|
jandrese posted:
Tell you what, if you can cook up even expensive and inefficient antigravity, the Swedish king has a medal for you.
|
# ¿ Jun 29, 2010 16:08 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 04:01 |
|
We need some good looking homebuilts up in this. Van's RV-8 Lancair Legacy New Dynon EFIS gizmo soon available to kit builders. Click here for the full 2000x1500 image. RV-10 panel all glassed out with current tech. The lack of any personal touches is because the builder didn't build this for himself, but posted it for sale "ready for paint job of buyer's choice" - building for profit violates the intent of the experimental aircraft laws and has furrowed some legislative brows. Not good. DynAero MCR 01, carbon fibre wonder of the ultralight world. Its speed envelope is between 34 and 160 knots. Silence Twister. Not sure if this project ever took off or if it ever complied with ultralight regs, but drat those elliptic wings are sexy.
|
# ¿ Jul 8, 2010 17:31 |
|
Also, eastern Europeans know how to make a god drat airplane commercial https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-tfhL87u8Y
|
# ¿ Jul 8, 2010 17:37 |
|
Oh, it's the actual music video? I didn't know. Cheesy as hell anyway.
|
# ¿ Jul 8, 2010 18:31 |
|
grover posted:Something is wrong with one of the engines, too, as one nozzle is tight while the other is open. And only one is spouting flames during the impact, but that might be coincidence. I agree. If you look at the video it seems like he's doing the low/slow/high alpha pass, which is a staple of any F-18 performance. When he hits full burners to accelerate out of it, the right engine isn't responding and that much asymmetrical thrust at near stalling speed means instant membership in the Martin Baker Ejection Tie Club. The shots of the sequence are incredible.
|
# ¿ Jul 24, 2010 20:24 |
|
Raytheon Permier Jet crash at Oshkosh. http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/4879556/ Eyewitess says: quote:It was Jack Roush's Premier. I saw most of it until it disappeared behind some planes. He appeared to be at high alpha, way behind the power curve, and then went into what appeared to be a 45-60 degree bank. Wing hit first, jet spun around 180 degrees or so, and the rear section of the fuselage broke off. No fire. I watched the pilot walk out (very bloody) and heard that the sole passenger was ok. Pics of said bloody pilot in the thread. drat! Probably not as bad as it looks, you do bleed a lot from face/nose cuts.
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2010 09:38 |
|
Are there any official stats on how many crashes/deaths there are every year at Oshkosh?
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2010 13:13 |
|
Moot1234 posted:That's a mighty high altitude for a Jag. I bet the pilot has a nose bleed. The regular take off procedure is: "take off, raise gear, descend to cruising altitude".
|
# ¿ Jul 30, 2010 09:10 |
|
BRS is the best thing that has happened to aviation since the piddle pack. Holy gently caress. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4a8cntPdRtk
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2010 07:48 |
|
I'm dreaming about owning an ultralight as well. No way it's going to be without a BRS. There's been two fatal ultralight crashes in Norway this summer, don't think either one had a chute. But both cases was low altitude, stall or engine failure, that thing does need quite a few feet to develop fully. Although in rare cases it can be a liability as well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVq_uqzgax8
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2010 07:55 |
|
Suicide Machine posted:I'd hate to see the price of one, though. About $20,000, not including installation.
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2010 17:44 |
|
Don't think this has been posted. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xp2Uc9XvmjY Legend Bob Hoover shows us a perfectly coordinated roll. And his slick skills of course.
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2010 14:00 |
|
Nerobro posted:Other than sperg value, what's the real difference between the two? The difference is basically just the name. Military bureaucracy demands its units in service to follow the official military naming convention. But fundamentally the DC-3 was a passenger plane and the C-47 a cargo plane, so militarizing it means ripping out the interior, widening the door and painting it green. But both of them were used for a zillion different things with different modifications.
|
# ¿ Sep 8, 2010 16:04 |
|
2ndclasscitizen posted:Why have they got missiles loaded for flyovers in Melbourne? In case of any Kiwi Skyhawks.
|
# ¿ Sep 9, 2010 12:23 |
|
Slo-Tek posted:Sunday is supposed to be severe clear, but with 2 billion fewer dollars in the sky. Maybe they've predicted the titanium overcast for Saturday?
|
# ¿ Sep 9, 2010 17:26 |
|
blugu64 posted:That and the cricket pitch in the last photo. Is that what you guys call it? I've tried for years to figure out that sport, but no amount of beer and foreigners explaining it to me has ever worked. Cricket is just a Commonwealth in-joke, there are no actual rules. Much like Mornington Crescent.
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2010 09:49 |
|
A spot of aeronautical virtual insanity, the upcoming Storm of War: Battle of Britain. Click here for the full 1920x1080 image. Click here for the full 1920x1080 image. Click here for the full 1920x1080 image. Click here for the full 1920x1080 image. My graphics card is crying blood.
|
# ¿ Sep 27, 2010 20:52 |
|
Most games are best when you enjoy them blissfully ignorant. Then one small driver issue later you find yourself scrolling through the official forums and BAM it's all ruined.
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2010 19:41 |
|
I remember seeing some stuff about Iranian amphibians before and I'm pretty sure we managed to find out which American kitplane it was based on. Factory in Flordia if I remember correctly. edit: vvv a UAV that isn't U and barely A. Ola fucked around with this message at 13:42 on Sep 29, 2010 |
# ¿ Sep 29, 2010 13:21 |
|
The test pilot stories, and many other stories from aviation advances of that era, is just pure pornography.
|
# ¿ Sep 30, 2010 10:47 |
|
Godholio posted:They also do a full rebuild every 300 flight hours vs USAF's 10k+ hours. It's a different doctrine, not just different maintenance schedules. Russians have conscripts doing aircraft maintenance, so they don't do troubleshooting or repairs on the field. The engines run virtually without maintenance for (say) 300 hours, then they simply pull the engines and send them into a central site. This classic example of commernist centralization probably works best in a world where cruise missiles / stealth bombers don't exist and your central maintenance site won't get blown up on day 1 of the war.
|
# ¿ Oct 12, 2010 15:27 |
|
Godholio posted:I know it's a whole different mindset, but it's hard to say their engines are better because they're more willing to eat small pebbles. Yeah and I don't think the pebble statement is very true either. The Soviet have often designed their aircraft with rough runways in mind, either high mounted intakes or FOD doors. Nebakenezzer posted:Y'know, it's weird, but this example of commernist thinking seems to me what Wal-Mart would do if it operated an air force. Chinese stealth invasion.
|
# ¿ Oct 13, 2010 23:42 |
|
It makes a special sound at certain throttle settings, a howl that dubbed it "the West Fjord Bull" amongst the people living around Bodø airbase in northern Norway. You can hear it at 0:54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozIRwMhRVRY
|
# ¿ Oct 15, 2010 18:21 |
|
Ramjet effect or not, it doesn't make untrue a photo caption that basically says "SR-71 at balls to wall throttle setting".
|
# ¿ Oct 23, 2010 17:12 |
|
Holy hell, that's what you call a proper engine failure. #1 poo poo a big brick in a way that neither Airbus nor Rolls Royce intended brickshitting to happen.
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2010 12:34 |
|
The engine sucking water is #1, the close up is of #2 - the engine that blew up. Note the kangaroo logo on #1 and then notice how that entire part of the nacelle is missing from #2. Flying debris causing damage to wing: After it's done loving up the wing, it proceeds to gently caress up a van: Rumours say that two people on the ground were injuried by debris.
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2010 13:21 |
|
There are quite a few airliner incidents where a fuel tank puncture has caused immediate fire.
|
# ¿ Nov 19, 2010 13:21 |
|
Pretty funny to think that it was originally intended to be a carrier borne fighter.
|
# ¿ Nov 22, 2010 15:59 |
|
It would be amazing to get an old ejector seat installed in a beauty salon, with yellow/black handles holding the perm-dome thing.
|
# ¿ Nov 26, 2010 13:32 |
|
Saw this video on another forum a while back and just came across it again, it might've been posted here as well. Inadvertent IMC, or getting into clouds when you shouldn't, is a big killer in general aviation. This gang seems like they were actually pushing the odds instead of being surprised by it, it almost ended very abruptly. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3C6bo9sz9uQ
|
# ¿ Nov 26, 2010 19:09 |
|
Ok, I'm a big fan of experimental aviation a.k.a. kitplanes. Done right it is one of the finest home engineering hobbies and with easy access to the wealth of knowledge from fellow builders it can truly turn out a wonderful flying machine that puts comparable certified machines to shame. But this is the complete opposite. This is the most incredible NTSB report on a GA accident I have ever read. Put something soft on your desk, your jaw will be doing multiple drops. http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief2.asp?ev_id=20071120X01821&ntsbno=NYC08FA023&akey=1
|
# ¿ Nov 27, 2010 20:31 |
|
I could understand someone duct taping a piece of wood or styrofoam to the rudder when trying to size the fixed trim tab which most of these aircraft have. But only for sizing it, after the quantity is know it gets installed properly with rivets or aluminum and ideally it takes place during the Phase 1 testing. This guy didn't bother with the Phase 1 testing, although he claimed to have done 40 hours in one week. Which should have launched many eyebrows up into the stratosphere given that a completely orthodox installation gets a 25 hour Phase 1 but easily takes a month to finish. The list of errors is so long and amazing, it's frankly quite shocking that nobody in the community around him really sat him down for a talk. If afraid of personal confrontation someone should just have called the FAA. Anyway, one has to admire the linguistic restraint of the NTSB guys writing that report.
|
# ¿ Nov 27, 2010 21:45 |
|
The whole premise of the lightweight F-16 was that it would be stationed up and down the European front lines and intercept the Soviet bombers. The MiG-29 was designed with the same concept in mind, a point defense fighter. The scenario is long dead of course, now F-16s look like this: and MiG-29s look like this: Not a slight on John Boyd though, his theories are all over the military, corporate and political world.
|
# ¿ Nov 28, 2010 16:14 |
|
Have been reading a few NTSB reports lately, this one is quite amazing. Summary: - Cessna 337 (the one with 2 engines, tractor/pusher) goes to high altitude to take pictures - Oxygen system has erroneously been filled with compressed air, both occupants go hypoxic and pass out at 20.000 feet. - Plane descends uncontrolled, overspeeds and breaks up. - Passenger loving survives! http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief2.asp?ev_id=20001208X07722&ntsbno=IAD97FA060&akey=1
|
# ¿ Nov 29, 2010 13:22 |
|
Saga posted:I've always liked the RV series and in an ideal world would love to build an RV10, but one thing that puts me off is I just wouldn't trust myself not to screw something up. That's a good attitude to have. I think you need to approach it like someone doing a 15,000 piece puzzle - it's not the finished object that's attractive, but the meticulous process of building it right. If you want a big pretty picture of a Venetian bridge, buy a poster. If you want to fly right away, buy a factory plane. But the resources available for the builder, particularly in the US, provides such a vast amount of knowledge, experience and technology within easy reach. And of course the NTSB provides a lot of "don't do this" information. If you approach it as a hobby engineering project where you're willing to learn everything that remotely affects your situation, above and beyond what is actually required, you're on the right track. And also the patience and persistence of a Buddhist monk traveling to the shrine by glacier. Obviously the massive carrot at the end of the 3-7 year project is a plane that will blow the doors off any rental/club machine, perfectly equipped to your desires. I'm currently dreaming about a night VFR RV-7 with a Deltahawk diesel, autopilot, a bit of EFIS candy and oxygen system to take advantage of the high altitude capability of the engine. Might as well be dreaming about my own F-15 with Nerf missiles.
|
# ¿ Nov 29, 2010 14:02 |
|
Hahaha I love stories about aircraft idiosyncrasies. I don't have any links or usable memory available, but have read some rather hairy stories about, for instance, Royal Navy pilots in the early jet age. Carrier ops in the 50s was pretty rudimentary stuff. Here's a great video which I'm not sure has appeared in this thread. Yak-50, popular acro plane, suffers engine failure and lands in a field. All in glorious high-res, annotated, pilots perspective video. quote:Post major maintenance/life extension at EGMJ a YAK 50 loses oil pressure over the Lake District at 1250ft. http://exposureroom.com/members/ANDYWILSON/516c094e78e441e4942f22ff800ade28/
|
# ¿ Nov 29, 2010 16:58 |
|
Nice attitude indicator.
|
# ¿ Nov 30, 2010 15:01 |
|
The most stunning kitplane I've seen for a while. Holy hell. Designed in NZ, based on the Italian Falco. All carbon fiber. Retractable gear. http://www.falcomposite.com/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzGd_j7SYGQ
|
# ¿ Dec 1, 2010 19:21 |
|
Snapshot posted:Beautiful, but I wonder how they're dealing with fatigue in the CF. From my classes, it's a bitch to detect fatigue damage before it reaches unsafe limits. That made me wonder too. There is quite a lot of glass fiber aircraft around, is it very different from carbon fiber? In other news, flying a U-2 is hard. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eamnTyfkUBY
|
# ¿ Dec 7, 2010 21:17 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 04:01 |
|
I believe the outriggers are used for takeoff only and then jettisoned. That one was perhaps stuck.
|
# ¿ Dec 7, 2010 21:38 |