Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

Lum posted:

The choice of lighting they used for the water bottle in that advert made this all the worse.



this owns

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

Kirk posted:

applying makeup is totally modifying something intended for sale or exchange

farding




farrrrrdz~

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

jegHegy posted:

lol no loving way



:negative:

its official: burn everything to the ground

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

Sniep posted:



i'm spergin so harddd

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

tonelok posted:

I'm just thankful that many of these people seem to congregate around wikipedia and not various internet forums.

:rolleye:

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

Yodzilla posted:

anime

:drat:

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

JawnV6 posted:

what's the thing where you compare word counts of articles

wikigroaning

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

RZApublican posted:

ahaha wikipedia e/n

i just jumped off a bridge because i lost the will to live


Tis sucks.

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

Seamonster posted:

rainbow flags in grayscale

thats not how colorblindness works you loving idiot

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

Footboy posted:

I don't get it. :X

out

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

Shaggar posted:

whats wrong with you're fonts?

looks like an limux

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

Sniep posted:



Used Effectively

nice bowling shoes fruitbasket

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

haveblue posted:



why is there anime in a train simulator


nevermind

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts
THIS IMAGE WAS COPIED BY A BOT !!!

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts
efb

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

madprocess posted:

the worst thing is when there's links in the article that seem to go to another page but in fact redirect to the top of the page you're reading because some tard merged the articles and didn't remove the link

cool

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

poemdexter posted:

The only part of XFL I remember was the guy with the jersey that said HEHATEME.

rod smart owns

quote:

Smart explained the origin of the grammatically non-standard phrase in a January 30, 2004 article with the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel as, "Basically, my brother's my opponent. After I win, he's gonna hate me. It is what it is. It's a saying I was saying when I'd feel something wasn't going my way. For example, (when) I was on the squad in Vegas and coach was putting other guys in, (if) I felt I'm better than them, you know, hey, 'he hate me.' See what I'm saying? Give me a chance. That's all I ask. It came from the heart. Within. The way I felt. My buddy Greg Kates always used to use it, so I took it from him."

When Smart and the Outlaws played divisional rival Los Angeles Xtreme, two Xtreme players put "I Hate He" and "I Hate He Too" on the back of their jerseys to express their disdain for Smart. In a later game between those two teams, those two players changed their nicknames to "Still Hate He" and "Still Hate He Too". The curious maxim also caught the eye of American audiences (as well as Smart's future Carolina Panthers teammate Jake Delhomme, who named one of his thoroughbreds, "She Hate Me").

loooolllll

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

Rufo posted:

*barman rings bell for silence*

*elderly man stands up in corner, clutching pint glass*

i gaveeeeeeeee my loveeeeee a cherryyyyyyyyyyyy

that hadddddddd noooooooo stoneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee


downnnnnnnnn whereeeeeeeeee the drunnnnnkardssssssssssss rollllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll


dooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwnnnnnnnnnnn wheeeeeereeeeeeeeeeeeee theeeeeeeeeee drrrrrrrrrunnnnnnnnkaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaardssssssssssss

rolllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

*other patrons get teary and stare into the middle distance*

are you susan boyle irl

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts
miyazaki films are loving trash

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts
bunch of yosposters with bad taste in music also have bad taste in film? shocking

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

CoupleBeersNoBeers posted:

samurai whatever had cool music i'd rather just buy the soundtrack

'had cool music' ??? have some more respect for our fallen brother nujabes

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

Yodzilla posted:

it's seriously some of the worst most embarrassing poo poo i've ever seen

as a white person watching this show,

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

Nikolai Fuckharin posted:

post 39/watch this video

what

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

Footboy posted:

The great thing is the

out

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts
i finally found it after months of searching.

http://tinyurl.com/4pl22se

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts
and the answer is none. none more negative

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts
no pocky apologists in yospos

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

ahmeni posted:

dunkaroos and lunchables were the golden tickets of the school yard black market when i was a kid

that poo poo could get you anything

truth itp

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts
romanians know how to party

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

Nikolai Fuckharin posted:

Breakfast at tiffany's is a cinematic masterpiece

dont date girls irl who identify with miss golightly

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

Sweevo posted:

repressed anime women?

