|
And here I was thinking the Glorious Sjrb Continued Conquest of Romes was schizophrenic.
|
# ¿ Aug 12, 2011 12:57 |
|
|
# ¿ May 1, 2024 02:55 |
|
Keep this guy around someplace, I just know he'll live along, unhealthy and insane life.
|
# ¿ Aug 15, 2011 00:49 |
|
Gorgo Primus posted:The none are a proud people with a rich history of doing nothing. Shame we didn't choose to LP as them. Not a lot would've happened though, so I doubt it'd have been an interesting LP. The none don't even bother naming their children, why should they care about wars, wealth or religion?
|
# ¿ Aug 15, 2011 01:43 |
|
Are the mongols still ruled by the blind crazy man?
|
# ¿ Aug 15, 2011 13:04 |
|
With any luck, EU3 is going to start with a nearly united Italy.
|
# ¿ Aug 17, 2011 22:24 |
|
At least Qutaiba's not dead! Yet...
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2011 14:24 |
|
Is Italy going to get all of its universities? If so, they're going to be the Big Bad of this game I think. Italy is full of drat rich provinces already, the half a dozen universities they start with make playing regular EU3 Milan/Austria very easy.
|
# ¿ Aug 20, 2011 01:04 |
|
1) Did Timur die during his first military campaign? No. 2) Did Zabulistan successfully resist the Ghaznavid invasion?Yes. 3) Did the Mongol invasion of Japan succeed in reaching the island?Yes. 4) Did the Australian megafauna survive human migration into the continent?No. 5) Did Sundiata Keita die in exile? Yes.
|
# ¿ Aug 20, 2011 13:51 |
|
Frionnel posted:Because you're a masochist and want to rewrite all of it from scratch? He's having someone else rewrite it all from scratch.
|
# ¿ Aug 25, 2011 21:56 |
|
Servant posted:Rome.[/i]) To add to these reasons, we're also taking over all the Romes in the Sjrb LP thread, whenever it feels like getting back on track.
|
# ¿ Aug 30, 2011 18:13 |
|
Change Ghent to Gent, which is the correct Dutch spelling. Bit silly to have the Dutch names for Vlaanderen and Antwerpen, but then throw in Ghent. If Artois is Flemish, it could be called Artesië. But it'd depend on how long it's been part of Flanders.
|
# ¿ Sep 2, 2011 19:08 |
|
If you'd set Japan at tech 0 on government, trade and production, perhaps with a harsher negative tech modifier, wouldn't they get a slow enough start that it'd take a few decades for them to compete with their neighbours?
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2011 01:07 |
|
What if you make the Ikko Ikki a Horde, will they be automatically at war with their neighbours then? Fix one terrible Paradox decision with another!
|
# ¿ Sep 10, 2011 12:37 |
|
Wiz posted:Would you guys be terribly sad if I just skipped the whole Australian tags and did something with the vote in V2 instead? No Kangaroo Cavalry?
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2011 00:18 |
|
Flanders looks like a bear in the world map.
|
# ¿ Sep 21, 2011 21:06 |
|
ZearothK posted:There's no point in a war that will not guarantee pretty borders for our descendants. Think of the children! What if the children fancy octopi or sea anemones? We need to spread our tendrils everywhere, while leaving space in between our expansion lines as to best imitate sea life!
|
# ¿ Sep 22, 2011 02:16 |
|
A Usury is against Allah's will, so why would we have need of banks at all?
|
# ¿ Sep 22, 2011 23:05 |
|
Kainser posted:But yeah, there isn't really any reactionary counterpart to Bill of Rights and such. Ugh, now I want some sort of Bill of Duties that increases income, recruit speed and discipline or something, at the cost of 5 yearly infamy.
|
# ¿ Sep 24, 2011 00:41 |
|
zeek40 posted:amazing flag I don't know whether to respond using or Clearly the best flag to come out of a Paradox Mega-LP.
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2011 18:20 |
|
Battlefield Commissions Good generals are the best, better generals are even greater.
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2011 22:58 |
|
The Saurus posted:Our current king is a military genius anyway. All of those people you listed were kings, not lowly generals. The House of Azer breeds great warriors, we do not need to have our forces led by lesser men when our kings provide all the leadership we require. Our current king is a 7-year old.
