- DARPA Dad
- Dec 9, 2008
-
|
The essence of the criticism of the criticism that has been ongoing, at least on my part, is that it is bad. It is not good. It is really not very informative. It is not that it is bad to "care".
If you actually legitimately care about film, there is a good chance you do not post about it on this web site, because if you look at the movie forum (or the book forum, etc) you see that largely there's an incredible fixation on really childish products (and they are usually products rather than films) with a corresponding lack of taste. I'm sure it's an idea that's unfamiliar to you, as a grown man who wants to surgically replace his dick and balls with a coin operated motorised Donald Duck ride who is about 3 wispy chin hairs away from being a convicted rapist, but when criticism is coming from a really juvenile place about a less-juvenile subject it can seem very superficial and difficult to respect. Like when they allow kids to do news reports on the actual news.
This is one side of the coin here. Some of the reviewers present as, essentially, children of varying extreme largeness. But even if you read what they have to say about children's movies, it's still incredibly basic analysis of a film seen through a lens of a culture who are obsessed with identity politics in all things.
For example, if you read this week's review of The Boxtrolls, all you will learn is:
- The reviewer liked Coraline and Paranorman, but this film has a worse story
- There are trolls who wear boxes, also there are two characters who have names
- The film is nominally about the trolls who wear boxes, however it focuses on one of them who isn't REALLY a troll, but is actually a boy. This is a "big problem".
- The villain is avaristic and ugly. He pretends to be a woman, this is also a big problem, but we're not told why. Just that tumblr dislikes that and they're right to do so.
- The animation is good, kids will like it.
The only thing gleaned from this review that you won't get from the trailer is a number score and at some point a man wears a dress. It's an 800 word sideways glance at a movie and it really does not do a good job reviewing it outside of conveying the general sentiment that it's sort of not bad. I don't respect this, and I don't much care what this person has to say about other movies especially if they're more complicated than this movie for 6-year-olds.
On top of which the reviews are completely joyless, on a comedy web site. It's not just that it's really out of place, it's poorly executed in its own right. I'm not trying to illegally troll or insult them so please do not electronically beat me up, but I don't think they're cut out for this.
Thank you for reading this wearying post. As a reward, here is a picture of the cast of Duck Tales taking public transport so you can finally blast the biggest load of your life you mewling piece of poo poo idiot
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 19:15
|
|
- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 15:51
|
|
- ghost bones
- Apr 27, 2013
-
everyone is fabulous always
|
The essence of the criticism of the criticism that has been ongoing, at least on my part, is that it is bad. It is not good. It is really not very informative. It is not that it is bad to "care".
If you actually legitimately care about film, there is a good chance you do not post about it on this web site, because if you look at the movie forum (or the book forum, etc) you see that largely there's an incredible fixation on really childish products (and they are usually products rather than films) with a corresponding lack of taste. I'm sure it's an idea that's unfamiliar to you, as a grown man who wants to surgically replace his dick and balls with a coin operated motorised Donald Duck ride who is about 3 wispy chin hairs away from being a convicted rapist, but when criticism is coming from a really juvenile place about a less-juvenile subject it can seem very superficial and difficult to respect. Like when they allow kids to do news reports on the actual news.
This is one side of the coin here. Some of the reviewers present as, essentially, children of varying extreme largeness. But even if you read what they have to say about children's movies, it's still incredibly basic analysis of a film seen through a lens of a culture who are obsessed with identity politics in all things.
For example, if you read this week's review of The Boxtrolls, all you will learn is:
- The reviewer liked Coraline and Paranorman, but this film has a worse story
- There are trolls who wear boxes, also there are two characters who have names
- The film is nominally about the trolls who wear boxes, however it focuses on one of them who isn't REALLY a troll, but is actually a boy. This is a "big problem".
- The villain is avaristic and ugly. He pretends to be a woman, this is also a big problem, but we're not told why. Just that tumblr dislikes that and they're right to do so.
- The animation is good, kids will like it.
The only thing gleaned from this review that you won't get from the trailer is a number score and at some point a man wears a dress. It's an 800 word sideways glance at a movie and it really does not do a good job reviewing it outside of conveying the general sentiment that it's sort of not bad. I don't respect this, and I don't much care what this person has to say about other movies especially if they're more complicated than this movie for 6-year-olds.
