Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Automotive Insanity > Aeronautical Insanity: switching to secondary tolerances
 
  • Post
  • Reply
rockopete
Jan 19, 2005

 Here's the NYT's graphic, may be a bit clearer for some purposes.

rockopete fucked around with this message at 03:14 on Mar 16, 2014

* # ¿ Mar 16, 2014 03:11
  • Quote
Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 00:20
  • Quote
rockopete
Jan 19, 2005

 None of this makes any sense unless it's a very bitter suicide/mass murder. Even that doesn't make much sense, but it has happened before, right?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EgyptAir_Flight_990

Why would a suicidal hijacker fly on for so long, though?

* # ¿ Mar 16, 2014 03:29
  • Quote
rockopete
Jan 19, 2005

simplefish posted:



Also this: what can a C5 swallow?
http://m.imgur.com/a/PwzZV

The Chinook and C-130 fuselage, god drat. I love this thread.

VikingSkull posted:

..... I miss the C-5 :smith:

It's being retired?

rockopete fucked around with this message at 01:18 on Aug 13, 2014

* # ¿ Aug 13, 2014 01:16
  • Quote
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply
The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Automotive Insanity > Aeronautical Insanity: switching to secondary tolerances