|
Please tell me that "Making Money" gets better. I just can't seen to get into this one. at about page 55 -60
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2009 05:23
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 13, 2024 08:35 |
|
|
pretty much, it feels very contrived, and forced. Just not the same pacing as the other I have read. It jsut really feels awkward.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2009 06:48
|
|
|
Agreed. I loved Night Watch, Thud, and going postal. I realize not every book can be great, but I am expecting more out of a Moist book. I was thinking that maybe it was me at first. Like I just wasn;t into reading books. But I know that isn't the case for the whole thing. I know I go threw spurts of reading/not reading, but hey.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2009 07:56
|
|
|
Oh, the good old fools guild in 'Man at arms'. I really thought it was a bit overdone, but overdone in a good way, kinda of how you would expect them to be if they were really exorborant(sp?) and making fun of themselves while not making fun(sounds weird I know, but I don't know how to put it otherwise). Men at Arms was a good book too. I had the general jist of the ending done, but not in the way that it turned out, or who it was. I figured it was either a higher up in the fools, or assassins guild, not the head of the guild, the magic of the gun, or the sword in the wall/king thing.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2009 03:46
|
|
|
Vermain posted:I believe he means more in the sense that the Fool's Guild being unfunny wasn't itself very humorous. Totally agree.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2009 07:45
|
|