On top of which the reviews are completely joyless, on a comedy web site. It's not just that it's really out of place, it's poorly executed in its own right. I'm not trying to illegally troll or insult them so please do not electronically beat me up, but I don't think they're cut out for this.
Thank you for reading this wearying post. As a reward, here is a picture of the cast of Duck Tales taking public transport so you can finally blast the biggest load of your life you mewling piece of poo poo idiot
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 19:17
|
|
- Ruddha
- Jan 21, 2006
-
when you realize how cool and retarded everything is you will tilt your head back and laugh at the sky
|
Powerful.
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 19:18
|
|
- Marta Velasquez
- Mar 9, 2013
-
Good thing I was feeling suicidal this morning...
-
Fallen Rib
|
Preemptively: Free Triticum Guzzler
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 19:18
|
|
- Swelter Discharge
- Mar 21, 2013
-
|
The essence of the criticism of the criticism that has been ongoing, at least on my part, is that it is bad. It is not good. It is really not very informative. It is not that it is bad to "care".
If you actually legitimately care about film, there is a good chance you do not post about it on this web site, because if you look at the movie forum (or the book forum, etc) you see that largely there's an incredible fixation on really childish products (and they are usually products rather than films) with a corresponding lack of taste. I'm sure it's an idea that's unfamiliar to you, as a grown man who wants to surgically replace his dick and balls with a coin operated motorised Donald Duck ride who is about 3 wispy chin hairs away from being a convicted rapist, but when criticism is coming from a really juvenile place about a less-juvenile subject it can seem very superficial and difficult to respect. Like when they allow kids to do news reports on the actual news.
This is one side of the coin here. Some of the reviewers present as, essentially, children of varying extreme largeness. But even if you read what they have to say about children's movies, it's still incredibly basic analysis of a film seen through a lens of a culture who are obsessed with identity politics in all things.
For example, if you read this week's review of The Boxtrolls, all you will learn is:
- The reviewer liked Coraline and Paranorman, but this film has a worse story
- There are trolls who wear boxes, also there are two characters who have names
- The film is nominally about the trolls who wear boxes, however it focuses on one of them who isn't REALLY a troll, but is actually a boy. This is a "big problem".
- The villain is avaristic and ugly. He pretends to be a woman, this is also a big problem, but we're not told why. Just that tumblr dislikes that and they're right to do so.
- The animation is good, kids will like it.
The only thing gleaned from this review that you won't get from the trailer is a number score and at some point a man wears a dress. It's an 800 word sideways glance at a movie and it really does not do a good job reviewing it outside of conveying the general sentiment that it's sort of not bad. I don't respect this, and I don't much care what this person has to say about other movies especially if they're more complicated than this movie for 6-year-olds.
On top of which the reviews are completely joyless, on a comedy web site. It's not just that it's really out of place, it's poorly executed in its own right. I'm not trying to illegally troll or insult them so please do not electronically beat me up, but I don't think they're cut out for this.
Thank you for reading this wearying post. As a reward, here is a picture of the cast of Duck Tales taking public transport so you can finally blast the biggest load of your life you mewling piece of poo poo idiot
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 19:21
|
|
- client
- Aug 19, 2010
-
|
The essence of the criticism of the criticism that has been ongoing, at least on my part, is that it is bad. It is not good. It is really not very informative. It is not that it is bad to "care".
If you actually legitimately care about film, there is a good chance you do not post about it on this web site, because if you look at the movie forum (or the book forum, etc) you see that largely there's an incredible fixation on really childish products (and they are usually products rather than films) with a corresponding lack of taste. I'm sure it's an idea that's unfamiliar to you, as a grown man who wants to surgically replace his dick and balls with a coin operated motorised Donald Duck ride who is about 3 wispy chin hairs away from being a convicted rapist, but when criticism is coming from a really juvenile place about a less-juvenile subject it can seem very superficial and difficult to respect. Like when they allow kids to do news reports on the actual news.
This is one side of the coin here. Some of the reviewers present as, essentially, children of varying extreme largeness. But even if you read what they have to say about children's movies, it's still incredibly basic analysis of a film seen through a lens of a culture who are obsessed with identity politics in all things.
For example, if you read this week's review of The Boxtrolls, all you will learn is:
- The reviewer liked Coraline and Paranorman, but this film has a worse story
- There are trolls who wear boxes, also there are two characters who have names
- The film is nominally about the trolls who wear boxes, however it focuses on one of them who isn't REALLY a troll, but is actually a boy. This is a "big problem".
- The villain is avaristic and ugly. He pretends to be a woman, this is also a big problem, but we're not told why. Just that tumblr dislikes that and they're right to do so.
- The animation is good, kids will like it.
The only thing gleaned from this review that you won't get from the trailer is a number score and at some point a man wears a dress. It's an 800 word sideways glance at a movie and it really does not do a good job reviewing it outside of conveying the general sentiment that it's sort of not bad. I don't respect this, and I don't much care what this person has to say about other movies especially if they're more complicated than this movie for 6-year-olds.
On top of which the reviews are completely joyless, on a comedy web site. It's not just that it's really out of place, it's poorly executed in its own right. I'm not trying to illegally troll or insult them so please do not electronically beat me up, but I don't think they're cut out for this.
Thank you for reading this wearying post. As a reward, here is a picture of the cast of Duck Tales taking public transport so you can finally blast the biggest load of your life you mewling piece of poo poo idiot
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DV1fUwKMdAI
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 19:23
|
|
- I AM THE MOON
- Dec 21, 2012
-
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 19:28
|
|
- jack.
- Sep 1, 2001
-
|
Mondo ownage.
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 19:28
|
|
- DARPA Dad
- Dec 9, 2008
-
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 19:34
|
|
- PleasingFungus
- Oct 10, 2012
-
idiot asshole bitch who should fuck off
|
why is a large piece of poop pictured directly beneath the union jack
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 19:40
|
|
- arnbiguous
- Feb 2, 2014
-
-
Gary’s Answer
|
it's donald duck's hat
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 19:42
|
|
- Protocol 5
- Sep 23, 2004
-
"I can't wait until cancer inevitably chokes the life out of Curt Schilling."
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kPII561-GY
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 19:46
|
|
- Ruddha
- Jan 21, 2006
-
when you realize how cool and retarded everything is you will tilt your head back and laugh at the sky
|
You're not allowed on the bus if you're a poopy boy.
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 19:46
|
|
- Trabandiumium
- Feb 20, 2010
-
|
The essence of the criticism of the criticism that has been ongoing, at least on my part, is that it is bad. It is not good. It is really not very informative. It is not that it is bad to "care".
If you actually legitimately care about film, there is a good chance you do not post about it on this web site, because if you look at the movie forum (or the book forum, etc) you see that largely there's an incredible fixation on really childish products (and they are usually products rather than films) with a corresponding lack of taste. I'm sure it's an idea that's unfamiliar to you, as a grown man who wants to surgically replace his dick and balls with a coin operated motorised Donald Duck ride who is about 3 wispy chin hairs away from being a convicted rapist, but when criticism is coming from a really juvenile place about a less-juvenile subject it can seem very superficial and difficult to respect. Like when they allow kids to do news reports on the actual news.
This is one side of the coin here. Some of the reviewers present as, essentially, children of varying extreme largeness. But even if you read what they have to say about children's movies, it's still incredibly basic analysis of a film seen through a lens of a culture who are obsessed with identity politics in all things.
For example, if you read this week's review of The Boxtrolls, all you will learn is:
- The reviewer liked Coraline and Paranorman, but this film has a worse story
- There are trolls who wear boxes, also there are two characters who have names
- The film is nominally about the trolls who wear boxes, however it focuses on one of them who isn't REALLY a troll, but is actually a boy. This is a "big problem".
- The villain is avaristic and ugly. He pretends to be a woman, this is also a big problem, but we're not told why. Just that tumblr dislikes that and they're right to do so.
- The animation is good, kids will like it.
The only thing gleaned from this review that you won't get from the trailer is a number score and at some point a man wears a dress. It's an 800 word sideways glance at a movie and it really does not do a good job reviewing it outside of conveying the general sentiment that it's sort of not bad. I don't respect this, and I don't much care what this person has to say about other movies especially if they're more complicated than this movie for 6-year-olds.
On top of which the reviews are completely joyless, on a comedy web site. It's not just that it's really out of place, it's poorly executed in its own right. I'm not trying to illegally troll or insult them so please do not electronically beat me up, but I don't think they're cut out for this.
Thank you for reading this wearying post. As a reward, here is a picture of the cast of Duck Tales taking public transport so you can finally blast the biggest load of your life you mewling piece of poo poo idiot
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 19:49
|
|
- post hole digger
- Mar 21, 2011
-
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 19:50
|
|
- dionysian
- Dec 30, 2012
-
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 19:57
|
|
- sexpig by night
- Sep 8, 2011
-
by Azathoth
|
The essence of the criticism of the criticism that has been ongoing, at least on my part, is that it is bad. It is not good. It is really not very informative. It is not that it is bad to "care".
If you actually legitimately care about film, there is a good chance you do not post about it on this web site, because if you look at the movie forum (or the book forum, etc) you see that largely there's an incredible fixation on really childish products (and they are usually products rather than films) with a corresponding lack of taste. I'm sure it's an idea that's unfamiliar to you, as a grown man who wants to surgically replace his dick and balls with a coin operated motorised Donald Duck ride who is about 3 wispy chin hairs away from being a convicted rapist, but when criticism is coming from a really juvenile place about a less-juvenile subject it can seem very superficial and difficult to respect. Like when they allow kids to do news reports on the actual news.
This is one side of the coin here. Some of the reviewers present as, essentially, children of varying extreme largeness. But even if you read what they have to say about children's movies, it's still incredibly basic analysis of a film seen through a lens of a culture who are obsessed with identity politics in all things.
For example, if you read this week's review of The Boxtrolls, all you will learn is:
- The reviewer liked Coraline and Paranorman, but this film has a worse story
- There are trolls who wear boxes, also there are two characters who have names
- The film is nominally about the trolls who wear boxes, however it focuses on one of them who isn't REALLY a troll, but is actually a boy. This is a "big problem".
- The villain is avaristic and ugly. He pretends to be a woman, this is also a big problem, but we're not told why. Just that tumblr dislikes that and they're right to do so.
- The animation is good, kids will like it.
The only thing gleaned from this review that you won't get from the trailer is a number score and at some point a man wears a dress. It's an 800 word sideways glance at a movie and it really does not do a good job reviewing it outside of conveying the general sentiment that it's sort of not bad. I don't respect this, and I don't much care what this person has to say about other movies especially if they're more complicated than this movie for 6-year-olds.
On top of which the reviews are completely joyless, on a comedy web site. It's not just that it's really out of place, it's poorly executed in its own right. I'm not trying to illegally troll or insult them so please do not electronically beat me up, but I don't think they're cut out for this.
Thank you for reading this wearying post. As a reward, here is a picture of the cast of Duck Tales taking public transport so you can finally blast the biggest load of your life you mewling piece of poo poo idiot
You're a good person
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 19:57
|
|
- In Training
- Jun 28, 2008
-
|
The essence of the criticism of the criticism that has been ongoing, at least on my part, is that it is bad. It is not good. It is really not very informative. It is not that it is bad to "care".
If you actually legitimately care about film, there is a good chance you do not post about it on this web site, because if you look at the movie forum (or the book forum, etc) you see that largely there's an incredible fixation on really childish products (and they are usually products rather than films) with a corresponding lack of taste. I'm sure it's an idea that's unfamiliar to you, as a grown man who wants to surgically replace his dick and balls with a coin operated motorised Donald Duck ride who is about 3 wispy chin hairs away from being a convicted rapist, but when criticism is coming from a really juvenile place about a less-juvenile subject it can seem very superficial and difficult to respect. Like when they allow kids to do news reports on the actual news.
This is one side of the coin here. Some of the reviewers present as, essentially, children of varying extreme largeness. But even if you read what they have to say about children's movies, it's still incredibly basic analysis of a film seen through a lens of a culture who are obsessed with identity politics in all things.
For example, if you read this week's review of The Boxtrolls, all you will learn is:
- The reviewer liked Coraline and Paranorman, but this film has a worse story
- There are trolls who wear boxes, also there are two characters who have names
- The film is nominally about the trolls who wear boxes, however it focuses on one of them who isn't REALLY a troll, but is actually a boy. This is a "big problem".
- The villain is avaristic and ugly. He pretends to be a woman, this is also a big problem, but we're not told why. Just that tumblr dislikes that and they're right to do so.
- The animation is good, kids will like it.
The only thing gleaned from this review that you won't get from the trailer is a number score and at some point a man wears a dress. It's an 800 word sideways glance at a movie and it really does not do a good job reviewing it outside of conveying the general sentiment that it's sort of not bad. I don't respect this, and I don't much care what this person has to say about other movies especially if they're more complicated than this movie for 6-year-olds.
On top of which the reviews are completely joyless, on a comedy web site. It's not just that it's really out of place, it's poorly executed in its own right. I'm not trying to illegally troll or insult them so please do not electronically beat me up, but I don't think they're cut out for this.
Thank you for reading this wearying post. As a reward, here is a picture of the cast of Duck Tales taking public transport so you can finally blast the biggest load of your life you mewling piece of poo poo idiot
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DV1fUwKMdAI
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 20:06
|
|
- Koos Group
- Mar 6, 2013
-
|
Did you just say "g'day"?
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 20:09
|
|
- arnbiguous
- Feb 2, 2014
-
-
Gary’s Answer
|
Did you just say "g'day"?
donald duck isn't even IN duck tales
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 20:13
|
|
- discount cathouse
- Mar 25, 2009
-
|
My idea for a sa Review section is lyle's corner:
the writer goes through lyle's post history in phiz and copys posts about which movies and books are deece in his eyes. That would be a lot better than what's going on right now.
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 20:17
|
|
- discount cathouse
- Mar 25, 2009
-
|
The essence of the criticism of the criticism that has been ongoing, at least on my part, is that it is bad. It is not good. It is really not very informative. It is not that it is bad to "care".
If you actually legitimately care about film, there is a good chance you do not post about it on this web site, because if you look at the movie forum (or the book forum, etc) you see that largely there's an incredible fixation on really childish products (and they are usually products rather than films) with a corresponding lack of taste. I'm sure it's an idea that's unfamiliar to you, as a grown man who wants to surgically replace his dick and balls with a coin operated motorised Donald Duck ride who is about 3 wispy chin hairs away from being a convicted rapist, but when criticism is coming from a really juvenile place about a less-juvenile subject it can seem very superficial and difficult to respect. Like when they allow kids to do news reports on the actual news.
This is one side of the coin here. Some of the reviewers present as, essentially, children of varying extreme largeness. But even if you read what they have to say about children's movies, it's still incredibly basic analysis of a film seen through a lens of a culture who are obsessed with identity politics in all things.
For example, if you read this week's review of The Boxtrolls, all you will learn is:
- The reviewer liked Coraline and Paranorman, but this film has a worse story
- There are trolls who wear boxes, also there are two characters who have names
- The film is nominally about the trolls who wear boxes, however it focuses on one of them who isn't REALLY a troll, but is actually a boy. This is a "big problem".
- The villain is avaristic and ugly. He pretends to be a woman, this is also a big problem, but we're not told why. Just that tumblr dislikes that and they're right to do so.
- The animation is good, kids will like it.
The only thing gleaned from this review that you won't get from the trailer is a number score and at some point a man wears a dress. It's an 800 word sideways glance at a movie and it really does not do a good job reviewing it outside of conveying the general sentiment that it's sort of not bad. I don't respect this, and I don't much care what this person has to say about other movies especially if they're more complicated than this movie for 6-year-olds.
On top of which the reviews are completely joyless, on a comedy web site. It's not just that it's really out of place, it's poorly executed in its own right. I'm not trying to illegally troll or insult them so please do not electronically beat me up, but I don't think they're cut out for this.
Thank you for reading this wearying post. As a reward, here is a picture of the cast of Duck Tales taking public transport so you can finally blast the biggest load of your life you mewling piece of poo poo idiot
Harsh, but fair.
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 20:18
|
|
- CantDecideOnAName
- Jan 1, 2012
-
And I understand if you ask
Was this life,
was this all?
|
99 new posts?! How--oh wait, they're arguing.
Looking forward to this weeks review set. I don't even know about most of these movies until they get reviewed.
