|
Lord Krangdar posted:I thought the killer was always meant to be Leland, but then the BOB stuff came about when Lynch was asked to add a closed ending for the international version of the pilot and he liked the look of one of the grips on the set (who became BOB). I could be wrong, though. Frank Silva was a set decorator, and was moving furniture in Laura's room at the location in Washington while the pilot was being filmed. Someone was warning him to not move the furniture in a way that would block him from exiting, something along the lines of, "Frank, don't lock yourself in there!" David Lynch overheard this and imagined him locked in Laura's room, and he saw a picture in his mind of Silva at the foot of Laura's bed. Lynch ran over and asked him if he happened to be a union actor. Silva said yes, and so they very quickly filmed a shot panning across Laura's room with Silva at the bed, without any idea how it could be used. (This is the shot that is in the international, "closed" version of the pilot, not the shot that was used in the series. That was shot on a set.) Then, later, when they were shooting Sarah having the vision of Jacoby's hand picking up the necklace and screaming, Lynch said "Perfect!" But Ron Garcia, the DP, said, no, they had to do it again because you could see Frank Silva in the mirror. Lynch loved that even more, and that's when he started thinking about BOB and used him for the "closed" ending, and later, the series. Lynch and Frost both say they know who the killer was while they were writing the pilot, but I've heard others dispute this, and say it's the same false "master plan" retconning like Lucas claiming he had everything mapped out for all the Star Wars films from the beginning. They definitely knew/decided before they started mapping out the second season.
|
#
?
May 14, 2017 06:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 23:06 |
|
|
Lord Krangdar posted:Anybody know is there any particular reason or story behind there being both a BOB and a Bobby, and two Mikes? A little while ago, I was talking to someone about how you rarely, outside of like Arrested Development and Newhart, get multiple characters with the same name. I appreciate that it's happened here, pretty much twice. 
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2017 09:58
|
|
|
I mean usually if you have multiple characters in a piece of fiction with the same name, it's part of a gag or a plot point; it's hardly ever just done without calling attention to it one way or another. It's one of those things that would make something too realistic to make sense as fiction.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2017 13:27
|
|
|
Data Graham posted:I mean usually if you have multiple characters in a piece of fiction with the same name, it's part of a gag or a plot point; it's hardly ever just done without calling attention to it one way or another. It's one of those things that would make something too realistic to make sense as fiction. They do draw attention to it if I remember correctly. It just turns out to be a false lead. So the coincidence is intentionally a coincidence.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2017 13:35
|
|
|
The first thing Harry asks when Cooper mentions them while recounting the dream is "Mike and Bobby??" and Coop just handwaves it away with "No, different Mike and different Bob" and then it's never mentioned again so... Yeah I really don't know.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2017 13:38
|
|
|
Lynch also loved duality so sure its just that.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2017 06:17
|
|
|
Rewatching FWWM. This movie would be a lot better if Sheryl Lee could act at all well.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2017 13:41
|
|
|
If any of you have a showing of "David Lynch: The Art Life" going on near you (probably mostly at college and art cinemas), I'd highly recommend it. It is a combination of a Lynch biography, Lynch's art, and how he got started in film. It is probably the closest we'll ever get to Lynch saying what his work is about.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2017 14:35
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/MinovskyArticle/status/776473650128117762
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2017 15:27
|
|
|
^^^^always loved this. I think there's a video of it somewhere watching Missing Pieces stuff right now and a lot of this is better than stuff in the actual movie. I can't believe some of these scenes didn't make it in Escobarbarian fucked around with this message at 15:31 on May 15, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 15, 2017 15:29
|
|
|
Yah like the guy above me said, this is basically a transcription of this video, which is seriously one of the best-of-all-time videos about soundtracking: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgXLEM8MhJo edit: replaced the video link with a much higher quality one Polo-Rican fucked around with this message at 16:08 on May 15, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 15, 2017 16:05
|
|
|
This is on the Blu-Ray special features too.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2017 16:30
|
|
|
Escobarbarian posted:Rewatching FWWM. This movie would be a lot better if Sheryl Lee could act at all well. is this a joke?
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2017 19:49
|
|
|
Any chance Naomi Watts is reprising her role from Mulholland Drive in the new Twin Peaks? That would be interesting.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2017 20:00
|
|
|
Sheryl Lee is like half the reason FWWM works at all.Slammy posted:Any chance Naomi Watts is reprising her role from Mulholland Drive in the new Twin Peaks? That would be interesting.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2017 20:03
|
|
|
Raxivace posted:Doesn't seem like the kind of move Lynch would pull but I guess nothing is impossible now we're getting a new Twin Peaks season in a week I mean holy poo poo we're getting new Twin Peaks in a week. I'm still salty that here in the UK it's only on Sky, which is expensive subscription only. I guess I'm waiting for the Blurays next year...
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2017 20:41
|
|
|
CottonWolf posted:I'm still salty that here in the UK it's only on Sky, which is expensive subscription only. I guess I'm waiting for the Blurays next year... Pulling out of lurking to say it'll be available on NowTV, which is like 5 or 6 quid a month, no contract. How I'm watching it!
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2017 20:54
|
|
|
Raxivace posted:Sheryl Lee is like half the reason FWWM works at all. Yeah she's great in it. I can't understand watching that movie and coming away thinking otherwise.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2017 21:05
|
|
|
The scene where she hides and watches Leland coming out of the house and then realizes exactly what's been going on is incredibly well done and raw
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2017 21:09
|
|
|
thetimebefore posted:Pulling out of lurking to say it'll be available on NowTV, which is like 5 or 6 quid a month, no contract. How I'm watching it! I will absolutely pay that for TP. Thanks!
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2017 21:58
|
|
|
i think there are a couple points in FWWM where you could say that sheryl lee is overacting a bit but in typical goon hyperbole that translates to "can't act well at all"
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 00:11
|
|
|
The only time I think Sheryl Lee's Laura is a bit "eh" is in that flashback in early Season 1, and even in that scene it can be at least justified as soap opera parody. It also contrasts well with her FWWM performance. "Raw" is a good word for what she's doing in the movie.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 00:18
|
|
|
cis autodrag posted:is this a joke? No, he's really that stupid.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 04:54
|
|
|
The latest in what I can only assume is a very long line of Badalamenti remixes. https://soundcloud.com/flyinglotus/twin-peaks
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 07:31
|
|
|
New stills!   
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 19:36
|
|
|
This thread has been around since 2009 lol
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 19:43
|
|
|
OldSenileGuy posted:This thread has been around since 2009 lol I'll see you again in 25 pages. *finger snap*
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 19:44
|
|
|
That shitposting you like is going to come back into style.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 19:46
|
|
|
OldSenileGuy posted:This thread has been around since 2009 lol TAKE ANOTHER LOOK SONNY, ITS GONNA HAPPEN AGAIN
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 19:49
|
|
|
Raxivace posted:That shitposting you like is going to come back into style. Much like the Black Lodge, shitposting is atemporal.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 20:21
|
|
|
Can't wait to see the next Twin Peaks season in another 25 years where everyone is dead.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 20:32
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 20:32
|
|
|
Captain_Person posted:New stills! That's a really high total for booze.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 20:42
|
|
|
notthegoatseguy posted:That's a really high total for booze.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 20:46
|
|
|
notthegoatseguy posted:That's a really high total for booze. She's at a supermarket, so she might also be buying other things in addition to booze.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 22:59
|
|
|
Two Worlds posted:She's at a supermarket, so she might also be buying other things in addition to booze. Perhaps a marble rye 
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2017 23:43
|
|
|
Two Worlds posted:She's at a supermarket, so she might also be buying other things in addition to booze. I wonder where some of the funny cameos on the cast list will be, like Michael Cera. Maybe he's at the cash register in that very scene! I am so jazzed for this, crazy to think it's on this Sunday!! That teaser had some pretty neo-noir feeling stuff, and looked terrific, I can't wait. Also great that it's 18 episodes, pretty long for a Showtime kind of show. Heavy Metal fucked around with this message at 00:49 on May 17, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 00:47
|
|
|
Heavy Metal posted:I wonder where some of the funny cameos on the cast list will be, like Michael Cera. Maybe he's at the cash register in that very scene! I can't decide if I'd rather see him play Andy and Lucy's kid, or a role in the latest season of Invitation to Love.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 01:27
|
|
|
Wizard Master posted:Perhaps a marble rye I literally just rewatched the series last week. How did I not make that connection?!
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 02:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 23:06 |
|
|
Captain_Person posted:New stills! All of these are extremely my jam. Especially Ben Horne. Can we get some vintage Ben and Jer moments please?
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2017 02:27
|
|
