|
I understand that intel CPUs with the added "T" are downclocked to stay within a certain TDP range of 35 Watts. So what is the difference between a model with a higher model-number that is downclocked to a CPU with a lower serial number to begin with? E.g. Let's compare an i3 4130 at 3400Mhz which consumes 54 Watts to a i3 4370T at 3300Mhz consuming 35 Watts (not exactly the same Mhz but close). Which one is faster and why is this so complicated?
|
#
¿
May 30, 2015 09:39
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 19, 2024 01:46 |
|
|
I think I get it now. Thank you very much for that informative answer, BobHoward!
|
|
#
¿
May 30, 2015 11:45
|
|
|
I know I brought this up earlier but what's the deal with the "t" processors again? The idea of a i7 CPU with a TDP of 35 Watts Intrigues me, but I wonder about the actual advantages and disadvantages of, say the i7-4765T. Somebody said it's basically a Celeron with more cores since it does not clock higher on its own, would that be correct? \/ Thanks to both of you. That cures me of wanting one of those things. lllllllllllllllllll fucked around with this message at 20:58 on Jul 27, 2015 |
|
#
¿
Jul 26, 2015 13:14
|
|
|
Kaby Lake promises less CPU strain playing 4K videos. Is this something that would be delegated to a modern dedicated graphics card (like Nvidia's 10XX series) if you have it? Or is this a useful feature whether you go with built-in graphics as well as for users with dedicated graphic cards? e: \/ Thank you, thank you. lllllllllllllllllll fucked around with this message at 22:01 on Oct 2, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2016 21:12
|
|
|
Its features include "Precision Boost", "SenseMI", "Pure Power" and "Neural Net Prediction". Not quite as good but still very 90's / 2000-ish.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2016 08:12
|
|
|
Right now Intel CPUs suck for their lack of performance gains and AMD CPUs suck for not catching up to Intel (and because of their mainboards).
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2017 09:33
|
|
|
Those regular i7s seem a bit less desirable now, compared to the i5.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 9, 2017 20:04
|
|
|
They really know how to sour this potential purchase. But I value single thread performance over number of cores, so I guess I stick with them.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2017 09:20
|
|
|
Twerk from Home posted:Yeah, if you want to buy something right now the Ryzen 1600 is a fine value. Please don't let me down, Team Red. 
|
|
#
¿
Oct 10, 2017 17:19
|
|
|
I wonder what the Core i5-8420, Core i3-8120 and Core i3-8320 will get you, compared to the non-xx20 models.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 25, 2017 17:58
|
|
|
cool startup feel posted:Intel CPU and Platform Discussion: Nice Meltdown The only things not melting are the CPUs. Because they're slowed by Spectre.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2018 10:29
|
|
|
I love how the 8400 is easily in the top 3 in most of these benchmarks when in comes to games(!), power consumption and pure performance (ST, but still).
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2018 09:55
|
|
|
Argh, what's that 8 core cpu later this year gonna be??? Are they going to go x+2 cores on everything again, or will they find a stupid way to make this an inconvenient choice somehow? I can't believe intel so easily adds cores when they haven't all these years. I wish we knew already.
|
|
#
¿
May 13, 2018 10:49
|
|
|
We can't get the better thing soon, because they're aiming for something even better which takes time. Just have patience.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2018 13:48
|
|
|
I just replaced my i7 2600 with an R7 2700 and there is no difference doing office work or even with games. I would have kept the old thing if the board didn't die a slow death, but 65W TDP vs 90W TDP is nice regardless. Connecting the old SSD to the new system was fun: Win 10 booted like nothing had happened.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 11, 2018 14:07
|
|
|
L33t_Kefka posted:Are you looking to sell the old i7-2600?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 12, 2018 07:39
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 19, 2024 01:46 |
|
|
Winks posted:The constant fanboy clashes would be really funny for a little while, then really awful. *there is nothing better than running cinebench
|
|
#
¿
Aug 11, 2018 08:10
|
|