Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Shipon
Nov 7, 2005
lol how the hell is their stock falling Congress just gave them billions

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

K8.0
Feb 26, 2004

Her Majesty's 56th Regiment of Foot

Shipon posted:

lol how the hell is their stock falling Congress just gave them billions

The impact of getting money from the government was priced in when people found out about it (a long time ago). The impact of current events is priced in now.

BlankSystemDaemon
Mar 13, 2009



Dr. Fishopolis posted:

Do you think that stock prices just go up and down randomly based on the whims of computers without any input from the realities of business or the economy? It means that intel missed its earnings targets by a mile and the market reacted in an expected fashion.

I agree that the stock market is an irrational casino but it's not that irrational.
Yeah, nah. It's completely irrational and disconnected from reality. Here's some examples:

Intel sells HFC platforms now that they bought BlackRock, and they're systems made to run at 5.2GHz on all cores with latency-reduced memory - just to get an edge on the people in the HFC datacenter that can't afford it.
Similarly, all the servers are wired the same, length-wise, irrespective of distance-to-switch - which are all SFP+ equipped cut-through switches.
HFC traders have invested billions into creating line-of-sight relay radio chains across the US with clear Fresnel zones - because that's marginally faster than going through all the hops to get from coast to coast.

Dr. Fishopolis
Aug 31, 2004

ROBOT
i'm aware that HFT exists, but they just told their shareholders "we pooped our pants and missed earnings by 58%" i don't think you have to invent an AI trading conspiracy to explain why the price is falling.

SwissArmyDruid
Feb 14, 2014

by sebmojo
i think the assertion here is, or at least my assertion is: The market is inherently unreasonable and divorced from reality. There is no allowance for X, Y, or Z, there is only A ≤ B, or not far ahead out enough of B, or A > B, but B was not big enough, and therefore bad, make stock go down.

It's the pitfalls of being a publically-traded company: The people investing don't know REALLY what you do except in the broadest possible terms ("make computer chips", "make cars", "sell things") or at all (search engine, social media) and they don't care, they only want to see A > B and by a lot, and if not, stock go down.

SwissArmyDruid fucked around with this message at 09:49 on Jul 31, 2022

Beef
Jul 26, 2004
As mentioned, the stock also fell when intel was beating expectations. People then look for secondary effects to explain the drop.

The drops aren't entirely without reason, but the magnitude is likely much higher due to automatic trading.

Potato Salad
Oct 23, 2014

nobody cares


These market numbers are LSD-induced funny money and have been ever since they shot up from 20k to nearly 30k on the DJI with zero correlating domestic productivity increase. The fundamentals no longer make sense. Remember that, halfway through that huge 50% increase in market :airquote: value :airquote: , collectively these companies were given two trillion in arbitrary breaks plus extremely favorable lending terms elsewhere and burned it all on stock buybacks.

Particularly for the tech sector (but a little less so for manufacturing like Intel), investment has been capricious. This apparently has been driving analysts up a wall. A friend of my family has basically quit over it--three decades in telecoms and tech research and now more than ever nothing makes any loving sense.

Potato Salad fucked around with this message at 14:05 on Jul 31, 2022

Dr. Fishopolis
Aug 31, 2004

ROBOT

Beef posted:

As mentioned, the stock also fell when intel was beating expectations. People then look for secondary effects to explain the drop.

The drops aren't entirely without reason, but the magnitude is likely much higher due to automatic trading.

...okay?

look, all I"m saying is that literally any company in any sector in the entire history of stock markets as a concept would face a share price hit if they announced a 22% earnings decline year over year, and that their earnings were going to miss by 58% (fifty loving eight percent) next quarter. it was the worst investor call for intel since the first tech bubble collapsed in 99.

that's not "not entirely without reason" that's "the market would be completely insane if the price didn't fall"

this is not due to automated trading and the price will absolutely fall further because it's rational for it to do so considering the call.

Dr. Fishopolis fucked around with this message at 17:02 on Jul 31, 2022

necrobobsledder
Mar 21, 2005
Lay down your soul to the gods rock 'n roll
Nap Ghost
There’s a lot of factors going on that haven’t been noted yet. With interest rates going up equity investment pulled away from tech stocks as a whole regardless of performance as they retreated into areas with better price to earnings ratios. Essentially low interest rates fueled over-investment into the tech sector worldwide, not just in the US. Heck, my own company’s not US based and is down 40%+ from its high during the pandemic and we’ve been beating earnings guidance consistently for years now. Investors basically want to see acceleration of earnings moreso than anything else to keep investing in a tech stock.

So yeah, Intel stock is being priced down even harder than expected also because markets tend to be more about forward looking sentiment than anything intrinsic or even technical about a stock (beta). Hell, GameStop stock has been my best performing stock compared to my company’s and that’s proof of how irrational markets really are.

calusari
Apr 18, 2013

It's mechanical. Seems to come at regular intervals.

calusari posted:

Turn off Enhanced Boost

Core Voltage set to 1.250

Voltage mode: Adaptive+Offset

CPU core voltage offset: - (minus)

CPU core voltage offset: 0.100

I posted earlier about undervolting. I got good reduction of temps under load. However, my computer is occasionally rebooting when left idle. I can game or watch youtube videos for hours with no issue. Is there anything I can tweak to prevent this from happening? Disabling c-states?

Kibner
Oct 21, 2008

Acguy Supremacy

calusari posted:

I posted earlier about undervolting. I got good reduction of temps under load. However, my computer is occasionally rebooting when left idle. I can game or watch youtube videos for hours with no issue. Is there anything I can tweak to prevent this from happening? Disabling c-states?

Make your undervolt less aggressive because what you are experiencing is an unstable undervolt. You can't stress test them like a normal overclock as the instability more often shows in cycling between idle and in-use.

If you do want to test it, you can try using this over the course of a few nights: https://github.com/sp00n/corecycler

Agreed
Dec 30, 2003

The price of meat has just gone up, and your old lady has just gone down

I'm just undervolting my 12900K with a negative adaptive offset but I feel dumb because I am certain that it could operate at the same frequencies with less voltage in the top end, but going lower becomes unstable at idle clocks - and though I understand it is possible and have even been in the right place in my BIOS, in the end I can't figure out how to manually edit the V/F curve without making my system unwilling to boot. It's got some conditions and rules I'm struggling to adhere to. I wish there were something like MSI Afterburner for my CPU, nice visual representation of the V/F graph with draggable points and once you hit apply it sorts out whatever dumbfuck thing you've tried if it's not within its algorithmic rules.

priznat
Jul 7, 2009

Let's get drunk and kiss each other all night.
What’s the temperature tracker du jour? I was thinking about getting one of those CPU retention blocks GN featured for my 12700k but not sure it’s worth the hassle.

Something that can plot some nice charts over time would be good.

Kibner
Oct 21, 2008

Acguy Supremacy

priznat posted:

What’s the temperature tracker du jour? I was thinking about getting one of those CPU retention blocks GN featured for my 12700k but not sure it’s worth the hassle.

Something that can plot some nice charts over time would be good.

I think Argus Monitor is the usual recommendation if you want to tie temps to fan speeds. Probably overkill for just temp monitoring, though.

Arzachel
May 12, 2012

priznat posted:

What’s the temperature tracker du jour? I was thinking about getting one of those CPU retention blocks GN featured for my 12700k but not sure it’s worth the hassle.

Something that can plot some nice charts over time would be good.

HWInfo is my go-to but I haven't really looked for alternatives

CoolCab
Apr 17, 2005

glem
msi afterburner is all i use

priznat
Jul 7, 2009

Let's get drunk and kiss each other all night.

Kibner posted:

I think Argus Monitor is the usual recommendation if you want to tie temps to fan speeds. Probably overkill for just temp monitoring, though.

That might be worth doing too, I really should check that out. Heard good things.

Thanks for the HWinfo and MSI afterburner tips! I have a gigabyte board and the apps it comes with are traaaaash and usually just lock up.

CoolCab
Apr 17, 2005

glem
HWinfo will be the most accurate I think, that's the one you use for a bunch of other hardware verification and similar nerdy stuff. afterburner (which is platform agnostic, you don't need an MSI card) is a GPU overclocking program first, but it does real time graphing of a bunch of stuff including CPU temps if you want.

never run two programs that monitor temps or voltages etc at once, neither will report the right results as I understand it.

SwissArmyDruid
Feb 14, 2014

by sebmojo
CNBC: AMD passes Intel in market cap on Friday

Simultaneously didn't think I'd see this again any time soon, and at the same time, already? Last time was earlier in February, but that quickly reverted.

Just to again prove that the investors and financial journalists don't know poo poo, the article cites, "The milestone also suggests that investors may value an asset-light chipmaker over one that’s investing heavily in manufacturing. AMD outsources production to outside “fabs,” or chip factories, whereas Intel has said it plans to continue building and operating plants."

I may be on team Red, but even *I* know that if anything happens between Taiwan and China before TSMC can get fabs spun up to full capacity on US soil, and something *will* happen sometime in the next few years, everyone that contracts out to them is going to be in a world of pain from Apple to Nvidia, while Intel will be sitting pretty.

I semi-joked a few years back that maybe AMD should look into buying GloFo back from the UAE, but at this point they might be better off starting from scratch with how long that deal would take to finish.

Indiana_Krom
Jun 18, 2007
Net Slacker

CoolCab posted:

never run two programs that monitor temps or voltages etc at once, neither will report the right results as I understand it.

The way these programs generally work is your motherboard and cpu and gpu all have temperature sensors read by embedded micro controllers on them, these controllers then write the temperature data to some reserved memory addresses, monitoring programs then read the data from that memory addresses and display the data in a human readable format for you. So you can actually run as many monitoring programs as you want because 2, 3, or even 100 of them can all just read that same memory address space just fine, it is "public" data inside your PC.

Where you can run into trouble is monitoring programs that also let you control fans, rgb leds, overclocking, voltage, or power saving features which are also controlled by writing to some reserved memory near the same space as all the sensor data, because then you can end up with multiple programs all attempting to write to that area of data and conflicting with each other.

Palladium
May 8, 2012

Very Good
✔️✔️✔️✔️
I run Afterburner and HWinfo together all the time on many PCs and never had a problem probably because I don't use stupid RGBs

Potato Salad
Oct 23, 2014

nobody cares


SwissArmyDruid posted:

I semi-joked a few years back that maybe AMD should look into buying GloFo back from the UAE, but at this point they might be better off starting from scratch with how long that deal would take to finish.

AMD is (unless I'm way mistaken) not flush with actual cash, so if they want to start making fabs on soil that isn't going to be invaded within the next few release cycles....yeah they need to start seeking financing and subsidies now.

in a well actually
Jan 26, 2011

dude, you gotta end it on the rhyme

SwissArmyDruid posted:

CNBC: AMD passes Intel in market cap on Friday

Simultaneously didn't think I'd see this again any time soon, and at the same time, already? Last time was earlier in February, but that quickly reverted.

Just to again prove that the investors and financial journalists don't know poo poo, the article cites, "The milestone also suggests that investors may value an asset-light chipmaker over one that’s investing heavily in manufacturing. AMD outsources production to outside “fabs,” or chip factories, whereas Intel has said it plans to continue building and operating plants."

I may be on team Red, but even *I* know that if anything happens between Taiwan and China before TSMC can get fabs spun up to full capacity on US soil, and something *will* happen sometime in the next few years, everyone that contracts out to them is going to be in a world of pain from Apple to Nvidia, while Intel will be sitting pretty.

I semi-joked a few years back that maybe AMD should look into buying GloFo back from the UAE, but at this point they might be better off starting from scratch with how long that deal would take to finish.

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/tsmc-fab-21-arizona

There’s no way they could do anything in less than 2 years. I’m sure all the euv litho is booked up beyond then.

Also Samsung’s launching a fab in tx in 2024 assuming Texas still has a power grid by then

AMD has no staff experience left on running fabs, it would not be a good choice for them.

Glofo absolutely hosed ibm tho lol.

priznat
Jul 7, 2009

Let's get drunk and kiss each other all night.
China invading Taiwan will make covid and the Ukrainian invasion look tame in comparison, economically speaking. I try not to even think about it, I imagine it would devastate a lot of semiconductor companies overnight, mine included.

nnnotime
Sep 30, 2001

Hesitate, and you will be lost.

SwissArmyDruid posted:

CNBC: AMD passes Intel in market cap on Friday
I may be on team Red, but even *I* know that if anything happens between Taiwan and China before TSMC can get fabs spun up to full capacity on US soil, and something *will* happen sometime in the next few years, everyone that contracts out to them is going to be in a world of pain from Apple to Nvidia, while Intel will be sitting pretty.
Yeah, but wouldn't Intel also be affected by a Chinese invasion? As China and Taiwan were 43% of Intel's revenues last year, per their recent10-K. $21 bil for China and $13 bil from Taiwan. Of course, this may be one reason by China won't be invading Taiwan anytime soon, as they would no longer be able to purchase chips from Intel, and Taiwan will likely sabotage their own fabs.

SwissArmyDruid
Feb 14, 2014

by sebmojo

nnnotime posted:

Yeah, but wouldn't Intel also be affected by a Chinese invasion? As China and Taiwan were 43% of Intel's revenues last year, per their recent10-K. $21 bil for China and $13 bil from Taiwan. Of course, this may be one reason by China won't be invading Taiwan anytime soon, as they would no longer be able to purchase chips from Intel, and Taiwan will likely sabotage their own fabs.

That's true. Everybody's getting hurt when Shenzhen gets cut off from the rest of the world. I made that statement thinking in terms of Intel would be able to snap up silicon boules that are the current pain point in semiconductor manufacture... BUT A LOT OF THOSE ARE MADE IN CHINA AND TAIWAN TOO.

Like, who's left? Siltronic and Sumco? Sumco and Shin-Etsu are in Japan, it would be foolish to assume that the Japanese economy and shipping in and out of Japan/Korea wouldn't also be affected.

SwissArmyDruid fucked around with this message at 07:27 on Aug 2, 2022

in a well actually
Jan 26, 2011

dude, you gotta end it on the rhyme

https://twitter.com/dylan522p/status/1552821676609622023

priznat
Jul 7, 2009

Let's get drunk and kiss each other all night.

I'm both shocked and not surprised at all..

Potato Salad
Oct 23, 2014

nobody cares


Industrial policy act-by-act fails yet again.

JawnV6
Jul 4, 2004

So hot ...

Dr. Fishopolis posted:

Do you think that stock prices just go up and down randomly based on the whims of computers without any input from the realities of business or the economy?

yes.

BobHoward
Feb 13, 2012

The only thing white people deserve is a bullet to their empty skull

SwissArmyDruid posted:

I semi-joked a few years back that maybe AMD should look into buying GloFo back from the UAE, but at this point they might be better off starting from scratch with how long that deal would take to finish.

Forget about how much time a deal would take, buying GloFo back would almost be starting from scratch. GloFo has literally given up on developing new process nodes themselves. Their most advanced 22, 14, and 12nm nodes are all second source licensed from STMicro/Samsung and they don't yet have Samsung's sub-10nm process recipe. Does AMD want to try to compete against Intel using whatever Samsung's currently willing to let GF license? I'm going to say that they probably do not.

in a well actually
Jan 26, 2011

dude, you gotta end it on the rhyme

Iirc Intel hired a bunch of the key people on thr 7nm glofo process a year or two ago lol

speaking of glofo they got their ipo out just in time lol

WhyteRyce
Dec 30, 2001

Cutting dividends at this point would probably murder the stock even more so probably a necessary evil

wargames
Mar 16, 2008

official yospos cat censor
but stock price does matter, are they really going to sell more stock in the future?

nnnotime
Sep 30, 2001

Hesitate, and you will be lost.

wargames posted:

but stock price does matter, are they really going to sell more stock in the future?
If you mean, for Intel to issue more stock: that would not be a good idea, as issuing more shares would dilute the share price down further.
And Intel already has 4.1 billion shares outstanding, so issuing any more shares would not be required.

WhyteRyce posted:

Cutting dividends at this point would probably murder the stock even more so probably a necessary evil
In the latest earnings call transcript the Intel CFO said they remain committed to growing the dividend over time, so I assume cutting the dividend would be only a last resort. Intel will pay $1.5 billion in dividends for the recent quarter, and they have over $26 billion cash and short-term investments, so the cash dividend is likely safe for at least another quarter or two.

If anything Intel will likely avoid share buybacks anytime soon. During an interview last year (2021) the Intel CEO said share buybacks would not be in focus going forward, which was around the time Intel was showing a lot of trouble.

However despite Intel's management having a plan to turn things around later this year, Intel's stock is pretty much the weakest of all the major semiconductor companies. If we have some major economic downturn or other catastrophe that affects Intel's operations further then odds are high Intel's stock would tank further, despite the attractive value it offers now. But Intel will be a beneficiary of the recently passed CHIPS legislation, so hope they are able to leverage the funds to good use in their capital investments and fab expansions.

Intel shows about a 7.8 P/E ratio, compared to AMD (P/E 35), Texas Instruments TXN (P/E 19), Nvidia NVDA (P/E 48), Taiwan Semiconductor TSM ( P/E 18).
Intel's P/E ratio does not show a lot of confidence from big investors compared to the competitors' stock valuation.

Edit: corrected Intel's P/E ratio.

nnnotime fucked around with this message at 01:29 on Aug 3, 2022

canyoneer
Sep 13, 2005


I only have canyoneyes for you
ARM Holdings average P/E ratio was like 70 over a five year period. The market sometimes gets really weird with tech stocks.

shrike82
Jun 11, 2005

intel's considered a mature blue chip (haha) at this point which is why they have to dump so much of their income into dividends

nvidia's valuation has exploded by being associated with both AI and crypto - the latter's dead for the time being, the former IMO is going to cool down a bit

the day-to-day (or even yearly) price movements is mainly concerning in that it might push management to do dumb stuff so let's see if nvidia pulls some poo poo given how they're down 40% for the year

ConanTheLibrarian
Aug 13, 2004


dis buch is late
Fallen Rib
:O

https://www.igorslab.de/en/never-en...bility-in-2023/

quote:

Intel has now announced the “launch window” for Sapphire Rapids (SPR) for calendar week 6 to 9 (Feb. 6, 2023 to March 3, 2023)

SwissArmyDruid
Feb 14, 2014

by sebmojo

shrike82 posted:

intel's considered a mature blue chip (haha) at this point which is why they have to dump so much of their income into dividends

nvidia's valuation has exploded by being associated with both AI and crypto - the latter's dead for the time being, the former IMO is going to cool down a bit

the day-to-day (or even yearly) price movements is mainly concerning in that it might push management to do dumb stuff so let's see if nvidia pulls some poo poo given how they're down 40% for the year

If ever there was a sign that Intel no longer exists to build chips, there it is. They are now a investment return engine that is funded by being the largest chipmaker in the world.

Unregulated capitalism truly is hell.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Serotoning
Sep 14, 2010

D&D: HASBARA SQUAD
HANG 'EM HIGH


We're fighting human animals and we act accordingly

SwissArmyDruid posted:

If ever there was a sign that Intel no longer exists to build chips, there it is. They are now a investment return engine that is funded by being the largest chipmaker in the world.

Unregulated capitalism truly is hell.

lol and what was their motivation until now? a hobby?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply