Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
therattle
Jul 24, 2007
Soiled Meat
So. I loiter in Goons With Spoons quite a lot, and they have a splendid general chat thread for matters unrelated to food. They also have a separate thread for people to ask general cooking/food questions (a need which is diminished in TBB). It occurs to me that TBB could do with something similar, but integrated: a general book barn chat and questions thread. You CAN talk about books and reading and writing if you want; or you can just shoot the breeze.

What say ye?

I will get things started. I just finished A Pale View OF The Hills, and while I cannot claim to have completely understood the story, it's still pretty drat amazing. Ishiguro is the master of the allusion, the unsaid, the suggestion - so the reader has to do some work (mostly but not always successfully!). What did people think the story was with Sachiko and her daughter, and Etsuko (narrator) and her husband?

Also, I was just invited to a weekend in Majorca with a colleague/friend, and it was incredible. Even though the weather wasn't brilliant it is such a beautiful place, and the food was delicious too. It didn't hurt that her mother's house, in which we stayed, was absolutely spectacular. We picked oranges off her trees to make fresh juice for breakfast...

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

wickles
Oct 12, 2009

"In England we have a saying for a situation such as this, which is that it's difficult difficult lemon difficult."
I was thinking of creating just such a thread last night - but then fell asleep and forgot all about it. I thought it could be more for book news or general chat but if off-topic stuff works well then so be it.

Radio 4 is one of the best things in the world and at the moment they have an 8 part series called Capturing America: Mark Lawson's History of Modern American Literature "Mark Lawson tells the story of how American writing became the literary superpower of the 20th century, telling the nation's stories of money, power, sex, religion and war".
It features insightful interviews with the likes of: Cornwell, DeLillo, Doctorow, Ellroy, Irving, King, Mailer, Roth, Updike, Vonnegut, (you get the idea).

The programmes and the individual interviews are available here for UK users at least (does any of this work for anyone outside the UK?)

therattle
Jul 24, 2007
Soiled Meat

wickles posted:

I was thinking of creating just such a thread last night - but then fell asleep and forgot all about it. I thought it could be more for book news or general chat but if off-topic stuff works well then so be it.

Radio 4 is one of the best things in the world and at the moment they have an 8 part series called Capturing America: Mark Lawson's History of Modern American Literature "Mark Lawson tells the story of how American writing became the literary superpower of the 20th century, telling the nation's stories of money, power, sex, religion and war".
It features insightful interviews with the likes of: Cornwell, DeLillo, Doctorow, Ellroy, Irving, King, Mailer, Roth, Updike, Vonnegut, (you get the idea).

The programmes and the individual interviews are available here for UK users at least (does any of this work for anyone outside the UK?)

Yeah, sure you did. :smug: I thought off-topic by people who like books and reading could be neat-o.

Radio 4 is awesome. I podcast The News Quiz every week, and "In Our Time" with Melvyn Bragg. It's always on in the background when I am cooking, clearing up, etc.

The Machine
Dec 15, 2004
Rage Against / Welcome to
Where do you guys read book reviews? :3:

Looking for something that would have a large mix of new/old books (that isn't just Amazon user reviews).

therattle
Jul 24, 2007
Soiled Meat

The Machine posted:

Where do you guys read book reviews? :3:

Looking for something that would have a large mix of new/old books (that isn't just Amazon user reviews).


The New Yorker, The Guardian (https://www.guardian.co.uk), used to get NY Review of Books and London Review of Books, but cancelled them - only reason I used to get LRB was to read the hilarious personals.

Syrinxx
Mar 28, 2002

Death is whimsical today

Why are fiction novels always called <Title> : A Novel ? Isn't it kind of implied that it's a novel when it's sitting in the fiction section?

Is this just some kind of throwback thing like adding Esq. to the end of a lawyer's name?

Irisi
Feb 18, 2009

wickles posted:

Radio 4 is one of the best things in the world

This is entirely true. Here's hoping the cuts the BBC are having to make won't harm it too badly. I particularly like the 5 o' clock news show with Eddie Mair and the ineffable glory that is The Shipping Forecast.

