Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
KillaKilla
Oct 19, 2007

Baby Hitler posted:

Plus having decades upon decades of nozzle/flow/pressure/atomization development in diesels maximizing power and efficiency using the same technology. Standard ~3bar pintle tip fuel injectors haven't really changed since their first use in the 60s with D-Jetronic.

It should be noted that direct injection on diesel engines actually operates at a far higher pressure than direct injection in gasoline engines, our transit bus engines (cummins ISL) maintain their common rail systems in excess of 1500 bar, or about 22,000 PSI, minimum. This is a big part of the reason advanced diesel engines have continued to offer comical increases in performance, even with the clusterfuck of an exhaust system that's required to keep them clean. See: Ford powerstroke engines pushing 800 lb-ft of torque in the F-250, Caterpillar's C15 offering in excess of 2000 lb-ft of torque.

I cannot comment on any reason why you could not do a similar common-rail system in a gasoline engine, that's well outside my qualifications.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply