|
COCKMOUTH.GIF posted:I should have been more specific. Whatever the latest Ivy Bridge, Intel manufactured Micro-ATX board is. If it exists.
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2012 05:33
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 14:47 |
|
|
COCKMOUTH.GIF posted:I've been purchasing Intel-reference boards for a while now, generally because I feel as though they're a bit more stable for my use. Additionally, it's a "why not just get everything from the manufacturer" kind of thing. I don't really overclock and I don't typically use the massive amount of extras/features that other motherboard manufacturers include (why would I want built-in WiFi on a motherboard?). I also feel like Intel will stick to more standardized specifications when it comes to the design/construction of their motherboards. A lot of Intel applications that integrate with their motherboards also seem to have a better quality than competing products (i.e. ASUS' fan monitoring/voltage manipulation applications).
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2012 16:06
|
|
|
Has someone just messed up really badly for the first batch or something?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 27, 2012 18:57
|
|
|
Alereon posted:Go with a good air cooler, only the crazy massive three-fan watercooling setups actually perform any better
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2012 20:05
|
|
|
calcio posted:And really, a ps2 port still!?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 30, 2012 10:08
|
|
|
Cicero posted:Am I the only one who has had a much easier time remembering Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge compared to previous Intel microarchitecture names? It feels like it's way easier to remember a name that's composed of two common words rather than one composed of a single uncommon word. It looks like they're going back to the old naming convention after Ivy Bridge and it saddens me. Haswell, Broadwell, Skylake, Skymont. I guess they're not technically just two words, but I'll end up remembering them that way.
|
|
#
¿
May 15, 2012 09:53
|
|
|
My fairly cheap dac gets crackling sounds through toslink input, but it has a usb input option which works fine. Granted I'm on a super cheapo Asrock board from a while ago. The processing happens on your dac either way. Toslink is going to give you a line-level signal. (Some dac manufacturers specifically call out that some toslink transmitters don't work too well at 24/192, which is probably what you're shooting for, but you should probably be fine.)
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2015 09:28
|
|
|
Ak Gara posted:That sounds like a good idea. After trying stock cpu usage was 10% Yeah threads are just computer science speak for 'the bit of the process that changes a lot while it's executing' so multithreading is needed if you want to split that program's work up between more cores as well as If you want to split it up between cores that can handle multiple threads E: hyperthreading is actually pretty cool and impressive basically you add a bit more stuff to the core so that you can keep the working data of more than one process in there and whenever one process doesn't use all of the core's circuitry or is waiting for something the other process does. And then there's a bunch of clever tricks to make it work faster and more efficiently as well as sometimes just biting the bullet and jamming in more trqnsistors is that good fucked around with this message at 20:30 on Jun 14, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Jun 14, 2016 20:26
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 14:47 |
|
|
Krailor posted:I hope they also use this opportunity to clarify their product offerings a little better: E: no they're not and I'm not sure why I thought they were. My bad is that good fucked around with this message at 01:16 on Nov 5, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Nov 5, 2016 01:14
|
|