|
Apparently that kind of phone phreaking is being used to fund terrorist organizations, so maybe frame it as a national security issue while you're at it. http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/nov/28/philippines-arrests-phone-scam-hacking Also, most of the organizations hacked had lax security measures like default passwords, which could be how the phone company made the determination that the firm was liable for the calls placed.
|
# ¿ Dec 4, 2011 06:59 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 13:16 |
|
Jesus just switch to a credit union and quit bellyaching. It's almost certain you already agreed to arbitration in previous agreements. Though I'm pretty sure credit unions are also going to have you go though arbitration.
|
# ¿ Dec 9, 2011 17:44 |
|
Not really a personal legal question, but hopefully one of you guys remember enough constitutional law to tell me re: Hosanna-Tabor Church v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, today's big supreme court decision. Does it basically allow employment discrimination of protected groups so long as they are employed as "ministers" under the law? Like you can explicitly be fired or not hired due to race/disability/whatever as long as the position in question is "ministerial"? Is there precedent for this/was that sort of discrimination exemption ever limited to firing ministers based on their religious activities? Let me know if there's a thread in d&d better suited to this.
|
# ¿ Jan 11, 2012 20:25 |
|
So a preacher who became ill could be fired explicitly because their church didn't want to pay the higher insurance premiums?
|
# ¿ Jan 11, 2012 20:39 |
|
Wow, if George Carlin were alive he'd have a field day with this. I mean, why not ask a prostitute? She's a member of a profession (the worlds oldest!) and she's got standing in the community, although that phrase could be prefaced with "low moral."
|
# ¿ Jan 19, 2012 20:53 |
|
You guys are coming down pretty hard on a guy whose literally only contact with the courts in his entire life began a week ago. I sure as poo poo would have assumed that a public defender would be overworked and more likely to encourage a lame plea that would have moved me off his caseload, and I am willing to bet that incidents like that happen even if they are the exception. Should a layperson be expected to know that PDs>private counsel as a matter of course?
|
# ¿ Jan 27, 2012 09:09 |
|
Jesus chaodmaster if you're gong to practice interne law without a license try to at least read the post. Fascinator, what do you have in writing from your insurance? If you have documented approval for the procedure you need to appeal the claim denial. If not, appeal it anyway. If that fails, speak with the doctor's office and explain the situation to see of you can be charged the "no insurance" price you were quoted.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2012 17:49 |
|
Hahah, yeah I don't know why you thought the health care industry couldn't engage in price discrimination. It gets crazier than that: they have different prices between private insurers , as well as medicare/Medicaid and the uninsured. If you have a problem with it write your state representatives to get a law on the books like California's that requires docs and hospitals to disclose their price lists, not that it will actually bring down health care costs.
|
# ¿ Feb 8, 2012 00:29 |
|
FordCQC posted:This is more on the right track than whoever claimed "price discrimination" above, but still not right. Healthcare services have a cost, which is the internal value of the service, and a list price that is what is billed to the payer (insurance or otherwise). The cost is lower than the list price because the healthcare provider is a business and is trying to make a profit... Maybe you didn't take Econ 101, but different prices to different consumers=price discrimination. Senior discounts, coupons are all ways of attracting consumers who would otherwise not purchase at the market price, or to maximize profits from consumers willing to pay above the market price, as in the case of private insurance. I realize it sounds pedantic, but I think it's impossible to have a good discussion about the ridiculousness of the health care system without using accurate terminology. El_Elegante fucked around with this message at 19:33 on Feb 8, 2012 |
# ¿ Feb 8, 2012 19:15 |
|
FordCQC posted:Hey, since we're being antagonistic, maybe you should go back to remedial English, since your reading comprehension is woefully lacking. The same price is being offered to everyone. Given that fact, go back and read my post and see if you can figure out why different insurance companies pay different amounts for the same services from the same provider. Take it easy, dude. The why isn't relevant to the question of price discrimination. All that matters to satisfy the definition is what youve stated here: that different consumers pay different prices. This is independent of mechanism.
|
# ¿ Feb 8, 2012 21:36 |
|
Black Cat posted:Ok so I'll tell him in as nicely worded of a message possible that he can't take me to court over it. Thanks for the advice and I'm sorry for being a bit pushy, its just been a big worry for me the past few days. You're an idiot, and now you're running around posting threads on the internet about how your income has improved enough that it may actually be worth his while to recover the back rent from you.
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2012 21:30 |
|
kanonvandekempen posted:I couldn't find anything on the front page about this (UK problem). Did you at least try google first? http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/ http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/guidance/help_if_you_cant_get_legal_aid.asp http://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/ Seriously, you have time to join Goonfleet and post in porn threads but the time it takes to google search something is just too much of an investment? The hell is wrong with you? (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2012 14:18 |
|
entris posted:This seems unnecessarily harsh. That's because it is! On the other hand I have zero problem getting probated for making fun of lazy as poo poo posters. To the poster below: I'll wager a months' probation that none of those things are true. If he had put in the minimum amount of research into his situation he would have posted a more detailed question rather than say "I guess I should contact some kind of legal advice bureau but I don't know how to go about that (i'm poor)". Coming from the guy who wrote this, no less! El_Elegante fucked around with this message at 15:03 on Jul 19, 2012 |
# ¿ Jul 19, 2012 14:35 |
|
so can I make bulletproof body armor out of 2x4s and carpet?