I have to thank CR for their Paranorman review years ago, I really need to see that movie again. Bummer to hear that the studio's latest project was a flop, but I guess they can't all be winners. And I find myself intrigued by the review of Skeleton Twins, if only because of the depression angle. Doesn't sound like something I would watch myself, but kudos to the movie for having the balls to treat depression as something that you can't magically cure.
(Somewhat unrelatedly, do you guys know when the CD thread where they are assigned a movie and a theme is happening?)
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 20:26
|
|
- arnbiguous
- Feb 2, 2014
-
-
Gary’s Answer
|
whoa, is that what the real posts in this forum are like
i guess that's what you get when you have a rule against criticism
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 20:29
|
|
- Plutonis
- Mar 25, 2011
-
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 20:31
|
|
- qnqnx
- Nov 14, 2010
-
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 20:37
|
|
- bonestructure
- Sep 25, 2008
-
by Ralp
|
99 new posts?! How--oh wait, they're arguing.
Looking forward to this weeks review set. I don't even know about most of these movies until they get reviewed.
I have to thank CR for their Paranorman review years ago, I really need to see that movie again. Bummer to hear that the studio's latest project was a flop, but I guess they can't all be winners. And I find myself intrigued by the review of Skeleton Twins, if only because of the depression angle. Doesn't sound like something I would watch myself, but kudos to the movie for having the balls to treat depression as something that you can't magically cure.
(Somewhat unrelatedly, do you guys know when the CD thread where they are assigned a movie and a theme is happening?)
Powerful.
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 20:37
|
|
- qnqnx
- Nov 14, 2010
-
|
99 new posts?! How--oh wait, they're arguing.
Looking forward to this weeks review set. I don't even know about most of these movies until they get reviewed.
I have to thank CR for their Paranorman review years ago, I really need to see that movie again. Bummer to hear that the studio's latest project was a flop, but I guess they can't all be winners. And I find myself intrigued by the review of Skeleton Twins, if only because of the depression angle. Doesn't sound like something I would watch myself, but kudos to the movie for having the balls to treat depression as something that you can't magically cure.
(Somewhat unrelatedly, do you guys know when the CD thread where they are assigned a movie and a theme is happening?)
snored loudly irl at your post
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 20:38
|
|
- Brasseye
- Feb 13, 2009
-
|
The essence of the criticism of the criticism that has been ongoing, at least on my part, is that it is bad. It is not good. It is really not very informative. It is not that it is bad to "care".
If you actually legitimately care about film, there is a good chance you do not post about it on this web site, because if you look at the movie forum (or the book forum, etc) you see that largely there's an incredible fixation on really childish products (and they are usually products rather than films) with a corresponding lack of taste. I'm sure it's an idea that's unfamiliar to you, as a grown man who wants to surgically replace his dick and balls with a coin operated motorised Donald Duck ride who is about 3 wispy chin hairs away from being a convicted rapist, but when criticism is coming from a really juvenile place about a less-juvenile subject it can seem very superficial and difficult to respect. Like when they allow kids to do news reports on the actual news.
This is one side of the coin here. Some of the reviewers present as, essentially, children of varying extreme largeness. But even if you read what they have to say about children's movies, it's still incredibly basic analysis of a film seen through a lens of a culture who are obsessed with identity politics in all things.
For example, if you read this week's review of The Boxtrolls, all you will learn is:
- The reviewer liked Coraline and Paranorman, but this film has a worse story
- There are trolls who wear boxes, also there are two characters who have names
- The film is nominally about the trolls who wear boxes, however it focuses on one of them who isn't REALLY a troll, but is actually a boy. This is a "big problem".
- The villain is avaristic and ugly. He pretends to be a woman, this is also a big problem, but we're not told why. Just that tumblr dislikes that and they're right to do so.
- The animation is good, kids will like it.
The only thing gleaned from this review that you won't get from the trailer is a number score and at some point a man wears a dress. It's an 800 word sideways glance at a movie and it really does not do a good job reviewing it outside of conveying the general sentiment that it's sort of not bad. I don't respect this, and I don't much care what this person has to say about other movies especially if they're more complicated than this movie for 6-year-olds.
On top of which the reviews are completely joyless, on a comedy web site. It's not just that it's really out of place, it's poorly executed in its own right. I'm not trying to illegally troll or insult them so please do not electronically beat me up, but I don't think they're cut out for this.
Thank you for reading this wearying post. As a reward, here is a picture of the cast of Duck Tales taking public transport so you can finally blast the biggest load of your life you mewling piece of poo poo idiot
good grief!
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 20:38
|
|
- Surprisingly Dope
- Jan 12, 2011
-
Lope burgs again
|
My idea for a sa Review section is lyle's corner:
the writer goes through lyle's post history in phiz and copys posts about which movies and books are deece in his eyes. That would be a lot better than what's going on right now.
I'd read that.
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 20:53
|
|
- Skip My Posts
- Aug 15, 2005
-
by FactsAreUseless
|
Duncan ftw
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 20:56
|
|
- yeah actually they will
- Aug 18, 2012
-
|
My idea for a sa Review section is lyle's corner:
the writer goes through lyle's post history in phiz and copys posts about which movies and books are deece in his eyes. That would be a lot better than what's going on right now.
I think it'd be pretty cool if lyle did a review - something for the authors to consider.
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 21:14
|
|
- Trash Trick
- Apr 17, 2014
-
|
Lol
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 21:38
|
|
- time is a wastin
- Sep 11, 2011
-
|
The essence of the criticism of the criticism that has been ongoing, at least on my part, is that it is bad. It is not good. It is really not very informative. It is not that it is bad to "care".
If you actually legitimately care about film, there is a good chance you do not post about it on this web site, because if you look at the movie forum (or the book forum, etc) you see that largely there's an incredible fixation on really childish products (and they are usually products rather than films) with a corresponding lack of taste. I'm sure it's an idea that's unfamiliar to you, as a grown man who wants to surgically replace his dick and balls with a coin operated motorised Donald Duck ride who is about 3 wispy chin hairs away from being a convicted rapist, but when criticism is coming from a really juvenile place about a less-juvenile subject it can seem very superficial and difficult to respect. Like when they allow kids to do news reports on the actual news.
This is one side of the coin here. Some of the reviewers present as, essentially, children of varying extreme largeness. But even if you read what they have to say about children's movies, it's still incredibly basic analysis of a film seen through a lens of a culture who are obsessed with identity politics in all things.
For example, if you read this week's review of The Boxtrolls, all you will learn is:
- The reviewer liked Coraline and Paranorman, but this film has a worse story
- There are trolls who wear boxes, also there are two characters who have names
- The film is nominally about the trolls who wear boxes, however it focuses on one of them who isn't REALLY a troll, but is actually a boy. This is a "big problem".
- The villain is avaristic and ugly. He pretends to be a woman, this is also a big problem, but we're not told why. Just that tumblr dislikes that and they're right to do so.
- The animation is good, kids will like it.
The only thing gleaned from this review that you won't get from the trailer is a number score and at some point a man wears a dress. It's an 800 word sideways glance at a movie and it really does not do a good job reviewing it outside of conveying the general sentiment that it's sort of not bad. I don't respect this, and I don't much care what this person has to say about other movies especially if they're more complicated than this movie for 6-year-olds.
On top of which the reviews are completely joyless, on a comedy web site. It's not just that it's really out of place, it's poorly executed in its own right. I'm not trying to illegally troll or insult them so please do not electronically beat me up, but I don't think they're cut out for this.
Thank you for reading this wearying post. As a reward, here is a picture of the cast of Duck Tales taking public transport so you can finally blast the biggest load of your life you mewling piece of poo poo idiot
Jesus christ
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 21:41
|
|
- Triticum Guzzler
- Jun 16, 2002
-
|
I think it'd be pretty cool if lyle did a review - something for the authors to consider.
if they replaced the "minority report" bits with anything written by lyle, regardless of applicability to the subject, it would be good
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 21:43
|
|
- A FUCKIN BONG BOMB
- Apr 6, 2006
-
|
Duncan is right.
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 22:03
|
|
- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
#
?
Apr 19, 2024 15:51
|
|
- Koos Group
- Mar 6, 2013
-
|
if they replaced the "minority report" bits with anything written by lyle, regardless of applicability to the subject, it would be good
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 22:27
|
|