|
univbee posted:They might mean "it won't install unless you have at least a 50 gig drive," a bit like how WHS v1 only has a 20 gig OS partition (of which less than half is actually used) but won't install unless you have at least a 75 gig drive to install to. When I tried installing in a VM for testing, I believe it required a 160gig HD for me to install to.
|
#
¿
Jan 7, 2011 19:16
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 03:48 |
|
|
MonkeyFit posted:So you're saying I should buy version 1 then. WHSv1 works like a charm with my 360. Music, pics and videos sync flawlessly. My Win7 media center PC has the WHS connector installed, and I've configured it to store all recorded TV on the WHS box as well. With my iTunes library shared out on the WHS, I have one big happy home for all of my digital media that I can access from any PC, and I can access it all remotely as well. It looks like the only other thing that Vail can do is some multimedia streaming. I am going to investigate further to see if it's worth running it in a VM and doing some kind of folder redirection trickery to let it access the data living on my WHSv1 box.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 7, 2011 20:17
|
|
|
Well, got kicked in the dick by drive failure. Bunch of "The group or resource is not in the correct state to perform the requested operation" messages, and as far as I understand that means that the files with those conflict messages are toast. I'm a bit confused though, because for some of these folders I had duplication turned on but I still appear to be out of luck. I bought a new drive and cloned the failing one to make sure nothing more is lost. I'm still on the fence as to whether I'll rebuild on v1 or v2. I have under 2 TB of data total so 2011 disk management shouldn't be a nightmare.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 29, 2011 06:44
|
|
|
COCKMOUTH.GIF posted:I'm starting to believe WHS 2011 should have never made it out the front door in its current state. To be fair, you are running a third-party storage abstraction layer on top of WHS. I was a die-hard WHSv1 zealot, and I upgraded to 2011 mainly for the remote access improvements. I have been running the same stock install for a long time and it's been remarkably stable.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 23, 2012 09:49
|
|
|
redeyes posted:Fine tuning and tweaking.. specifically? I'm genuinely interested in the specifics as well. I'm probably going to move to a virtualized WHS and Win7 MC environment fairly soon.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 23, 2012 21:05
|
|