|
I'm toying with the idea of setting up some Unifi Pros as standalone APs for our branch offices. They'll be behind NATed DSL internet connections, so I'm guessing that running them off a controller is out of the question. Am I wasting my time using them as standalone APs?
|
# ¿ Nov 23, 2012 11:26 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 24, 2024 19:46 |
|
ptier posted:You may have to play with the DHCP / DNS at the site to point to the right public IP but otherwise you should be fine. Cheers, I've seen that one and have been assuming it'll work (most sites have cisco routers so I can configure DHCP option 43). I wasn't confident in the fallback option of configuring them and then deploying them as standalone units, but I'm about to grab a unit and give it a go. stevewm posted:Do you have a VPN setup between your branches? You could just install the controller software somewhere that all your branches can reach... Bandwidth use is negligible as the only thing going to/from the controller is status updates and events. Mr Chips fucked around with this message at 01:37 on Nov 24, 2012 |
# ¿ Nov 24, 2012 01:34 |
|
IT Guy posted:Question: If I have three access points setup in an office all with the same SSID, how does a client choose which access point they will connect to? I assume it is based on signal strength? I'm planning to have enough units set up to test this some time before Christmas, assuming the morons in my org's finance department actually pay our supplier on time.
|
# ¿ Dec 7, 2012 00:50 |
|
MrMoo posted:Controller roaming is 802.11r as mentioned before, limited but 'enterprise' use case: continuing VoIP calls between zones. adorai posted:Unifi does not support 802.11r, which is the technology that APs use to assist client roaming. Mr Chips fucked around with this message at 01:26 on Dec 7, 2012 |
# ¿ Dec 7, 2012 01:22 |