|
What's really funny about nanowrimo is they never did any quality check, people submitted padded stories that repeated the same word for multiple pages just to very very very very very technically corss thd finish line. If they hadn't said anything about accessiblity and had just said "we only count words, we've always been about quantity, we aren't gonna start policing quality now", they would have been fine.
|
|
|
|
|
| # ? Nov 15, 2025 15:36 |
|
it just seems so insane, the whole point of wrimo was getting your bad art on the page, there was never any actual reward, so why on earth would you ever use AI
|
|
|
|
Shrecknet posted:it just seems so insane, the whole point of wrimo was getting your bad art on the page, there was never any actual reward, so why on earth would you ever use AI Because you want the fame and fortune that all artists have by birthright, but that was cruelly denied to you because of your inferior genetics
|
|
|






