|
I'm sure most of these will be e-mails from Conservatives. On the opposing side of the coin, I have a crazy Liberal cousin. She's deep into meditation, holistic treatment, organic foods, paleolithic diets, and whatever the pseudoscientific treatment "du jour" is. She constantly posts that new age poo poo on Facebook all the time. I'm almost certain she hasn't vaccinated her child, since I got into a huge argument with her once on Facebook when she suggested that it would have given her son autism. When I mentioned that I needed to get my tetanus booster shot, she proudly proclaimed that she hadn't had one in about 12 years. She's even suggested that the H1N1 outbreak was somehow related to the government. Just showing that there are familiar crazies on both sides of the aisle. I don't know which is worse.
|
# ¿ Aug 14, 2009 18:03 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 07:41 |
|
Sgt. McKill posted:I got this e-mail from my dad the other day, I think it's a popular one. To that I would say, "Explain to me one policy of the Obama administration that is even close to something like this."
|
# ¿ Aug 14, 2009 18:48 |
|
When something says "NOT A JOKE!" and "HAS BEEN CHECKED BY SNOPES!!" over and over, you can bet that both statements are false.
|
# ¿ Aug 14, 2009 22:42 |
|
thegreatcodfish posted:National rights of the child That sounds like the greatest thing... why hasn't this been ratified yet?
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2009 14:25 |
|
Toad on a Hat posted:Haha "Janet Nappy"? Napolitano Headed Hoes
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2009 18:57 |
|
I don't think I'd ever speak to my parents if they were diehard conservatives.
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2009 16:43 |
|
I never really encounter people who go the other way. Are there Christian Conservative children who have Atheist Liberal parents?
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2009 21:50 |
|
Ask him why European countries that offer "free healthcare, free housing, free clothing" have less unemployment than us.
|
# ¿ Aug 26, 2009 17:13 |
|
Yes, you need to correct format this for e-mail:quote:>>>>THIS JUST IN, BREAKING NEWS: NEW FEDERAL PRISON CAMP CONSTRUCTED FOR POLITICAL PRISONERS
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2009 15:54 |
|
EDIT: Nm
|
# ¿ Aug 28, 2009 21:33 |
|
Pungent Mammy posted:This is an original from my dad after I responded to a forward he sent me with one sentence that suggested that Fox News might have a slight bias much like the "state run media" he was villifying. Your father is insane.
|
# ¿ Aug 30, 2009 03:09 |
|
I don't believe I saw this yet. A friend of mine forwarded this to me (his crazy family sent it to him):quote:How's this for apocalyptic literature. This was written by a pastor's wife in biblical prose as a commentary of current events. It is brilliant.
|
# ¿ Sep 1, 2009 18:51 |
|
That will still fool people. They'll see "CORRECT ATTRIBUTED" and assume that means all the facts are correct.
|
# ¿ Sep 2, 2009 14:38 |
|
quote:'If you aren't happy here then LEAVE. We didn't force you to come This is what I say to tea party protesters.
|
# ¿ Sep 2, 2009 19:33 |
|
quote:3. Kennedy was assigned to Paris, never advanced beyond the rank of What the hell does his education have to do with his rank? and this is a great one: quote:8. Kennedy has held his Senate seat for more than forty years, but considering his longevity, his accomplishments seem scant. <List follows of groundbreaking achievements in civil rights>
|
# ¿ Sep 3, 2009 00:36 |
|
5. This is a bad thing? 6. This is a bad thing? 7. This is a bad thing?
|
# ¿ Sep 8, 2009 13:31 |
|
I seriously can't understand how people who HAAAAAAAAAATE taxes expect the government to pay for anything. They're like little kids; do they think money grows on trees?
|
# ¿ Sep 11, 2009 16:07 |
|
All of that is great and I wish they would enact those changes. EDIT: LOL? And the link at the end goes to the ACLU. Aren't they the sworn enemy of conservatives?
