|
rear end Catchcum posted:Are you able to use apps in osx lion?
|
# ¿ Jul 22, 2011 00:36 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2024 05:31 |
|
So regarding the HD problems in some iMacs, how do we tell if a given iMac is affected?madprocess posted:Retina displays? Maybe in 10 years, in the meantime dpi will just steadily creep upwards! Granted, I don't expect to see a retina 27' iMac anytime soon, but I wouldn't be surprised to see the smaller Apple portables get them in the near future. CDOR Gemini posted:a HDD/SDD combo Small White Dragon fucked around with this message at 02:54 on Jul 27, 2011 |
# ¿ Jul 27, 2011 02:52 |
|
madprocess posted:If you knew anything about screen tech you'd know it is. Also what dpi are these "retina" displays you're talking about? EDIT: But seriously, OS X Lion is likely to have a lifespan of 2 years or so. You really don't think they could go from producing a 10' 266dpi display to a 13' 266dpi in the span of a couple years? Small White Dragon fucked around with this message at 03:35 on Jul 27, 2011 |
# ¿ Jul 27, 2011 03:30 |
|
flyboi posted:This explains it pretty well: EDIT: dissss posted:Apple isn't, at least not at the moment. Given that the current lifespan of an OS X release is about 2 years, it does not seem to unreasonable to expect to see some Macs with such displays before 10.8's release. Small White Dragon fucked around with this message at 03:54 on Jul 27, 2011 |
# ¿ Jul 27, 2011 03:46 |
|
madprocess posted:Who is producing a 266 dpi 10 inch screen. Where can I buy it. How much does it cost. Just because a part isn't sold directly to consumers at your local big box store, it doesn't exist as part of any other product? Really now. Or has technology stopping advancing? If so, please let me know, there's some R&D people to lay off.
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2011 04:15 |
|
madprocess posted:You know aside from the fact they can only do it at 10 inches now. So while you're correct I can't say for certain that we're going to see a Mac with a 2x display in 2 years, or what it might cost, I think it's quite likely these products are in the pipeline. Even beyond Apple, I've seen enough to know other companies think such displays in commercial products in the not-distant future are a lot more likely than you imply. Of course, only time will tell.
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2011 06:11 |
|
madprocess posted:Personally, I don't expect Apple using "retina" panels in their computers until they're available at all sizes of screen they sell. It would just be bizarre if you only had say the 11 and 13 inch Airs with Retina displays (especially since they will always have lower end graphics chips than the rest of the line due to their design) while all other models still had normal displays. While I imagine they'd prefer to start from the big, high-end monitors, I don't anticipate seeing a 27' 2x-DPI display soon. If they waited until they were, they could be way behind the curve on that. I've taken care to state that very hi res displays aren't impossible, they're just not likely to be out for quite some time. madprocess posted:That's another reason I don't see Apple being the ones to introduce really high dpi screens to computers, they do like to hold off and not go with stuff like this right away.
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2011 18:53 |
|
Sidenote: One of Apple's recent knowledge base articles makes reference to a late 2011 iMac.
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2011 00:36 |
|
japtor posted:Yeah that's been there for years, I meant as a standard non developer thing meant for normal users. From WWDC last year they basically said to design for 2x (cause the issues with fractional scaling)...hopefully the work to get that done would get in between levels to be usable enough though. Small White Dragon fucked around with this message at 20:31 on Feb 17, 2012 |
# ¿ Feb 17, 2012 20:06 |
|
Fat Whale posted:Some serious evidence for "Retina" display Macs: While I wouldn't hold my breath for a 27" 5000px display within my price range anytime soon, if the iPad 3 does indeed sport a retina screen, I think it's fairly safe to assume laptop-sized retina displays won't be far behind.
|
# ¿ Feb 22, 2012 03:26 |
|
wheez the roux posted:Is there any reason to think the 15" MBPs will be out this month and not rolled out in the Summer alongside the 13" laptops that just entered production?
|
# ¿ Apr 10, 2012 19:49 |
|
I am a little sad, if a 15" is shipping this month, then it most likely means no retina display. (I am assuming we have to wait for ML machines for that.)
|
# ¿ Apr 10, 2012 19:55 |
|
Bass Bottles posted:I know there's supposed to be a major refresh on the pro line soon, but how soon? I've read some people say end of April and others say mid-July. I'd really rather not go 3 months without a laptop. A lot of retailers are reporting not going more stock of 15" models, which usually indicates an update coming very soon. On the other hand, updates to the 13" and 17" are likely a few months off.
|
# ¿ Apr 11, 2012 20:23 |
|
Bob Morales posted:The 15" and 17" could update at the same time since they use quad-core chips. The dual-cores don't come out till June so that would be a reason for the 13" to be stuck until then.
|
# ¿ Apr 11, 2012 23:42 |
|
MacRumors speculating Apple may drop the 17" MBP
|
# ¿ Apr 23, 2012 07:32 |
|
DEUCE SLUICE posted:I've always been curious - how do the double-drive iMacs present the disks to the user? DEUCE SLUICE posted:The new Macbooks Pro need the hi-res display as default, no optical, 128GB of onboard flash like the Air, and a platter drive. Make it so, Steve.
|
# ¿ May 3, 2012 22:11 |
|
Hiyoshi posted:Are they both named Macintosh HD? flavor posted:Presumably we know just about jack poo poo whether something is done or not. But apart from that question, what major "software side" is there to a retina display? It's just a display with a higher resolution, and there needs to be optional support for making some elements larger so they're reasonably visible under that resolution. This could also be added to Lion and doesn't justify waiting an indefinite amount of time for a new OS version. (It would be a different story if there already was a release candidate of ML.) Yes, Apple COULD roll a special build of Lion, or even some weird Lion/ML hybrid. Or they could just release ML before or when machines with the new displays are ready. There are a lot of things Apple *COULD* do, but with ML just around the corner, I'd be shocked if we see the displays before the new OS. flavor posted:The Sandy Bridge MBPs also needed OS X additions in order to support the CPUs and Thunderbolt, so Apple just rolled a special version of Snow Leopard for their release before re-joining the branches with the next SL update. I don't see how that would be impossible for Ivy Bridge and retina displays.
|
# ¿ May 4, 2012 00:19 |
|
triplexpac posted:I've been monitoring this page like a hawk, after weeks there's finally an update on new iMacs / MacBook Pro
|
# ¿ May 14, 2012 20:21 |
|
So what kind of cable would a retina monitor use then?
|
# ¿ May 16, 2012 19:23 |
|
Bob Morales posted:Thunderbolt since it could handle it.
|
# ¿ May 16, 2012 22:56 |
|
flavor posted:I know Boot Camp would give me the full resolution, but I'm not buying an MBP to primarily run Windows on it.
|
# ¿ Jun 7, 2012 09:37 |
|
http://www.apple.com/why-mac/compare/desktops.html Any changes? New laptops reflected... No 17 inch
|
# ¿ Jun 11, 2012 20:02 |
|
Apparently there's a 3 to 5 week delay if you want a 768GB flash drive.
|
# ¿ Jun 11, 2012 20:27 |
|
Apple Store posted:There may be some items in your cart that qualify for a discount. Please refresh this page in your browser. If the issue persists, please try again later or call the Apple Store at 1-800-MY-APPLE.
|
# ¿ Jun 11, 2012 20:49 |
|
flavor posted:I got into the live chat after ten minutes or so of waiting and the trick was to take out the gift card from the order. They said they'd send it later but it already subtracted $100 from the order.
|
# ¿ Jun 11, 2012 21:43 |
|
tuna posted:Ordered the Retina MBP with 2.7ghz and 12gb ram. It came with the 512ssd default so that made that choice easy. Waiting on confirmation email now .
|
# ¿ Jun 11, 2012 22:05 |
|
terriyaki posted:Totally torn between the upper model non-Retina MBP with the 1680x1050 upgrade vs the base model MBPTNG.
|
# ¿ Jun 11, 2012 22:27 |
|
Great Enoch posted:Is there a technical reason why the 13" didn't get a retina update or is it just not that practical an application? I expect you'll see a 13 inch with a retina display, it's a question of "when."
|
# ¿ Jun 11, 2012 22:52 |
|
Sinestro posted:I love timing sometimes. I finally get money and, hey, new MBP! Is the 2.6 -> 2.7 worth it if I am using it as a desktop replacement, and likely to have to stick with it for a refresh or two?
|
# ¿ Jun 12, 2012 01:39 |
|
Fat Whale posted:According to David Pogue, Apple is currently redesigning both the iMac and Mac Pro, and they're underway for a release in 2013. Update: MacRumors posted:A MacRumors reader writes in to share an email he received from Apple CEO Tim Cook after he asked about the future of the Mac Pro:
|
# ¿ Jun 12, 2012 02:39 |
|
fleshweasel posted:If that's so, and Diablo III is supposed to be Retina optimized, is that going to mean that the UI and font rendering will be 2880x1800 but the 3D rendering will be 1440x900 and upscaled?
|
# ¿ Jun 12, 2012 06:52 |
|
Digital_Jesus posted:Man it's gonna be a long 2 weeks waiting for my new MBP.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2012 00:22 |
|
flavor posted:Interesting that it did that and also that you selected that option. I thought that $450 was outrageous for that. I think all SSD sizes are kinda too small, so even with 768 GB I'd use an external HDD or network storage for many things. I also do a lot of work on airplanes, where space is at a premium. On that note, I'd love to hear some reviews of how the display works in Windows.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2012 06:31 |
|
tuna posted:RMBP arrived this morning ahead of schedule. Why does wifi have to be down at work? WHY
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2012 19:29 |
|
mediaphage posted:The airplane thing is the only thing that gives me pause, really, but I'll probably just live with using a tablet if the guy in front of me leans back.
|
# ¿ Jun 19, 2012 19:21 |
|
tuna posted:In case anyone is looking for sleeves, etc. for their new rMBP, I ordered an Incipio sleeve for my rMBP the other day and it arrived lastnight. They say it's for the rMBP but I'm fairly sure they're just the normal MBP sleeves on a slightly different page. It's not as snug as it should be but feels like it'll do a perfectly reasonable job of protecting it still. In my usage I'm putting it into a rucksack with a few other things in there that might scratch it, so it works fine for me until something better comes out. Trying to decide on a case for my rMBP (which doesn't arrive for a while.)
|
# ¿ Jun 23, 2012 15:23 |
|
Decius posted:The part about the MBPR only doing 20 fps while drawing the desktop in the Anandtech-review
|
# ¿ Jun 23, 2012 19:02 |
|
Argali posted:So does anyone have any inkling as to when we can expect the next wave of iMacs? If you mean a major update, rumor is retina screen iMacs will ship in 2013. I really can't wait to see the 27" retina display they're purportedly working on, that poo poo will be insane.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2012 05:19 |
|
fleshweasel posted:It'll be amazing, although I don't see what's particularly technically difficult about applying the engineering of high density displays to larger sizes. Beyond that... - A 27 inch retina display has nearly 15 million pixels, and I haven't researched this, but I imagine the GPU needed to push that much doesn't exist yet. (For reference, this is 2.7x the number of pixels in the retina Mac Book Pro, which is itself quite taxing on its GPU.) - Not an issue with an iMac, but for external displays, I'm told Thunderbolt may not be able to push that much data at 60fps.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2012 05:46 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2024 05:31 |
|
How for those of you who've had an rMBP for a few days, how are you feeling on GPU performance?
|
# ¿ Jul 2, 2012 10:08 |