|
Yeah I rethought it and now would say I’d demand 5,000 up front.
|
#
¿
Apr 9, 2021 19:28
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 12:28 |
|
|
Due process isn’t always fun !!
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2021 23:56
|
|
|
Debt collector firms are usually buying in bulk afaict.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2021 02:29
|
|
|
Even if you have proper documents there is no guarantee the hospital will follow them or family wont Sue to revoke them etc etc
|
|
#
¿
Apr 23, 2021 14:35
|
|
|
Where do you live
|
|
#
¿
Apr 23, 2021 23:05
|
|
|
Usually I’d say county bar referral but that is a federal case and they may be better off with a city firm
|
|
#
¿
Apr 23, 2021 23:05
|
|
|
Maybe. That’s the best answer
|
|
#
¿
Apr 26, 2021 14:31
|
|
|
Legal work can potentially be done through an insurance type set up and often is for richer people and companies Legal shield is not effective legal insurance
|
|
#
¿
Apr 27, 2021 12:22
|
|
|
Not really paying her at all in this case. Also lawyers don’t “work for you”. We aren’t your employees or whatever to Karen around
|
|
#
¿
Apr 27, 2021 16:07
|
|
|
FrozenVent posted:Who do you work for then? Associates work for the partners. Partners are usually in a partnership structure so are co owners Solos obviously work for themselves.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 27, 2021 16:42
|
|
|
The should not do that Also accusing a lawyer of playing semantics is weird. It’s like what we do
|
|
#
¿
Apr 27, 2021 16:59
|
|
|
Respectfully to sandwich artists, they are not professionals
|
|
#
¿
Apr 27, 2021 17:05
|
|
|
Oh yeah . Property disputes are not predictable in the slightest. It could be solved with a letter or a case litigated to the Supreme Court and back.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 27, 2021 17:14
|
|
|
Outrail posted:What if they have formal chef training and specialize in sandwiches? A chef is not normally a professional in the USA Idk what happens in other places
|
|
#
¿
Apr 27, 2021 18:05
|
|
|
I have no idea what you mean by “semantically” If you are saying I am using words with meaning then yes I am doing that. Everyone does that
|
|
#
¿
Apr 27, 2021 19:34
|
|
|
employment and labor law also have definitions for professional
|
|
#
¿
Apr 27, 2021 21:04
|
|
|
Nlra: (12) The term "professional employee" means-- (a) any employee engaged in work (i) predominantly intellectual and varied in character as opposed to routine mental, manual, mechanical, or physical work; (ii) involving the consistent exercise of discretion and judgment in its performance; (iii) of such a character that the output produced or the result accomplished cannot be standardized in relation to a given period of time; (iv) requiring knowledge of an advanced type in a field of science or learning customarily acquired by a prolonged course of specialized intellectual instruction and study in an institution of higher learning or a hospital, as distinguished from a general academic education or from an apprenticeship or from training in the performance of routine mental, manual, or physical processes; or (b) any employee, who (i) has completed the courses of specialized intellectual instruction and study described in clause (iv) of paragraph (a), and (ii) is performing related work under the supervision of a professional person to qualify himself to become a professional employee as defined in paragraph (a). ———- Sandwhich artist would not be a professional under that
|
|
#
¿
Apr 27, 2021 21:15
|
|
|
You can always sue people but the question you have to ask 1. How much will it cost to do so 2. What is your chance of winning 3. How much will you win if you win 4. What are your chances of enforcing the judgment Things usually break down at 1,2,3 and 4
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2021 00:32
|
|
|
Anyway I don’t know the law in that state but my hunch is it is not as clean as you understand it to be
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2021 00:37
|
|
|
thepopmonster posted:Did you, at any point, watch, read, or listen to any US political news coverage during the period 1st December 2016 through 21st January 2021? Not a lot I read a lot of tweets I guess
|
|
#
¿
Apr 30, 2021 13:19
|
|
|
In my experience landlords will settle issues at a discount if they can be sure the issue is solved Some times
|
|
#
¿
May 2, 2021 23:37
|
|
|
Volmarias posted:"You say 'I'm all paid up", I say "You owe me $1000," let's meet somewhere in the middle! How about $500 over what is fairly mine?" Right and then charge your client 600$ for the work of cutting what they owe in half
|
|
#
¿
May 3, 2021 11:46
|
|
|
(If you are the trustee and the beneficiary the trust may be invalid in some circumstances)
|
|
#
¿
May 4, 2021 15:04
|
|
|
toplitzin posted:Would this be for something like "oh poo poo, i won the lotto. I am calling my lawyer and having the trust sign the wining ticket because i don't want to be a public figure with my picture and "THIS DUDE JSUT WON 705 MILLION!" plastered everywhere" Depends who the beneficiary is And the trustee (You would be the settlor in this scenario )
|
|
#
¿
May 4, 2021 19:49
|
|
|
You’d have to improve the cart too And shout “this is my cart !” At least once a year
|
|
#
¿
May 5, 2021 01:41
|
|
|
I dont think your example satisfies common law adverse possession. The hostile possession element gets wonky euphronius fucked around with this message at 16:40 on May 5, 2021 |
|
#
¿
May 5, 2021 16:36
|
|
|
toplitzin posted:Is Adverse Possession the legally codified form of Manifest Destiny? no that is just right of conquest. To the extent the USA didnt buy the land directly.