|
# ¿ Sep 15, 2009 16:18 |
|
I don't think that Orrin Hatch has read the Sixteenth Amendment. EDIT: Or Article I, Section 8, I don't know which one fits better. the fucked around with this message at 18:41 on Nov 3, 2009 |
# ¿ Nov 3, 2009 18:38 |
|
When conservatives complain about taxes, I always ask them how the gently caress they expect the government to pay for anything. "Why yes, I'd love a 1st world civilization, but DON'T MAKE ME PAY FOR IT! "
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2009 19:00 |
|
LorneReams posted:HAHAHAHA, what the gently caress? When has Orrin Hatch EVER given a flying gently caress about personal liberties and rights? Maybe when he argued that people should have their computers destroyed for downloading music: Wikipedia posted:Hatch caused an overnight controversy on June 17, 2003 by proposing that copyright owners should be able to destroy the computer equipment and information of those suspected of copyright infringement, including file sharing. In the face of criticism, especially from technology and privacy advocates, Hatch withdrew his suggestion days later, after it was discovered that Sen. Hatch's official website was using an unlicensed JavaScript menu from United Kingdom based software developer Milonic Solutions. Milonic founder Andy Woolley stated that "We've had no contact with them. They are in breach of our licensing terms." Shortly after the publication of that story in Wired magazine, the company who runs Hatch's website contacted Milonic to start registration.
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2009 20:32 |
|
My girlfriend's father today said that the way to solve the "immigration problem" is to refuse treatment to any illegals at an emergency room. This would also reduce our healthcare costs. I didn't call him misanthropic until after he'd left the room.
|
# ¿ Nov 26, 2009 04:42 |
|
I didn't know people could drown in snow.
|
# ¿ Jan 6, 2010 19:28 |
|
My parents forwarded that Blizzard/Katrina e-mail today. I immediately replied to all (including all the people he forwarded to) with "Don't forward this racist crap anymore." My mother replied with "I don't see how it's racist! The people banded together to solve a problem."
|
# ¿ Jan 15, 2010 03:43 |
|
I have of course heard of the slavery thing, it's possible that it's true... but there's zero proof of it one way or the other.
|
# ¿ Jan 26, 2010 16:15 |
|
They're going to punch you in the face at the next family reunion.
|
# ¿ Jan 28, 2010 22:33 |
|
How do you pronounced "Obamite?" Is it OH-buh-MITE or oh-BAH-mite?
|
# ¿ Feb 4, 2010 15:48 |
|
Why would anyone want to be a Senator with those kinds of restrictions? Plus, most of those aren't applied to CEOs of businesses, much less civil servants.
|
# ¿ Feb 5, 2010 21:55 |
|
This conversation is currently "ongoing" on facebook: Gus - Why give miranda rights to terrorists and treat them like a civilian? GG. ------- Julio likes this Julio - Agreed bro, I imagine its easy to make out "you have the right to remain silent" under heavy machine gun fire, morters and rpg's. Me - Why even have a trial at all? Just put them up against a wall and pull the trigger. Who needs due process? Gus - I don't know. No one has balls anymore Me - Guilty until proven innocent for the win! Jamie - Terrorists are not soldiers, nor are they covered by the Geneva Conventions. Why they should be afforded rights under the very same Constitution which they seek to destroy is beyond me. We would not allow a soldier from another country to be tried in our civilian courts, and we definitely do not owe terrorists the privilege either. Me - Richard Ried, Timothy McVeigh, Ted Kaczynski, Eric Rudolph Gus - And its stupid we can't use the only method of "torture" the U.S. has which is not even torture. We've only done it 3 times and it works well. Sigh. If only it were the 1940s. Nagasaki/Hiroshima methods? Lol Me - You mean the same methods of torture that we tried and hung Japanese soldiers for using on American prisoners of war? Gus - YES! Lol jk. Just the water board thing, forgot what its called. They just lay you upside down and pour water on your face, actually highly effective. But apprently its immoral and not nice. Jamie - The 4 you named are US citizens who have Constitutional protection by virtue of having been born in the US. Military detention and trial is not torture. It is a matter of national security. Me - @Gus: No, it isn't. @Jamie: But they're terrorists, right? And terrorists, by your own admission, seek to destroy our constitution. They're enemy combatants. We should not afford them due process. Jamie - The "guilty until proven innocent" remark is moot; many of these monsters admit readily that they perpetrated the acts that are ascribed to them. Once an admission has been made there should be no need for a trial. Terrorists who are US citizens are US citizens regardless of their intent. The terrorists to whom Gus is referring are by no means US citizens, nor have they ever been. Therefore they do not deserve protection as such. Me - So, let me get this line of logic straight... Misguided teenager who failed to light his underwear on fire: torture him and throw him in a military tribunal. Oklahoma City bomber: He's an okay guy who should get a normal trial. What about Nidal Hassan... let me guess.... military tribunal? But wait... he's a U.S. Citizen.. what will you do? Gus - Eh, not from what I've read, but alright. Me - Gus, the problem with waterboarding is that it's torture. This means that it puts you under so much mental and physical stress that you'd literally admit to anything. If I wanted to, I could waterboard you and only stop once you admit that you like getting pegged in the rear end by dudes. And I'd waterboard you, and I'm 100% sure that you'd crack and "admit" to it. Does this mean you were telling the truth? Of course not. It means that you were just saying whatever you could to make the pain stop. This is why it doesn't work and will never work. the fucked around with this message at 21:14 on Feb 8, 2010 |
# ¿ Feb 8, 2010 20:59 |
|
Gifts for Audiophiles posted:I saw this on Fox & Friends this morning, and after talking about it they put up an altered image that swapped the picture of Bush with a picture of the Constitution. Man, that's hilarious!
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2010 19:15 |
|
Miss Fats posted:Edit: By the way, Dr. Jim Murk is this guy: http://www.murkfamilyministries.org/ http://www.murkfamilyministries.org/articles.html Jesus Christ...
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2010 19:06 |
|
Yes because the industrial revolution and global events have nothing to do with the national debt.
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2010 22:07 |
|
Whenever people complain about taxes, I always ask them how they would pay for every public resource in a 1st world country (schools, running water, libraries, roads) without taxing the income of the citizens. I can never get a good answer.
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2010 22:26 |
|
quote:That’s great NFL & CBS. I remember the good old days when I was a child and could watch an NFL football game with my family - without being violated. Yes, back in the good old days where I wasn't RAPED in the rear end LITERALLY while sitting down to watch a football game.
|
# ¿ Mar 24, 2010 17:12 |
|
I stopped the video once I read the description of "When 94 percent of Catholic senators vote to kill children..."
|
# ¿ Mar 26, 2010 16:38 |
|
Without Hitler we wouldn't have a unified German state. Therefore, Hitler is good.
|
# ¿ Mar 31, 2010 17:03 |
|
I think you can technically do that if you're a homeless drifter.
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2010 15:18 |
|
Funny how everyone on Fox News this morning was defending the NDoP after it was ruled unconstitional.... after they were arguing the health care bill shouldn't be allowed because it's unconstitutional. Also, they said on the show that it was a tradition in our country, something about the founding fathers (except it was passed in 1952), but failed to mention other traditions our founding fathers had that we don't honor anymore (see: Slavery).
|
# ¿ Apr 16, 2010 15:57 |
|
brewz posted:I'm guessing with the sources quoted this would qualify for the thread. (Came from my uncle also) Is it bad that I support everything in that bill that was listed in the e-mail?
|
# ¿ Apr 20, 2010 04:00 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 07:41 |
|
notcreativeenough posted:ER isn't free. Neither is freedom .
|
# ¿ Apr 21, 2010 19:54 |