:q:

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

Latro posted:

He's Tedius alright.

I find your beliefs about women interesting

From your (z2.invisionfree.com/TZ_VG_Coalition/index.php?showtopic=835) messageboard post, I find your beliefs interesting, certainly, although I wouldn't be quick to agree with all of them. You can be criticised for claiming that what you say is 'fact', whilst at the same time accusing feminists of dogmatism - they could quite easily say that it's you who's being dogmatic.

That having been said, I as a heterosexual male appreciate femininity in women, but do not feel that I should have the right to force that on other people. I find the concept of masculism interesting, and if I looked into it more closely I may well end up believing that I do agree with it. I like your idea that long hair is more attractive than short hair, and that brunettes (especially brown eyed brunettes) are more attractive than blondes - that much I would agree with as a matter of my own personal preference, but who would I be to enforce that preference on women or anyone else? As for the idea that women should wear skirts, and have bare legs, that is even more controversial in libertarian terms, and I'm not sure I would agree with a society in which women were forced to wear skirts and have bare legs. Yes, I think femininity and submissiveness as character traits in women are sexually appealing - but that's just me. I'd like to have someone tell me that my libertarian views are in fact harmful, because maybe I'm starting to believe it.
I see that some of your userboxes were removed for their divisive content. That's Wikipedia for you - WP:SOAP is part of a policy. Still, I think that we should adopt a more relaxed approach to Wikipedia userspace and nomination for deletion.

As I said, your views are interesting and I'm not criticising you directly for them - but I would like to know why you believe these things.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 00:25, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Also, I can't relate fully to everything in that post, because some of it is inapplicable outside of the United States.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 00:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Also, as for you being a proponent of nudism - how would you get around the fact that clothes are necessary in many parts of the world for our species to keep warm? Where I live, there is no time of the year when nudity in public would be practical for the reason that it would be too cold.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 00:37, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

It is wrong to discriminate against men or view such discrimination as acceptable. Believing or teaching that discrimination against men is acceptable and that discrimination against women is unacceptable constitutes discrimination against men. Such teaching is called reverse sexist doctrine. - I agree 100% with you on this point.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 00:39, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

OK, I understand that you are a libertarian now, but I don't see how libertarianism fits with enforcement of rules on women's dress code, looks and behaviour.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 00:43, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

And if anyone wants to remove this for WP:NOT#FORUM, then chill out a bit. Wikipedia is a community has the right to trump WP:NOT#FORUM at times if it helps editors understand each other.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 00:49, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Ah, nope. WP:NOT is a policy document and is binding. Wikipedia is a community is an essay, and is not. the problem here is that Tedius regularly trots out this diatribe for anyone who will listen. Apart from its being highly offensive & just plain factually wrong, it's not in any way conducive to building an encyclopedia - Alison ❤ 06:09, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

I am politically moderate, that is, between libertarian and authoritarian, but I am leaning towards libertarian. For one thing, according to the fifth tenet in that forum post, I am opposed to media censorship. Supporting nudism is characteristic of libertarianism. I am libertarian according to the Political Compass. That message board post at my board does not say that women should wear bare legs. It specifically rules out women fashioning themselves after men, such as wearing short hair or being bald or wearing trousers. I am against the idea of women wearing their hair short, not only that long hair is more attractive on women, but for a more real reason, as stated elsewhere in that message board. The idea of short hair for women is divisive and magnifies looksism. I found that short hair is massively overrated and that very long hair is highly underrated. I am saddened that very long hair is often frowned upon in makeover shows. Those makeover shows, like the Maury Povich show and other talk shows, Ambush Makeover, and What Not to Wear, are garbage, especially for long hair fans. For my views on women's clothing, it is all right for women to wear long skirts/dresses, knee-length skirts/dresses, miniskirts, shorts, leggings, hosiery, or thongs, or to be nude, but it is not all right for women to trousers. Women wearing that short hair is a gesture of a woman showing health-unconsciousness, defiance, dissatisfaction, despair, what not. I believe that non-African-American heterosexual women should wear their hair at least bra-strap length, and that relaxed-haired African-American women should wear at least medium hair. I am against the nudity taboo, not clothing in general. The nudity taboo is destructive and divisive. I am not against women in hosiery, especially if the weather demands hosiery. I understand that clothing should be worn if the weather demands it, and I have nothing against that. I just forgot to address about the weather demanding clothing, so I just corrected that in the message board post. I am only against wearing clothes in settings where nudity is practical (such as beaches and water parks and other recreational settings in warm weather) or forcing people to do so. I have found such practice to be destructive and divisive. Contrary to popular belief, I found that body modesty actually adds to sexual interest and desire. I disagree with some of the userbox deletions, such as video game console related ones. According to what I have heard about the userbox policy, "divisive userbox" rule applies only in template namespace, not to my userspace. The administrator who deleted them (jc37) got too carried away with the userbox policy, and I have accused the administrator of being biased against userboxes favoring Sony-brand video game platforms. Decimus Tedius Regio Zanarukando 01:17, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Good grief - not another sexist diatribe. You never miss a moment, do you? - Alison ❤ 02:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

I cannot accept that I am a sexist when it comes to my views on women's fashion. If you call those as sexist, then you are labeled a butch feminist. As my userbox page states, I do not believe in romantic love, so you must not expect me to have a wife. Decimus Tedius Regio Zanarukando 04:23, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

lol!! Plus ça changes ... - Alison ❤ 04:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

How can you not believe you're sexist? You think it's ok to control every aspect of a woman's life, and that isn't sexism? Hypocrite. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.104.111.174 (talk) 15:06, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Tedius, it's been over a week and you're still editing your "speech" above. Please stop with the sexist nonsense - Alison ❤ 21:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

No, I still cannot accept that I am a sexist. So, you stop with that feminist nonsense. Decimus Tedius Regio Zanarukando (talk) 01:02, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

And you stop with that hypocritical nonsense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.104.111.174 (talk) 03:24, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts
^^ drag these two through the street behind trucks tia

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

haveblue posted:

gently caress facial hair

says a person who cant grow any

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts
WEE, sleekit, cow'rin', tim'rous beastie,
O what a panic's in thy breastie!
Thou need na start awa sae hasty,
Wi' bickerin' brattle!
I wad be laith to rin an' chase thee
Wi' murd'rin' pattle!

I'm truly sorry man's dominion
Has broken Nature's social union,
An' justifies that ill opinion
Which makes thee startle
At me, thy poor earth-born companion,
An' fellow-mortal!

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

a bad babe posted:

whale drunk

:confused:

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

Rufo posted:

party at your mums house

:dwonsrim:

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

Jonny 290 posted:

did it pledge sig ep afterwards?

as a former sig ep, i laughed at this (leaving that frat was the best thing i ever did, gently caress all frats and gently caress you if you were ever in one)


also going back to drinkchat and gin my barmistress buddy has this killer cocktail called a 'dirty german' invented by her father, its got hendricks and cucumber and whatever its delicious and a firetruck cherry red color served in a martini glass, it rules

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

golgo13sf posted:

Recipe please

currently trying to extract it out of her

e: dont google 'dirty german' at work

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

graph
Nov 22, 2006

aaag peanuts

golgo13sf posted:

Recipe please

she wouldnt give me the full one but she says this is 80% of it

hendrick's, chartreuse, ginger infused liqueur, black cherry vodka, muddled cucumber, grapefruit

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply