|
I need a book recommendation. Today I had some exchange\DNS\rDNS\Header problems that needed answers and it highlighted how little I know about email in general and how exchange handles email. I want something in the area of Baby's first exchange server, as that will probably have all the basics in it that I need to brush up on.
|
# ¿ Apr 3, 2012 08:33 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 17:58 |
|
Is it possible to get a log of which users have used OWA? We recently "announced" the fact that OWA exists and my manager is interested to see how much use its getting.
|
# ¿ Sep 13, 2012 08:17 |
|
DontMuchTooThink posted:OWA is just a website. You can log all the information you need using IIS Logging. Thanks for that. Nice and easy.
|
# ¿ Sep 14, 2012 02:35 |
|
incoherent posted:They fixed this in a rollup. You can deploy 3.0 again (if you're on SP3+the rollup) Got a link for this? The stuff i'm reading still says 3.0 is unsupported.
|
# ¿ Nov 14, 2013 23:27 |
|
Update 9/19/13: A side-by-side coexistence of PowerShell 3.0 and PowerShell 2.0 is supported starting with Exchange 2010 SP3. Note that Exchange 2010 will only use PowerShell 2.0 so PowerShell 2.0 is still a required component. So does this mean that I can install 3.0, but not actually use any of the 3.0 features?
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2013 01:27 |
|
Right well that is fine. I can finally use some sweet export-csv -append action.
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2013 01:31 |
|
I'm trying to automate a PST export for a mailbox within a date range using New-MailboxExportRequest. I'm using Exchange 2010 SP3.code:
If I just put in the raw dates instead of the $a and $b variables, It says it cannot convert the string into a valid DateTime. Our date format is DD/MM/YYYY which might make a difference? Not sure if this is an Exchange or Powershell specific query. Swink fucked around with this message at 02:16 on Jan 21, 2014 |
# ¿ Jan 21, 2014 02:11 |
|
That post seems to be my exact issue but the resolution does not work for me.code:
This is maddening.
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2014 04:34 |
|
Well that would explain things as I have been successful getting an export of the 1st to the 7th to work, but not the 8th to the 15th using the exact same syntax.Nitr0 posted:
Is doing this likely to have an adverse affect on the users? As for saving the dates as Objects, when I use Get-Date in place of the date string, it omits the dates entirely - ContentFilter : ((Received -ne $null) -and (Received -ne $null)) Swink fucked around with this message at 06:39 on Jan 21, 2014 |
# ¿ Jan 21, 2014 06:23 |
|
I have a problem with my Outlook 2010 clients on Exchange 2010 SP3 - When a staffmember leaves and we remove their account, anyone with the departed staff-member in their list of shared calendars gets prompted for credentials. Presumably Outlook is trying to connect to the non existing account to update data. Why does Outlook behave this way? How can I prevent it from happening?
|
# ¿ Feb 25, 2014 23:45 |
|
I recently had to search 2-3 years worth of PSTs for keywords etc. I used software from http://www.sherpasoftware.com/ It did the trick. I think I had around 100 PST files. I needed to find emails between certain parties on a certain subject. From memory I think a yearly licence was $4000. As our need was a one-off, we paid $1000 for a 30 day "rental". Edit - I reread your initial post and maybe you're asking for an overall storage strategy? As we are required to keep every email sent and received, we do not have the storage capacity for this. Our process is to journal all mail into our Archive mailbox, then dump a weeks worth of mail into a PST. We store about 3 months worth of PST email on tapes going back 7 years. When we needed to discovery on this giant, 2 year timeframe we had to restore about 10 tapes to get all the PST files, then searched them using Sherpa's 'Discovery Attender' program. Swink fucked around with this message at 03:14 on Mar 11, 2014 |
# ¿ Mar 11, 2014 03:06 |
|
.
