|
God drat it my vacation made me miss an Intel 320 300GB on SA-Mart for $360. drat it all.
|
# ¿ Jan 6, 2012 23:39 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 25, 2024 03:26 |
|
AHCI should already be enabled unless you built your system wrong.
|
# ¿ Jan 31, 2012 00:31 |
|
evil_bunnY posted:This is what it looks like to work with professionals.
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2012 22:40 |
|
For my money, the Samsung 830 is still the drive to buy. I'm really tempted to grab one, but I'm curious to see if Apple ends up with one for their iMacs this spring.
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2012 22:57 |
|
Syrinxx posted:I don't suppose there's any way to get an SSD working on an Xbox 360? KrautHedge posted:Is there anything special I need to do with an SSD on OS X Lion? I've got a crucial M4 coming tomorrow and I have never set on up before. http://digitaldj.net/2011/07/21/trim-enabler-for-lion/ I think they might have updated the utility finally, I don't know for sure though.
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2012 22:48 |
|
Bob Morales posted:Hey, what ever happened to those 256GB Western Digital SSD's NewEgg blew out for $200 back in June? I know there are still folks here using them. I really wish I could have caught a couple of them when they got cleared out.
|
# ¿ Feb 22, 2012 18:12 |
|
gggiiimmmppp posted:Anyone have any glowing experiences with hybrid drives as primary drives in a laptop? Newegg has the 500gb seagate for 99 today. I'm using an ancient 60gb agility for the time being, but I've been loading out for a lower-end 120.
|
# ¿ Feb 28, 2012 18:50 |
|
Don't worry about mounting it. Just let it dangle.
Star War Sex Parrot fucked around with this message at 03:27 on Apr 3, 2012 |
# ¿ Apr 3, 2012 03:24 |
|
Doh004 posted:That's essentially when I'm doing for now (it's resting at the bottom of my empty second bay) but why? Shouldn't the bracket prevent this from happening?
|
# ¿ Apr 3, 2012 03:39 |
|
DinosaurHouseParty posted:Is is any news of SATA IV in the near future?
|
# ¿ May 8, 2012 22:50 |
|
FallenGod posted:My shiny new Crucial M4 256gb SSD has arrived, lets see how it fairs against my old WD 256gb drive from ages past: But compared to my new Samsung 830, welp:
|
# ¿ May 10, 2012 17:52 |
|
What's the capacity? Smaller SSDs can't match the sequential throughput of 256+ GB SSDs. Random is generally more important to everyday use anyway.
|
# ¿ May 11, 2012 03:48 |
|
Using non-randomized data makes it impossible to compare to other drives. Don't use 0s or 1s as the test data. You're just lying to yourself if you do.
|
# ¿ May 11, 2012 06:40 |
|
CLAM DOWN posted:VVV Sorry, I didn't now that. This is the very first time I've had an SSD and I'm just trying to make sure it's working right. An explanation on why using 0s and 1s is lying to yourself: some SSDs compress the data before it's thrown onto the NAND, so highly compressible data like all 0s or 1s (which don't reflect real world usage) artificially inflate their benchmark scores.
|
# ¿ May 11, 2012 07:26 |
|
xPanda posted:I'm torn between the Samsung 830 and Intel 520, and as they each perform/cost about the same I want to focus on reliability. Would it be right to say that these drives are both too new to really comment on their long term reliability? I find the Intel drive confusing - Intel is known for reliability, but the SF-2281 controller has a bad rap, doesn't it? Any opinions on which I should get? Also my Air has a 256GB Samsung 470 in it that I've been thoroughly pleased with.
|
# ¿ May 11, 2012 07:27 |
|
rawrr posted:I thought airs use non standard SSDs?
|
# ¿ May 11, 2012 07:34 |
|
redeyes posted:Exactly, so you can spend 5-10 grand, get the best thing Apple produces and still get a consumer standard hard drive. Uncredible. If you want a Cheetah or Raptor or something in the Mac Pro, I'm sorry but Apple just doesn't ask for it from its vendors. That's a walking dead system anyway. Star War Sex Parrot fucked around with this message at 17:08 on May 11, 2012 |
# ¿ May 11, 2012 17:03 |
|
Bob Morales posted:I don't think he's saying it's a bad or unreliable drive but Dell lets you get 10k SATA and SAS drives in their Precision workstations This all goes back to: buy a Samsung 830 instead of an Intel 520. gently caress Sandforce.
|
# ¿ May 11, 2012 17:13 |
|
Yes Samsung's SSDs are very reliable.
|
# ¿ May 17, 2012 04:34 |
|
Dogen posted:If you mean would it have an adverse effect on temperatures, results have been mixed but center around "no effect". Temps were much higher than they should have been on the 200 systems we purchased with Thermal Armor so we had to disassemble all of them and rip the Thermal Armor off. loving stupid design, ASUS.
|
# ¿ May 17, 2012 17:35 |
|
Lblitzer posted:I understand that they tarnished their reputation pretty badly but to dismiss them entirely because they had a bad run with SandForce controllers seems a bit much.
|
# ¿ May 24, 2012 17:51 |
|
jwoven posted:Shady, shady company.
|
# ¿ May 24, 2012 21:30 |
|
movax posted:I dunno, I thought their RAM was fairly well regarded. I ran all OCZ DDR2 on my older systems, but then again it wasn't any crazy extreme overclocker stuff, like some of the really high-end Crucial Ballistix. gently caress that company.
|
# ¿ May 24, 2012 21:41 |
|
Dogen posted:If you install Intel RST drivers I am pretty sure the default options install a utility that you can use to check SMART status, which further reduces the need for a manufacturer produced utility
|
# ¿ May 30, 2012 18:45 |
|
redeyes posted:Yes, they fix all kinds of SSD specific issues. You do NOT want to be on an Intel system without RST drivers. If you say so. I'm not sure what all these SSD specific issues could be.
|
# ¿ May 30, 2012 19:55 |
|
People still put optical drives in their systems?
|
# ¿ May 31, 2012 08:11 |
|
Kerbtree posted:MP3-cds for the car don't just appear, you know. Playing Blu-rays, too. zenintrude posted:Gotta rip those discs somehow.
|
# ¿ May 31, 2012 21:25 |
|
Factory Factory posted:They look like poo stacked on top of an HTPC.
|
# ¿ May 31, 2012 21:40 |
|
fookolt posted:Oh poo poo.
|
# ¿ Jun 2, 2012 20:30 |
|
Boris Galerkin posted:Why do some companies use 128/256/etc and some other companies use 120/240/etc for sizes?
|
# ¿ Jun 5, 2012 22:55 |
|
30 seconds on Google for this: Yes your numbers seem reasonable considering you're using SATA 2. Now that your purchase has been validated, enjoy your SSD.
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2012 07:01 |
|
I wonder what will happen to OCZ's hot PR girl.
|
# ¿ Dec 4, 2013 02:30 |
|
Xenomorph posted:awful color schemes that Windows 3.1 had... ("hotdog stand", etc)
|
# ¿ Dec 11, 2013 22:01 |
|
Alereon posted:Unlike harddrives, a very small number of reallocated sectors is not unusual on SSDs
|
# ¿ Jan 10, 2014 02:54 |
|
Speaking of Apple SSDs, I got my new rMBP today: Holy poo poo, PCIe SSDs are fast!
|
# ¿ Jan 25, 2014 00:14 |
|
Bob Morales posted:I ran an 80GB Intel X-25 in my 2010 for over a year with no issues
|
# ¿ Feb 14, 2014 06:00 |
|
Enabling TRIM in OS X on third-party SSDs works pretty reliably, in my experience. Also, unrelated but I don't think I've talked about it much here, so for those who don't frequent the Mac hardware thread: Fusion is loving awesome. If you have a Mac that can fit two drives, I highly recommend doing a DIY Fusion setup. I have a 256GB SSD + 4TB HDD setup in my iMac and it's great.
|
# ¿ Feb 14, 2014 06:31 |
|
Unexpected posted:I thought a SSD would have much higher benchmarks when connected via Thunderbolt (Seagate adapter) as opposed to USB 3 (Anker adapter) but this is not the case.
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2014 03:44 |
|
Don Lapre posted:Enable RAPID for stupid 1tb/s+ benchmarks
|
# ¿ Mar 19, 2014 18:06 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 25, 2024 03:26 |
|
Civil posted:Is the info on crucial drives still valid?
|
# ¿ Mar 31, 2014 04:52 |