|
Zeroisanumber posted:I thought that Khamis was killed trying to run a NTC checkpoint, found charred black in a car filled with cash and dead assholes in nice suits. It's not 100% confirmed, when Al Rai news started saying it was true I started to think it was a ruse so he could escape the country. For me no body means no confirmation, which worked out well in the case of Gaddafi snr.
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
# ? Jul 14, 2025 18:54 |
|
Ultras Lazio posted:Catching up on a few points here… I agree with all of this (except the likelihood of further interventions) but especially the last part. What I would clarify through is that "brown" is not simply a distinction of skin color it's a racial perception of some sort of idealized form of "Arab". No it doesn't make sense, but it doesn't really have to to be a factor in judgement.
|
![]() |
|
BeigeJacket posted:BBC, AJ, etc have reporters who, generally speaking, adhere to journalistic code of ethics BBC is literally a state apparatus and Al Jazeera is bankrolled by a vicious dictator in his own right, Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, whose country is home to abhorrent mass slavery, human trafficking and a complete lack of meaningful human rights as well bottom of the barrel economic equality. Media in general is increasingly concentrated and tied to non-media corporate interests all of which are incredibly unworthy of trust and beholden to the political and economic interests of those at their helms, there is no requirement for meaningful Actual Conspiratorial Collusion when the same results are achieved from a soft, voluntary approach whereby all parties have more or less the same bias without any intervention on any Evil Scheming Party's part. Being skeptical of the media has absolutely nothing to do with conspiracy theories and everything to do with institutional analysis, which deals far less with absolutes and presupposes no such improvable ridiculous paranoiac speculation that genuine conspiracy theories rely on. Putting media critics and conspiracy theorists in the same boat is intellectually dishonest and cowardly.
|
![]() |
|
Mr. Self Destruct posted:BBC is literally a state apparatus. Sure it's a state apparatus, but so are schools (not to be confused with ideological state apparatus, which are the bad ones). It's also not directly funded by the government and instead by a "subscription" that every Briton with a TV must pay. Sure the government has occasionally stepped in to control the BBC, but almost always through the courts with super injunctions and whatnot, not with the clandestine influence of government lizard people (unlesssss..... ![]() Sure it's not perfect, but by not having advertisers I'd trust them a whole lot more than any of the American news agencies.
|
![]() |
|
Mr. Self Destruct posted:Being skeptical of the media should not mean that one sucks up anything that people like Lizzie Phelan vomit into the internet. There is need for honest, bona fide academic media criticism, but it's a very different thing from retards saying that the mainstream media cannot be trusted on anything, but hey here's this website that says USA now owns all of Libyan oil reserves must be true
|
![]() |
|
bleedbackwards posted:Definitely looks like he was shot in the head prior to death. Hmm.. Could there be a connection? ![]()
|
![]() |
|
In general I agree that the lack of advertisers gives them a huge advantage in reliability, but when it comes to international affairs such as this where the British government has enormous stakes that extra credibility increasingly often diffuses in favour of supporting official narrative. American news agencies are far worse because they require no pressure whatsoever to propagandize because of their being beholden to said advertisers. In actual news, I'm pretty surprised to see Julian Assange actually calling out the intervention as being a US/Euro takeover of the country and its resources and a co-option of the arab spring. I expected him to bend or be silent on this issue, kudos to the man for not looking like an asset or shill on this issue.
|
![]() |
|
Mr. Self Destruct posted:In general I agree that the lack of advertisers gives them a huge advantage in reliability, but when it comes to international affairs such as this where the British government has enormous stakes that extra credibility increasingly often diffuses in favour of supporting official narrative. American news agencies are far worse because they require no pressure whatsoever to propagandize because of their being beholden to said advertisers. You do realise that the BBC is has it's own charter and code of practice (including some fairly strict rules on impartiality) and that they frequently criticize the government? (look at the WMD mess with Andrew Gilligan). I'm not saying they're perfect, but to paint them as the mouthpiece of the British governement is misleading. Why are you surprised at Assange saying what he said exactly? It seems no different from his previous positions.
|
![]() |
|
Mr. Self Destruct posted:In actual news, I'm pretty surprised to see Julian Assange actually calling out the intervention as being a US/Euro takeover of the country and its resources and a co-option of the arab spring. I expected him to bend or be silent on this issue, kudos to the man for not looking like an asset or shill on this issue. The co-option bit is interesting though, in light of the Rolling Stone article about SECSTATE Clinton being rebuffed by Egyptian youth groups being a catalyst for intervention (seeing the US "shut out" in Egypt and wanting to avoid that in Libya).
|
![]() |
|
I wish this thread was more about the news coming out of the Arab Spring than arguing over how Gaddafi was killed. The important thing is that he's dead. How isn't so much of an issue, since Libya will finally be able to properly move forward into whatever they're going to be. Here's hoping it isn't a strongman again!
|
![]() |
|
Reaction to Gaddafi's death in Egypt is interesting, most people are happy the war in Libya looks like it's coming to an end, but they're also very much against how Gaddafi was killed, calling those who did so "barbaric" and saying that he deserved a fair trial and a clean death. It's markedly different from most western publications' opinions.
|
![]() |
|
Mr. Self Destruct posted:In general I agree that the lack of advertisers gives them a huge advantage in reliability, but when it comes to international affairs such as this where the British government has enormous stakes that extra credibility increasingly often diffuses in favour of supporting official narrative. True. I guess the one flaw with the BBC is that they are going to be biased by national pride and the patriotism of the people who pay their licenses that wouldn't be too pleased if Britain was painted as the bad guys. Maybe we need a World Broadcasting Corporation.
|
![]() |
|
These videos really amaze me.
|
![]() |
|
Mr. Self Destruct posted:BBC is literally a state apparatus and Al Jazeera is bankrolled by a vicious dictator in his own right, Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, whose country is home to abhorrent mass slavery, human trafficking and a complete lack of meaningful human rights as well bottom of the barrel economic equality. It's funded by a sheik, but from what I've seen Al Jazeera really hasn't failed me once from when I started watching it. I should know, I come from loving Australia where Gaddafi's death wasn't even the top story anywhere, and if you ask any Australian who has watched TV news and not gone on the internet about Libya they know gently caress all and probably think that "It'll just be like Iraq! ![]()
|
![]() |
|
de_dust2 posted:Check out these pictures: I see Kalashnikovs, FN-FAL Rifles, 14.5mm Machineguns and Anti-Aircraft Guns as well as RPG-7's and older Soviet tanks - fixtures of 2nd and 3rd world militaries. I would imagine every one of those weapons seen there was taken from the loyalist forces (although the weapons provided by Qatar may be similar in some regards).
|
![]() |
|
Ham posted:Reaction to Gaddafi's death in Egypt is interesting, most people are happy the war in Libya looks like it's coming to an end, but they're also very much against how Gaddafi was killed, calling those who did so "barbaric" and saying that he deserved a fair trial and a clean death. It's markedly different from most western publications' opinions.
|
![]() |
|
Meanwhile in Bahrain, A heart-wrenching Audio account of a medical professor describing her imprisonment and torture.
|
![]() |
|
RobattoJesus posted:Sure it's a state apparatus, but so are schools (not to be confused with ideological state apparatus, which are the bad ones). It's also not directly funded by the government and instead by a "subscription" that every Briton with a TV must pay. Sure the government has occasionally stepped in to control the BBC, but almost always through the courts with super injunctions and whatnot, not with the clandestine influence of government lizard people (unlesssss..... And certainly better overall than your standard lovely media conglomerate. Al-Saqr posted:Meanwhile in Bahrain, A heart-wrenching Audio account of a medical professor describing her imprisonment and torture. And Bahrain gets extra dick points for arresting hospital staff for the crime of treating badly injured protesters.
|
![]() |
|
Can we finally agree that the decision not to release the OBL death photos were utterly and entirely justified? Libyans who might become thrust onto the world stage after this, possibly in positions of power, are going to be associated with these images of holding down a bloodied and broken old man who got dragged out of a hole, begging for his life, then shot in the head and made to lie in state in a loving walk-in cooler, while hooligans with cell phones hover, jabber and take pictures. This is Libya's immediate future. This is what revolution means. Bloody, barbaric death and abandon. Just be glad it's not you on camera.
|
![]() |
|
J.theYellow posted:
They paid the price for starting a revolution against all odds, against a bloodthirsty leader who managed to cleverly hoodwink the West into thinking he had changed his ways. A pathetic, unheroic death is exactly what Gaddafi's deserved after destroying thousands of lives along with ordering the rape and torture of numerous unarmed civilians. It's the perfect warning for cruel leaders who think they can rule forever and never have to face the consequences of their actions. The only tragedy is with him gone there's no one else qualified to pass on the important knowledge and techniques of Bunga Bunga to the leaders of the world.
|
![]() |
|
etalian posted:They paid the price for starting a revolution against all odds, against a bloodthirsty leader who managed to cleverly hoodwink the West into thinking he had changed his ways. And nobody will ever have a fashion sense like Gaddafi had. ![]()
|
![]() |
|
J.theYellow posted:This is what revolution means. The way he's been treating the people for the last 40 years, it should really come as no surprise. Dictators rarely have happy endings.
|
![]() |
Ham posted:Reaction to Gaddafi's death in Egypt is interesting, most people are happy the war in Libya looks like it's coming to an end, but they're also very much against how Gaddafi was killed, calling those who did so "barbaric" and saying that he deserved a fair trial and a clean death. It's markedly different from most western publications' opinions. I think calling them barbaric is an overreaction just because there's videos. It's a weird thing. There's no videos of Gaddafi's army raping, torturing, and butchering, using every dirty offense and cruelty as they did, so nobody's talking about that still. It's just 'boohoo that poor old poof and his silly fashion sense, he was a victim of the mob' I hate when people are driven by the media's latest video clips like that. The guy MADE victims for this last year, and surely before, and now he's the victim. Good grief.
|
|
![]() |
|
As it seems there's a lot of new people here this is the twitter list I put together of journalists reporting in or on Libya. Reuters - Gaddafi's body lies in Misrata market cooler https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laZkbn-EICs quote:People stand in line to see the body of former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi in Misrata October 21, 2011. Gaddafi’s body lay in an old meat store on Friday as arguments over a burial, and his killing after being captured, dogged efforts by Libya’s new leaders to make a formal start on a new era of democracy. quote:Libya’s National Transitional Council has said it would declare the full “liberation” of Libya on Sunday, after initially saying it would take place on Friday, then on Saturday. Moatissim Gaddafi talking while under arrest, can anyone translate? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gW3WqcBYUtc Video of the moment of Gaddafi's capture https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLAS2NQT8f8 Latest Saif claim via twitter from about 40 minutes: quote:#Saif Gaddafi arrested in #Zliten. Photos and a video of his detention will be published within hours said commander Ali el-Shawesh How about a lovely bit of death cake? ![]()
|
![]() |
|
Want to eat that cake.
|
![]() |
|
Some days the tyrant bites you and sometimes you bite the tyrant, good luck to Libya for the future.
|
![]() |
|
Brown Moses posted:How about a lovely bit of death cake? If I get married I'm going to have a giant wedding cake with the delicious frosting corpses of all my favorite dictators lying on each layer.
|
![]() |
|
Amazing article from the rabidly pro-Gaddafi "news" website Mathaba.net:quote:Is Qaddafi Dead? They've got some serious denial going on over at Mathaba.net. Speaking of which, here's a list of pro-Gaddafi twitter accounts for fans of schadenfreude.
|
![]() |
|
Stoatbringer posted:The way he's been treating the people for the last 40 years, it should really come as no surprise. And his house got the same humiliation treatment too: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fp0jCYACu8A
|
![]() |
|
quote:because 99% of tell-lie-vision (TV) viewers Can't wait for this to make its way into American vernacular.
|
![]() |
|
I'm loving loving the reaction of the pro-Gaddafi sites at the moment, like this video from AfriSynergy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJlcNGwkWY8
|
![]() |
|
Brown Moses posted:I'm loving loving the reaction of the pro-Gaddafi sites at the moment, like this video from AfriSynergy: Amazing powerpoint animations can easily hide obvious truths.
|
![]() |
|
Libya SOS is taking it hard:quote:ANALYSING ‘GADDAFI’S KILLED’ VIDEOS:
|
![]() |
|
CNN Man is moving pictures of Gadhafi's mutilated body around a magic touchscreen and making wild conjectures about how he died. Prime journalism right there. Not that I care about ol' Sillyclothes McWarcriminal, but it just seems ridiculous.
|
![]() |
|
Brown Moses posted:But that did not matter, because 99% of tell-lie-vision (TV) viewers believed it, just as they did when Obama's White House came up with his forged birth certificate, I love this. They just kinda throw it in there. "Oh by the way he's not a US citizen"
|
![]() |
|
Brown Moses posted:Libya SOS is taking it hard: Also so jealous over the rebels having a successful sexy night party: http://libyasos.blogspot.com/2011/10/shame-shamelessness-sexy-dinner-in.html
|
![]() |
|
Libya360 is feeling pretty butthurt tooquote:NATO’s Mighty Wurlitzer has been churning at a furious pace the past few days. Recent news of the death of the Revolutionary Brother Leader is part of a wider and far-reaching psychological operation underway and the reason I have abstained from posting news from the Resistance.
|
![]() |
|
Awesome craziness here.Mathaba.net posted:People have been so worried as to whether the Leader of the World Revolution, Muammar Qaddafi of Libya, is dead or alive. Let us examine this question, and reach some definitive positions based upon the Third Universal Theory, which Muammar Qaddafi championed. Gaddhafi is apparently Schroendinger's Dictator, both alive and dead at the same time. Perhaps they will use socialist theory to determine the time and cause of Gaddhafi's death; it's about as effective as anything else it's been used for. Also, I'm loving the D&D invasion of this thread. "It doesn't matter how many people Gaddhafi had killed or tortured to stay in power for over forty years - he improved Libya's health care, and thus must be mourned and treated with proper and due respect." ![]()
|
![]() |
|
Eschers Basement posted:Awesome craziness here. Hey hey hey, as long as you improve education and healthcare in your country, you deserve your own raperoom.
|
![]() |
|
![]()
|
# ? Jul 14, 2025 18:54 |
|
I like how pro-gads keep echoing dehumanizing the rebels calling them Rats. Its one thing to call someone a terrorist, but you really think calling a large portion of Libyan civilians rats is going to make you come off as a sane rational person. It's sad because even the NTC has the decency to admit that most pro-gad fighters where probably tricked into fighting and aren’t really bad people. These pro-gad people bitching about how violent the rebel rats are, but would totally be cool with gadafi mass murdering half the Libyan population, because hey if you defy gadafy you obviously are a rat who does not diserve to live.
|
![]() |