|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Autofellatio/Archive_9 
|
#
¿
Jan 2, 2011 19:03
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Oct 3, 2023 05:47 |
|
|
Jiffman's dedication to capturing the perfect autofellatio picture seems to have gotten him in hot water..quote:Unblock request declined
|
|
#
¿
Jan 2, 2011 22:18
|
|
|
Aleksei Vasiliev posted:i tried to find an anime that was full of citations and ran into 50 edits to the cartoon's tits but the poor thing still doesn't have a nose..
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2011 04:34
|
|
|
The Wonder Weapon posted:
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2011 00:38
|
|
|
Hammerite posted:aaaaaaaagh gently caress it gently caress it all. this poo poo is why i will never donate to wikipedia i wonder what percentage of their bandwidth costs are from sperglord stuff
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2011 02:20
|
|
|
got dat wmd posted:potential gold here if you've got time http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/~reagle/wp-redux/ Altruism. Altruism doesn't really exist. Even if you are doing something that is helpful or charitable for others, you will still reap the good of that action. The idea that one should do things for altruistic purposes is wrong and can lead to the downfall of society, as Ayn Rand wrote about in Atlas Shrugged. If one portrays that they are doing something completely for others benefit and has no self interest, that is when you should question thier motives. Why do they wish to appear so benevolent? When one does for other people at least there are good feelings that arise and right there, the theory of altruism is defunct or never existed.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 19, 2011 03:17
|
|
|
JimboWales, the father of wikipedia, setting his vision in motionquote:Current: 982815015 JimboWales at Thu, 22 Feb 2001 04:10:15 +0000.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 19, 2011 03:25
|
|
|
Current: 980653483 TimShell at Sun, 28 Jan 2001 03:44:43 +0000. TimShell TimShell is a founding partner og BoMis. He knows LarrySanger personally.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 19, 2011 03:31
|
|
|
finally something worthwhile on wikipedia
|
|
#
¿
Jan 25, 2011 02:53
|
|
|
quote:Curtis James quote:Delete as hoax. I'm very skeptical of the claim that the subject became a professional track and field athlete at the age of 9. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 13:59, 12 November 2010 (UTC) lol
|
|
#
¿
Jan 25, 2011 03:02
|
|
|
My Little Pony in popular culture My Little Pony, being amongst the most popular toy lines of all time, is regularly referred to in various media. Perhaps most prominently, the ponies have had several "cameo" appearances in cartoons. * Radio talk-show host Laura Ingraham refers to former Senator John Edwards as "Silky Pony" and plays the My Little Pony theme music when discussing stories about Edwards. * In 2005, when US President George W. Bush nominated Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court of the United States, political cartoonist Steve Sack drew a cartoon depicting Bush brushing a pony toy with false eyelashes under the title "My Little Crony", since it was recently after the dismissal of Michael D. Brown for failing to handle the Hurricane Katrina crisis. * Robot Chicken did a skit called "Apocalypse Ponies" which featured Pestilence Pony, War Pony, Famine Pony, and Death Pony. * Another Robot Chicken short involved the mythical winged horse Pegasus having his wings severed and turned into a My Little Pony-esque creature by a demented little girl (voiced by Cree Summer), who whipped him into accepting his fate, and his new name - "Sunny Muffins." This was a parody of a scene from the TV miniseries Roots, in which the African man Kunta Kinte is flogged into accepting his new name, "Toby". * The Backyard Sports series has a parody called "My Precious Pony". In the series, Maria Luna says that she collects My Precious Pony dolls. * Wizards of the Coast, a subsidiary of Hasbro, released an April Fool's joke revealing that the newest d20 RPG setting would be an adaptation of the My Little Pony setting to a role-playing game.[7] * Something Positive referenced My Little Pony in a similar way on May 28, 2008.[8] * For April Fool's Day in 2006, the front page on Slashdot.org (a popular news site) was redesigned in the fashion of My Little Ponies.[9] * A parody/homage of the ponies has made multiple appearances in the Cartoon Network animated series Dexter's Laboratory, as the Pony Puff Princess and the Pony Puff ponies, idolized by Dee Dee and her friends. Except for the unicorn horn, they bear remarkable resemblance to the ponies of My Little Pony. * On Clarissa Explains It All, Clarissa in an episode rents a series called "My Little Unicorn". * In the 2007 Transformers film, Ironhide crashes into a pool of a house. A little girl walks out of her house, thinking that it was the Tooth Fairy. She was carrying a My Little Pony stuffed animal just before Ironhide emerges from the water. The plush toy she is holding is of the character Pinkie Pie, in the Generation Three line. This is an allusion to Hasbro, because My Little Pony was created by Hasbro, and the Transformers franchise is licensed by Hasbro. * In "Mars, Bars" is episode 14 of season 3 of the television show Veronica Mars. In the jail cell scene, Veronica has a drawn-on tattoo of a My Little Pony with the words Thug Life written over it. * In the Walt Disney Pictures Movie Meet the Robinsons, My Little Pony is referenced two times. In a few scenes, the Bowler Hat Guy has a unicorn binder. In another scene, The Bowler Hat Guy is drinking from a cup with a pegasus top on it that looks like it has the My Little Pony Pegasus named Firefly. She has a pink body and blue mane and tail with lightning bolts on her rump. * On G4's show Action Blast! during intervals is a segment called The Cobra Commander Show where G.I Joes arch-enemy Cobra Commander discusses his view on the world. One episode reveals that he likes to play with My little Pony dolls and watch the My Little Pony cartoon series. * Cartoon Network's The Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy had a parody of My Little Pony in "Ecto Cooler / Schlubs" as My Troubled Pony. The series was canceled before the ending was made, so Grim hunts Schlubs for gold bars to make an ending. The credits show Grim watching television, with the ending of My Troubled Pony on, drawn crudely with crayons, by Billy. * A Perry Bible Fellowship comic strip by Nicholas Gurewitch, titled "Gamblin Man", features a My Little Pony look-alike named fancy-dancy magic-prancy running in a real-world horse race, but flying away in mid-race.[10] * In Boy Meets World, Cory's Little sister holds a Glow 'n Show pony in one of the earlier episodes * A parody of "My Little Pony", known as "My Little Pwny" has appeared on many gaming forums, including Bungie. * A My Little Pony cartoon made a prominent appearance on a popular YouTube video disguised as pornography. The animated episode appears as punishment to the viewer, who is shamed by an unknown man in the video for trying to watch a scene of pornography on Youtube. * On The OC the character of Summer Roberts has a plastic pony named Princess Sparkle who appears to be a My Little Pony. * Jonathan I. Schwartz, the CEO of Sun has been given the nickname MLP by Daniel Lyons. * On Nickelodeon's original movie Spectacular!, a scene shows the character Nikko Alexander passing his ex-band mates while in a "flashy" cowboy outfit. Nikko's ex-girlfriend says in response to his outfit, "I always wondered who wrangled My Little Ponies!" As a matter of fact, Venus Terzo who plays Marion Lane on Spectacular! also does voice-overs on the My Little Pony TV series.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 30, 2011 03:04
|
|
|
Penisface posted:Name a movie where the asian character is not a superhuman badass. slant-eyed sluts 1-5 lots of negative stereotypes in those... luckily they made amends by #6
|
|
#
¿
Feb 5, 2011 01:55
|
|
|
btw nytimes has a debate on why wikipedia is such a sausage-festquote:Wikipedia, the "free encyclopedia that anyone can edit," has more than 3.5 million articles in English covering nearly every subject under the sun. Every day, hundreds of thousands of people go there to add information or create new pages (the site offers straightforward instructions). Yet despite the site's openness, surveys suggest that less than 15 percent of Wikipedia's contributors are women. The Wikipedia Foundation has set a goal to raise the share of female contributors to 25 percent by 2015. hmm the wikipedia editor population breaks down as 85% men and 15% women? that's weird, 15% female seems a little bit... http://www.inthelight.co.nz/spirit/aspergers.htm posted:35 people in every 10,000 have Apsergers Syndrome (about 10:1 ratio of male to female, though the lower incidence of women may be due to their ability to mask the condition and remain undiagnosed) too high?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 5, 2011 02:05
|
|
|
RZApublican posted:dealing with wanting to gently caress the sister you never knew you had? quote:GSA is rare between people raised together in early childhood due to a reverse sexual imprinting known as the Westermarck effect, which desensitizes them to later close sexual attraction; it is hypothesized that this effect evolved to prevent inbreeding. apparently back in Westermarck's day it was groundbreaking science to observe that brothers and sisters usually don't want to gently caress each other also you forgot to quote the most characteristically-wikipedia part of that article: GSA In Popular Culture posted:The manga (and subsequent anime adaptation of) Koi Kaze describes the story of a man in his late twenties who is reunited with his much younger sister who he was separated from when she was still a very young child, and the subsequent GSA that arises between both of them. Dixie Cretin Seaman fucked around with this message at 19:58 on Feb 21, 2011 |
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2011 19:54
|
|
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:hahahah holy Ones who like natural view may add additional photo somewhere else in the article. (Currently I am gently trying to convince my GF to make some images for this and other articles, but very unlikely will succeed. If anyone from Asia wishing to be a model, please let me know at my talk page.) Yestadae (talk) 02:15, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
|
|
#
¿
Mar 6, 2011 16:10
|
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Fictional_military_organizationsquote:This category has the following 8 subcategories, out of 8 total.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 11, 2011 03:32
|
|
|
Nevergirls posted:"Some devotees desire people with cognitive disabilities[original research?]." lmao i have a fetish for curvy aspergettes
|
|
#
¿
Mar 13, 2011 20:27
|
|
|
Aleksei Vasiliev posted:lmao there's no article for this on the japanese wikipedia you obviously haven't read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_of_the_2011_Sendai_earthquake_and_tsunami_on_top_editors_of_ja.wikipedia.com  they're all dead
|
|
#
¿
Mar 18, 2011 02:24
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:The usage of the term "Welcome to Macintosh", and not Welcome to The Macintosh was intentional.[citation needed] In this case Macintosh is a Proper Noun, reflecting Apple's belief that Macintosh is a sentient being, so he should be referred to as if he were a person: For example, "Let me introduce you to Michael." Not, "Let me introduce you to the Michael." Restart iPhone To restart iPhone, first turn iPhone off by pressing and holding the Sleep/Wake button until a red slider appears. Slide your finger across the slider and iPhone will turn off after a few moments. Next, turn iPhone on by pressing and holding the Sleep/Wake button until the Apple logo appears. Press and hold sleep/wake button Is iPhone not responding? To reset iPhone, press and hold the Sleep/Wake button and the Home button at the same time for at least 10 seconds, until the Apple logo appears.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 20, 2011 03:42
|
|
|
Aleksei Vasiliev posted:http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anime In the late 1980s, lots of people in countries other than Japan started to like anime too. In the United States, giant robot anime became popular. In Europe, anime for children became popular.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2011 01:54
|
|
|
Coffee Quack posted:
gotta stay on topic http://i.imgur.com/rI2Vg.png
|
|
#
¿
Mar 22, 2011 05:15
|
|
|
Nevergirls posted:idgi I agree with that list conspicuous absence of manga catagory
|
|
#
¿
Apr 3, 2011 19:59
|
|
|
Nevergirls posted:nope it's there
|
|
#
¿
Apr 3, 2011 20:11
|
|
|
what is this posted:ps being an upper class white girl and going to yale and then getting ground up a little bit by a lathe is probably better than living 30 years (a ripe old age!) in sub saharan africa, starving the whole time, with child soldiers periodically massacring your village, watching babies die because their mothers have no milk to give, raped by militia men and left alone after the crops, livestock, everything is destroyed lets make this right, support OLPC (One Lathe Per Child)
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2011 03:00
|
|
|
CoupleBeersNoBeers posted:hay i found something that was the tits For example, the Dehydrated Boulder, upon hydration, becomes so large that it crushes him, or the Coyote finding out that the Earthquake Pills bottle label's fine print states that the pills aren’t effective on road runners, right after he swallows the whole bottle, thinking they're ineffective. Other times he uses items that are implausible, such as a superhero outfit, thinking he could fly wearing it (he cannot).
