|
I'm off on my first virtualization foray in my home / lab environment, and could use some goon advice with regards to data storage and backup. My setup is this :
What I want to accomplish is A. virtualize my poo poo. B. utilize my storage such that I have two sync'd file-level copies of all my data at any given moment, and C. have a versioned backup of it all. My stumbling block is where to set up the file-level type storage, versus where to set up the block level or system-image level backup. My plan is to install on the bare metal of Server 1 the MS Hyper-V Server 2016, and then virtualize my AD server instance on top of it. But I'm not sure where to store the VHD's - should I create an iSCSI target on my NAS? Or use one of my RAID partitions on server 1 for my VHDs? Also, because my AD server has (in the past) hosted things like redirected folders / user profiles, I'm not sure the best way to accomplish that going forward. Should I host redirected folders on an iSCSI NAS target mounted via my virtual AD server? Or use the bare metal hyper-v install to create a storage space on Server 1 that I allocate to my hyper-v VHD? And how does that play into how large my VHDs will be - and the best way to have both file-level redundant copies of my data on both my Server and NAS versus if I just had my virtual servers mount a shared SMB drive on the bare-metal Hyper-v server or something. Or maybe just abandon folder redirection altogether, because it is complete crap? Create an iSCSI target on my bare metal hyper-v host server that can be mounted by my virtual servers, rather than setting that up on my NAS? I think all the versioning can be handled by Synology backing up a hyper-backup image to my external HDD - but also open to suggestions on this... mindphlux fucked around with this message at 09:13 on Dec 7, 2016 |
# ¿ Dec 7, 2016 06:42 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 17:31 |