|
 This message isn't getting out of .biz's network, is it? They are telling me my server is rejecting it based on size but there aren't any traces of it in either my spam filter or my Exchange server. CORP-EX13......biz and UHSDR-EX.....biz are both their mail servers.
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2020 14:11
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 24, 2024 00:16 |
|
|
Is there a way to make a room resource not visible in the GAL, but let other select users still manage it? The idea is to not let users send requests directly using Outlook, they have to go through a group of users. But if you hide the resource in the address book, those users can't open the calendar to manage it. I tried changing the default access rights to 'None', but the calendar is still visible in the address book.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 5, 2020 14:35
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:If someone has to "go through a group of users" isn't that basically the same thing as having booking delegates? I think it's more they don't want the minions to be able to use it
|
|
#
¿
Nov 5, 2020 19:35
|
|
|
Will Styles posted:Booking delegates work as an approval list. Anyone who is a delegate will receive a copy of the meeting invite and they can accept/decline the meeting. This will give that group of people control over what meetings appear on the calendar, however they'll have to manage every meeting. Right. But they don’t want anyone to be able to even send a request. It’s just silly. Did the hide/unhide trick, we’ll see. We have an internal conferencing tool on our phone system that we might be using a way which will eliminate this. Hopefully.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 6, 2020 01:09
|
|
|
Here's the secenario: We have an internal distribution group/security group that's mainly for a room resource. However, people have been giving the address out to external people and they're using that. SomeGroup@contoso.org We don't want them doing that. Only internal people should be emailing this group. It shouldn't even be used as a distribution group...but anyway. Checking "Only senders inside my organization" doesn't seem to affect this. Apparently, this is because we have a Barracuda Appliance that gets our email first, and then after filtering, it sends to our Exchange server. In this case, anything from the Barracuda connector is 'authenticated', so Exchange sees that as 'inside my organization'. I tried making a Mail Flow rule but you can't do anything using the group so I'm stuck.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2020 20:27
|
|
|
Hawkline posted:I don't think mail from a perimeter appliance should be authenticated. How would I go about checking?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2020 21:23
|
|
|
I think am just going to make another connector specifically for the spam appliance. Not sure who set this up.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2020 22:57
|
|
|
quote:xxx xxxx (Cygilant) "Proactively eliminate threats" "Comprehensive, up-to-the-minute threat intelligence, visibility into security events, real-time incident notification and guidance to quickly address security issues." 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2021 13:48
|
|
|
A ticket came in: Allow Access to Outlook Web Access only from US
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2021 20:13
|
|
|
Internet Explorer posted:And to think, it could be as easy as a click of a button. It's easy in the firewall to do apply incoming GeoIP US-only It's just going to create about 20 tickets to unblock certain things in the future.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2021 21:26
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 24, 2024 00:16 |
|
|
Is there a way to view the full message headers in 365 Message trace? Would be useful for troubleshooting.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2021 17:14
|
|