|
|
#
¿
Jun 2, 2011 06:18
|
|
|
Wile E. Coyote has made two appearances in Family Guy. In I Never Met the Dead Man he appears riding in a car with Peter; when Peter runs over the Road Runner and asks if he hit anything, Wile E. says no and to keep going. In PTV, he appears in a flashback when Peter claims he had a mail-order operation, which turns out to be none other than ACME. He offers a store credit when Wile E. claims a refund for a giant sling shot that "slammed me into a mountain". Ms. Coyote then comes in telling her husband Wile E. to hurry up.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 2, 2011 15:01
|
|
|
Hi - I came to this page trying to learn about the nature of Stewie's communication. From my own watching of the show it seems like other people (eg. the mother character) have a partial but incomplete understanding of what Stewie says (except for the dog who seems to fully understand). Am I correct? Anyway, if someone more knowledgeable could expand on this subject this article would benefit a lot. Manning (talk) 09:50, 20 September 2009 (UTC) There use to be a section but I removed it cause it was an unsourced OR mess. Like many animated shows, there is inconsistency on who can understand him. CTJF83Talk 10:02, 20 September 2009 (UTC) I appreciate that, but the article first and foremost needs to be written for the benefit of people like myself who genuinely do not understand the topic and come here to learn. I've also never encountered this "inconsistent understanding" aspect before (but I don't watch a lot of animated shows either). If it could be improved that would be great. Also the article on Brian Griffin seems to have a decent explanation. Cheers Manning (talk) 10:12, 20 September 2009 (UTC) Well it'll be hard for us to write anything that is well sourced and isn't OR. For example, in "The Cleveland–Loretta Quagmire" Brian Griffin implies that Stewie can only be understood by family members and those close to the family but in early episodes it is hard to tell which family members can understand him and in Petergeist the librarian can understand him, so see all the conflictions? CTJF83Talk 17:12, 20 September 2009 (UTC) @Manning - I too have wondered about who can understand Stewie. Clearly Brian can. I think the whole 'evil genius' role and the way he talks to the rest of the family, and their apparent lack of understanding or the way Lois just placates him, means they just hear baby talk, but we can understand what he's truly thinking. Plus the schemes or adventures he gets up to are jsut his imagination. I'm sure one could test these hypothesis out; but I lack the complete box set/time - but have plenty of motavation :o) IHSCarlett 11:45, 21 September 2009 (BST) When this was in the article, it was subject to constant re-editing based on each editor's interpretation. The basic rule is Stewie often is not understood by others because he is a baby. This cannot be made more specific because who can understand Stewie changes at the convenience of the writers, and why is seldom made clear. I would favor either: just using that basic statement without embellishment unless a reliable source is found, or leaving it out altogether until a reliable source is found Reminder: Family Guy is a work of fiction—there is no single correct interpretation to ambiguous story elements. / edg ☺ ☭ 11:47, 21 September 2009 (UTC) I go for leave it out all together. I eliminates the large amount of OR that will be added. CTJF83Talk 18:22, 21 September 2009 (UTC) I believe it was Love Blactually where they actually made a gag mention of Loretta being close enough outside of the immediate family for him to be understood. Of course it was a gag. But I very much agree to leave it out. --HELLØ ŦHERE 18:35, 21 September 2009 (UTC) In the end of one episode it is discovered that the Griffans are being watched by some futuristic space people. One of them says "Any Questions?", and another says "Can they understand the baby?" Its inconsistant and gives the story flexibility. Sometimes it apeares as if Lois and others have no idea what he is saying and other times they carry on full conversations. Brian however has no trouble understanding stewie.69.233.195.133 (talk) 19:24, 12 October 2009 (UTC) I came to wikipedia today to find out about this topic - to find out which characters understand Stewie or at least whether or not that is consistent. It's depressing to me that I have to come to the discussion page to find out anything about this, and marks an aspect that I dislike about wikipedia. Can't you agree that it's a good idea to say somewhere on the page that it's inconsistent and make small comment about the usual case...? Quite plainly people visit the wikipedia page with this type of question in mind - completely redacting any mention of a (mildly) controversial topic makes the wikipedia experience worse for everyone. Ronald ugh@treasurelondon.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.35.24.236 (talk) 22:40, 3 October 2010 (UTC) A lovely sentiment, but it belies a misunderstanding about what Wikipedia is NOT supposed to be; specifically, it is not a collection of every single piece of information in existence. For these aspects of fine detail about the show, fan-forums are a more appropriate venue; specifically I would recommend the FG Wikia. DP76764 (Talk) 22:52, 3 October 2010 (UTC) http://familyguy.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page CTJF83 chat 23:11, 3 October 2010 (UTC) No, it doesn't in any way, shape, or form. The fact that it is a common question means it's notable, and notable facts are included. The only reason we haven't included it is the lack of reliable sources. Don't use policy to beat down on people pointing out flaws in Wiki. — trlkly 13:42, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
|
|
#
¿
Jun 2, 2011 15:14
|
|
|
basically everything from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Female_ejaculationquote:All's I know is I have been having ejaculations ( call it what you want)since I was 18 and I'm 44 now. It does not smell, stain and from what I have been told taste like urine. I dont belive it is urine. I empty my bladder before intercoursw. Still acheive a large amount and it can at times eject across the room.---- quote:my experience: it does exist,but not in a over exagerated way like a hose spraying,I have had sexual relationships and to be honest have never really reach orgasim like i have with my new parthner.....i was so surprised at what happened to me....it was no way anything to do with urine!and i know trust me...all i know is that i got so wet with him,i said how thats never happened to me before?.........so i guess its either the guy knows how to make this happen or something or maybe were perfect piece together....its clear and odurless and makes the sex better anyway.I t it didnt exist but because i experienced it,thats why im on this page. quote:Is it just me OR does tis need a picture if not while happening the of Skenes gland labeled like File:Skenes gland-english.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Markstar (talk • contribs) 04:59, 22 November 2009 (UTC) quote:Not trying to sound like a voyeur or anything, but since there's a video tape of a male ejaculating on the male ejaculation page, shouldn't some one volunteer to do a taping on the female ejaculation page? quote:So I was thinking that this article needs a photo depicting actual female ejaculation (and not urniation), and not just footage taken from common pornography -- of course this would be STRICTLY for scientific purposes. quote:an article this big needs a picture. perhaps one with pubic hair to lessen pornography accusations. 99.20.100.127 (talk) 23:06, 21 October 2010 (UTC) quote:If we need photographic proof I would be more than willing submit some of my own personal footage and/or photos. I can also say from personal experience that it tastes like water with a hint of cucumber juice, unless unusually high amounts of Vitamin B are present in the system in which case it tastes like water that has had bleach added to it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.47.114.129 (talk) 23:12, 8 March 2010 (UTC) quote:Having completed a introductory study of feminism myself, I feel that the issue of female ejaculation is one of importance for feminist theory. No issue more profoundly highlights the collision between androdgynous and essentials feminism (those who argue men and women are totally equal, versus those who argue that attempts to give women the same features of men are misguided as they exist within a 'male identified' society. The fascination within pornography with female ejaculation also makes for an interesting feminist debate as it can be linked with the 'debasement' and sexualisation of women that has been recently documented in Natasha Walter's latest book 'Living Dolls'. For these reasons I feel feminism is importantly tied to the issue of female ejaculation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.26.216.211 (talk) 22:17, 18 July 2010 (UTC) quote:The sperm upsuck mechanism doesnt appear to be accepted by the majority of the establishment yet. Once the basic process of sperm and egg were found the previous ancient knowledge was dissmissed as primitive and uneducated, labelling female ejaculation mere shamefull bed wetting to be avoided at all costs. Prior to this shamefull labelling perhaps there was some real intelligent evolution by accidental squirters whose off spring became more prevalent. Squirting by other animals is not known (as far as I know). These are just my thoughts as far as I know, if there is no supporting evidence I wouldn't mind researching it myself! ;-). quote:A review of the evidence for orgasm in nonhuman primates with the author's own evidence from the digital stimulation of female chimpanzees suggestings that something akin to interspecies orgasm occurs in chimps (this apparently was not a reciprocal arrangement). Though this research will probsbly be most remembered for the original data collected (and the original data collection method) actually the most bizarre part of this paper is the author's suggestion that female orgasm evolved to stimulate male ejaculation. Few theories on the function of female orgasm have flown in the face of such counter evidence as this one, but I actually heard the first author present it at a national meeting in great seriousness and with a straight face.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 2, 2011 22:17
|
|
--173.75.45.2 (talk) 04:08, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
|
Aleksei Vasiliev posted:http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3410020 
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2011 22:14
|
|
|
Yodzilla posted:i'm also the 12 year old girl rightfully scared of her mind "hey mom some of the other "my little pony" editors are having a picnic! can i go?" "i don't know honey, will there be any adult supervision?"
