|
Cannister posted:Yeah, I know that shutter speed isn't the same as frame rate. I was saying that to avoid the "saving private ryan" effect on a dSLR you have to keep the frame rate down, but too far down and you get a lot of motion blur. I think his point was that motion blur comes from slow shutter speeds and not low FPS per se. However, I'm pretty sure that all else being equal, 60fps video played back at 60fps will be much smoother than 24fps played at 24fps, since there are going to be more than twice as many frames to capture any movement.
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2010 10:43 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 17, 2024 21:51 |
|
Haven't had much time for photography and video lately, but I'm now trying to put together a shot clip for work. I already have some footage though mainly it's going to be done tomorrow. I'll be using Sony Vegas for putting the whole thing together, but I have a question, similar to Bottom Liner's. Do you typically work directly with the mov files that the (Canon) cameras spit out? I got the NeoScene trial based on some recommendation, but the videos that it converts seem to be slightly less sharp and saturated than the originals, while more than doubling the size. That's still too small for uncompressed video, but then if it's recompressing the footage, I'm guaranteed to be losing quality. So is this just a huge waste of time? Should I stick with the camera's files or go uncompressed (rather not due to lack of disk space), or use another format?
|
# ¿ Apr 3, 2011 16:42 |