|
Mithaldu posted:Take it as a sign to learn more comfortable ways. Alternatively alternatively Ctrl + W.
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2010 01:23
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 09:44 |
|
|
Lakitu7 posted:First 10.52 weekly On a similar note, speedier Mac snapshot. quote:Changelog
|
|
#
¿
Mar 25, 2010 21:53
|
|
|
sbaldrick posted:Windows 7 and Opera 10.51 The Element X/X+1 thing? I've seen that for a while now. Doesn't it have something to do with HTTP 1.1 Pipelining or whatever?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2010 22:35
|
|
|
sbaldrick posted:It is this. I've seen it for years and it's always driven me nuts. I have always thought it's something I do as it can often make Opera unusable. If I remember correctly, I believe I've seen people say it goes away (perhaps entirely) if you disable the pipelining. On 10.51, it looks like it's at Opera:Config -> Performance -> EnablePipelining.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2010 23:53
|
|
|
Blodskur posted:New snapshot. Newer snapshot (for Mac users). Apparently Mac Beta 2 is coming.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 9, 2010 21:53
|
|
|
GobyWan posted:whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat Or could it be Apple trying to get some positive PR?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2010 16:11
|
|
|
Blodskur posted:Opera Mini for the iPhone looks like it's doing quite well. Wow, a full sweep. Good for them.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2010 23:04
|
|
|
So it has to do with this protection code they added in?membranoid posted:Edit: Haha how ridiculous, hitting stop just when the flash starts to load actually works. Wow, that does work.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 15, 2010 01:59
|
|
|
10.52 Beta 2 for Macquote:Highlights quote:Known Issues
|
|
#
¿
Apr 15, 2010 23:40
|
|
|
And following up on that, there's a 10.5 RC for Mac.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 16, 2010 20:48
|
|
|
Plorkyeran posted:An explanation of why youtube was broken in Opera on Wednesday. That's an interesting story, even if I can't fully understand the code. I'm glad it's fixed now. I ended up going to the latest Windows snapshot anyways and I thought that fixed it but this must have instead.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2010 11:47
|
|
|
Don't get too settled yet. There's a 10.53 RC1 for Windows and Mac.Changelog posted:Version 10.53
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2010 22:32
|
|
|
ColdPie posted:Funny, 10.5 still isn't out for Linux. They seem to be syncing the releases to 10.6 now. Last I remember, they had a beta of the UNIX platform out so they must be done with ripping out dependence on QT or whatever it was they were doing with it. Sergeant Hobo fucked around with this message at 17:48 on May 31, 2010 |
|
#
¿
May 31, 2010 17:46
|
|
|
Mithaldu posted:My main point is: It is a waste of time. The problem of having a browser run as a cohesive whole, yet in separate processes is very, VERY non-trivial. Let me demonstrate just how non-trivial: Even Google Chrome does not spawn a process per tab. It only spawns a maximum of 10 or so processes, each of which handles multiple tabs. Yes, this means that if you go above that you may not have your entire browser crash, but instead random tabs will be taking down by one misbehaving tab. Even Google was not able to figure out a viable way handling inter-process-communication on a level that would enable full separation without raping RAM, CPU and bus bandwidth entirely. Honestly, if they wanted to, I'd be fine with them throwing the plug-ins into their own processes or whatever. I don't think we need full-on Chrome-level process-per-tab but I don't think it'd be too out of the way to sandbox the plug-ins a little.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 14, 2010 23:24
|
|
|
The Opera 10.6 beta is out. I just installed it and it's pretty awesome so far.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 16, 2010 11:46
|
|
|
I just hope they do this right: securely with as little crashing and other shenanigans as possible. This whole thing seems like a gambit to appeal to people who would use Opera but like Firefox's extensions too much to move (I've seen lots of people online say pretty much that). With any luck, it'll payoff with higher market share. On a side note, I'm hoping hardware acceleration comes into play with 11. Looks like the phones are getting it so here's hoping. Sergeant Hobo fucked around with this message at 00:33 on Oct 15, 2010 |
|
#
¿
Oct 15, 2010 00:29
|
|
|
I tend to open multiple windows with multiple tabs in each, particularly if I'm doing forum surfing. Perhaps tab grouping would be better overall, I don't know.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 25, 2010 22:38
|
|
|
One of these days, I'm going to experiment with using the Windows menu on the F4 sidebar instead of the tabs toolbar, just to see if I can get used to it.ColdPie posted:As someone who rarely has more than 10-15 tabs open at a time, and that's only during complicated programming sessions, I've always wondered the use case that leads to 150 tabs open at once. What are you doing where that's a more efficient way to browse than just using bookmarks or Google? I haven't reached 150 tabs, but the times that I use tabs the most is when I'm browsing forums. Say Window 1 is SA. I open a tab per forum and then from there, open a tab per thread I want to look at. When I'm all done opening the threads up, I close the tab for the forum and repeat. Most of the time, I end up reading the threads I open before I start with another forum. Window 2 could be the same thing but an entirely different site. I don't know if there is a more efficient way to do this but I tend not to like opening one thread, reading it and then backing up to the root, although the rewind button could make that easier.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 26, 2010 22:18
|
|
|
New Opera 11 snapshot. There's lots of changes, particularly to core, but there's also a fair number of known issues:quote:Extensions:
|
|
#
¿
Nov 3, 2010 00:44
|
|
|
Is there a way to set the middle-click option to open a tab in the current stack (or make a stack, if there isn't one)? I already set the option to have the tab open next to the active tab, which is partly what I want. This would basically make it almost effortless for me to browse forums because I seem to open new tabs for forums and then threads.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 23, 2010 23:58
|
|
|
Riso posted:By the way, if you don't like Opera 11 hiding the full URL, the setting is appropriately called "Hide URL Parameter". Ah, thanks. I've been interested in this. It hasn't bothered me yet but it's good to know where to go to disable it. Lakitu7 posted:More news about stacking: Yay. 
|
|
#
¿
Nov 26, 2010 15:58
|
|
|
Opera presents WebGL and Hardware AccelerationThe website posted:A long time ago, in an office far far away...Opera released a custom build showing an implementation of a 3D canvas context. Now, more than 3 years later, we are releasing the first public build with a standards-based 3D canvas implementation using WebGL for Windows. Also, according to that post, it seems that this tech won't be a part of 11.10. I guess that means we're trying out potential 11.50 tech.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 1, 2011 01:20
|
|
|
Heresiarch posted:That's a good thing as far as I'm concerned. v11.1 should be stability fixes for the relatively new v11 line, not new features. At this point, I can hope for 11.50 and not 12. I really want the hardware acceleration (for some reason). Though, considering the complexity involved, I'm almost willing myself to bet money that it'll be 12.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 2, 2011 00:32
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 09:44 |
|
|
Bonus posted:The previous version was quite sluggish for me but 11.5 is really really fast. Holy cripes!!! This is basically my first impression as well.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 28, 2011 22:50
|
|