On an entirely unrelated topic, I would like to know why recommended texts for university/college are so expensive. I just bought two midwifery textbooks and paid £70 quid in total. I felt a bit sick handing over all that money, especially when I know that in 4 years time they'll bring out new editions & I might have to get them too. Why can't they make them available in e-book format & charge us poor students less?

freebooter
Jul 7, 2009

therattle posted:

Only reason I used to get LRB was to read the hilarious personals.

My creative writing teacher in uni used to read these out to us at the end of every class. Money well spent.

This is a good website for sci-fi reviews. I also find the New York Times Review of Books to be interesting. And I'll plug my own book reviews.

Earwicker
Jan 6, 2003

Syrinxx posted:

Why are fiction novels always called <Title> : A Novel ? Isn't it kind of implied that it's a novel when it's sitting in the fiction section?

Is this just some kind of throwback thing like adding Esq. to the end of a lawyer's name?

It's a marketing thing but it differentiates more "literary" novels (that is, not novels that necessarily actually have more literary value, but novels that are marketed as such) from thrillers, mysteries, scifi, and other kinds of genre fiction. Note that most genre novels don't usually have this, though some thrillers have "a thriller" and some mysteries have "a (name of recurring protagonist) mystery". It's also a fairly recent development, I think it started getting popular in the late 80's/early 90's.

Plus, there are of course some books in the fiction section that are not novels. Collections of short stories or novellas for example. And I think it's a fair bet that it's also been used on the cover of "novels" that are really a bunch of bullshit about the writers' personal life as a means of thinly masking that.

Earwicker fucked around with this message at 19:27 on Mar 2, 2010

Facial Fracture
Aug 11, 2007

therattle posted:

The New Yorker, The Guardian (https://www.guardian.co.uk), used to get NY Review of Books and London Review of Books, but cancelled them - only reason I used to get LRB was to read the hilarious personals.

John Crace's Digested Read is one of my favourite things. His breakdown of Amis's Pregnant Widow was great. To the person who asked about reviews, he's doing "classics" now too; as long as you don't mind having a classic spoiled for you--and you'll probably have an idea of the plot going in anyway--it's a entertaining way to get an overview.

My dad saves me the books supplements from the New York Times since I'm too cheap to subscribe. They're probably available online and are often good.

Also, I just ordered this http://www.amazon.com/Power-Delight-Lifetime-Literature-1962-2002/dp/0393058409/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1267556304&sr=8-2 after having wanted it for a few years. I've read a few of Bayley's essays and he just comes across as a very nice, very clever man who genuinely loved books.

Irisi posted:

On an entirely unrelated topic, I would like to know why recommended texts for university/college are so expensive. I just bought two midwifery textbooks and paid £70 quid in total. I felt a bit sick handing over all that money, especially when I know that in 4 years time they'll bring out new editions & I might have to get them too. Why can't they make them available in e-book format & charge us poor students less?

Can you bring back your books to the university bookstore when you're finished with them and get some of the money back? I can, but it drives me crazy not to be able to highlight and dog-ear and otherwise abuse the books as I usually would. I've got a bunch of Canadian history texts that I never want to see again for the rest of my life but I hate to refrain from scribbling in the margins and stuff.

Juanito
Jan 20, 2004

I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?
Hell Gem

Irisi posted:

On an entirely unrelated topic, I would like to know why recommended texts for university/college are so expensive. I just bought two midwifery textbooks and paid £70 quid in total. I felt a bit sick handing over all that money, especially when I know that in 4 years time they'll bring out new editions & I might have to get them too. Why can't they make them available in e-book format & charge us poor students less?
In most cases it is completely intentional. It's a disgusting business.

One course I took, we had to buy a 60 dollar book that was pretty small (less than 150 pages paperback) And at the end of each chapter was a page of questions with empty spaces for answers.

During class we were expected to tear out these pages and turn them in.

The guy running the class, it was his loving book. Guess what? You tore the pages out of the book, so now you can't sell it back since it is useless to a new student.

Pathetic, pathetic scam. I didn't buy the book, just photocopied it from a friend, and cut to the size of everybody else. The questions didn't require a special page to be turned in.

Paragon8
Feb 19, 2007

The worst is when the book you have to buy is written by your own professor.

