|
If it's deeper in your tree, yes.
|
#
¿
Jul 5, 2011 12:55
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 18:39 |
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:My best suggestion would be to have wifi allocate from a different IP block (it should probably by vlanned off from the rest of the network anyway) and set up the adapter priority so the wired connection takes priority. I believe that should happen automatically anyway because Windows gives priority to the connection with the higher link speed. Also lol if you're not setting your WLAN in some kind of jail.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 25, 2011 20:46
|
|
|
chemosh6969 posted:Is it possible to manage the system PATH variable of machines using a policy? With any PATH issue, be wary of append vs replace 
|
|
#
¿
Jul 29, 2011 09:27
|
|
|
Is there anything in particular differentiating those machines? Have you tried hooking a logger to a mirror port to see what's actually going on?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2011 18:48
|
|
|
FISHMANPET posted:Yeah, I did this, it didn't work, I went to lunch, talked to the head Windows guy that said it wasn't possible, came back from lunch, and the policy had applied itself. But yeah always leave time for new policies to replicate. Force replication and gpupdate if you're in a hurry.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 22, 2011 07:57
|
|
|
So deploy a shortcut to a list of AD printers and let users choose? E: look at bangers being all useful and thorough!
|
|
#
¿
Dec 2, 2011 23:52
|
|
|
FISHMANPET posted:Also can a drive mapping preference apply itself any time other than logon?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 19, 2011 13:09
|
|
|
gallop w/a boner posted:This doesn't answer your question; but under what circumstances do people map a home drive using a method like this, rather than by just filling in the home drive field for the user object in ADUC? I have always just used the home drive setting in there and found that it mapped happily without my specifying anything anywhere else. Moey posted:If you are interested let me know, I have a nice script that I found that will loop through subnets pinging and then pulling WMI info. Post it anyway!
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2012 10:32
|
|
|
And on, you know, the actual AD printer objects?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 20, 2012 23:44
|
|
|
Mierdaan posted:Somewhere in SHSC's history there was a guy who posted about his job, where everyone had laptops. If IT walked by your laptop and it was unlocked, they posted a note reminding you to lock it. There was no second note - IT would confiscate your laptop and you'd have to get it back from your manager after explaining why you couldn't follow simple instructions. Hell we would even pull that prank on coworkers at customer premises. No one forgot twice.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 26, 2012 22:36
|
|
|
sanchez posted:I had a coworker who would put both user and computer settings in the same policy and then link it in two different places.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 14, 2012 00:05
|
|
|
Syano posted:You're probably just going to have to just play with it until it works for you then. There never really has been a guideline saying 'x amount of GPOs is too much for y bandwidth' and thats really just due to the insane amount of variables in play.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 15, 2012 22:56
|
|
|
Swink posted:Remote policy refresh!
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2012 10:35
|
|
|
Pretty sure your script could check for pending reboots instead: http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/scriptcenter/Get-PendingReboot-Query-bdb79542
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2013 16:01
|
|
|
Erwin posted:It wouldn't be every server, only test environments, etc. What's the difference between me doing it manually during the evening, or them rebooting themselves after installing updates at 2am on a Sunday?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2013 16:08
|
|
|
You build GPO's with groups of settings that belong together, for whatever reason.Caged posted:I tend to have each GPO achieving a 'thing' - so if I want to set the power policy on my desktops then all the various settings are one GPO. This makes it easy to toggle on and off since you aren't going to change anything else when you do that, and it's a lot easier than having to remember that 5 GPOs together achieve one objective.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 30, 2014 22:48
|
|
|
Lord save you if you test in production for complex changes, but the way to test is to copy whatever you have and makes changes. When you want to implement, link the copy. Boom.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 30, 2014 23:01
|
|
|
hihifellow posted:If GPO processing time worries you, the event log will time GPO processing in milliseconds by subsection
|
|
#
¿
May 1, 2014 10:25
|
|
|
From what I remember what really kills GPO processing is group-based and WMI filtering. And I've always encountered the weird loving random setting here and there when diagnosing slow startup.
|
|
#
¿
May 1, 2014 22:28
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 18:39 |
|
|
Spudalicious posted:So we have a 2008 domain that's hosting exchange, a fileserver, and a few other servers. It is primarily email as of right now, but we're looking to start joining up our myriad environment to the domain to provide centralized services. Right now our domain is a domainname.local, which is no good. I've never really tried changing a domain name from .local to our actual .edu domain name and I was hoping someone had done a name switch like that and could offer some advice.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2014 12:24
|
|