|
fondue posted:Sup fellow ASUS Transformer Prime owner! To me, a device with only half the advertised battery life isn't really "working right out the box", but to each their own.
|
# ¿ Jan 29, 2012 13:21 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 19:34 |
|
Playbook sales are booming, great success!
|
# ¿ Jan 29, 2012 20:53 |
|
I have no problems with the smooth resistive scaling of this Android app.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2012 15:29 |
|
Rastor posted:Which is exactly why the Android developer guides have extensive documentation about how to create one app which works differently on phones and tablets. This is what you need to do to make apps work well across very different form factors like phones and tablets, you can't just write a phone UI and call it a day or your app will look terrible against dedicated tablet apps no matter how sophisticated the scaling algorithms. So can you basically bundle two different apps in the same app on Android like you can with universal apps in iOS?
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2012 22:34 |
|
Codiusprime posted:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1n5Qfxk-x80 What reader app is that? Edit: and is that supposed to be a good example of PDF reading on Android tablets? skeevy achievements fucked around with this message at 16:12 on Feb 10, 2012 |
# ¿ Feb 10, 2012 15:52 |
|
Craptacular! posted:I think the sad lesson of the Prime is that as long as your first on the market with bleeding edge technology, early adopters will shoot themselves in the foot while crying that it hurts. I don't think working GPS is really "bleeding edge technology" here in 2012.
|
# ¿ Feb 10, 2012 20:45 |
|
Vagrancy posted:I wouldn't go as far as "COMPLETELY". You still need iTunes to transfer files into apps, and Wifi sync is a bit on the clunky side at times meaning it's often faster/less hassle to just plug it in. I don't have a ton of apps that use documents, but if I click a download link or attachment for .xls files, .epub files or .pdf files, I can download them right to the appropriate app. From my limited experience with the iOS SDK I know you can register file extensions globally, so as long as your app registers its extension you should be able to put files on the device from the browser or from DropBox or from emails or what have you. skeevy achievements fucked around with this message at 20:10 on Feb 13, 2012 |
# ¿ Feb 13, 2012 20:00 |
|
Splizwarf posted:Speaking as a guy who ships stuff for a living, without a tracking number you're at the absolute mercy of the Postal Service. Tracking codes are the only defense. Do you use a shipping company or do you just hurl boxes across the continent?
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2012 03:00 |
|
Kynetx posted:I hope so. With competition, everyone wins. This thread says otherwise. Splizwarf posted:Yeah, my bad, forgot "party" also means binge drinking and trying to get laid. "Get-together with several friends where we have a nice dinner and hang out" is what I meant, but it's so unwieldy. Maybe if I made it into an acronym? Like ASD or DKE!
|
# ¿ Feb 21, 2012 16:45 |
|
randyest posted:iPad2 launched on 3/11/2011 at $729 for the 32G 3G model and on 3/13/2011 iSuppli tore it down and put the BOM at $326 for the 32G/3G model. That's a cost of $403, or ~55% profit. Add in manufacturing and that's only another ~$7. That's a strong analysis, it's only missing the costs for Apple to design, distribute and market the iPad, the costs to develop the operating system, build retail stores, billion dollar data centers, and a couple other things that somehow lead to Apple's net margins being somewhere in the 23% region instead of 55%. That's only a 140% error though, so kudos, by IYG standards that's a bullseye!
|
# ¿ Feb 28, 2012 23:32 |
|
randyest posted:You're so right, as long as you completely ignore context and consider 23% margin to be "tiny" and agree with the claim that ipads at launch are sold "for the cost of parts and manufacture" which is the claim to which I replied. Here it is again so you can revel in the awesome IYG claim you're defending: You replied to that post: randyest posted:iPad2 launched on 3/11/2011 at $729 for the 32G 3G model and on 3/13/2011 iSuppli tore it down and put the BOM at $326 for the 32G/3G model. That's a cost of $403, or ~55% profit. Add in manufacturing and that's only another ~$7. This is wrong and dumb all on its own, no matter how wrong and dumb the original post was as well. Readers can't be expected to follow the chain of wrong and dumb for every post in this thread all the way back to its roots.
|
# ¿ Feb 29, 2012 16:45 |
|
Ciabatta posted:Android is about freedom, Apple is about doing what you're told. Therefore, I believe you ascribed lack of control to the wrong group. Android tablets are like an open U.S. election, where you have the freedom of choice and control over the ultimate outcome. iPads are like totalitarian states, where there is a sham of freedom in the form of fixed elections (i.e. changing your iPad's wallpaper), but ultimately you have no meaningful input, options, or prospects of an improved life for your children. This is an excellent analogy between the American electorate and the Android ecosystem. It's worth nothing that in both systems, only simpletons at the bottom of the food chain believe that the people in charge have their best interests at heart, and that their "freedom" to choose will result in some meaningful difference in their quality of life, yet these people are always the most vocal and passionate advocates of their particular affiliation. Yes, quite.
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2012 02:51 |
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:I'm not sure that 2 of the top 5 Android devices on this list are e-readers is good for the Android ecosystem. Is this chart seriously suggesting 50% of tablet owners own Android tablets? What corner of the Samsung cafeteria did they get their sample from?
|
# ¿ Jun 19, 2012 14:08 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 19:34 |
|
Thermopyle posted:At first glance, the conclusion should be that we can't make any conclusion because it's all anecdotes. This is great, can you add it to the OP?
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2012 00:44 |