|
It does kinda sound boring, but it's probably pretty much necesarry for most guys if they want to survive 4-5 house shows a week.
|
# ¿ Aug 7, 2009 19:02 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 25, 2024 23:20 |
|
Someone might want to start a topic for this, it seems to come here (and the last thread) every few months (I might be mis-remembering).
|
# ¿ Aug 20, 2009 14:58 |
|
Yellowjacket Hawky posted:You're a giant baby about threads. ...What? Whatever, figured it might make an ok thread.
|
# ¿ Aug 20, 2009 19:29 |
|
Captain Strange posted:Do you guys think the WWE might ever consider doing non-canonical, low-key shows to compete with Indy talent or to spread appeal overseas? It seems they're forever struggling to find places for some of their low and mid card talent. I can't imagine they couldn't turn a profit producing a more indy-style (ie more athletics, less talking), lower budget show under a different brand name. You know, so long as it wasn't HEY KIDS ITS THE NEW WWE INDY - just make their own little indy organisation and not ever talk about it on TV. Hell, just make FCW mobile.
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2009 00:35 |
|
Does anyone do an Inverted Chokeslam?
|
# ¿ Aug 29, 2009 16:10 |
|
jeffersonlives posted:And this is a bad thing how exactly? You should want the fans to have to buy the PPV to see the important stuff, if your primary goal is to sell PPVs. If you want to start giving important stuff away for free, you can't run monthly PPVs because there just isn't that much to go around. I think you're thinking too much like a bussiness man. Sometimes you're gonna have to sacrifice a few bucks here and there for the sake of making the show not suck. Taking this position will make you a retarded mark by default, but thems' the breaks.
|
# ¿ Sep 3, 2009 00:35 |
|
Veg posted:Did Lex Luger have metal elbows? No, that's Dusty Rhodes.
|
# ¿ Sep 3, 2009 09:51 |
|
Veg posted:Pretty sure I didn't watch WCW when Dusty was wrestling.. but the Bionic thing seems eerily familiar. Did they use the same term for Lugers elbows any time? I was just joking around, but I do remember the anouncers selling Luger having metal in his arms. I never thought there was any truth to it though.
|
# ¿ Sep 3, 2009 10:20 |
|
Koko B. Ware is in the Hall of Fame.
|
# ¿ Sep 7, 2009 12:06 |
|
Ktik posted:HBK/HHH said the Harris Twins were their protection in the locker room after the match. Neidhart was embarrassed on Raw I think two weeks later then left for WCW. Foley, Taker, and I think one other name (Maybe Vader?) all skipped the Raw the next night. Foley came back when he realized he needed money. If Taker stayed home (he might have, I don't remember all the details), it was probably to back up the guys like Foley who threatened to, sense there's no chance (...in...hell) they would fire him over it.
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2009 04:39 |
|
TL posted:Although while Orton was briefly REALLY over as a face, he quickly had his legs cut out from under him by dropping the belt to Triple H after a month. And I can't really blame them for putting the belt on HHH so quickly, since Randy SUCKED as a face. And HHH sucked at whatever role he took on.
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2009 08:39 |
|
Sting vs. HBK or The Undertaker: This is the Last Great American Wrestleing Dream Match. Discuss?
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2009 09:29 |
|
Skinty McEdger posted:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViNwvQAxeUc "Sid Vicious?! What do you do to a horse that's got a broken leg?"
|
# ¿ Sep 13, 2009 13:45 |
|
Wazzu posted:Fixed. Big stupid muscle is an intergral and extremely important part of wrestleing, and Batista shouln't feel ashamed. Also, it's usually just too drat easy to break up a submission attempt in a tag match.
|
# ¿ Sep 14, 2009 12:51 |
|
reality_groove posted:I think it was Hurricane, pulling things out of HHH's rear end or something? ...The attitude era was really overrated. There, I said it
|
# ¿ Sep 26, 2009 19:52 |
|
Psychlone posted:I remember watching the KISS Demon on WCW Saturday and didn't think he was that bad. He wasn't great, but he looked intimidating and could work a decent 5-10 minute match. I don't get the hate for the character, other than it was commercialized and hokey. But that's what KISS is. I think if they yould have just called him the "The Demon" and let the KISS connection speak for itself, the giant TM tatooed on his forehead wouldn't have bugged people as much.
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2009 22:14 |
|
Incendiary Pig posted:So what was the whole story behind Mr. America? Did everyone know that Hogan was Mr. America? Was Mr. America supposed to be like a total gimmick change for Hogan? I was pretty much meant as a joke after a point, they didn't really try to hide who it was.
|
# ¿ Oct 3, 2009 20:05 |
|
errbody posted:FCC on cable
|
# ¿ Oct 7, 2009 00:55 |
|
Honeymoon posted:I liked his WM24 spot better, totally because of Carlito staring at Shelton and thinking "aw gently caress, did we actually kill him?"
|
# ¿ Oct 13, 2009 13:35 |
|
FishBulb posted:The only reason anyone even remembers that song is because of Arrested Development. Magic_Ceiling_Fan posted:I think that The Undertaker can still draw. A lot of people are content just to see The Undertaker. I don't know, the thing with him is there's usually no way of knowing for sure if he'll even show up outside of PPVs.
|
# ¿ Oct 20, 2009 13:32 |
|
KungFu Grip posted:yoU GO MAIke ME BUIy ME SUM? Cracka-rear end translation: "You're going to make me buy myself some?"
|
# ¿ Oct 29, 2009 14:36 |
|
crankdatbatman posted:Also...I haven't seen it but I have heard rumors, how bad was the "rematch" at Halloween Havoc 98? It was bad. It was bad.