Then when they leave for a new job, the book has no resale value because they're the only people who set that book :(

wickles
Oct 12, 2009

"In England we have a saying for a situation such as this, which is that it's difficult difficult lemon difficult."

Irisi posted:

This is entirely true. Here's hoping the cuts the BBC are having to make won't harm it too badly. I particularly like the 5 o' clock news show with Eddie Mair and the ineffable glory that is The Shipping Forecast.
If Radio 4 was ever affected in any way I think there'd be a middle-class uprising! Have you ever heard some of the random poo poo people complain about on Feedback? (Fridays at 1:30PM)

therattle posted:

The New Yorker, The Guardian (https://www.guardian.co.uk), used to get NY Review of Books and London Review of Books, but cancelled them - only reason I used to get LRB was to read the hilarious personals.
All of these are great plus the TLS is useful too. For other stuff I guess sites like Goodreads are good for reviews.

I can't afford subscription to The New Yorker, NYRB or LRB and used to buy an occasional copy from Borders but now that's closed in the UK does anyone here know where I could buy a copy from? They put up a few articles online but the bulk is subscription access only.

Actually, if any one has any copies of The New Yorker, New York Review of Books or London Review of Books they no longer want can I have them? I'll pay for shipping.:unsmith:

inktvis
Dec 11, 2005

What is ridiculous about human beings, Doctor, is actually their total incapacity to be ridiculous.

Paragon8 posted:

The worst is when the book you have to buy is written by your own professor.
If someone's making a killing on textbooks it's generally safe to assume it's not the writers. More than a couple I've talked to receive negative royalty statements on a regular basis and whoring the thing out is the only way to keep the publishers from pulping it.

I think the prices are mostly just driven up by the publishers' generous returns policies, which in turn are usually the only reason campus bookstores can afford to keep supplying the books in the face of unpredictable demand. It's a bit of a no-win choice between inflated prices or being told they've sold out of the book you desperately need on a much more regular basis.

therattle
Jul 24, 2007
Soiled Meat

wickles posted:

If Radio 4 was ever affected in any way I think there'd be a middle-class uprising! Have you ever heard some of the random poo poo people complain about on Feedback? (Fridays at 1:30PM)

Actually, if any one has any copies of The New Yorker, New York Review of Books or London Review of Books they no longer want can I have them? I'll pay for shipping.:unsmith:

Sorry, man - I hoard my New Yorkers.

Yes, can you imagine if they made cuts to Radio 4? People would be marching in the streets politely, waving grammatically-correct placards, and registering their objections in the strongest possible terms (without resorting to foul language). They'd egg the minister in charge with Waitrose organic free range eggs. (I must confess to being squarely in this demographic: Radio 4-listening, Guardian-reading, media-working, organic food-eating middle class liberal.)


PS glad to see people climbing in to this thread. That's the spirit!

The Machine
Dec 15, 2004
Rage Against / Welcome to

Paragon8 posted:

The worst is when the book you have to buy is written by your own professor.

Then when they leave for a new job, the book has no resale value because they're the only people who set that book :(

My school has a computer class cowritten by the professor with tear-out homework assignments. You also need the original code in the back of the book to do assignments online.

This is a freshman computer class thousands of people take every semester because it counts as a science/math requirement for pretty much every major.

The guy is fuckin' loaded I bet.

Magnificent Quiver
May 8, 2003


Paragon8 posted:

The worst is when the book you have to buy is written by your own professor.

Then when they leave for a new job, the book has no resale value because they're the only people who set that book :(

One of my professors just put his book online. Professors get poo poo royalties on their own textbooks anyway, why not deal with a publisher that will let you provide the book for free to your own students?

Shonagon
Mar 27, 2005

It is impervious to reason or pleading, it knows no mercy or patience.

Irisi posted:

On an entirely unrelated topic, I would like to know why recommended texts for university/college are so expensive. I just bought two midwifery textbooks and paid £70 quid in total. I felt a bit sick handing over all that money, especially when I know that in 4 years time they'll bring out new editions & I might have to get them too. Why can't they make them available in e-book format & charge us poor students less?

They aren't necessarily making anyone much money, because they don't sell many copies. Say you've got a print run of 4000 copies, and after four years you have to pulp any remainder and bring out a new edition. The cover price on that 4000 print run has to pay for:

- Author advance/royalty, maybe 7.5% of receipts (don't know about academic)
- Bookseller discount, anything from 35% at your local bookshop to 80% if you're buying through Amazon. (Yes, Amazon get an 80% discount from the publisher.)
- Print costs, pretty high if the book is full of photos or colour. High print cost and low print run = crippling unit cost
- Production costs, also high if the book is full of diagrams and charts and numbers that have had to be painstakingly double checked
- Salaries, heating and light at the publisher's office (if a book doesn't make any contribution to that, the publisher goes down)

So on the £35 you just paid for a textbook, the publisher gives away maybe 55% in retailer discount on average. That leaves around £17 to cover author costs, image costs, freelance costs like designers, proofreaders, indexers, running costs including salaries, print costs (which could easily run to £3 per book or more for this kind of thing), and the small profit without which the publisher is just not going to bother to do it in the first place.

Obviously these costs apply to everything, but you can imagine that when you're printing 30,000 copies of a mass market paperback, and expecting to reprint at 10,000 without changing a thing beyond the copyright page, your unit costs are very small. (You are really getting gouged when you pay £6.99 for a Dan Brown p/b, in terms of cost to the publisher vs cover cost.) If you have to make a new edition every few years, your unit costs are huge, and you have to price accordingly. This is also why travel guides are so absurdly expensive.

I completely agree that all travel guides and academic texts should go electronic, though bear in mind what that will do to the costs of texts for people who don't have/like/can't afford e-readers.

The London Deanery (NHS UK) has been giving out e-readers already loaded with medical textbooks to junior doctors and apparently it's been really successful. I'd expect that kind of thing to become the norm in the West soon. But again, where does that leave places that can't invest in that kind of technology?

(This is not an apologia for publishers and obscene cover costs, we operate on a retarded business model and have only ourselves to blame. Just an explanation...)

Shonagon fucked around with this message at 10:07 on Mar 4, 2010

therattle
Jul 24, 2007
Soiled Meat

Shonagon posted:

They aren't necessarily making anyone much money, because they don't sell many copies. Say you've got a print run of 4000 copies, and after four years you have to pulp any remainder and bring out a new edition. The cover price on that 4000 print run has to pay for:

- Author advance/royalty, maybe 7.5% of receipts (don't know about academic)
- Bookseller discount, anything from 35% at your local bookshop to 80% if you're buying through Amazon. (Yes, Amazon get an 80% discount from the publisher.)
- Print costs, pretty high if the book is full of photos or colour. High print cost and low print run = crippling unit cost
- Production costs, also high if the book is full of diagrams and charts and numbers that have had to be painstakingly double checked
- Salaries, heating and light at the publisher's office (if a book doesn't make any contribution to that, the publisher goes down)

So on the £35 you just paid for a textbook, the publisher gives away maybe 55% in retailer discount on average. That leaves around £17 to cover author costs, image costs, freelance costs like designers, proofreaders, indexers, running costs including salaries, print costs (which could easily run to £3 per book or more for this kind of thing), and the small profit without which the publisher is just not going to bother to do it in the first place.

Obviously these costs apply to everything, but you can imagine that when you're printing 30,000 copies of a mass market paperback, and expecting to reprint at 10,000 without changing a thing beyond the copyright page, your unit costs are very small. (You are really getting gouged when you pay £6.99 for a Dan Brown p/b, in terms of cost to the publisher vs cover cost.) If you have to make a new edition every few years, your unit costs are huge, and you have to price accordingly. This is also why travel guides are so absurdly expensive.

I completely agree that all travel guides and academic texts should go electronic, though bear in mind what that will do to the costs of texts for people who don't have/like/can't afford e-readers.

The London Deanery (NHS UK) has been giving out e-readers already loaded with medical textbooks to junior doctors and apparently it's been really successful. I'd expect that kind of thing to become the norm in the West soon. But again, where does that leave places that can't invest in that kind of technology?

(This is not an apologia for publishers and obscene cover costs, we operate on a retarded business model and have only ourselves to blame. Just an explanation...)

My question then would be why so many very specific textbooks are needed, especially at relatively introductory levels? Why write your own first-year economics textbook (with the corresponding low print run and high costs) when there are plenty out there that would probably be 95% as good?

Shonagon
Mar 27, 2005

It is impervious to reason or pleading, it knows no mercy or patience.

therattle posted:

My question then would be why so many very specific textbooks are needed, especially at relatively introductory levels? Why write your own first-year economics textbook (with the corresponding low print run and high costs) when there are plenty out there that would probably be 95% as good?

Wouldn't you try to be the recognised expert in the subject, and the guy getting the royalties, rather than just telling people to buy someone else's book? Of course a professor would want to pimp their own texts. The real question is why universities don't lean on flagrant abuses such as the above. (Out of interest, how many of those texts were printed by the university publisher?)

Hah - my ex studied philosophy at Oxford, with a highly renowned ethicist, who set all his own stuff as required reading for the course and, when asked a question, would reply, 'Let's see what I think about that' and flip to a relevant page in one of his books. Ethicist.

I'm not defending the practice at all, I think some of the stuff above is disgusting abuse. I just wanted to point out that academic textbook prices aren't set at £35 purely because the publisher knows people have to buy them (though there's always an element of that in any pricing strategy); poo poo costs money to make, too.

Paragon8
Feb 19, 2007

It also depends on how widely distributed the book is. Like my college professor that set his own book, was only used on that one course he taught ever. Niche subjects are going to have high costs just from supply and demand.

Whereas my friend whose dad was a high school teacher and ended up writing a high school textbook that was extensively used throughout Europe made quite a bit of money. Not Dan Brown money, but enough for a nice Volvo.

Really nice textbooks though can really be worth the money. The ones with illustrations and diagrams etc. I think people mostly resent the ones that just seem to be copied across from a word document.

therattle
Jul 24, 2007
Soiled Meat

Shonagon posted:

Wouldn't you try to be the recognised expert in the subject, and the guy getting the royalties, rather than just telling people to buy someone else's book? Of course a professor would want to pimp their own texts. The real question is why universities don't lean on flagrant abuses such as the above. (Out of interest, how many of those texts were printed by the university publisher?)

Hah - my ex studied philosophy at Oxford, with a highly renowned ethicist, who set all his own stuff as required reading for the course and, when asked a question, would reply, 'Let's see what I think about that' and flip to a relevant page in one of his books. Ethicist.

I'm not defending the practice at all, I think some of the stuff above is disgusting abuse. I just wanted to point out that academic textbook prices aren't set at £35 purely because the publisher knows people have to buy them (though there's always an element of that in any pricing strategy); poo poo costs money to make, too.

In answer to 1, sure, yes, but I suppose the job of the publisher is also to ascertain whether the demand would be there, and if said book will be the one to succeed.

The ethicist one is classic. I wonder if there was any self-awareness or humour in what he did and said. I certainly hope so...

I think that we're both actually seeing both sides, and this isn't really an argument anyway: poo poo costs money to make and distribute, and the system is also abused, with elements of monopoly pricing.

Group hug!

Irisi
Feb 18, 2009

Shonagon posted:

The London Deanery (NHS UK) has been giving out e-readers already loaded with medical textbooks to junior doctors and apparently it's been really successful. I'd expect that kind of thing to become the norm in the West soon. But again, where does that leave places that can't invest in that kind of technology?

(This is not an apologia for publishers and obscene cover costs, we operate on a retarded business model and have only ourselves to blame. Just an explanation...)

Thank you for the explanation, Shonagn, you're always so informative!

It does make sense for the NHS to be giving out the e-readers, given that little details about methods of treatment, etc. are constantly being updated & revised. Wish they'd give them to us poor, underfunded nurses & midwives in training too. (Mind you, that would mean that I wouldn't get to colour in diagrams of the lymphatic system anymore, and I quite like doing that; it's not every field of study that classifies "colouring with crayons" as a legitimate method of revision)

wickles
Oct 12, 2009

"In England we have a saying for a situation such as this, which is that it's difficult difficult lemon difficult."

Irisi posted:

... it's not every field of study that classifies "colouring with crayons" as a legitimate method of revision)
Hey, leave Geography alone!

therattle
Jul 24, 2007
Soiled Meat

Irisi posted:

Thank you for the explanation, Shonagn, you're always so informative!

It does make sense for the NHS to be giving out the e-readers, given that little details about methods of treatment, etc. are constantly being updated & revised. Wish they'd give them to us poor, underfunded nurses & midwives in training too. (Mind you, that would mean that I wouldn't get to colour in diagrams of the lymphatic system anymore, and I quite like doing that; it's not every field of study that classifies "colouring with crayons" as a legitimate method of revision)

Stop complaining bout being underfunded, whinging nurses. All you have to do is nursery-school-level colouring-in, and changing bed-pans.

I'm voting Tory because that George Osborn is sooooo dreamy, and they'll show those lazy public service workers a thing or two!

Ballsworthy
Apr 30, 2008

yup

McMurphy
Feb 14, 2004

THE FACES OF THOSE IVE KILLED
THE FACES OF THE DEAD
THE FACES OF THOSE I'VE KILLED

Gentlewoman and gentlemen, I implore you: if you are going to write your brilliant observations in a book then give away that book, write is loving pencil. If it's a library book, just kill yourself. That's all.

therattle
Jul 24, 2007
Soiled Meat

McMurphy posted:

Gentlewoman and gentlemen, I implore you: if you are going to write your brilliant observations in a book then give away that book, write is loving pencil. If it's a library book, just kill yourself. That's all.

Yes. Otherwise it's desecration. People who write on books other than their own make me furious.

Seksiness
Aug 24, 2006
I screwed your grandma and all I got was this lousy custom title... and herpes
I love getting annotated books. I picked up a copy of Dead Scrolls at a flea market in Brighton and not only got an excellent book but some excellent backstory on Gogol and a short comparison of the influences on him from Pushkin and Lermontov. Writing in library books is pretty dickish though.

criptozoid
Jan 3, 2005
Yeah, while writing in library books is indeed reprehensible, one of the few true pleasures of lending/giving books is to inflict your marginalia on other people.

Juanito
Jan 20, 2004

I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?
Hell Gem
I've never been able to write, highlight or make any markings in my books. If something is really important then I'll make a note of it somewhere else.

Mr. Fun
Sep 22, 2006

ABSOLUTE KINOGRAPHY
The worst part of writing in library books is when someone really dumb had the book before you. I got Light in August out of my University library and there were entire paragraphs underlined with notes like "racism!" and "symbol!". Thanks retard.

Who are these people that they don't have other paper to take notes on?

Gorn Myson
Aug 8, 2007






Half the time the stuff people write in books is completely indecipherable to me. So its as if someone took a book and just started scribbling all over it for no reason. I picked up a library book a few months back and it looked as if someone had drafted a letter in the back. Couldn't make out a single word of it.

On the other hand, in the copy of "Roman Revolution" by Ronald Syme, someone managed to correctly translate a couple of the latin phrases within it. Which was nice.

quote:

I love getting annotated books. I picked up a copy of Dead Scrolls at a flea market in Brighton and not only got an excellent book but some excellent backstory on Gogol and a short comparison of the influences on him from Pushkin and Lermontov. Writing in library books is pretty dickish though.
Brighton as in Brighton, England? Its just that I'm down at Sussex Uni right now and every Tuesday these 2 guys turn up at the front of the uni with a load of cheap second hand books. Anyway, last week I saw "Dead Scrolls" there, only I went back today to go and pick it up and some bugger had nabbed it already...

tombom
Mar 8, 2006
I think my favourite library annotation was in a pretty fat history book where the only marking was somewhere in the middle, where somebody had pointed to an "it's" and written "its?".

The book was correct.

Juanito
Jan 20, 2004

I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?
Hell Gem
I think I saw that once in a book, where someone had marked something that supposedly incorrect, but they were wrong and the book was right. It makes you want to leave a note for the previous person, unfortunately, they'll never see it.

