|
satan!!! posted:The article isn't disputing that CC is occurring though. The opening paragraph - I'm trying to grasp the gist of this phenomenon because this article (despite the fact that it seems to be pretty much saying that CC is still a thing, just that models might need to be reexamined) is being thrown around a lot on the right-wing blogosphere lately. More or less, the contention is: "If more carbon, why not more heat?" Which strikes me as dumb, because we're still looking at a pretty small time interval (a decade), and climate change isn't limited to temperature (ocean acidification), and climatological data is noisy because anthropogenic inputs aren't the only ones, right? I don't understand climate, so I'm hoping someone who actually reviews the literature can explain why this is a total red herring using small words.
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2013 20:42
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 02:32 |
|