Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

YggiDee posted:

How do I remove an Add-On that is incompatible with the current version of Firefox? I have a Skype addon for some dumbshit reason, but because it's not compatible with 9.0, I don't have any options to activate/deactivate/uninstall or anything. I just want it gone.

Can you uninstall it if you launch FF with admin rights? Also, I seem to remember that you can uninstall the Skype addon through the control panel's add/remove programs.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

Pooperscooper posted:

God drat, firefox updates way too often it kills work places.

The constant updates won't be an issue come FF 12 when they implement silent updating (like Chrome).

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

Xenomorph posted:

Will the "silent" updates mean Firefox will install to the local user's profile like Chrome?

Issuing a thousands updates won't mean anything if Firefox is still installed to a system location.

I thought that was how they were gonna do it, but this wiki post describes exactly how they're doing it. Basically, they're using an on-demand service to bypass the UAC dialog. It worries me that this is even possible in the first place - what's the point of UAC if a service can bypass it? I guess I need to read more into how they're doing this.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

pseudorandom name posted:

You'll get a UAC dialog the first time the privileged service is installed.

Like Steam.

Ok, so basically, it's basically saying, "You've already given this guy elevated privileges once, so we'll remember this and always give it elevated privileges." Is that correct?

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

pseudorandom name posted:

Not really, but close enough.

How exactly does it work then?

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

pseudorandom name posted:

Installing services requires administrative privileges. Services have a number of configuration parameters, one of which is the account it runs as, another is whether or not unprivileged accounts are allowed to start that service.

Installing the service will require a UAC prompt. It will be configured to run using a privileged account and allow unprivileged user accounts to start it. Once it is installed, Firefox will be able to invoke the service on demand without any UAC prompts.

Awesome, thanks.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

GreenBuckanneer posted:

How do I disable addon compat on the latest FF11 beta?

I want to install Restart Firefox because I know for a fact it works but even having the compatibility reporter installed wont let me force it.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/checkcompatibility/

Nvm this worked. gently caress addon compatibility.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/restart-firefox-10749/ works with FF10. Just out of curiosity, why do you need this? If you're having issues, seems like you should either create a new profile or get rid of some lovely extensions.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

Left Ventricle posted:

I have had issues with Hotmail and Firefox for a couple years now. It just won't load for me. I have to use Internet Explorer for that. Firefox also won't load interactive maps, like Google and Bing. It's probably some obscure setting I inadvertently/unknowingly modified a while ago.

Read the OP. I have an ordered list telling you how to diagnose FF problems.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

Marinmo posted:

A suggestion for the OP: Under step 3, where it says to create a new profile, perhaps link to the relevant support article (http://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/Profiles)?

Excellent idea.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

Marinmo posted:

I'm sorry, I have to correct myself. This is probably a better suited article. http://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/Managing-profiles

You're right. Good call.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

neamp posted:

Is it just me or is Firefox using way too much CPU resources now while idling?
Just having the SA forums open with a few tabs in the background now uses up 3% of my processor. I thought it might be Javascript running in the background somewhere but disabling it does not change anything.
The resources used vary with the website that's open, but worst I have found yet was a page with just one big image and a menu bar (high res scanned book) where it used a constant 8% just sitting there, me not even touching it.
I just now tested opening the same page in IE, Chrome and Firefox (not at the same time), just letting it sit there for a few minutes doing nothing. The average CPU load for IE and Chrome was < 0.10%, Firefox meanwhile sat at 6.1%. What the hell?
On a desktop that might not mean much beside a slightly warmer room and higher electricity bill, but hope you are not running a laptop from the battery, I guess.

I have 5 tabs open (2 of which are Gmail and Facebook which constantly have JS stuff running), and I'm seeing 0% with it jumping up to 1% or 2% every 5 or 10 seconds. That can't seriously affect battery life or an electricity bill or CPU temperature, though. I think you're over-analyzing it.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

butts! posted:

:catdrugs:



SO loving COOL

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

You don't need an add-on. This is built into FF 11. However, it looks like the add-on offers quite a bit of extra functionality/analysis.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

crestfallen posted:

I'd ask yourself if it matters. Is Firefox getting really slow (or slower) because of it? like is switching tabs slow, is the UI still responsive, whatever.

Is the rest of your computer slow(er) because of it?

If so, look into it.

If everything is fine, then who cares. Especially if you have like 4-8 GB of RAM just sitting around. Using memory is good. It's supposed to keep things speedy.

This. It's just caching content so things are faster. Unless you notice some sort of performance loss, it's not a problem. I'm also willing to bet you're either viewing lots of pages with shitloads of images or have had FF open for a very long time. Either of these two scenarios will lead to memory usage like you're seeing. FF will release the memory if another program needs it, so again, don't worry about it.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

WattsvilleBlues posted:

Anyone using Aurora 13 on Windows 7? Startup times have improved dramatically, have they worked on this for version 13?

Supposedly for version 14, but every version seems to get a little faster. Some stuff scheduled for 14 might've landed in 13.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

McOgre posted:

:words:

I don't have a tablet, and I'm not running Windows 8. Just to clarify, FF worked fine under 64-bit Windows 8 but not under 32-bit Windows 8?

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

McOgre posted:

Yes.

Were you using the same version of FF under both architectures? Could be any number of things - a driver issue, a Windows 8 bug, perhaps a bug that got introduced in a FF update. I think there's a guy here that does FF development, so maybe he has some insights.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.
Save whatever settings you need (passwords, bookmarks, etc.) and create a new profile (see the OP).

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

298298 posted:

No idea if this is common but I can't remember it happening before 13, now after I've had FF open for long durations all video watching starts to stutter. I can close FF and reopen but it doesn't fix it, I'll have to restart the whole PC. I've tried updating flash, etc and nothing fixes it. Works fine in IE.

Is this something new or do I need to just suck it up and reboot my PC like a man?

(Long durations = 8+ hours)

Have the latest graphics drivers?

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

WattsvilleBlues posted:

I had a similar problem about a year ago, where the updates would download but would not for the life of me "apply".

As with most Firefox problems, creating a new profile fixed the issue quicker than trying to track down and resolve the issue . Every few months I make a make a note of my installed extensions, make a new profile and reimport all my bookmarks and settings, then install all my extensions again. I rarely have any issue with Firefox that a new profile doesn't sort out.

FF now has profile rebuilding built in. Go to Help -> Troubleshooting Information, and you can hit Reset Firefox.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

Xander77 posted:

Both of these are still a problem. Can anyone propose a different solution?

Follow the instructions in the OP.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

298298 posted:

Now every time I full screen a video it launches a whole new tab for the video where the taskbar is hiding half the controls. Reinstalled flash and nada. Doesn't do it in IE/Chrome.

Why do you do this to me firefox, I just want to love you. Please let me love you.

That's bizarre. Could be an addon. Go through the steps in the OP.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

298298 posted:

I did, had to end up downloading a 2+ month old version of flash to get it fixed.

Got the latest graphics drivers?

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

crestfallen posted:

Overall I like Firefox better as a browser. More customization, more options, other things they have going on.

But Chrome wins my heart because the UI is always responsive. It either responds instantly or it's dead. Firefox has these weird laggy periods often enough to be worth mentioning--the browser/tab hasn't crashed, it's just being slow for seemingly no reason.

As a result, Chrome feels faster more of the time, so I keep going back to it. I know Mozilla will keep working on that, but it's been an issue for me for... a long time now.

Regarding the weird laggy periods, that might get better with the latest release, 16. 16's big improvement is incremental garbage collection which is partially designed to combat the exact problem you mentioned.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

bag of a bee posted:

I think some of Firefox's sluggishness compared to Chrome is the fact that Chrome does everything it can to keep the UI decoupled with what's going on with the rendering web page. On Firefox a hiccup in page loading can sometimes be felt with a hiccup in the UI whereas Chrome could have the same hiccup but you don't "feel" it.

I believe there is a long term project to change the browser to have that snappy decoupled responsiveness though: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Electrolysis

But I don't really know how that's going or if it's even the problem.

Electrolysis was put on hold indefinitely maybe a year ago. :(

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

AbstractNapper posted:

So today I got a weird message for the first time from Windows Defender, titled "Review the files that Windows Defender will send to Microsoft (Important)"

It contains "Mozilla Firefox\Firefox.exe" and "Mozilla Firefox\plugin-container.exe".
This was shortly after firefox autoupdated to 16.0.2.

Anyone has any idea what's going on with this? (I am on Windows 7 x64 SP1).

I certainly didn't see that, and I've got MSE running on Windows 7 x64 SP1 with FF 16.0.2.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

PirateBob posted:

How do I stop firefox from popping up with update notifications? I've downgraded to 16.02 because of issues with 17.

What issues? A better solution is to fix the problems than pretend they don't exist.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

pokecapn posted:

I don't program Firefox extensions and I shouldn't be expected to.

Unless I missed something, he didn't explain his problem. All he said is that 2 new tabs are opening when clicking a link. There could be a variety of causes. He should go through the steps outlined in the OP to isolate and correct the problem. Reverting to a previous version should be the absolute last resort.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

withak posted:

He probably just wants to use his web browser.

Reverting to a previous version potentially leaves you open to security risks. To each his own, though.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

Xenomorph posted:

So, from what I've seen, it has really taken them until version 19 to get Firefox to look the same on each platform?

I use Firefox on OSX and Windows every day, and it looks and performs essentially identically on each system (and it has for a long time). What are you referring to?

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

Alereon posted:

You should have noticed REDUCTIONS in the amount of memory used. You may have a lovely plug-in or extension installed, or may need to make a new profile. Please see the instructions in the OP.

In addition to this, exactly how much memory is "so much memory"?

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

Scalding Coffee posted:

It uses up more than 150% (almost 2 mil) of memory usage when I open my daily tabs, compared to the last build. I also need to restart the browser to stop the stuttering. I did get rid of several add-ons.

Starting a new profile is such a bitch. Might need an add-on to help.

If you use the built-in method, it's not that bad anymore.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

Goober Peas posted:

Is anyone else experiencing weird issues with 18.0.1? It runs fine the first few minutes of browsing, then it becomes slow to respond. For instance, if I click on 'Bookmarks', it takes a 3-count for the menu to open up. I have all of two add-ons loaded -- Adblock Plus and Xmarks. I've tried resetting to default state and that hasn't helped. I have 16 GB of RAM and it doesn't look like Firefox is using more than 1 GB at any given time.

Follow the instructions in the OP (pay attention to the sections where you create a new profile).

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

Goober Peas posted:

Really dumb question -- is the expectation that everytime Firefox updates that users should create a new profile? That seems to be the recurring answer, and adding to the growing frustration in using Firefox as a browser.

Absolutely not. It's the exception rather than the rule. I haven't created a new profile since probably FF 12 or earlier. Keep in mind that the people posting in this thread are the ones having the issues. If FF is working just fine, there's probably no reason for you to post. For every person that posts in this thread with an issue, there are probably 1000 without any issue.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

Install Gentoo posted:

What versions enable that h.264 support, or how can I check if what I'm using now does?

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/mozilla-firefox-browsers-h264-video,20012.html

quote:

The upcoming Firefox 20 for Windows will include a Windows Media Foundation playback backend that will enable the browser to support H.264, AAC, and MP3.

The feature is currently integrated in the nightly builds of the browser, but not enabled by default.

While the addition only affects the Windows version of Firefox, Mozilla said that the feature allows Firefox to play H.264 video, as well as AAC audio in MP4 and M4A files, and MP3 audio files without having to rely on third-party plug-ins.

To enable the backend, enter about :config in the URL bar and change the entry "media.windows-media-foundation.enabled" to "true". The nightly build can be downloaded here.

TL;DR: FF 20

[edit]
Oops, there was another page of posts....

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.
Many of the people using Chrome now switched a while back when Chrome actually was significantly faster than FF. Now that they offer about the same level of performance, a lot of people don't want to switch back. FF's main advantage has always been its extensions and overall customizability; its extension framework is still much more powerful than Chrome's.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.
I'm on the stable channel, so this is the fist time I've seen the JS PDF reader in action. It seems to work amazingly well. I'm really impressed.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

JBark posted:

Probably a long shot, but does anyone have a workaround for this annoying bug/feature?
Inline autocomplete selects HTTPS domain against HTTP domain by default

In a nutshell, if you hit any https page on a domain, inline autocomplete for the domain will default to https from now on. It's incredibly annoying, and the only way I can find around it is to type out the full 'http://www.url.com'.

For example, if you've ever bought anything from GoG.com, you'll likely hit this problem. Type in gog.com in your address bar and hit Enter. It will likely take you to https://www.gog.com which doesn't work.

No, but I've definitely encountered this bug, and it's super frustrating.

Also, good point on the text rendering. I hadn't noticed that, but now I definitely notice it.

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

syzygy86 posted:

I don't think it's actually a bug in Firefox but a misconfiguration of the server. More specifically, Firefox now requests the https page by default, but if the web server doesn't have https/SSL setup and is not configured to redirect an https request to the http site, you'll get that error.

The bug I'm referring to is this: You go to http://butts.com and then later go to https://butts.com (and both correctly resolve - the server is correctly configured). Then, sometime later, you want to go back to http://butts.com so you type butts, and then inline autocomplete automatically fills in https://butts.com. Even if you press CTRL+enter (which should just add https://www. and .com to butts without the https), it'll incorrectly take you to https://www.butts.com.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Fangs404
Dec 20, 2004

I time bomb.

slidebite posted:

I really dig that Firefox pdf reader now. I've actually uninstalled Adobe reader and just associated .pdf with Firefox now.

I agree. I read a lot of PDFs (CS PhD student), and I haven't seen it render anything wrong yet. Sometimes, it'll drawn on the screen weird, but if I just scroll up/down and force it to redraw the screen, it's ok. The text may not be as crisp as Chrome's, but this is certainly a step in the right direction.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply