|
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6131/nixeus-vue-27-a-430-wqhd-2560x1440-sips-led-monitor Corean monitors can now stay in Corea.
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2012 15:25
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 23, 2024 18:18 |
|
|
I would pay the extra for height adjustable stand.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2012 15:39
|
|
|
Doctor rear end in a top hat posted:http://www.buy.com/pr/product.aspx?sku=211536584  I would only get an arm for a multimonitor setup (which I don't need) anyhow.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2012 15:46
|
|
|
Doctor rear end in a top hat posted:I certainly wouldn't buy it for that reason—I considered it a bonus. That's pretty disappointing, though. Speaking of which, is there anywhere we can find a comprehensive list of all the IPS panels that LG makes?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2012 19:26
|
|
|
Has anyone tried/know more about the 30'' Corean IPS panels? Seems too good to be true at $680...
|
|
#
¿
Aug 6, 2012 21:23
|
|
|
Just pulled the the trigger on one of those Corean 30 inchers for ~$680. My 4 year old Samsung 1900x1200 just decided to begin dying a slow death a few days ago. Then again it has survived a move across the country, and 2 more subsequent moves. Rest in peace, old friend; may you find that eternal backlight in the sky. I'm not too optimistic about dead pixels considering the price but from what I've gathered from other forums people can and do get flawless panels. Yes, it is a sizable premium over those 27 inchers but hey, when you're hellbent for 16:10, nothing else will do.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2012 16:47
|
|
|
Got my 30 inch. 1 dead pixel - 6 inches right of dead center. Very gorgeous otherwise.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2012 02:13
|
|
|
Indeed. My seller got mine to me in 2.5 business days. Ordered on monday night, got here thursday morning.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2012 12:35
|
|
|
Quick report on the 30 inch (yamasaki leonidas): Packaging is solid. Power adapter is a big brick but fortunately takes power from the female end of a standard computer PSU cable so no need to bother with the supplied prong adapter. Be aware that the cable coming out of the brick that goes to the monitor is a little on the short side. I would have liked another foot. The stand is stable insofar as it remains firmly planted to my desk. The panel is massive enough to allow considerable wiggle but only when the panel is physically touched. The panel seems heavy enough to stabilize itself against desk movement/vibration much like how a heavier firearm counteracts felt recoil. The panel build quality is quite high; completely encased in a brushed finish metal, including the bezel. However, the screen surface itself is set rather deeply in said bezel. I think 2 credit cards' thickness worth of a gap in there. Moreover, the space inside this gap (on the right and left sides) seems lightly colored which will show clearly if viewing the screen from an angle but not head on. There is one dead pixel. Don't care. The brighness seemed a little low to me, even at the maximum setting the monitor allows via physical control. No biggie, just a few extra clicks in the Catalyst control panel. Color accuracy is obviously much better than any TN panel I've ever used. I don't have a colorimiter though so how far off I am and how close I can get it is unknown.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2012 21:16
|
|
|
I have a corean 30 inch. Good poo poo. 1 dead pixel though but for $680 and insanely fast "free" shipping I'll live.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2012 03:48
|
|
|
Wake me up when I can get a IPS 4k display for a thousand bucks. At 32 inches that works out to a little under 140 dpi. A 1080p on a 15.6 inch laptop for instance, is 141 dpi and I find that to be decently adequate. Retina is nice and all but for desktops and the viewing distance on them compared to laptops taken into consideration, I can't see the need at the moment.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 29, 2012 04:23
|
|
|
Tab8715 posted:Tell me about using a 30" @ 2560x1600. Just straight up gargantuan. Although I will say that if you are going to a single 30'' from dual 1080p screens, you might need to get used to playing some window tetris. Everything will fit as there is enough space, but you gotta move it around. Also prepare to spend a shitton on graphics cards to play games at native res. Yes, I said cards as in plural.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 19, 2012 15:23
|
|
|
I was talking primarily about BF3 and yes I do demand the ultra setting.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 19, 2012 17:42
|
|
|
Doctor rear end in a top hat posted:How about a 20" 3840x2560 monitor? YESSSS wake me up when there's 32 inch 4k desktop display for a thousand bucks. I'll be in a coma until then.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2013 20:30
|
|
) but dat resolution. The sooner we get past this 1920x1080 bullshit, the better.
|
Mods thread title change
|
|
#
¿
Feb 28, 2013 06:30
|
|
|
Treytor posted:I mentioned it a little while ago in this thread, but Seiki has a 50" 4k TV that people are using for monitors: A 32'' 4k monitor would be ideal for me. Good enough PPI but not so large that it can't fit on a desk. Probably just best thought of as 4 15.6 inch laptop screens taped together seamlessly.
|
|
#
¿
May 18, 2013 05:03
|
|
|
That size is perfect for me. Good enough ppi but a deskable size.
|
|
#
¿
May 31, 2013 16:41
|
|
|
I need 2x 6870s to get BF3 running smoothly at 2560x1600 on mostly ultra.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2013 18:53
|
|
|
Alereon posted:Do note that a Radeon HD 6870 isn't exactly a fast card (mid-range from two generations back...) so it shouldn't be too concerning that 1440p isn't realistically playable. You'd certainly need to look at at least a Radeon HD 7950 Boost 3GB or Geforce GTX 670 2GB (though it's kind of stupid to buy a card with only 2GB of video RAM for 1440p gaming as it will likely be obsolete in a flash). While there have been and are driver issues on the AMD side, the R7950 Boost 3GB is a pretty compellingly priced card. The 6870 isn't a fast card because of a VRAM limitation and its not the chip's age being the primary problem. The 7950 might be 25%-40% faster but also consumes a third more power at full tilt compared to the 6870, gaining you practically nothing in "efficiency." But yes, 2560xN  means you need more VRAM (and power supply) than you might think.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2013 20:07
|
|
|
The Lord Bude posted:Well if someone can explain how to set up 3 27" 1440p monitors, at the correct viewing distance of just over an arms length, and somehow miraculously have room for my fuckoff massive bookshelf speakers, whilst also maintaining a perfect equilateral triangle between the speakers and my seating position (yes I use a tape measure, because I am an enormous sperglord) whilst also ensuring that there are no objects blocking line of sight to the speakers so as not to muffle the sound... This is why I don't get people wanting to use 40+ inch 4k panels for monitors (when they get affordable). That poo poo is just too big for a desk.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 25, 2013 15:12
|
|
|
They seem to have plenty of pixel density because 30 inchers require slightly more distance between you and them on a desk than say, a 23 inch and yes I do have a 30 inch. 40 inches is simply not a deskable size for most people since they'd either run out of desk space entirely or out of view distance and have to operate their keyboard/mouse a foot or two in mid air out in front of their desk.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2013 21:12
|
|
|
I'm torn between the larger (36 inch+) 4k "monitors" that aren't really deskable for most people and the smaller (<30 inch) ones that are going to have really tiny text without any scaling when viewed at normal desk distances. It just seems that for conventional usage: "its a monitor sitting on its factory stand on a desk" there's a fairly small sweet spot for 4k monitor size. I guess on the plus side for smaller you could always just play games on FHD and get crazy mad FPS for those of us who already have 1440p or 1600p capable rigs.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 7, 2014 19:28
|
|
|
For 2160 vertical lines, I won't resist having 16:9 rammed down my throat. The problem was that 1080 just wasn't enough when 1200 was available.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2014 14:38
|
|
|
Its a TN. That makes it even worse than being 30Hz. Nobody is interested.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 13, 2014 21:32
|
|
|
Yeah some of those guys are not only insanely fast but efficient too; my 30 inch could have been shipped to Dulles airport which is totally DC area but they sent to Reagan which is like 9 blocks from my place. 2.5 business days from Korea to my desk.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 15, 2014 15:39
|
|
|
The Lord Bude posted:This. Call me when I can buy a 4k IPS screen between 30 and 40" that does 60hz without driver fuckery to make the computer think you have 2 screens; and it costs less than $1k; and I can get 60fps on max settings with a single GPU (I'm guessing this is two generations away). Until then; not interested. Also keep the input lag to reasonable levels too.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 23, 2014 20:02
|
|
|
the Dell uses like 40% less power than the HP and is a few pounds lighter if any of these differences mean anything to you.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 1, 2014 16:44
|
|
|
japtor posted:5120x2880 is officially a thing I'm just looking for a dependable 32-34 inch 4k IPS panel with not horrific input lag for <$1000. Anything physically larger is not deskable and anything smaller just feels like a downgrade from my 30 incher.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 5, 2014 13:53
|
|
|
Oh, I agree the term is highly subjective and defined as much by the dimensions of the desk as the preferences of the user. For multiple displays, you're not as obligated to view everything at once, whereas with a single panel you are. A 40 inch 4K might still look fantastic but I would need to move my mouse and keyboard into the thin air in front of my desk to really use the thing. On the other hand, I'm not sure I could go no scaling with the insane PPI of a smaller display.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 5, 2014 17:21
|
|
|
Josh Lyman posted:27" or die. Still physically smaller than my 30'' 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 12, 2014 15:26
|
|
|
business in
|
|
#
¿
Sep 26, 2014 14:41
|
|
|
Anybody have an opinion on the new U32E850R?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 5, 2015 18:29
|
|
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:Any thoughts on LG's 32UD99? News on this guy came out around the time the XB271HU had its price drop at Costco, and I didn't see any discussion about it. I haven't shopped for monitors in years, and will likely be connecting a 2016 MBP and a PS4 Pro. It seems like that would be a reasonable 4K display for those devices. I'm waiting for reviews to see how the HDR support on this pans out. It doesn't seem to have enough brightness to support the HDR10 standard but who knows. 32 inches is certainly much more usable without scaling than a 27 although IMO 35-36 would be ideal.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2017 22:58
|
|
|
Erm, I had an old Viewsonic overclocked to 85hz that died after only 4 years.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2017 19:11
|
|
|
PerrineClostermann posted:I use a 29" Ultrawide in the center, and then use two monitors above it on either side. Kind of like this: Ah, Logitech Z623. Because they don't make the Z-2300 anymore.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2017 20:42
|
|
|
Mmmm Logitech z2300 yesss
|
|
#
¿
Aug 14, 2017 13:32
|
|
|
Paul MaudDib posted:
Bullshit. 4x 1080p windows on the desktop at the same time is too good.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 30, 2017 13:32
|
|
|
HDMI spec versions. Pascal only supports HDMI 2.0 out of the box. DP 1.2 will do 4k up to 75hz though but tell that to the people who actually make LCD panels and they'll give you a plain old 60hz part and tell you to piss off.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2017 19:18
|
|
|
Klipsch promedia, eh? They're pretty good but I prefer my Logitech z2300.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 18, 2017 04:20
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 23, 2024 18:18 |
|
|
nnnotime posted:Did you get the P4317Q? I got the same model a few months ago. To adjust height I had to put some books under the stand. I don't know why they put the speakers on the monitor, just adds unnecessary weight. Make sure your xbox game bar thing is turned off in Windows.?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2018 14:22
|
|