|
# ¿ Sep 26, 2012 02:12 |
|
Busy Bee posted:Man, you guy's are rough! Going through my post history and basically assuming that since I talk and ask about illegal drugs I must be a criminal who hates cops. Don't be such a hyperbolic jackass. If you're routinely engaged in illegal activities it's highly likely that you are eventually going to deal with law enforcement at some point. It should not have a come as a surprise to you. In fact if you are going to be a recreational drug user, you may as well budget for the legal costs of your hobby. On the other hand, this encounter might be a good opportunity to asses your drug use and whether you're better off making some lifestyle changes.
|
# ¿ Dec 4, 2012 22:28 |
|
Dude quote one instance of anyone calling you a drug addict or a cop-hater. You need to tone it down.
|
# ¿ Dec 4, 2012 23:04 |
|
Jizznastics posted:Mabye some posters with an amble supply of braincells can answer this? I think you mean "ample," but maybe butchering the English language is a hobby of yours?
|
# ¿ Dec 5, 2012 06:34 |
|
No, you idiot. "Other people do it all the time" is exactly what you're saying, and it's exactly the wrong defense. You can and should plead poverty as lawyers who understand How Things Work are telling you. You're twenty and have never handled any kind of legal matter before, I would defer to the professionals.
|
# ¿ Dec 12, 2012 02:01 |
|
Jesus Christ how have you been in the lovely landlord business for two whole years and not realized it would be more convenient and cost-effective to hire a goddamned lawyer.
|
# ¿ Feb 3, 2013 21:07 |
|
If you're making your business decisions with the intent to punish tenants with no idea what your civil liabilities and legal obligations are, you are not a good businessman.
|
# ¿ Feb 3, 2013 23:42 |
|
Ugh don't tease us just post it already. Or pm it to me.
|
# ¿ Jul 20, 2013 22:47 |
|
And you want to use law-sorcery to stay in the house of the abusive man, as if that would make that home any more pleasant and less scary to be around?
|
# ¿ Oct 8, 2013 01:52 |
|
Are you loving retarded?
|
# ¿ Jun 19, 2014 11:17 |
|
Thanks for telling us about your nasty skin
|
# ¿ Aug 6, 2014 18:04 |
|
Have they filed a lawsuit?
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2014 16:47 |
|
Queen Elizatits posted:That was it thank you. I wonder why I thought Stephen King had anything to do with that. I was pretty young when I read that book and I think it's traumatized me against homeowners association's for life. The Amazon page carries an enthusiastic blurb from him.
|
# ¿ Sep 24, 2014 07:39 |
|
Queen Elizatits posted:That was it thank you. I wonder why I thought Stephen King had anything to do with that. I was pretty young when I read that book and I think it's traumatized me against homeowners association's for life. The Amazon page carries an enthusiastic blurb from him.
|
# ¿ Sep 24, 2014 07:39 |
|
Praying for the day when "get fake boobs" is legal advice
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2014 04:35 |
|
Just move on with your life, you'll be happier in the long run.
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2014 04:50 |
|
What are you hoping to do in grad school, anyway? Also you definitely need to post pictures of your tattoo.
|
# ¿ Dec 13, 2014 09:52 |
|
Really doesn't sound like you're cut out for life outside the ivory tower. Do grad students get meal plans too? Just live out the remainder of your days never leaving campus. Also post the tattoo.
|
# ¿ Dec 13, 2014 10:15 |
|
Definitely worth giving up your pills.
|
# ¿ Dec 13, 2014 10:49 |
|
Don't be sorry, it's an illuminating example of how your parents and our education system have failed you. Also the legal Qs thread is at its best when it's about incredibly petty non-criminal stuff between two irresponsible parties. Protip: if you don't have an emergency fund that can absorb a couple hundred bucks, you can't afford a tattoo.
|
# ¿ Dec 13, 2014 11:26 |
|
Probably epidermolysis bullosa or bullous impetigo. Calling them sores seems a little excessive, but laypeople might disagree.
|
# ¿ Jan 13, 2015 02:15 |
|
I have a new favorite thread, and wanted to ask about some of the issues raised. For the sake of argument let's say heterosexual couple in Illinois, but if the state you know best would be interesting include it here. The rough sequence of events is: Man has spouse of 7 years. She disappears, 2 days later communicates that she wants a divorce. About a week after that has a full on psychotic episode that leads to a 4 month hospitalization. Husband meanwhile thinks her desire for divorce was genuine and proceeds with a no fault divorce. My questions: Does she have capacity to agree to divorce? Can one submit a no fault divorce if a spouse lacks the capacity to contest it? Can the divorce be finalized under those circumstances? If she is hospitalized and not released until after the divorce was finalized and she would have contested if she had capacity, are there legal proceedings that allow her to contest it after the fact?
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2015 23:41 |
|
I mean the OP in that thread is either one of the worst human beings ever and or is genuinely incapable of understanding mental illness. That said, I don't know what his legal obligations to act in her best interests are.
|
# ¿ Jan 22, 2015 15:55 |
|
I see that, but what about federal loans? What happens to them in death?
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2015 04:09 |
|
The Mandingo posted:Not nearly as interesting as being in Judge Judy Lmao
|
# ¿ Apr 7, 2015 21:05 |
|
It's bona fide, it's like no one here is even trying
|
# ¿ Jul 30, 2015 15:52 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 13:16 |
|
blarzgh posted:I'll update my trial brief real quick. Haha
|
# ¿ Sep 6, 2015 18:31 |