwc
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2025 00:48
|
|
|
Ignatius M. Meen posted:I could dunk Cube, but not more than I'd dunk Tsi for being absent from the game. Did you not claim lurker day vig? Day vig the lurker.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2025 00:55
|
|
|
moritz, do you have any scum reads of your own besides just agreeing with zoya about cube
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2025 00:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 25, 2025 09:32 |
|
|
I could easily consider cube tomorrow, but I'm trying to see the argument about how he's scummier than what seems to be a caught befuddler and entirely failing. Wouldn't mind some posts from both of 'em, as usual.Ignatius M. Meen posted:Also big Has this happened before? I agree that I'd probably need a reference to take the idea seriously. Tired Moritz posted:beautiful seals Yeah, that's where I am on those. Unless we lose two more town tonight, in which case she gotta go.
|
|
#
?
Feb 11, 2025 01:00
|
|
here, I do remember result thieves exist that can be town, but that'd be one of the extenuating circumstances you'd have to claim knowledge of for me to think this is less sketchy.