|
Wasabi the J posted:OLEDs also suffer from the different colors aging at different rates, so a screen could have lots of color distortion years later. this is not an issue with newer style OLEDs where white light is phosphoresced into colors, so there's only one type of LED
|
#
¿
Jun 16, 2015 18:59
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 20:16 |
|
|
Don Lapre posted:Its not because of a phospher coating but the underlying issue (getting dimmer with use) is the same. e: beaten is there a source for the overall dimming anywhere? i know the differential aging is solved by using a white led w/ filters
|
|
#
¿
Jan 7, 2016 00:45
|
|
|
Etrips posted:Ohhhh DP 1.4. Wonder how long it will be before we see them on widescreens to get that 144hz goodness. DSC = visually lossless compression = artifacts lmao they dont want to bite the bullet and go for the bandwidth
|
|
#
¿
Mar 3, 2016 00:40
|
|
|
xthetenth posted:And how do you expect them to get the bandwidth? Active cables? more lanes or finally switch to optical cables. Fuzzy Mammal posted:Have you read the whitepaper on it? They ran blind a/b tests, it should be fine. The alternative is $100 cables.... i'll wait til reviews but i dont hold out hope. lossy compression is difficult to do without losing perceptible detail somewhere. or have multiple passive cables. each dp 1.3 cable can handle 33 gbps so having 3 is not exactly problematic for static desktops, but it's irritating. it's possible to do 3:1 and 4:1 actually lossless compression using software like lagarith but since hardware is ruled by cost we can't have nice things 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 3, 2016 02:14
|
|
|
Hi Jinx posted:Another issue is that lossless can never really guarantee any sort of reduction.E.g if your source data is random, it will not compress at all. You can't have your display hardware throw its hands in the air and proclaim that it'll drop a few frames because they couldn't be compressed sufficiently. sure if you're sending over random data. dropping a frame here or there might be preferable DSC is a stopgap until bandwidth issues over monitor cables is fixed by optical or active cables. it's like interlacing, it blows. also there's bound to be motion issues and poo poo. if even a lil stuck pixel is annoying, imagine a degraded line of text Malcolm XML fucked around with this message at 01:06 on Mar 4, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2016 01:04
|
|
|
xthetenth posted:If she really needs actual space on that sort of budget, I'd consider something like a 40"+ 4K, or maybe an ultrawide because a 27 inch 4K doesn't add room so much as sharpness. If a new computer needs budget room even a 1440p 27" would be a big step up. How much physical room does she have for a screen? 4K at the same dpi is 4x usable real estate assuming you have eagle eyes
|
|
#
¿
Mar 14, 2016 20:00
|
|
|
froody guy posted:Taken from some old discussion gsync is a real loving expensive fpga
|
|
#
¿
May 26, 2016 21:09
|
|
|
Lurdiak posted:Bad drivers don't account for the monitor not detecting any of my cables except the ghetto VGA! french cables use reversed bits
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2016 22:42
|
|
|
Lol 2k in q3?? Not happening like that Dell OLED. gently caress I spent less on my 4k her TV than that
|
|
#
¿
Jan 24, 2017 01:52
|
|
|
P2715q trip report: displayport impl is hosed up and no hdmi2 Don't buy Got a pb2727uq and it owns Better build but not USB 3 hub :/
|
|
#
¿
Jul 17, 2017 17:15
|
|
|
The Milkman posted:This post is barely comprehensible but what's wrong with the DisplayPort? It's what I use at work Paul MaudDib posted:The P2715Q disconnects when you power it off, the DisplayPort spec says you're not supposed to do that, you should always respond to an EDID probe. Yeah this And since there's no HDMI 2.0 if that fucks with your graphics card (gtx 980ti) you're kicked down to 30hz Just buy the Asus. Its actually better built
|
|
#
¿
Jul 17, 2017 19:38
|
|
|
Hmm hope it doesn't have the display port issues
|
|
#
¿
Jul 28, 2017 12:48
|
|
|
Also it doesn't get anywhere near as bright as needed for hdr10--350 nits is not great
|
|
#
¿
Jul 28, 2017 12:49
|
|
|
eames posted:Nvidia appears to be the driving force behind those monitors and HDR10 was one of their spec requirements. These are their flagship G-Sync monitors that'll launch together with their new generation of GPUs. Fight me nerds
|
|
#
¿
May 25, 2018 21:55
|
|
|
Combat Pretzel posted:144hz >>> 4K >>> 2000$ >>> HDR Sorry about your broken eyes and crippling poverty 4k HDR is fundamentally better than the 1080p and 1440p trash panels that are being sold for $700. Having group eyes assaulted at twice the speed is just icing on the cake. Cannot wait for the second generation of these displays to iron out the inevitable kinks.
|
|
#
¿
May 27, 2018 01:55
|
|
|
TenementFunster posted:yes, I've asked the same question many times before and will ask it periodically until I receive a helpful answer. this is absolutely not a troll. i am looking a monitor for someone who needs a monitor and the most important factor is the monitor not be made in the people's republic of china. does anyone know of a monitor for sale that isn't made in china? thank you. No, op
|
|
#
¿
Jul 3, 2018 01:32
|
|
|
Cabling matters for display port. Get something VESA certified. Amazon basics or club3d are good
|
|
#
¿
Nov 25, 2018 22:06
|
|
|
Malloc Voidstar posted:Are there any recommended DisplayPort cable brands? I'm looking for a 10ft DisplayPort cable to run a 1080p monitor at 240Hz (Acer XB252Q). AmazonBasics reviews say it won't work, Monoprice reviews say theirs won't work, random brands have reviews saying theirs won't work. Who do I buy from? Club3d Anything VESA certified really. 1080p240 is the same as 4k60.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 19, 2018 17:27
|
|
|
LG finally has a 4k HFR display. Since their panels are the best around, hopefully we don't see the garbage quality of AUO anymore
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2020 18:12
|
|
|
People who want 32 inch 4k don't understand you can scale dpi in 2020. 27 lets you use multiple monitors. It's a more versatile size they can sell into business
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2020 18:53
|
|
|
BadMedic posted:Apologies if this has already been answered, but is the Eve Spectrum legit? It looks really good but... I threw $100 at it for the 4k version. I'm ready to lose that much at most.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2020 23:01
|
|
|
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1560683-REG/lg_27gn950_b_27_ultragear_4k_nano.html Reasonably priced. Not $2000. No hdmi 2.1 though.
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2020 18:45
|
|
|
bolind posted:I'm looking for opinions on the LG 34WK95U-W. It's strictly for business/office use. No gaming. $1500 is a lot. You could buy 2 4k 27" and go dual monitor for 50% less IIRC it had some issue with thunderbolt controllers in macbooks which is likely 90% of their target market
|
|
#
¿
Jun 12, 2020 04:05
|
|
|
Paul MaudDib posted:it's just a quadratically diminishing effects type situation, there really are diminishing returns past ~60fps, but 80fps is notably better than 60fps, and 144 fps is notably better than 80, etc. overall motion clarity >> raw fps. CRT don't go 144fps but still are nicer for motion
|
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2020 00:49
|
|
|
K8.0 posted:I mean if we were living a world where you could buy a 4k 200hz VRR CRT, sure that'd be the ideal gaming monitor. In reality, the only scenario where I see a real argument for a CRT is for retro gaming where you can't benefit from modern technology, and you are often dealing with non-square pixel aspect ratios. Even then, I'd only recommend it if you enjoy personally maintaining a CRT. well, quite: there's literally no reason to have a 100000hz display if the motion clarity is rear end i'd rather have 120fps with BFI than 240hz with smeary poo poo
|
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2020 01:16
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 20:16 |
|
|
DeadlyHalibut posted:I got my LG 27GL850 and it's pretty great! The monitor stand is questionable but its not as bad as I thought, once you set it up you can pretty much ignore it. If you want to control the monitor inside windows keep it otherwise it's unnecessary
|
|
#
¿
Aug 20, 2020 19:22
|
|