|
If you thought the hoodie shot was indicative of some sort of emotional torment in Parker's life you were obviously never a skinny white teenage boy!
|
# ? Jul 24, 2011 02:28 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 01:07 |
|
Deadpool posted:Actually, Venom isn't really just a bad guy. Originally anyway. He only hated Spider-Man. Otherwise he saw himself as a protector of the people. He even teamed up with Spidey several times in order to save people even though his goal was still to get revenge on Spidey. Carnage though? Yeah, straight up bad guy. Yeah this is true, I'd love to see a Maximum Carnage movie if they could do it right. Also what are your thoughts on the upcoming Deadpool movie? I think Ryan Renolds is perfect to play him... But it's the Script I'm worried about. Also are they going to break the forth wall in the movie? ExplodingSquid fucked around with this message at 03:27 on Jul 24, 2011 |
# ? Jul 24, 2011 03:21 |
|
ExplodingSquid posted:Yeah this is true, I'd love to see a Maximum Carnage movie if they could do it right. I've read the script, it's fantastic. And yes they do.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2011 04:07 |
|
Dacap posted:You're a bit mixed up. They had originally cast Anne Hathaway in the movie as Black Cat (ironic that she's Catwoman now) and that she would be the Vulture's daughter. It was later reported that they decided instead to make her a new character called "The Vulturess" who follows in her father's footsteps. Just looked up the treatment I've got for it, "Spider-M4n", from Raimi and James Vanderbilt-- Vulture is her biological father, Max Dillon is in as Electro, Spider-Man hangs up his mask handing crime fighting duties over to Black Cat at the end and the last bit of the treatment is pretty much the ending of The Mask. Minus Parker gleefully saying "smokin!" Not saying anything either way, just giving a cite to my earlier statement.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2011 04:17 |
|
Deadpool posted:I've read the script, it's fantastic. And yes they do. Oh poo poo didn't know it was out there! Do you have a link?
|
# ? Jul 24, 2011 04:33 |
|
ExplodingSquid posted:Oh poo poo didn't know it was out there! Do you have a link? Discussing leaked scripts is a no no.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2011 04:45 |
|
ExplodingSquid posted:Oh poo poo didn't know it was out there! Do you have a link? Unfortunately that's not allowed here. FOX pretty much eradicated links to it and even reviews of it from the web. And even sued one lady for several million dollars because she hosted it.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2011 04:45 |
|
Ahh that's cool. Looking forward to a trailer or something, not sure how long that will be though. This is a movie I'd love to see. ExplodingSquid fucked around with this message at 06:55 on Jul 24, 2011 |
# ? Jul 24, 2011 06:51 |
|
ExplodingSquid posted:Ahh that's cool. Looking forward to a trailer or something, not sure how long that will be though.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2011 07:34 |
|
mcmagic posted:There was a trailer for it in front of Captain America and I have to say I wasn't impressed.... He meant for the Deadpool movie
|
# ? Jul 24, 2011 07:45 |
|
Wouldn't it be badass if after the credits of ASM, Nick Fury shows up to ask if he'd like to be in The Avengers? Like Sony and Marvel had been working together this whole time to gently caress with our heads and make a mint in dough.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2011 22:06 |
GrazoTheClown posted:Wouldn't it be badass if after the credits of ASM, Nick Fury shows up to ask if he'd like to be in The Avengers? Like Sony and Marvel had been working together this whole time to gently caress with our heads and make a mint in dough. No. The Avengers is going to be too busy as it is with 5 super-heroes plus SHIELD, plus villains. Unless that movie is 10 hours long everyone is going to get less screen-time than an episode of Squidbillies between the cgi fight scenes. Plus, the best Spidey stories are always solo.
|
|
# ? Jul 24, 2011 22:18 |
|
Bob Quixote posted:No. The Avengers is going to be too busy as it is with 5 super-heroes plus SHIELD, plus villains. Unless that movie is 10 hours long everyone is going to get less screen-time than an episode of Squidbillies between the cgi fight scenes. Wrong. The best Spidey stories involve him standing around making quips in the middle of a bunch of other heroes while important stuff is about to happen or they are in the midst of mortal peril.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2011 22:51 |
mango sentinel posted:Wrong. The best Spidey stories involve him standing around making quips in the middle of a bunch of other heroes while important stuff is about to happen or they are in the midst of mortal peril. He does that in his own stories too though. Usually he seems like a baffled observer in his own bizarre life. I think he's the only person in New York who realizes how goofy it all is and just enjoys a laugh at his own expense.
|
|
# ? Jul 24, 2011 23:12 |
|
Bob Quixote posted:No. The Avengers is going to be too busy as it is with 5 super-heroes plus SHIELD, plus villains. Unless that movie is 10 hours long everyone is going to get less screen-time than an episode of Squidbillies between the cgi fight scenes. I liked the 90's cartoon episode with Spidey and Blade after Tombstone.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2011 02:28 |
|
Paragon8 posted:I don't understand how they get a great natural redheaded actress who can play feisty and sassy really well and dye her hair blonde and cast her as Gwen Stacy. Actually she's a natural blonde. It was Howard they faked into being blonde for Gwen.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2011 03:12 |
|
Bob Quixote posted:No. The Avengers is going to be too busy as it is with 5 super-heroes plus SHIELD, plus villains. Unless that movie is 10 hours long everyone is going to get less screen-time than an episode of Squidbillies between the cgi fight scenes. I'd watch a 10 hour Avengers movie that had Spider-man in it. It would make my eyes bleed from the awesome and my bladder explode but would totally be worth it. Unless it was, you know, bad... then I would be sad.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2011 19:02 |
|
Lobok posted:Actually she's a natural blonde. It was Howard they faked into being blonde for Gwen. That's who that poster was referring to.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2011 19:07 |
|
With three different threads to check I lost track of where I saw it (if not Twitter), but apparently the webshooters are going to take a while to develop? Three years from what I heard? Does anyone remember seeing that revealed or spoken over the weekend? Seems like a long time if they're trying to keep him a teenager.headrest posted:That's who that poster was referring to. Ah ok. Unclear with all the talk of the new trailer above it.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2011 20:04 |
|
Lobok posted:With three different threads to check I lost track of where I saw it (if not Twitter), but apparently the webshooters are going to take a while to develop? Three years from what I heard? Does anyone remember seeing that revealed or spoken over the weekend? Seems like a long time if they're trying to keep him a teenager. How would they take that long to develop if he was already using them in the trailer? Does the movie skip ahead into the future? PriorMarcus posted:His origin is told in flashback. Link? Bozz fucked around with this message at 20:43 on Jul 25, 2011 |
# ? Jul 25, 2011 20:11 |
His origin is told in flashback.
|
|
# ? Jul 25, 2011 20:18 |
|
PriorMarcus posted:His origin is told in flashback. I've not heard anything like that at all. In fact a lot of what I've heard completely contradicts that.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2011 21:08 |
|
Bozz posted:How would they take that long to develop if he was already using them in the trailer? Does the movie skip ahead into the future? That's what I'm wondering, but first I thought I'd make sure it was actually said somewhere. I had some beers over the weekend but not that many.
|
# ? Jul 25, 2011 21:29 |
|
I liked the organic webshooters because then Peter couldn't go "Oh no the Vulture flew away with MJ and I'm out of web cartridges!" whenever the plot needed some EXTRA TENSION
|
# ? Jul 26, 2011 07:20 |
|
The Great Burrito posted:I liked the organic webshooters because then Peter couldn't go "Oh no the Vulture flew away with MJ and I'm out of web cartridges!" whenever the plot needed some EXTRA TENSION I'm pretty sure 2 did the whole "I'm losing my web abilities OH NO" thing anyway, though.
|
# ? Jul 26, 2011 07:29 |
|
I guess so, I just remember it happening a lot in the comics when I was younger and it seemed really lazy.
|
# ? Jul 26, 2011 07:49 |
|
He's going to run out of fluid eventually. I wouldn't call it lazy, I'd call it conveniently realistic.
|
# ? Jul 26, 2011 07:54 |
|
That's what pissed me off about them being organic. Oh no! "I'm being an emo so can't web sling". It wasn't right.