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2011 13:38 |
|
Wiz posted:No, but they have Holland as a vassal so once they annex them they will. How is Flanders doing with their merchants? They've got a load of rich provinces there and they're only a medium-sized nation, so if they've got good traders going as well they're going to have a large tech lead in a few decades.
|
# ¿ Oct 3, 2011 20:43 |
|
That's the fun of EU3. You can be kicked down a dozen times, but it only takes one successful war to utterly crush your current nemesis. Then your borders expand and you will find a new nemesis, continuing the cycle until you face an 'end-boss' super-blob.
|
# ¿ Oct 3, 2011 23:55 |
|
Government: Option A: The administration must expand to meet the needs of the administration. Ideas Option C: In order to house all the administrators, we must build grand administration buildings that will require skilled engineers to keep out the people tormented by the bureaucratic administration.
|
# ¿ Oct 6, 2011 00:45 |
|
Wiz posted:So you tried to get all the benefits of liberal reforms but without giving up any executive power. Look, the people deserve a lot of freedoms and decent pay and healthcare and whatnot, but they are still peasant rabble that is incapable of making the right choices when it comes to politics. Democracy just doesn't work!
|
# ¿ Oct 6, 2011 01:35 |
|
FadingChord posted:We decided to tolerate heathens and were rewarded with... We were rewarded with endless wars that cost many, many Azeri lives.
|
# ¿ Oct 7, 2011 00:23 |
|
I dunno about the Holland-Dutch names for colonies, the Netherlands in this LP did form out of Flanders, which has the same language but a different use of words. On the other hand, Flanders/Belgium never really colonized outside of Belgian Congo, so coming up with names would be pretty hard.
|
# ¿ Oct 7, 2011 21:31 |
|
Wiz posted:I'm not gonna add a whole set of new colony names for Flemish. If you want to do it, by all means. Meh, knowing us Flemish/Belgians it'd all just be "Nieuw-Vlaanderen" and "Vlaamsch Amerika". Phlegmish, there's going to be some divide at least, Flanders was independent for a few centuries and fought/conquered the other Dutch nations. There's even a similar religious divide (although it's not christian/protestant). Anyway, I'm terrible at alt-history and will let you guys get on with the show
|
# ¿ Oct 7, 2011 22:04 |
|
Wiz posted:Finland isn't a country, its a Swedish province. Your mod is a sham. It has no Flanders so I decided to conquer the world as Navarra, but Aragon arrived before I got asked if it was my home country! (it is not, but still!)
|
# ¿ Oct 10, 2011 17:41 |
|
quote:drat I hope Norway gets inherited. The Netherlands will become the top European player and will most likely beat Sweden to a pulp (or they'll get dogpiled and lose everything). If they get the Norse colonies, then North America is going to see some fun colonial tensions between the Dutch and the English.
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2011 12:57 |
|
Sockerbagarn posted:You're overestimating the value of Norways territories, they're all too far north both in Europe and America and won't produce any good trade goods, unless you really like fish. Espanya, Italy, Burgundy and Great Britain will still be dominating. Some of the Canadian colonies are fur and the Netherlands should be pretty goddamn rich with their CoT and all those juicy cloth/iron provinces in their homeland. With the Norse provinces they should get a nice manpower and force limit boost.
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2011 18:00 |
|
Let's not repeat Hohen-mistakes.
|
# ¿ Oct 12, 2011 03:39 |
|
Y'know, these are all 3 ideas I always try to take in regular EU3, so I don't really care what wins. Still keeping my original vote, though.
|
# ¿ Oct 12, 2011 12:32 |
|
Wiz posted:Also, if anyone wants to reminisce a bit, I was bored and made this easter egg for the scenario with the most prominent/memorable Senators as EU3 rulers. Honestly we only lacked income because people wanted to do stuff like raise relations with gifts and field an army. If only we'd built more mines in 2-3 gold provinces, we'd have been a lot richer!
|
# ¿ Oct 14, 2011 14:40 |
|
Atsushogob posted:Yeah that's what I thought, we really need fewer enemies. The best way to accomplish this is to subjugate or outright conquer our enemies.
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2011 20:15 |
|
What's with Byzantium and getting attacked by all their neighbours?
|
# ¿ Oct 27, 2011 20:06 |
|
I thought if you made peace with an Alliance Leader (the Mughals), you made peace with everyone? Didn't know a minor PU member could even continue to fight while the master made peace.
|
# ¿ Nov 1, 2011 01:51 |
|
I always find it amusing that it's both easier and faster to conquer Europe in CK than it is in EU3.
|
# ¿ Nov 5, 2011 01:53 |
|
How would Arsenal of Democracy handle the player starting with the whole world under his control? How would Hearts of Iron 3?
|
# ¿ Nov 7, 2011 04:24 |
|
|
# ¿ May 1, 2024 02:55 |
|
Lions, Eagles, Crowns, what else does a flag need?
|
# ¿ Nov 9, 2011 18:16 |