Swink fucked around with this message at 01:56 on Mar 12, 2014 |
# ¿ Mar 12, 2014 01:50 |
|
How do I go about troubleshooting permissions problems in Exchange 2010? I have a User A who has Full Access permission as well as Send As permission to User B. However User A is not able to send as User B. I've never delved into Exchange logs but I assume this is where I need to go?
|
# ¿ May 2, 2014 03:50 |
|
I'm adding permissions via code:
This issue seems to affect just the one user. And he is configured exactly the same as the others.
|
# ¿ May 2, 2014 05:32 |
|
A followup to my issues with 'Send As' permissions: My problem was that the account I was trying to send as was hidden (Hide from Exchange Address Book flag). Which apparently just doesn't work. A workaround is posted here http://exchangeserverpro.com/how-to-send-as-a-hidden-mailbox/ but i havent gotten around to trying it yet.
|
# ¿ May 7, 2014 06:51 |
|
^ this is normal. I use a program called CATMAN from codetwo.com to sync between users
|
# ¿ May 13, 2014 01:50 |
|
Is there a way to use the auto mapping feature in 2010 without having to grant full mailbox access? For example, I want to my coworkers' mailbox auto added to my outlook profile, but just the root and inbox. Not the rest of his poo poo.
|
# ¿ Aug 6, 2014 11:22 |
|
I'm trying to set a global limit on attachment size for an Exchange 2010 install using Set-TransportConfig -MaxSendSize 50MB The behavior I want is for the users to get an NDR if their email exceeds the limit, but instead users are getting a message from Outlook when attaching the file that says "Attachment Exceeds allowable limit", and the attachment is not attached. All the Outlook clients are in cached mode. Am I doing this incorrectly?
|
# ¿ Sep 24, 2014 01:00 |
|
NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:Why do you want the NDR? This way is better imho. But anyway to get what you want I think put the limit on the send conncetor Set-SendConnector –Identity cocksucker –MaxMessageSize 50MB I want the users to get an ndr that explains how to use a file sharing doodad. My hope we'll get less support calls from a comprehensive ndr than the prompt. How can I apply this to all users for ever?
|
# ¿ Sep 24, 2014 08:24 |
|
Mierdaan posted:In the example command NevergirlsOFFICIAL gave, 'cocksucker' is the name of the send-connector, not your end user. I could see how this would be confusing. haha. Shoulda checked the cmdlet out. Cheers.
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2014 00:43 |
|
I have a problem with staff going to remote sites, logging onto a PC and pulling down their entire mailbox over the WAN, maxing it out for hours. What are my options in Exchange\Outlook 2010 for limiting the rate at which a client can pull down mail? I dont necessarily mind that they pull 4+gigs of mailbox over the wire, I'd just rather drip-feed it to them at say 200Kb/s.
|
# ¿ Nov 13, 2014 05:31 |
|
^ You are exactly correct. The issue is they log onto a new PC and Outlook starts building the local cache, which could be several gigs. There is a stack of throttling options in Exchange, but I would need to rate-limit the Outlook clients themselves. This might be something I just have to wear until we roll out Office 2013+ which has better Cached Mode controls. I should have been clearer in my original post that I was already using cached mode. Thankyou for your responses though! Swink fucked around with this message at 01:15 on Nov 14, 2014 |
# ¿ Nov 14, 2014 01:03 |
|
NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:How about deploy outlook via RemoteApp so the outlook client just runs in online mode someplace local to the exchange server Nice! I don't have the CALs though. Plus our DB application needs to be able to interact with a local copy of Outlook.
|
# ¿ Dec 1, 2014 05:02 |
|
It's not as bad as you think. I'm just going to have to wear the cache issue for now.
|
# ¿ Dec 1, 2014 21:49 |
|
I am, using exactly that method linked. I'm not sure that it actually prevents a user from entering their password details into the app (and in turn having those details sent to the 3rd party server) it only blocks the sync being made on the server side. Does anyone care about this? My boss does, which is why I've done it.
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2015 07:11 |
|
So apparently one of our highly paid consultants receives our attachments as "winmail.dat" files. He's using Mail for OSX. This is seemingly a notorious problem. According to a bunch of random blogs, the problem lies with Exchange not sending mail in a format that can be properly read. I keep seeing "TNEF" mentioned when sending RTF formatted emails. What, if anything, do I actually need to change to ensure this guy can receive whatever garbage we're trying to send him? 90% of our mail is in HTML format, which is pretty standard, I would have thought. Bonus: The apple support forums might be the worst place on the internet. Why even post there if "buy an android" is going to be every answer?
|
# ¿ Feb 18, 2015 01:19 |
|
I believe the message body displays fine but the attachments arrive as winmail.dat. It could be some or all of the attachments.
|
# ¿ Feb 18, 2015 02:07 |
|
In my tests wiht this guy I create a new, standard HTML message. I wonder if it's our mailgateway malforming the messages? We use M86's Mailmarshal which as far as I can tell, transports all mail back to 2002 before delivering it. Edit - aha I can see items in Mailmarshal with winmail.dat attachments before they've even been delivered to the recipient! Swink fucked around with this message at 02:22 on Feb 18, 2015 |
# ¿ Feb 18, 2015 02:18 |
|
"never use exchange rich-text format". I'll give it a whirl. Edit - problem solved. Swink fucked around with this message at 08:42 on Feb 25, 2015 |
# ¿ Feb 18, 2015 06:41 |
|
You can also use set-mailboxautoreplyconfiguration if you don't want to talk to the user.
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2015 02:37 |
|
^ our office shuts down over Christmas and we have a policy of all staff having an out of office. I use this cmdlet to set and enable the message for all staff, then disable it.
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2015 04:15 |
|
Any of you use Mimecast for mail archiving? I need to archive all mail for 7 years and I'm getting sick of storing it locally.
|
# ¿ Apr 23, 2015 08:23 |
|
^ how many users?
|
# ¿ Apr 30, 2015 05:27 |
|
Basic q: if I don't have circular logging enabled, what process prevents the disk from filling up with logs? What truncates the old logs? Also: any book suggestions for bringing myself up to speed with Exchange?
|
# ¿ Jun 17, 2015 07:19 |
|
Our deployment has the Databases on D and the logs in the same folder. The logs exploded after I migrated a 10gb mailbox to another DB and filled the disk. Our backup wasn't able to run with the mailboxes unmounted. Good times.
|
# ¿ Jun 17, 2015 23:32 |
|
We do something similar using journaling. All our mail is forwarded to our 'archive' mailbox. The archive has no retention policy, all the rest of the mailboxes do. This is Exchange 2010 on premise.
|
# ¿ Jun 19, 2015 04:32 |
|
NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:idk if this belongs in this thread but: If you have Outloook 2013+ you can only sync a week\month's worth of mail in the cache. It will increase slower but if your people have multi-gig mailboxes you'll buy yourself some time. Auto-archiving older mail, perhaps? You're gonna have a great time if your users do what mine do, and add each other's mailboxes. You'll end up storing everyones mail 50 times in various OSTs. Hurrah! Edit - I assume Outlook is required to be in RDS. But you could run it locally and sync via Outlook Anywhere. Swink fucked around with this message at 00:38 on Sep 29, 2015 |
# ¿ Sep 29, 2015 00:31 |
|
On Prem Exchange and Sharepoint must be the biggest drag on their support. Question: I need a way to mark an incoming email based on which alias smtp address was used. I've got users with multiple alias' but the users aren't able to tell which address the sender used. Is this doable? I'd just want to append a text-flag to the end of the email or something. I'm on Exchange 2010
|
# ¿ Oct 5, 2015 07:11 |
|
TEAH SYAG posted:Heh, my company has done quite a few projects to pull O365 back on premise for clients in the last 2 years. What are the usual reasons they want to come back on-prem? My company is considering it and I'm struggling to find reasons not to do it. I wouldnt mind some stories from the trenches.
|
# ¿ Oct 13, 2015 10:21 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 17:58 |
|
I had that symptom when a user had a shared calendar attached to their outlook of a user that no longer existed. Mostt times if the old user was removed the issue was gone, sometimes I had to configure the setting to not cache shared mailboxes before it went.
|
# ¿ Oct 19, 2015 06:56 |