|
# ? Jul 26, 2011 10:27 |
|
I thought it was brilliant. It was able to combine the Spider-Man No More storyline into a power-loss story and that's great because we get both without having to do both - more time for Spider-Man to keep being Spider-Man; it gets around having to use some inexplicable PoisonBeamGas plot weapon to depower him; because it actually shows his stress and loneliness in a physical way he has to struggle with, and what are superheroes if not people whose problems all manifest as physical struggles; and because it makes the ending all the better in that he not only gets the girl but gets to continue to be Spider-Man.
|
# ? Jul 26, 2011 13:25 |
Wouldn't he run out of webbing more often anyway if it was organic? People don't have infinite blood or infinite urine, so why should he have infinite webbing just because he produces it internally? Also, where does he store that poo poo? I just sort of picture him having huge pulsing tumorous outgrowths on his back full of silk-fluid. What kind of massive reworking of his body did he have to go through to suddenly gain pores that shoot out goo in his wrists with enough pressure to launch it hundreds of feet and have it stick to objects without blowing stuff up at short range? Mechanical web-shooters are the best web-shooters.
|
|
# ? Jul 26, 2011 15:34 |
|
Can't believe it was way back in February I posted this. Seems much more recent:quote:Let's see if I can remember the whole debate from my days back at SHH!: Bob Quixote posted:What kind of massive reworking of his body did he have to go through to suddenly gain pores that shoot out goo in his wrists with enough pressure to launch it hundreds of feet and have it stick to objects without blowing stuff up at short range? You have pretty much the same problem with the mechanicals. Either you hand wave it as some super-strong mutated biology, or hand wave it as some impossibly accurate, complex, quiet, miniature device. Lobok fucked around with this message at 20:18 on Jul 26, 2011 |
# ? Jul 26, 2011 19:02 |
|
Lobok posted:Can't believe it was way back in February I posted this. Seems much more recent: Needs to go in the OP. I remember the last time I saw it. Still valid, still on the side of mechanical shooters. Just throwing that out there.
|
# ? Jul 26, 2011 19:10 |
|
I hope this entire thread will be an endless debate about webshooters. So far, so good! Back on topic, I just feel it's too soon to return to an Spider-man origin story. It feels like Sony is just treating the series as a cash cow. I'm picturing Jameson with dollar signs for eyes. Ten years is too short of time for another origin story.
|
# ? Jul 26, 2011 19:40 |
|
Peter should have mechanical web shooters, but only because he's too embarrassed to use his newfound ability to shoot webbing out of his rear end.
|
# ? Jul 26, 2011 19:41 |
|
I posted the debate summary to hopefully stifle the debate. As in "every reason you can think of has probably already been posted a zillion times since 2001 and while it might be a good reason, there are good reasons for both sides so it comes down to what you prefer." Although, like some fans themselves, the movie apparently is taking the compromise position of organic webs, but mechanical shooters.Gherkin Jerkin posted:I hope this entire thread will be an endless debate about webshooters. So far, so good! No, that's Peter with dollar signs for eyes. Lobok fucked around with this message at 19:54 on Jul 26, 2011 |
# ? Jul 26, 2011 19:51 |
|
Bob Quixote posted:No. The Avengers is going to be too busy as it is with 5 super-heroes plus SHIELD, plus villains. Unless that movie is 10 hours long everyone is going to get less screen-time than an episode of Squidbillies between the cgi fight scenes. X-Men managed to pull it off, and they didn't even have separate movies to explain why we should give a poo poo about Storm or Jean other than them being pretty.
|
# ? Jul 26, 2011 20:32 |
|
Lobok posted:No, that's Peter with dollar signs for eyes. Even better. Parker must be getting a portion of the cut.
|
# ? Jul 26, 2011 23:24 |
|
OP updated with web shooter debate plus the video of Andrew Garfield at Comicon.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2011 02:28 |
|
The main shot in the trailer was 100% CG and the internal name for it was actually 'the mirrors edge'. The shot cost is approximately 350k and it will be longer in the movie. EDIT: Anybody see The Lizard trailer at Comicon? -A n i m 8- fucked around with this message at 03:59 on Jul 28, 2011 |
# ? Jul 28, 2011 03:49 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 01:07 |
|
-A n i m 8- posted:The main shot in the trailer was 100% CG and the internal name for it was actually 'the mirrors edge'. The shot cost is approximately 350k and it will be longer in the movie. Where'd that news come from? Also, teaser poster. What you'd expect.
|
# ? Jul 28, 2011 05:50 |