Earwicker
Jan 6, 2003

therattle posted:

Yes. Otherwise it's desecration. People who write on books other than their own make me furious.

A lot of the time when you see writing in a library book, the library got it that way

PBCrunch
Jun 17, 2002

Lawrence Phillips Always #1 to Me
I posted this in the what you finished thread but it got kind of lost in there I think. I'll post it here since this book has been mentioned in a number of threads in this forum.

I just finished up Blindsight by Peter Watts and I was pretty confused through pretty much the whole thing. The plot was hard to follow, the characters were all severely unlikeable and it was hard to follow their motivations.

Is this what happened?
They took their ship to a small but very dense planet past the edge of the known solar system. The ship's AI was controlling the "vampire" the whole time. The crew (except the vampire/ship AI) went into the ship where all the crew that went had their brains hacked by all the EMF. They make a couple of trips back and forth into Rorschach and one of the crew dies. In the process the crew obtains a not-really-dead alien and takes it onto the ship. A new crewman is defrosted and analyzes the dead alien. Did Rorschach kill the biologist because he had all that cybernetic poo poo and that kept the brain hacks from working? Rorschach allowed the specimen to be taken to further an agenda that was outside the main narrator's understanding.

The crew makes several trips and takes two live aliens. They hear the imprisoned aliens communicating and decide that even though the aliens are non-sentient they are still intelligent.

Rorschach attacks with a cannon and gets the bodies (and experience data) of the two aliens back and also takes the replacement biologist guy with them.

Then when the ship self destructs in order to destroy Rorschach the narrator is left to drift through space. He hears that "Heaven" was destroyed somehow. Somehow he knows that the vampires did it and now Earth is devoid of humans and overrun with vampires. Mankind was doomed all along and it had nothing to do with aliens. The inefficiency of sentience did us in all on our own?

Is this correct?

LGBT War Machine
Dec 20, 2004

ooooohawwww Mildred

therattle posted:


Yes, can you imagine if they made cuts to Radio 4? People would be marching in the streets politely, waving grammatically-correct placards, and registering their objections in the strongest possible terms (without resorting to foul language).
Actually, they would register their protest without hesitation or repetition and sung to the tune of an entirely different complaint. And then they'd drive the minister to Mornington Crescent and stick his head under a tube train.

Soulcleaver
Sep 25, 2007

Murderer
I had a technical writing professor who was tired of seeing students get ripped off, so he had his course require only a single book that he wrote himself and sold at cost (About $10). Loved that guy.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Delicious Sci Fi
Jul 17, 2006

You cannot lose if you do not play.

PBCrunch posted:

I posted this in the what you finished thread but it got kind of lost in there I think. I'll post it here since this book has been mentioned in a number of threads in this forum.

I just finished up Blindsight by Peter Watts and I was pretty confused through pretty much the whole thing. The plot was hard to follow, the characters were all severely unlikeable and it was hard to follow their motivations.

Is this what happened?
They took their ship to a small but very dense planet past the edge of the known solar system. The ship's AI was controlling the "vampire" the whole time. The crew (except the vampire/ship AI) went into the ship where all the crew that went had their brains hacked by all the EMF. They make a couple of trips back and forth into Rorschach and one of the crew dies. In the process the crew obtains a not-really-dead alien and takes it onto the ship. A new crewman is defrosted and analyzes the dead alien. Did Rorschach kill the biologist because he had all that cybernetic poo poo and that kept the brain hacks from working? Rorschach allowed the specimen to be taken to further an agenda that was outside the main narrator's understanding.

The crew makes several trips and takes two live aliens. They hear the imprisoned aliens communicating and decide that even though the aliens are non-sentient they are still intelligent.

Rorschach attacks with a cannon and gets the bodies (and experience data) of the two aliens back and also takes the replacement biologist guy with them.

Then when the ship self destructs in order to destroy Rorschach the narrator is left to drift through space. He hears that "Heaven" was destroyed somehow. Somehow he knows that the vampires did it and now Earth is devoid of humans and overrun with vampires. Mankind was doomed all along and it had nothing to do with aliens. The inefficiency of sentience did us in all on our own?

Is this correct?

No sorry, you got it all wrong.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply