|
Pentax in space, bitches! http://www.flickr.com/photos/arena5/sets/72157606119049987/
|
#
¿
Aug 19, 2009 06:53
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 24, 2024 08:38 |
|
|
TsarAleksi posted:They sent up the one they would miss the least if something went wrong. Your space-envy is palpable 
|
|
#
¿
Aug 19, 2009 07:30
|
|
|
I hate when I'm downtown Toronto and I forget there's a Jays game or something going on. Pretty much everyone's wearing the same thing and they all look boring then 
|
|
#
¿
Aug 20, 2009 23:02
|
|
|
Adobe's adobe abode. ADOOBE DOOBEE DOO
|
|
#
¿
Sep 7, 2009 22:09
|
|
|
gently caress my life. I was shooting some test shots with my K10 a few days ago and set it to 6MP JPEG and forgot to change it back to DNG RAW. Today I shot freshman day for fun because they're always doing stupid poo poo and I didn't realize that I was shooting JPEG. They came out OK for the most part, but all my beautiful high ISO noise looks like retarded JPEG compression now  CHECK YOUR SETTINGS BOYS AND GIRLS. CHECK AND DOUBLECHECK AND CHECK AGAIN
|
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2009 23:01
|
|
|
Are you relieved? AND patient?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 9, 2009 00:19
|
|
|
As far as cameras in space go, all I can imagine is the mirror slapping open and sending a camera twirling in zero-g. I'm sure that violates some law of thermodynamics but I can't help but laugh.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 9, 2009 22:03
|
|
|
Augmented Dickey posted:goddamnit why is it that every day I feel like going out and shooting it decides intermittently rain I can't wait until this winter when every day I feel like going out and taking some shots in the snow, and I have to come to grips with the fact that I just don't want to stand around in sub-zero temperatures trying to adjust my camera with mittens on or fumbling around with the controls with finders that have lost all feeling. Winter, I love you baby but why you gotta make me hate you?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 11, 2009 15:29
|
|
|
Also, California is full of interesting people and things. Edit: From reports I've heard, I mean.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 11, 2009 21:03
|
|
|
"My camera's been to space" is the new "buttery bokeys" Edit: I love cameras in space so I see nothing wrong with that, btw. Edit2: Oh poo poo, I completely missed the part that this WHOLE EXPERIMENT was done for under $150. That's loving awesome, doggs. some kinda jackal fucked around with this message at 18:51 on Sep 17, 2009 |
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2009 18:48
|
|
|
Something about camera sensors? Sounds like it'll soon be time to revert back to film 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 21, 2009 16:50
|
|
|
AIIAZNSK8ER posted:Sounds like some rich guy just wanted to scream, "Lasers... LAZERS! muahahhaha". they really should've designed something like the Image Fulgurator http://www.juliusvonbismarck.com/fulgurator/idee.html to ruin paparazzi shots. This is a pretty cool concept, but then I watched the video where they test it out at Checkpoint Charlie and I realized I'd be pretty pissed off if I was a tourist there for a day and someone fagged up my photos with some kind of message bullshit. I mean, that's assuming they didn't tell all the people that they saw shooting what they did. Like that one couple they talked to seemed pretty surprised so I'm willing to bet there were more <  >Just my two cents.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 21, 2009 17:17
|
|
|
Did some reading about the digital back used in that "digital holga" someone posted in one of the other threads. It was pretty awesome, with one thing that stood out in particular: It gives you an audible beep to tell you whether your histogram is overexposed, underexposed, or generally on the money. It'll give you a high or low pitch beep if it thinks you need to correct exposure. I think that was an awesome idea, and I'm a little disappointed that nobody (that I know) has implemented it yet. Seems like it would be much easier to just listen without taking your eye from the VF instead of chimping the histogram after every other shot or something. If you have EV compensation at your fingertips, you could theoretically fix the problem without even moving your eye.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 24, 2009 00:50
|
|
|
Sadi posted:How is this different than the EV meter at the bottom of a view finder? Because it makes noise, obviously 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 24, 2009 02:05
|
|
|
I wonder if she knows how to use it, or if she's just shooting in Auto 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2009 02:16
|
|
|
Twenties Superstar posted:Haha what? some kinda jackal fucked around with this message at 18:07 on Sep 27, 2009 |
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2009 07:41
|
|
|
my focus screen cutting let me show you it 
|
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2009 03:58
|
|
|
While we're on the subject of magazines, Google just published copies of LIFE magazine from the 1930s through 1970 (I think) in their entirety, ads intact. Here's a Photography issue from 1966. Bonus points for old ads
|
|
#
¿
Oct 6, 2009 18:41
|
|
|
Four Banger posted:or this guy. Are you kidding me, if I could get 1111 suckers to pay me five bucks apiece for a headshot I wouldn't even need to think twice.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2009 21:10
|
|
|
psylent posted:It's a shame the Nazis didn't have kodachrome: Tremendous faggots aside, some of these photos would have been marvellous in kodachrome. How disappointing. Look at the photo technology the Allies could have shared, Hilter, if you weren't such a douche. Just look < >
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2009 17:19
|
|
|
Private Label posted:So when someone comes to me with that question, I try and focus on the positives. v "Well, at least you have your health" 
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2009 20:59
|
|
v
|
Knux posted:This is what was created. You guys should also get a kick out of the subject matter of the actual sleeve. No loving way, that is too awesome.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 20, 2009 14:40
|
|
|
I laughed at that article a little harder than I should have.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 22, 2009 00:22
|
|
|
Hey, you just ragged on my entire workflow <>
|
|
#
¿
Oct 29, 2009 20:26
|
|
|
Holy mother of gently caress. That lens curves space and takes photos of things five minutes into the future.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 6, 2009 07:14
|
|
|
brad industry posted:They did those hosed up/awesome Hello Kitty Lada Gaga photos that have been floating around Oh jesus loving christ I can't appreciate this on any level
|
|
#
¿
Nov 13, 2009 21:18
|
|
|
psylent posted:People can't tell the difference between a photo taken with the Hasselblad and a Canon P&S I'm not sure I can really tell the difference either. The subject matter doesn't really help though.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 16, 2009 01:32
|
|
|
On first inspection it kind of looked cool, but the closer I look the more gaudy it is. Neat idea though.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 23, 2009 23:51
|
|
|
Pentax diss 
|
|
#
¿
Nov 24, 2009 04:39
|
|
|
Just saw this on NPR. I, also, would love to turn a truck into a camera obscura. Edit: http://cameratruck.net Edit2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nC3Tu9JxI3g some kinda jackal fucked around with this message at 01:15 on Nov 25, 2009 |
|
#
¿
Nov 25, 2009 01:08
|
|
|
Whoah, I've been totally neglecting my creative chattin'
|
|
#
¿
Nov 25, 2009 02:56
|
|
|
Augmented Dickey posted:proper dog placement is a fundamental component of photography. Take your thinly veiled pet photos back to the Snapshot thread, you soccer moms < >
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2010 20:01
|
|
|
UserNotFound posted:This is so well done, it never fails to crack me up: This is amazing, thanks for sharing!
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2010 14:56
|
|
|
Want to upgrade to an AF Mamiya 645, but I'm trying to tell myself I should hold out for an AFD-2 or AFD-3 body so I can use a proper digital back on it. Then I realize I'll never in a million years be able to justify a digital back and I get all depressed On the upside, 645AF and AFD bodies are getting cheaper every day, so hey -- at least I can shoot 120 at 3200 with AF 
|
|
#
¿
Jan 21, 2010 08:08
|
|
|
I don't really have a problem with that particular photo. It helps focus the eye on Obama in an otherwise cluttered room. Not that it would be a Where's Waldo photo otherwise, but I don't really mind the TS in this case. Though the angle it was shot at does make the TS look a little off. Maybe if they put the photographers dead centre, it would look a little better.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 1, 2010 19:11
|
|
|
Someone want to ID the Nikon body and lens they keep in the net at NHL games? Was watching hockey and this brought out the camera nerd in me Now I wish I was watching the HD feed instead
|
|
#
¿
Feb 7, 2010 19:36
|
|
|
I'm trying to ID the little silver button on the left side of the body in the photo, above the sync port. That's what was throwing me off since I don't see that on any of the bodies 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 7, 2010 19:50
|
|
|
You know honestly what made me switch from Aperture to Lightroom? The fact that Aperture kept its' photos in that giant fuckall vault file that I couldn't just go into like a normal folder. That aggrivated me to no end for backup purposes. Plus I couldn't just go into a single folder in Finder and copy a photo, I had to export it from Lightroom bla bla bla. I guess it all made sense, it just seemed really clunky to me.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2010 07:40
|
|
|
Haggins posted:There is an option to make it so Aperture doesn't manage your files. Really? ... oh now I'm considering giving it a second look  DaNzA posted:Serving breakfast on your camera This would have been a little funnier if I hadn't just read an article on people starving in africa
some kinda jackal fucked around with this message at 20:28 on Feb 10, 2010 |
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2010 20:24
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 24, 2024 08:38 |
|
|
spf3million posted:New aerial photos of 9/11 released. Some of these are just unbelievable. I can't even imagine what was going through the photographer's mind. I'd be the guy who forgot to check his camera and took all the photos handheld from a helicopter at 1/20...
|
|
#
¿
Feb 11, 2010 07:26
|
|