|
# ¿ Oct 30, 2009 00:36 |
|
Chilly McFreeze posted:Similarly GatDAMN, Finley's pretty stiff sometimes.
|
# ¿ Oct 30, 2009 23:20 |
|
Capsaicin posted:Speaking of Wikipedia, this is probably the worst wrestling related article I found: Hold on, before I can finish reading that, I have to walk over to the toilet, unzip my pants and revove my genitals from the confines of my boxer-breifs, then deposit an amount of urine into the toilet.
|
# ¿ Oct 31, 2009 16:58 |
|
LividLiquid posted:So in your eyes, having a match with somebody that isn't a complete squash is "putting someone over?" because Hogan didn't squash Kidman and still buried the guy. Who's HBK burying?
|
# ¿ Nov 1, 2009 14:58 |
|
Burrito posted:There was a ppv or RAW within the past year that had someone with a sign that was a giant cardboard cut out of John Cena's face, and it rose up from the crowd in an ominous manner. A gif was made of it and I need that gif and maybe even what show it was on. Does anyone know what the hell I'm talking about? Ok what the hell, sombody get off their rear end and pull this out of their gif folder. Jerusalem, Hulkamatt, come on.
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2009 08:45 |
|
I think editing the comentary will go a long way.
|
# ¿ Nov 14, 2009 08:52 |
|
Now when you say performers salary, are we talking HBK/Orton level, or Yoshi Tatsu '18k and a carton of smokes a year' level?
|
# ¿ Nov 23, 2009 18:56 |
|
Alan_Shore posted:I've heard a lot of negative things about Goldberg here, like how he doesnt care for the business, getting into fights with people backstage, taking himself too seriously. But on the Rise and Fall of WCW I was really surprised to see him come cross very well in his interview segments. So what's going on here? Stuff does come up here and there, but that's just because was really high profile. He's barely on the charts when in comes to dickhead wrestlers.
|
# ¿ Nov 28, 2009 12:23 |
|
Free Market Gravy posted:Which is why I didn't really side with Regal, either, although that was just as much Regal misunderstanding what it meant to give Goldberg a "good match." If he literally refused to learn how to sell, then he got what was coming to him.
|
# ¿ Nov 28, 2009 23:47 |
|
Minges posted:Honestly, knowing that it was all scripted but not following dirt back then, I remember the match and thinking "boy, Regal's loving great." Like it didn't look bad to me, just that Goldberg hit his first real challenge in the technical master Regal. Even though I thought Regal was just a creepy fat British guy with a lovely haircut. He just seemed so good at rasslin! Ditto. I was always confused as to why Regal never went anywhere after that (until I started posting here).
|
# ¿ Nov 29, 2009 14:15 |
|
Bearnt! posted:I was curious as to what the overall opinion here was about which Wrestlemania match is Shawn Michaels best. I've listed all of them below even the Rockers matches just for the hell of it but I think it's safe to say you can start the list at Wrestlemania X. drat, a 6-9 record?! Mr. Wrestlemania my rear end.
|
# ¿ Dec 4, 2009 18:44 |
|
Something that also makes it a lariat is if you do a gay little flip thing in the ropes beforehand, Nigel.
|
# ¿ Dec 4, 2009 23:56 |
|
Serious question: So Lashley was just in really good shape, Batista is a bodybuilder, and Lé Trip is a cripple. Is Cena anywhere near as strong as Mark Henry?
|
# ¿ Dec 5, 2009 09:33 |
|
Chilly McFreeze posted:Cena's pretty strong, for a guy 150 pounds less than Mark Henry. Oh with out a doubt. That's why I don't have any problem at all with the FU. The fucker overshoots Hogan's inflating Silverdome number with an overhead throw on at least a yearly basis.
|
# ¿ Dec 5, 2009 09:48 |
|
AsInHowe posted:Shawn Michaels is Mr. Wrestlemania because so many of those matches are rewatchable epic classics, while many Undertaker WM matches were Undertaker vs Big Jobber. Oh would you stop. Quit trying to manipulate the the numbers in HBK's favor. He has a Wrestlemania losing record 15 years wide.
|
# ¿ Dec 5, 2009 10:01 |
|
Dragging Iron Feet posted:Bit off-topic, but can you guys tell me the best way to set up tournament brackets? I'm trying to set up the Match of the Decade tournament and can't seem to do it right. I say just do a point system like they're doing for the WH2K yearly awards. Brackets will just end up knocking out serious contenders in the first round, and there's no good way to rank stuff when it's all over.
|
# ¿ Dec 10, 2009 08:09 |
|
Matlock posted:Green: Acid/Blind I thought red made you grow a second pair of arms or turn you into a midget or poo poo like that.
|
# ¿ Dec 11, 2009 07:47 |
|
AKA Driver posted:Scheduling-wise, how did the WWE think it was a good idea to put a PPV on Tuesday, not once, but twice, with Taboo Tuesday? Was there a specific reason that they did a mid-week PPV like this that was going to be difficult to work around fans schedules (DVRs were fairly rare in people's homes in 2004. Sure, you could tape it, but where's the fun in ordering a PPV just to watch it on tape later)? Just wanted to see if they could get away with it? Hell, I work sunday nights, it'd be nice to catch a PPV every now and then. During the week might be a nice place to stick a lower budget PPV or two just to mix things up.
|
# ¿ Dec 18, 2009 14:08 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 25, 2024 23:20 |
|
oldpainless posted:The consortium? I do not think that word means what you think it means. That's what it means now.
|
# ¿ Dec 24, 2009 08:21 |