|
Farking Bastage posted:This is from a Dell Latitude E6410. I'm pretty sure it's only a SATA2 controller in this one, but I've had difficulty verifying.
|
# ¿ Jan 1, 2012 00:38 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 24, 2024 15:46 |
|
A fair few people have been reporting a particular showstopping problem with the M4 on the Crucial forums: http://forums.crucial.com/t5/Solid-State-Drives-SSD/0x00000f4-error-on-M4-64GB/td-p/76392 Mr Chips fucked around with this message at 04:53 on Jan 2, 2012 |
# ¿ Jan 2, 2012 04:51 |
|
Bob Morales posted:But the only reason I can see to do that would be a portable drive you're trying to share between a between a Windows and Mac (or whatever) system, so it'll be USB-slow anyway.
|
# ¿ Apr 14, 2012 03:50 |
|
fletcher posted:Does ANYBODY have anything good to say about OCZ? I feel with the amount of people getting burned by them a warning should be in the title of this thread.
|
# ¿ Apr 20, 2012 09:31 |
|
I'm feeling pretty special today, finally had an OCZ drive die on me! That's about 1 failure per 15000 POH
|
# ¿ Apr 30, 2012 02:58 |
|
evil_bunnY posted:POH doesn't matter too much on NAND. I was just surprised at getting two years' worth of work out of OCZ drives in my home lab before something went wrong.
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 01:57 |
|
Vertigus posted:Stumbled on this thread, read the title, and then read this post and cancelled my $150 OCZ order on Amazon and bought this. you have chosen...wisely
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 05:19 |
|
Bob Morales posted:Would that apply if it was a Marvell drive?
|
# ¿ May 2, 2012 03:51 |
|
fookolt posted:RAM is a lot like hard drive space: it won't stay unused for long.
|
# ¿ May 8, 2012 14:30 |
|
Endymion FRS MK1 posted:http://vr-zone.com/articles/runcore-intros-invincible-ssd-with-physical-self-destruct-feature/15892.html
|
# ¿ May 17, 2012 08:20 |
|
Bob Morales posted:Hahah what the gently caress
|
# ¿ May 18, 2012 02:19 |
|
Civil posted:Sorry for posting the tiger direct deal, guys, I didn't know they were that lovely. Amazon is down to $210 for the drive, and is a much better vendor. loving Amazon will no longer ship these to Australian addresses. The cheapest local price here is about US$295, except no-one's got any stock.
|
# ¿ May 19, 2012 11:45 |
|
4 Day Weekend posted:Buy from Amazon or Crucial directly. Shipping is cheap and fast. The Dissonant posted:Any Aussie goons have recommendations for good places to order SSDs (in particular, the Crucial M4)? MSY only seems to have Intel. Mr Chips fucked around with this message at 00:10 on May 22, 2012 |
# ¿ May 22, 2012 00:07 |
|
Bob Morales posted:Is there a to use an Expresscard SSD anymore, unless it's a last resort? It might be nice if you wanted an SSD in a laptop that didn't have an optical bay you could put a 2.5 inch SSD in, I suppose. At that price it's not an attractive proposition.
|
# ¿ May 31, 2012 06:17 |
|
General_Failure posted:Anyone recommend where I can buy an SSD from in Australia? Besides eBay that is. And if you answer with Amazon, unless something has changed and they are actually shipping more than a limited subset of items with horrific postage, please feel free to punch yourself in the genitals repeatedly. Use http://staticice.com.au/ to find the cheapest thing in your area. MSY have the 240GB Sandisk Extreme frives for $248, which is about as good as you're going to get in Australia
|
# ¿ Jun 8, 2012 00:45 |
|
Bob Morales posted:The M4 is rated at 40GB per day for 5 years
|
# ¿ Jun 28, 2012 01:37 |
|
General_Failure posted:edit: In case you are curious: These guys got my business after Amazon decided they didn't want my money.
|
# ¿ Jun 29, 2012 04:18 |
|
Alereon posted:Intel has announced pricecuts across all of their drives, along with a new SSD 330 240GB for $199. This takes their prices from "ridiculous" to "a moderate premium", which is much more fair. Now if only Samsung would move decisively under the $1/GB mark...
|
# ¿ Jul 17, 2012 02:59 |
|
Space Gopher posted:If it helps, folding@home is 95% epeen, 3% distributed computing research project, and maybe 1-2% actual medical research.
|
# ¿ Jul 23, 2012 01:25 |
|
You Am I posted:Doing virus scans of SSDs are awesome as well
|
# ¿ Aug 16, 2012 03:17 |
|
mik posted:The 320 uses an Intel controller, while the 330 uses a Sandforce one. Not that the latter implies lower reliability necessarily, but it generally explains the former's higher cost. IIRC the 320 uses 34nm flash and has greater overprovisioning, which may account for some of the price difference.
|
# ¿ Sep 3, 2012 02:22 |
|
Heads up to .au goons - MSY have the 512GB 830 for $399. edit: the Adelaide branch doesn't any more, I got the last one. Mr Chips fucked around with this message at 01:27 on Nov 9, 2012 |
# ¿ Nov 9, 2012 01:23 |
|
Factory Factory posted:IIRC, that has to do with very-small-write sizes. Enterprise SSDs absolutely blow at 512 byte or smaller I/O, but do very well at page-size or larger I/O. Oracle's SwingBench focuses a lot on very small I/O.
|
# ¿ Nov 10, 2012 01:02 |
|
dpbjinc posted:Good news: They fixed the Crucial m4 bug. Bad news: It's only for HP customers right now. hmm....we've got some 2500-odd lenovos with that same C400 drive in them. Every time I power the machine off will be so much more exciting.
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2012 00:54 |
|
HorseDickSandwich posted:Thanks for the replies. I saw in the OP something about avoiding a certain Intel drive so I sort of blocked it from my mind. I know Intel is a reliable brand and from what I've seen of reviews, most people seem to like this drive. http://www.anandtech.com/show/6462/intel-explains-20nm-nand-endurance-concerns-on-the-ssd-335
|
# ¿ Nov 26, 2012 06:12 |
|
Bob Morales posted:Dang it's fast. It's also a power-hog, expensive, and it's made by OCZ.
|
# ¿ Nov 28, 2012 04:44 |
|
rscott posted:That's at a Queue Depth of 32, which is a pretty heavy usage scenario so maybe their controller just wasn't designed for that kind of performance scenario. I'd be interested in seeing how it does at lower QDs compared to other controllers.
|
# ¿ Dec 11, 2012 02:22 |
|
SourKraut posted:Anyone know roughly what the lifespan is for the Samsung 830s? I received my used 830 from Amazon (Warehouse deals, woo!) and SSD Magician is saying that it's health is "good", with a total bytes written (TBW) of 400 GB. edit: start reading back from about page 218 of the thread HalloKitty linked Mr Chips fucked around with this message at 01:29 on Feb 11, 2013 |
# ¿ Feb 11, 2013 00:18 |
|
BobHoward posted:Broken by design, always has been. SATA is a loving hack, just one which happens to mostly work reasonably well. Did you know that SATA retains literal register-level compatibility with 1982 IBM PC hard drive controllers, just so that vendors too loving lazy to update BIOSes could keep booting ancient operating systems on modern SATA HW?
|
# ¿ Mar 15, 2014 01:41 |
|
echinopsis posted:thanks.. I mean I can buy it here in NZ but the first link on eBay for example was a good $40 Cheaper than the cheapest [according to price website] one available here Do Amazon ship to NZ? I'm on the western isle (Perth) and just priced up a 500GB Evo and with shipping and exchange rates it was still $60 cheaper than any Australian retailer
|
# ¿ Jun 6, 2014 03:15 |
|
Torabi posted:Has there been any word about an 850 EVO too? Since then I might as well wait for that to come out before buying my first SSD. If you haven't bought an SSD by now, there's no time like the present. With any luck the models apporaching end-of-sale will get really cheap as vendors clear out stock for the new models. For example, I got a 512GB Samsung 830 for AUD $399 back in Q1 2013 just as they were being EOS, which is less than what the 840 Pro goes for now.
|
# ¿ Jul 1, 2014 13:42 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 24, 2024 15:46 |
|
td4guy posted:Leave your swap file the way it is, default. Don't worry about anything. I will never call them gibibytes
|
# ¿ Aug 1, 2014 08:42 |