Ruby on Rails Love-In

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Serious Hardware/Software Crap > The Cavern of COBOL > Ruby on Rails Love-In

«‹›2 »

dustgun: Jun 20, 2004; And then the doorbell would ring and the next santa would come

I've spent all day trying to get prawnto & prawn to render layouts. I want to shoot myself in the face and I think I'm just going to hack something up so that ... something something and then it works.

In short, someone make a better PDF creation plugin for rails.

# ¿ Aug 24, 2009 21:16

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 07:16

dustgun: Jun 20, 2004; And then the doorbell would ring and the next santa would come

So, Baltimore it is for railsconf. I think that at least a few attendees will have to be murdered for expectations to be met.

# ¿ Sep 28, 2009 18:50

dustgun: Jun 20, 2004; And then the doorbell would ring and the next santa would come

Without having any experience using paperclip, could it be an ImageMagick problem?

# ¿ Oct 16, 2009 18:49

dustgun: Jun 20, 2004; And then the doorbell would ring and the next santa would come

Sewer Adventure posted:

Hey guys I made a plugin because the Ack/grep bundles were good but not quite good enough
http://github.com/briancollins/nice_find

You are a good person.

# ¿ Oct 28, 2009 20:29

dustgun: Jun 20, 2004; And then the doorbell would ring and the next santa would come

I think that as an addition to the encoding checks, that makes a lot of sense. Just include a readme explaining what you did and that a failure in one of those tests shouldn't imply that it absolutely for sure won't work.

# ¿ Feb 16, 2010 03:01

dustgun: Jun 20, 2004; And then the doorbell would ring and the next santa would come

Pardot posted:

So who else is headed out to Baltimore?

Based there, but probably only going to Bohconf. Have fun getting murdered, suckers.

# ¿ May 31, 2010 18:31

dustgun: Jun 20, 2004; And then the doorbell would ring and the next santa would come

Pardot posted:

Come now, you don't need those parens

Don't forget the code cleanup they did a while back

code:

website = make_me_a_website :with_my_stuff_in_it
website = oh_and_make_it_use_my database
put_this_on_my_server_please website

# ¿ Jun 15, 2010 14:56

dustgun: Jun 20, 2004; And then the doorbell would ring and the next santa would come

Just throwing this out there, but if anyone's working on an upgrade from 2->3, remember to switch to jquery at the same time. Definitely worth it.

# ¿ Jun 24, 2010 14:33

dustgun: Jun 20, 2004; And then the doorbell would ring and the next santa would come

I swear that sometime in the last month I read something about a new rails 3 engine or app that acted like django-admin. Any help?

edit: hurrr http://github.com/sferik/rails_admin

dustgun fucked around with this message at 20:16 on Sep 26, 2010

# ¿ Sep 26, 2010 20:06

dustgun: Jun 20, 2004; And then the doorbell would ring and the next santa would come

Does anyone here have experience making a versioned API in rails? I'm wondering if there are any sort of best-practices or lessons learned out there as far as organizing routes and controllers and models go.

dustgun fucked around with this message at 17:25 on Oct 20, 2010

# ¿ Oct 20, 2010 17:21

dustgun: Jun 20, 2004; And then the doorbell would ring and the next santa would come

http://embed.ly/ can also be useful for such things.

edit: woop, ruby-oembed apparently can use embedly. Carry on.

dustgun fucked around with this message at 22:10 on Dec 28, 2010

# ¿ Dec 28, 2010 22:04

dustgun: Jun 20, 2004; And then the doorbell would ring and the next santa would come

For rails 3:

code:

@tattoos = Tattoo.includes(:user).limit(50)

Rails 2:

code:

@tattoos = Tattoo.find(:all, :limit => 50, :include => :user)

and then get the username from tattoo.user.username in your loop, unless I'm misunderstanding something.

dustgun fucked around with this message at 18:15 on Feb 11, 2011

# ¿ Feb 11, 2011 18:13

dustgun: Jun 20, 2004; And then the doorbell would ring and the next santa would come

rugbert posted:

Oh cool thanks!

Is there a good Add This gem or something? I tried adding the add this code to my posts but when you click it, it likes the current page and not the current post :/

Can you post the code you're using?

# ¿ Feb 15, 2011 05:43

dustgun: Jun 20, 2004; And then the doorbell would ring and the next santa would come

Trying to get 3.1 running on dreamhost.
Shoot me.

# ¿ Jun 23, 2011 15:23

dustgun: Jun 20, 2004; And then the doorbell would ring and the next santa would come

Doc Hawkins posted:

Any of you fine folks doing something for the Rails 3.1 Hackfest next week?

I'm gearing up to upgrade my company's app to 3.1 anyways, so being able to really bug the hell out of core people when I run into any problems appeals to me. Deeply.

# ¿ Jul 17, 2011 21:56

dustgun: Jun 20, 2004; And then the doorbell would ring and the next santa would come

8ender posted:

Any idea if 3.1 is going to be dramatically different than 3.0? I'm in the same boat and just to see how bad things were I upgraded one of our 2.3.11 apps yesterday and it was oddly painless. I think I changed one or two lines of code but everything just worked. I was kind of expecting apocalyptic app failure across the board but it doesn't look like all that much changed in the core MVC parts of rails.

I tried to see if I could a more-or-less-in-place upgrade with 3.1rc1 and it didn't go too well for us. Mind, this is an app that's been upgraded in bits and pieces since 1.3ish, so there are some parts that use really old idioms or code, but we keep dragging it forward just the same. I imagine most issues we have will involve places that we did bad things to rack and rails.

Everything except the new asset pipeline looks pretty consistent, though, which is nice after the giant ActiveRecord changes last time around. So many queries to rewrite.. so many..

# ¿ Jul 18, 2011 19:58

dustgun: Jun 20, 2004; And then the doorbell would ring and the next santa would come

Does anyone here run selenium tests over a dozen or so VMs? I'm gearing to finalize our setup (such as things can be finalized) and am interested if there are any oddball things I'm not thinking of that have tripped people up in the past.

# ¿ Aug 31, 2011 00:31

dustgun: Jun 20, 2004; And then the doorbell would ring and the next santa would come

Ok, I'm crying uncle: How do I get rid of pages and pages of

code:

Started GET "/assets/layout/footer.png" for 127.0.0.1 at 2012-02-22 21:20:59 -0500


Started GET "/assets/layout/header-bg.png" for 127.0.0.1 at 2012-02-22 21:20:59 -0500


Started GET "/assets/layout/footer_bg.png" for 127.0.0.1 at 2012-02-22 21:20:59 -0500


Started GET "/images/ticks/ajax-loader.gif" for 127.0.0.1 at 2012-02-22 21:20:59 -0500

per request in dev testing with rails s thin ?

dustgun fucked around with this message at 03:25 on Feb 23, 2012

# ¿ Feb 23, 2012 03:22

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 07:16

dustgun: Jun 20, 2004; And then the doorbell would ring and the next santa would come

Pardot posted:

Why do you want to get rid of them? It's useful to have access logs. Logs are streams.

I'm treating it like a stream right now and pipping it through grep, and I guess I just can't quite articulate why I don't need dozens of GET requests logged (streamed, whatever) of static, unchanging images per page to development.log beyond "it's dumb and worthless information". God know that file can kill my greps enough as-is. Maybe I'll start streaming nyan cat each request to Rails.logger too, because that'll at least cheer me up.

That came out a bit bitchier than I wanted. Sorry.

prom candy posted:

I think I read on Github or Stack Overflow that suppressing the asset log messages is an option that's coming soon.

code:

config.assets.logger = false

It just removes Served asset blahblahblah.png - 304 Not Modified (1ms). Hopefully more is coming.

# ¿ Feb 23, 2012 03:44

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Serious Hardware/Software Crap > The Cavern of COBOL > Ruby on Rails Love-In

«‹›2 »