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2011 20:10
|
|
|
Coffee Quack posted:imagine all the lives that could be saved if only wikipedia had a few more photos of public urination
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2011 14:20
|
|
|
Lamont Cranston posted:yes, and they restored nearly everything he removed and de-modded so did they restore the lolicon wikipe-tan? im pretty sure the questions surrounding copyright were sufficiently addressed by now
|
|
#
¿
Jun 25, 2011 03:35
|
|
|
fishmech posted:Aren't there still like 10,000 pictures on wikimedia of dudes' junk for every 1 picture actually allowed onto wikipedia if only more dudes' junk were available we could rid third world countries of the scourge of aids 
|
|
#
¿
Jun 26, 2011 02:23
|
|
|
axolotl farmer posted:http://dir.salon.com/story/tech/feature/2002/08/28/0wnz0red/index.html hmm i wonder what kind of far-out brainstorming sessions prompted this masterpiece.. the first drat sentence posted:Programmers who hack their own bodies don't need exercise
|
|
#
¿
Jun 28, 2011 22:10
|
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conveyor_belt Popular culture Many video games feature conveyor belts, such as Donkey Kong (1981), Half-Life (1998) or Metal Gear Solid 2. The Gladiators 1990s TV series featured The Travelator, a moving walkway (a type of conveyor belt) in its obstacle course. A 2008 MythBusters episode "Airplane on a Conveyor Belt" featured a conveyor belt regarding the myth that a plane cannot take off while sitting on a conveyor belt moving in the opposite direction.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 29, 2011 02:15
|
|
|
Fermat posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adultism i was 100% sure there would be something about the tyranny of age of consent laws in that article or at least the talk page. i guess once in a while wikipedia exceeds my (very low) expectations 
|
|
#
¿
Jul 21, 2011 01:45
|
|
|
Nevergirls posted:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Empty_nest_syndrome is wikigroaning still a thing? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empty_nest_syndrome http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empty_Nest
|
|
#
¿
Aug 12, 2011 03:02
|
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiss features this voyeuristic photo of two teenagers kissing, complete with leaves from the tree the photographer was hiding behind. checking out the original photo uploaded reveals 1) even more tree leaves making it creepier, and 2) the girl is topless and her nipple is visible but hey, at least its not encumbered by restrictive copyrights  meanwhile over on the talk page they have bigger problems to address quote:Being a classic-cartoon watcher, it seems to me there's something missing from the article, and that is the "Insulting kiss" which Bugs Bunny used to plant on Elmer Fudd all the time. That's a bit of antiquity, but WB didn't make it up: They got it from a Charlie Chaplin movie. So I have to figure it was already old even when Chaplin did it. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 00:19, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
|
|
#
¿
Aug 27, 2011 20:05
|
|
|
Lamont Cranston posted:why hasn't anyone gone over and argued for the original picture because wikipedia is not censored from Talk:Vulva Pre-Puberty Vulva? I may be unaware of what exactly is defined as child pornography, but assuming the person pictured isnt someone who didnt hit puberty until they were 18... isnt this child porn? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.160.17 (talk) 02:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC) The use of this image struck me as odd and somewhat suspect as well. It was uploaded recently, and the uploader is apparently Italian. He has had a conversation in user talk pages with someone else about it that I translated in Google Translate, and I can't draw a conclusion of the age of the person depicted, but breach of child pornography laws were drawn into question. I think this image should probably be deleted or at least removed from any pages it is used in, and the uploader should be contacted by a moderator. -- Ifrit (Talk) 00:42, 17 March 2011 (UTC) "Wikipedia is not censored" inDEED. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.70.113 (talk) 01:46, 9 April 2011 (UTC) I have no idea what picture you are talking about, but I would like to point out that nudity and pornography are very different things. Nudity is not a requirement for child pornography and not all pictures of nude children constitute child pornography. One could easily see photos of nude children (along with their parents etc.) on nudist sites, and these sites are the first to point out that they are protected even by american laws. The first commenter sounds like a YouTube commenter that sees breastfeeding videos on YouTube and calls it child abuse, since he sees breasts as sexual objects. I don't know if is should be included or not, but fear that it might be pornography isn't a valid reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.112.45.87 (talk) 11:43, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2011 19:27
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Oct 3, 2023 05:47 |
|
|
Detroit Q. Spider posted:oh come now, are you really surprised? seriously, the only surprise was that it took me two tries to find something like that. here have another one Talk:Puberty Images/diagrams honestly i think there are tons of images that could be added than that one picture, maybe a diagram of those sex ed books or a hot teen, maybe a bit jailbaitish? 200.83.92.102 19:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC) is a real picture of an adolescent boy and girl out of the question? a real picture would pretty much sum up the whole article. remember child porn has to have he person performing a sexual act or have the picture focusing on the genitals or breasts. OR you could just get two pictures - Drawn out diagrams, one depicting the male puberty and the other one the female puberty. These diagrams usually show about five drawings, each of a step in puberty. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.200.150.137 (talk) 16:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC) Dude, where are you going to get a girl of age around 12-14 to show her breasts to wikipedia, and a boy of 14 to show his penis to the world, Im 14 and I wouldn't do that, so why would other people do taht
|
|
#
¿
Aug 29, 2011 03:58
|
|