|
|
#
¿
May 5, 2021 16:40
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:how is me fencing in part of your property so only I can access it not hostile, i have literally erected a barrier to prevent you from using your land and its hard to imagine a more clear infringement on your landowner rights Yeah you are reading the issues wrong. Thats a common problem when lay people try and interpret law jargon thought everyday definitions of words. As I mentioned take a dive into hostile possession for the nuances it can get into.
|
|
#
¿
May 5, 2021 16:54
|
|
|
pseudanonymous posted:Since we're talking about adverse possession... Theres like a 2 foot strip of land next to my garage that is my property, my neighbors built a concrete strip on it and planned to put wood there and then asked me if I wanted to paint my garage or anything before they stacked wood there and I was like well that's my property you put that concrete strip on. Not addressing your situation but generally giving someone a license to do something on the land in question defeats the hostile ownership element discussed above. If you are concerned you need to hire a local attorney to discuss it. I have no idea what your situation actually is.
|
|
#
¿
May 5, 2021 17:00
|
|
|
with land you dont need contracts similar to other everyday scenarios. Land law was invented 100s of years before contract law was invented in London law courts
|
|
#
¿
May 5, 2021 17:15
|
|
|
blarzgh posted:Hostile just means "looks like Brown intends to treat that property as if they own it." so, yeah, building a fence enclosing that strip into your own land typically will satisfy a jury that you "intended to treat the property as if you owned it." not if the other party allows it as Ive been talking about above. Also lol at bringing an adverse possession case in front of a jury.
|
|
#
¿
May 5, 2021 17:17
|
|
|
"Im building my fence on your land rear end in a top hat!!" "ok, sure whatever" Adverse possession defeated!!
|
|
#
¿
May 5, 2021 17:19
|
|
|
Ive considered your posts and am not persuaded.
|
|
#
¿
May 5, 2021 17:24
|
|
|
blarzgh posted:Me: "It is murder if you kill someone." You should know that not all homicides are murder. Come on now. I thought we were dealing from a position of mutual respect.
|
|
#
¿
May 5, 2021 17:26
|
|
|
It’s an evidence issue not a proof issue. The standard of proof is normally preponderance of evidence which is - with any semblance of good persuasive skills from your lawyer - not a problem The distinction between evidence and proof is another one of those tricky areas Edit The standard of proof normally in these kinds of cases o should say euphronius fucked around with this message at 17:56 on May 6, 2021 |
|
#
¿
May 6, 2021 17:40
|
|
|
Following that post and adding : Adverse possession has been codified in most states asfaict. I don’t have a 50 state comparison law article at my finger tips Those codification are more or less based on the restatement of property law which is then based on common law and what some lawyers in Philadelphia thought at the time Land developers on the USA obviously hated the English common law version of adverse possession and it neutered by their legislatures euphronius fucked around with this message at 18:19 on May 6, 2021 |
|
#
¿
May 6, 2021 18:07
|
|
|
Dik Hz posted:Why do lawyers have such a hard-on for talking about adverse possession? It is a terror topic from 1L and we are all imprinted
|
|
#
¿
May 6, 2021 21:29
|
|
|
The cart is sex with me If you want a promotion you have to push the cart
|
|
#
¿
May 15, 2021 12:49
|
|
|
The cart is the job you want If you are a woman you can’t have the cart The cart is a employee who comments on your breasts every day Management won’t move the cart away from you
|
|
#
¿
May 15, 2021 12:50
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 25, 2024 12:28 |
|
|
Mr. Nice! posted:Hey goons. If my lawyer told the press that I was “loving retarded” and a “short-bus [person],” should I sue for defamation or hope that works as a defense? What are your damages
|
|
#
¿
May 18, 2021 18:56
|
|