|
I actually thought I liked an article on Conservapedia. http://www.conservapedia.com/Pseudoscience It checks out until they suggest that string theory is not a falsifiable scientific theory. Oh, and here are a few "examples" of pseudoscience: quote:Big Bang Astronomy
|
# ¿ May 15, 2011 11:18 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 00:44 |
|
So basically: if we keep it up, literally nobody will be able to view the site? I dunno if that would be useful or sad. It's the greatest satire ever.
|
# ¿ May 15, 2011 11:32 |
|
raezr posted:Even though every other page on this site blasts liberals for smoking too much weed, the actual marijuana page isn't very damning at all. http://conservapedia.com/Marijuana I have no idea what their definition of "liberal" or "conservative" is, it's so inconsistent. Marijuana is an interesting issue from a liberal/conservative perspective. Conservatives should be all in favor of relaxing government regulations on controlled substances and yet they are the biggest proponents of the war on drugs.
|
# ¿ May 15, 2011 15:05 |
|
The NPR Store posted:Conservatives believe in magic and are scared of witches. They think the Salem with trials involved actual witches. "A male practitioner is a wizard". I finally understand why they found Harry Potter offensive. But let's look on the bright side: there is a group of people out there who could easily be convinced that you are, in fact, a wizard. It's no longer secluded to the realm of imagination. Let the new age of LARPing begin!
|
# ¿ May 15, 2011 16:19 |
|
jojoinnit posted:Have you guys seen their article on the Confederate States of America? Conservapedia posted:The main reason for secession was to preserve slavery--but all the slaves were emancipated with no compensation to the owners. I like this interesting tidbit because: Conservapedia posted:Reparations are payments required of the nations who have lost a war to the nations who won, for damages caused by the nations who lost. Large reparations have sometimes caused extensive economic damage to the countries that have to pay them: for example, after the First World War the Treaty of Versailles obliged Germany to pay enormous reparations to France and the other allied nations. This compounded the already heavy costs associated with the war itself and thereby contributed significantly to the rampant inflation that afflicted the country during the 1920s and 1930s. Mr. D Bewildering fucked around with this message at 18:36 on May 17, 2011 |
# ¿ May 17, 2011 18:33 |
|
jojoinnit posted:It would make more sense to me to create a separate server that handles edits, that blocks IP ranges trying to edit pages, so they discourage vandalism while still allowing regular people to read the site. Just let them IP block the world until the only people who can read it are the three people who write the articles.
|
# ¿ May 22, 2011 19:12 |
|
raezr posted:I decided to look this up http://conservapedia.com/Liberal_hypocrisy#The_Obamas_and_obesity I was going to post about how I never understood why conservatives bothered with this sort of attack, but then I read: quote:and the Obamas have yet to publicly discuss the significant obesity problem within the lesbian community.
|
# ¿ May 23, 2011 05:37 |
|
Goreld posted:Truly, pre-Christian humor is nonexistent. These are some of the best things I've ever read. Bookmarking it for eternity.
|
# ¿ May 23, 2011 20:32 |
|
"If you're so smart Mr. Atheist, then why are you so fat? " e: oh wow http://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_If_you%27re_so_smart_PZ_Myers,_then_why_are_you_so_fat%3F They really do enjoy these obesity arguments, don't they? Mr. D Bewildering fucked around with this message at 16:49 on May 31, 2011 |
# ¿ May 31, 2011 16:46 |
|
raezr posted:I mentioned this before, but it continues to boggle me that they demonize hippies so much. When was the last time anyone ever cared about hippies? Their mindset is stuck in the 60s. See: race relations
|
# ¿ Jun 1, 2011 01:34 |
|
Considering the anti-art, anti-science, anti-education, anti-literature stance of your typical conservative, how would new words exist in their perfect utopia? Or would they consist entirely of muck-ups like Palin's "refudiate"?
|
# ¿ Jun 3, 2011 22:08 |
|
Per posted:How does that work? Can anyone do that? Sounds kind of fraud-y. "Ayn Rand" is the pseudonym. She used her real name.
|
# ¿ Jun 3, 2011 22:13 |
|
Pead posted:Premise: Given that public schools educate about 90% of Americans, it is astounding how few prominent Americans attended public school after the banning of school prayer in 1962. And I bet a lot of public school students are atheist and obese too.
|
# ¿ Jun 4, 2011 00:16 |
|
Bruce Leroy posted:Of note here is that Rand had every right to take part in these programs, but she was a loving hypocrite for doing so after railing against them and the other people who take part in them so viciously. Her philosophy is a cancer on this world and her writing is just loving awful. Of course she had every right to them. I'm just curious what kind of excuse she could have possibly had to justify this action for herself. And for that matter, what excuse would her supporters come up with to explain away her hypocrisy? Can I interpret it as tacit approval of Medicare/Social Security?
|
# ¿ Jun 4, 2011 12:15 |
|
Strudel Man posted:Yes, I know it's true. The absurdity is arguing that he's a liberal on that basis, when his one and only current cause is one espoused principally by the right, not the left.
|
# ¿ Jul 4, 2011 13:36 |
|
Nenonen posted:I think being a religious wacko is something that you're born with or acquired at a very early age - I've known people who have shuffled through different religions, only becoming more fundamentalist at each turn. What is common is that their childhood homes were very religious as well. Whether it's in genes or upraising, I don't know. If the "born religious" argument really become s part of the Republican mindset, then how much more terrible does the "I won't have muslims on my cabinet" position of several Republican candidates look?
|
# ¿ Jul 10, 2011 15:49 |
|
Dr Christmas posted:I'm predicting a lot of accusations that the left is "happy" that it was a right-wing christian. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umTITWQuXwY Dan Fanelli: "Does THIS look like a terrorist?" Now he does
|
# ¿ Jul 26, 2011 13:43 |
|
When I think "conservatives" and "moral high ground", I can't help but think of Newt Gingrich first and foremost. Just study that man's love life if you want to know why "sanctity of marriage" is bullshit.
|
# ¿ Aug 29, 2011 14:19 |
|
Genesis 1:6-8 posted:And God said, “Let there be a vault between the waters to separate water from water.” 7 So God made the vault and separated the water under the vault from the water above it. And it was so. 8 God called the vault “sky.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the second day.
|
# ¿ Sep 26, 2011 17:14 |
|
jojoinnit posted:Tebow worship is like a lovely internet poster reading a convoluted webcomic. e: I guess it seems more amazing when it happens in nature rather than as a narrative. But none of this is all that spectacular or uncommon.
|
# ¿ Jan 10, 2012 16:52 |
|
Lassitude posted:Nah, they're in favour of executing minors. I like to think that it has more to do with the following line from Ron Paul's infamous newsletter: quote:“We don’t think a child of 13 should be held as responsible as a man of 23. That’s true for most people, but black males age 13 who have been raised on the streets and who have joined criminal gangs are as big, strong, tough, scary and culpable as any adult, and should be treated as such.”
|
# ¿ Jan 17, 2012 16:59 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 00:44 |
|
Tebow talk cracks me up. Is there anything that they won't view through the tinted window of partisan politics? And the "morality" of putting Manning on the field is what made me lose it. Schlafly is acting like he's a feeble old man compared to the young, strapping warrior of God that is Tim Tebow. Is there anything to the Tebow obsession other than the God angle?
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2012 15:28 |