|
Jaxyon posted:Guys in the AI future it's going to be hard to establish ownership of art. "Imagine bots running randomized art prompts, for AI art generation programs, for automated NFT minters... forever."
|
# ? Sep 13, 2022 08:32 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 18:37 |
|
On the "bright" side, his work are considered to have a 'style' of its own. That's how you know you have made it.Mister Facetious posted:"Imagine bots running randomized art prompts. Have you heard of #inktober? introducing #botober: https://twitter.com/JanelleCShane/status/1568248183037345796 https://www.aiweirdness.com/botober-2022-draw-human-draw/ Trying to get a bunch of toddlers to cooperate. (Ada is trying her best) SniHjen fucked around with this message at 09:25 on Sep 13, 2022 |
# ? Sep 13, 2022 09:20 |
|
Volmarias posted:Some manufacturers already pay for shelf space, imagine if you only showed Coca-cola products on the doors on exchange for $$$? I've seen videos of these doors screens. Occasionally, one or two of the drinks will wiggle or "dance" briefly to attract your attention (I hate it). It's basically perfect. Soda companies have an additional way to show advertisements to people (and you can't really block these, like you can internet ads) and the store can set up a bidding war between the soda companies. "Oh, you want your soda to sparkle? That costs extra"
|
# ? Sep 13, 2022 18:00 |
|
https://twitter.com/shardsambit/status/1408932413481259011 Of course it's all about the advertising. Banner ads between products, center video ads, and of course the enticing animated effects. It's just getting started too. The goal is using facial recognition to display targeted ads. Rebel Blob fucked around with this message at 18:52 on Sep 13, 2022 |
# ? Sep 13, 2022 18:47 |
|
Can one of those cameras be pointed at the contents, and the contents be displayed on the outside? That would be very helpful.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2022 18:54 |
|
Antigravitas posted:Can one of those cameras be pointed at the contents, and the contents be displayed on the outside? That would be very helpful. There are cameras pointed at the inside, to gather data about what people take. But the screen's only set up to show video ads. There's also cameras pointed at the outside, to track when people walk by, whether they look at the door, how long they spend at the door, and whether they open the door. It's the classic big tech "just collect as much data as possible, in hopes that some of it will somehow be useful to optimize and min-max your advertising for maximum effect".
|
# ? Sep 13, 2022 19:23 |
|
Next phase is the loving refrigerator calling you loudly by name and asking if you'll be having dulche De leche again. gently caress you fridge, I'm going with fudge brownie!
|
# ? Sep 13, 2022 19:39 |
|
Wait until someone hacks it to play Weird Al Yankovic's I Love Rocky Road.
|
# ? Sep 13, 2022 19:41 |
|
Refrigerator: “This is your third beer run this week, click here to acknowledge this warning and absolve 7-11 and it’s subsidiaries of liability.”
|
# ? Sep 13, 2022 20:34 |
|
withak posted:Refrigerator: “This is your third beer run this week, click here to acknowledge this warning and absolve 7-11 and it’s subsidiaries of liability.” Just a hop, skip, and a jump away from Carl's Jr kiosk: "At Carl's Jr we believe that no child should go hungry. You are an unfit mother. Your children will be placed in the custody of Carl's Jr."
|
# ? Sep 13, 2022 21:30 |
|
This is my son Carl last name Sjr.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 03:43 |
|
Wooo, look at this totally "not racist" thing people are using AI for now: https://twitter.com/MaxKennerly/status/1569635559223558145 Another wonderful use for technology! Jesus, it's weird that the 80s cyberpunk writers weren't somehow weren't pessimistic enough about what a tech dystopia future would actually be like.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 04:09 |
|
dr_rat posted:Wooo, look at this totally "not racist" thing people are using AI for now: Ah, the two races: white and woke.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 04:21 |
|
Woke is like the ((( ))) thing but for black people.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 04:26 |
|
Tech Nightmares: I'm not racist, but my AI is
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 04:42 |
|
dr_rat posted:Wooo, look at this totally "not racist" thing people are using AI for now: "Please do not misinterpret."
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 04:49 |
|
"Have you brought any fruits or vegetables to the planet?" "Two weeks."
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 05:01 |
|
By popular demand posted:Next phase is the loving refrigerator calling you loudly by name and asking if you'll be having dulche De leche again. I'm imagining the wine section literally calling out to a recovering alcoholic by name. Edit: Posted this before seeing withac's post lol
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 07:24 |
|
https://twitter.com/mikewayland/status/1562518465587851265 Name the various things that could go wrong with bringing platooning autonomous driving via wi-fi over to individual vehicles
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 15:30 |
|
Waiting for the inevitable heist where someone just paints a QR code on the back of their van and the follower truck gets confused and obediently fucks off with the thieves.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 15:39 |
|
Sage Grimm posted:https://twitter.com/mikewayland/status/1562518465587851265
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 15:49 |
|
If you put an engine on a trailer then is it still a trailer?
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 15:51 |
|
Sage Grimm posted:https://twitter.com/mikewayland/status/1562518465587851265 So basically, what if trains, but roads?
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 16:06 |
I don't think I'll properly understand how horror media gets targeted to kids. I know it's little different from the Alien Movie Action Figures from when I was a kid, but I always wonder about the process, and how it's nearly automated these days. Like, I really doubt the creators of Poppy's Playtime or Friday Night Funkin' have any cash flow from the knockoff merchandise, and I've seen with my own eyes that kids play knockoff versions of these properties on Roblox & the like instead of the product themselves.
|
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 16:23 |
|
raifield posted:So basically, what if trains, but roads? *no couplers. But also I'm pretty sure separating the engines like this is an inefficient use of the fuel?
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 16:31 |
|
Triskelli posted:
it starts with twitch streamers playing the game and doing over the top scared funny noises, then those videos getting uploaded to youtube, yada yada, my kid wants to dress up like a character from a video game he's never played for halloween.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 16:32 |
|
HootTheOwl posted:*no couplers. The software is the coupler. This is a software-defined train.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 16:49 |
|
lol my blue tooth and wifi still has hiccups a few times a week, and this is with devices that are all less than a year old, loving dont trust that wireless trailer convoy poo poo.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 16:57 |
|
Sage Grimm posted:https://twitter.com/mikewayland/status/1562518465587851265 Has anyone done "woops, the payment for renewing your Remote Autonomous Choo Choo license didn't go through due to a glitch, get hit with a loud renewal request as simultaneously the autonomous car abruptly halts in the middle of I90 near Boston during rush hour"?
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 17:40 |
|
I don't understand what the point of this is. If you have two vehicles each with their own engines, why does one need to "tow" the other? And if you don't have two vehicles each with their own engine, this can't possibly work. The only use case I can think of where I've seen one operable vehicle towing another operable vehicle is RVs that tow a car, but presumably it would still be better to simply... tow the car, rather than burning the extra fuel of having the car drive a foot behind you or whatever. Is it just to save the labour of exact one (1) truck driver, who would otherwise drive a second tractor-trailer combo? How will it be parked at a loading dock, if so? What happens if you attempt to do a lane change that would cause the trailing vehicle to sideswipe something? Does it decouple, or drive itself into whatever's next to it? Are the mirrors on the vehicles large enough to even have adequate visibility of the full combined length of two large vehicles? Also, and I can't stress this enough: *ENDLESS SCREAMING*
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 18:12 |
|
raifield posted:The software is the coupler. This is a software-defined train. In software that's called a link.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 18:29 |
|
Solutions in search of a problem.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 18:40 |
|
Jaxyon posted:Solutions in search of a problem. While also creating many problems of its own.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 18:43 |
|
PT6A posted:I don't understand what the point of this is.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 18:45 |
|
PT6A posted:I don't understand what the point of this is. If you have two vehicles each with their own engines, why does one need to "tow" the other? And if you don't have two vehicles each with their own engine, this can't possibly work. The only use case I can think of where I've seen one operable vehicle towing another operable vehicle is RVs that tow a car, but presumably it would still be better to simply... tow the car, rather than burning the extra fuel of having the car drive a foot behind you or whatever. Saving long-haul drivers. In theory, the convoy of autotrucks would pull up to a waiting area at the destination, where human drivers would show up and get into each of the trucks to manually drive them into the right spot for unloading.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 18:45 |
|
PT6A posted:I don't understand what the point of this is. If you have two vehicles each with their own engines, why does one need to "tow" the other? And if you don't have two vehicles each with their own engine, this can't possibly work. The only use case I can think of where I've seen one operable vehicle towing another operable vehicle is RVs that tow a car, but presumably it would still be better to simply... tow the car, rather than burning the extra fuel of having the car drive a foot behind you or whatever. The point is also to temporarily be able to expand your carry capacity while still driving your sedan. Like if you rent a moving truck you wouldn't have to have a second person to drive the truck you could just have it auto-follow you. On the professional end you could have one 'truck' driver piloting a specialized beacon vehicle that shepherds multiple headless engine cargo trailers. Mirrors would be designed accordingly, rear/side cameras on the trailers would feed to the driver, parking at loading docks could be done via self-driving or remote operator, etc. edit: For delivery drivers too, especially with other self-driving tech. One driver could go out with a little train of small delivery cargos pods which could decouple and return home after delivery. Pods could rendezvous with a delivery driver in the field to replenish their cargo or simply remain at the drop-off locations until sent back. MixMasterMalaria fucked around with this message at 18:56 on Sep 14, 2022 |
# ? Sep 14, 2022 18:47 |
|
MixMasterMalaria posted:The point is also to temporarily be able to expand your carry capacity while still driving your sedan. Like if you rent a moving truck you wouldn't have to have a second person to drive the truck you could just have it auto-follow you. Oh yeah, this will work out great because the 36,000 lb UHAUL straight truck I rented surely will be able to stop just as quickly as my passenger car. No chance of literally causing myself to get run over there.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 18:52 |
|
Motronic posted:Oh yeah, this will work out great because the 36,000 lb UHAUL straight truck I rented surely will be able to stop just as quickly as my passenger car. No chance of literally causing myself to get run over there. Yeah I mean there's certainly issues. I assume however that such hypothetical vehicles would take a different and smaller formfactor than the current UHAUL trucks. Maybe just scale up capacity with modular headless vehicle pods?
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 19:00 |
|
Road trains aren't a new thing by any means. I'm pretty sure the coupling methods between the various segments aren't the primary issues they face in even small scale deployment.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 20:14 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 18:37 |
|
The problem, as is per usual with tech intended to replace trains (why do techbros hate trains so much?) is the laws of physics. If they're not physically linked they need their own engine which means more fuel, more maintenance, more ways for the following truck to suddenly swerve because of an error call and plow through everything in the adjacent lane or go flying off a cliff. I know it's probably classified but I wonder what the loss rate on those Afghanistan trucks was in the field.
|
# ? Sep 14, 2022 20:14 |