|
Lexicon posted:Maybe they are intentionally vague on implementation details, but I don't understand how this works.
|
# ¿ Jul 6, 2012 00:19 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 03:09 |
|
Sprat Sandwich posted:I got a redeem code - 'This code has already been used. Each code may be used once'.
|
# ¿ Jul 25, 2012 14:34 |
|
Sprat Sandwich posted:Begins with a 7 and ends with a 4?
|
# ¿ Jul 25, 2012 15:07 |
|
Baggot posted:I am also still waiting for my Up-to-Date redemption code. It's been just about 24 hours now. Come on, Apple!! They just sent me a fourth one. On a whim I used the third one (with ML already installed) and it downloaded OS X Server. The Up-to-Date program should be really simple so I'm not sure how they've managed to screw it up this much.
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2012 01:19 |
|
Kilometers Davis posted:Is the dashboard actually useful though? I rarely hear about anyone using it.
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2012 04:41 |
|
Notification Center is literally the only new ML feature I've actually noticed, and I like Growl slightly better than it, so I've personally found ML to be a (very minor) downgrade from Lion.
|
# ¿ Jul 29, 2012 23:09 |
|
Wario In Real Life posted:How would you possibly consider it a downgrade? You can still install Growl... I've seen the list of new features. They're a mix of improvements to bundled programs I don't use and incredibly minor things I can't bring myself to care about.
|
# ¿ Jul 30, 2012 01:07 |
|
Terpfen posted:It's been a long time since I've seen such ferocious protection of $20.
|
# ¿ Jul 30, 2012 03:46 |
|
Polymerized Cum posted:When speaking of MP3s, are bitrate and size a linear relationship?
|
# ¿ Aug 16, 2012 01:39 |
|
Tax laws change every year, so anything involving taxes needs to be updated at least that often. In general you should just pretend that any software which does tax-related things is on a subscription model. Even if a particular product gives free updates at the moment, it's unlikely to forever simply due to how much it ends up costing to keep up with tax code changes. If you aren't using QB for tax stuff, you probably don't need to update it on a regular basis (but I am not an accountant and there may be other important things that change which I am not aware of).
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2012 22:34 |
|
That page has just shy of 200 MB of gifs.
|
# ¿ Dec 1, 2012 22:36 |
|
Mr. Onslaught posted:One fix suggests doing this:
|
# ¿ Dec 12, 2012 19:15 |
|
Or like most people, they just don't give a gently caress about Java in the browser
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2013 19:22 |
|
Richman777 posted:Any general consensus on the stability of Mavericks with release 3? I have a developer account and am a developer but I don't really need any of the new features for it or anything. More just curious.
|
# ¿ Jul 20, 2013 23:01 |
|
Kingnothing posted:What's the point of having 60mbps with a 150gb cap? You could burn through it in hours. Why does that matter? Do you actually have such a huge queue of poo poo to download that your connection speed is the limiting factor on how much bandwidth you use each month?
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2013 00:26 |
|
Stock Terminal can't copy on select, but at least Command-C is less awkward than Ctrl-Shift-C. Ctrl-F/B page up and down correctly in most programs, including vim and man.
|
# ¿ Sep 24, 2013 02:23 |
|
ijyt posted:What was there to really unify in 2004? Right now there's a huge disparity when it comes to iOS 7 and OS X. There's been a huge disparity between OS X and OS X for a very long time.
|
# ¿ Oct 12, 2013 16:55 |
|
Nuntius posted:Both these things are 10.8 not 10.9 features 10.7 for the About This Mac window (I happened to just look at that a few minutes ago in a 10.7 VM).
|
# ¿ Oct 23, 2013 04:59 |
|
benisntfunny posted:The parallels people email me like every day to upgrade from 8 to 9. I'm struggling to find a good reason. I went from 7 to 9 and AFAICT it wasn't an improvement in any way other than that 7 doesn't support 10.9.
|
# ¿ Oct 26, 2013 03:18 |
|
Big City Drinkin posted:
Why are you concerned about 76 MB?
|
# ¿ Oct 27, 2013 20:31 |
|
crazysim posted:They also benefit from letting developers be able to target only the latest version of OS X and not have to put off their enjoyment of the latest bells and whistles. Even just targeting older versions of OS X when you aren't using any of the new features is a pain. The only entirely reliable way is to continue to use the older SDKs, which can only be obtained by installing old versions of Xcode.
|
# ¿ Nov 1, 2013 02:03 |
|
Binary Badger posted:Man, when is Google going to write a 64-bit Chrome on Mac?
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2013 04:13 |
|
BobHoward posted:This isn't going to sound real helpful but step 1 is "file a bug report" and step 2 is "wait, and hope". step 2 is more of "bug report closed as duplicate of something you can't see" Apple has done a good job of training me to not bother reporting bugs in beta products.
|
# ¿ Nov 6, 2013 04:26 |
|
The dev center explicitly says 3.0.1 is for Mavericks.
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2013 23:05 |
|
Not really over time. It took me at most a week from when I got my rMBP to go from loving my U2410 to hating it.
|
# ¿ Dec 16, 2013 15:30 |
|
horse mans posted:This is going to be the strangest question ever, but: is it possible to remap the right Shift key to... the left Shift key? The Logitech K760 has some kind of issue where left poo poo behaves strangely when using Cmd-Tab, but it works just fine with the right shift key.
|
# ¿ Dec 23, 2013 01:47 |
|
XtraFinder has an option for that.
|
# ¿ Jan 17, 2014 19:14 |
|
Tippis posted:I suppose. It's just that it boggles my mind how close some of them has gotten to TC and then tripped over some small (but crucial) detail. It's obvious what they're trying to do, but also obvious that they haven't succeeded. Forklift is definitely a contender — had I started there and then gone over to TC at some point in time, I would have been pleased as Punch.
|
# ¿ Jan 24, 2014 00:57 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 03:09 |
|
Are there any third-party UIs for restoring things from Time Machine that are less terrible?
|
# ¿ Jan 25, 2014 05:18 |