|
Hermansen posted:Prices aren't revealed yet though, but it's a 1.4, how bad can they be? With both a turbocharger AND a supercharger! 
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2010 04:16
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 19, 2024 09:08 |
|
|
Hermansen posted:I guess that's why ze germans gets almost as much horsepower out of 1.4 liters, as americans do from 4. There's no replacement for d ...oh yeah
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2010 04:33
|
|
|
InitialDave posted:Sounds like a good basis for a work truck, but if it's mk1 Hilux, doesn't that mean leaf-sprung live axles are the order of the day? Might be a shock for people who've driven anything built in the last couple of decades. Once the assuredly-cheaply made body panels all rot off, I hope you can't tell the difference between this and a 30 year old Hilux, ignoring the engine. That would be just great.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2012 20:44
|
|
|
Having the headlights larger than the grille makes it look like some animu O_O thing. Or something, it definitely looks downsy.
|
|
#
¿
May 18, 2012 20:57
|
|
|
While I love me some turbo V6es, I just don't understand why. They could easily get the same power and better economy from a LSwhatever, and it would probably cost less in manufacturing, too. And probably be lighter. Why? Also, it's weird that lut of 4 engines, only one is NA, in the CTSes nowadays. Crazy times, man.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 19, 2013 02:03
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 19, 2024 09:08 |
|
|
Sole Survivor posted:My best guess is that GM is using a Twin Turbo V6 in the CTS to differentiate it from the Chevrolet SS. I... guess? I dunno, seems like a hell of a lot of cost and work for something totally 100% unneeded. Gives some neat talking points though I guess.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 19, 2013 02:30
|
|